ExchangeDEX+
Buy CryptoMarketsSpotFuturesGOLDEarnEvent Center
More
Commodity Zero-Fee Gala

CEX

CEXs are platforms managed by centralized organizations that facilitate the trading of cryptocurrencies, offering high liquidity and user-friendly fiat on-ramps. Leaders like Binance, OKX, and Coinbase serve as the primary gateways for institutional and retail entry. In 2026, the industry focus is on Proof of Reserves (PoR), enhanced regulatory compliance, and hybrid models that offer self-custody options. This tag provides updates on exchange security, listings, and global market trends.

4231 Articles
Created: 2026/02/02 18:52
Updated: 2026/02/02 18:52
Cronos price prediction 2026-2032: Will CRO reach $1?

Cronos price prediction 2026-2032: Will CRO reach $1?

Key takeaways Cronos (CRO) is the native cryptocurrency token of the Cronos chain, a decentralized, open-source blockchain developed by the Crypto.com payment,

Author: Cryptopolitan

2026/01/08

Best Crypto To Buy Now: Is This XRP Alternative Set To Become The Next 15x Altcoin This Cycle?

Best Crypto To Buy Now: Is This XRP Alternative Set To Become The Next 15x Altcoin This Cycle?

Investors hunting for the best crypto to buy now want real utility, deep liquidity, and clear catalysts. One project keeps […] The post Best Crypto To Buy Now: Is This XRP Alternative Set To Become The Next 15x Altcoin This Cycle? appeared first on Coindoo.

Author: Coindoo

2025/11/23

STBL Advances toward Stablecoin 2.0 with Multiple Listings and Integrations

STBL Advances toward Stablecoin 2.0 with Multiple Listings and Integrations

STBL gets closer to Stablecoin 2.0 with new listings, integrations, and long-term infrastructure partnerships as improving security, scalability, and stability.

Author: Blockchainreporter

2025/11/23

Dogecoin Price Outlook For December and Remittix’s Upcoming Reveal

Dogecoin Price Outlook For December and Remittix’s Upcoming Reveal

Dogecoin is under pressure again, trading near $0.14 after testing a five-month low at $0.1471. Previously, the key support zone around $0.15 has held several times this year, but the charts now show a precise death cross.

Author: Brave Newcoin

2025/11/23

Waarom Ethereum whales massaal naar de LiquidChain presale kijken

Waarom Ethereum whales massaal naar de LiquidChain presale kijken

i Kennisgeving: Dit artikel bevat inzichten van onafhankelijke auteurs en valt buiten de redactionele verantwoordelijkheid van BitcoinMagazine.nl. De informatie is bedoeld ter educatie en reflectie. Dit is geen financieel advies. Doe zelf onderzoek voordat je financiële beslissingen neemt. Crypto is zeer volatiel er zitten kansen en risicos aan deze investering. Je kunt je inleg verliezen. Ethereum whales zitten op gigantische hoeveelheden vermogen dat vastzit binnen een ecosysteem. Zodra zij toegang willen tot de zekerheid van Bitcoin of de snelheid van Solana, botsen ze op hetzelfde probleem: ze moeten ETH verkopen om die markten te bereiken. Elke verkoop zorgt voor koersimpact, slippage en vaak miljoenenverlies in uitvoering. LiquidChain ($LIQUID) wil dat hele systeem doorbreken. In plaats van te traden via exchanges of risicovolle cross-chain bridges, creëert het project een gezamenlijke liquiditeitslaag bovenop Bitcoin, Ethereum en Solana. Met behulp van layer-3 cryptografie kunnen whales op ETH blijven zitten, terwijl ze toch liquiditeit gebruiken uit alle drie ecosystemen, zonder wrapped tokens, zonder tussenpartij en zonder conversie risico. Dat idee slaat aan. De presale ging razendsnel over de grens van $43.000, terwijl investeerders al 3,3 miljoen $LIQUID tokens hebben vastgezet tegen een prijs van $0,01225. De staking beloningen, die opschalen tot meer dan 17.000% op jaarbasis, maken het extra aantrekkelijk voor grote spelers om vroeg positie in te nemen. Waarom whales hun oog op LiquidChain richten: het lock-in probleem Wie miljoenen aan ETH bezit, kan simpelweg niet in en uit Bitcoin of Solana springen zonder marktschade te veroorzaken. Een order van $1 miljoen kan al meerdere procenten slippage uitlokken op een DEX. LiquidChain pakt dat probleem op een manier aan die tot nu toe ontbrak. Het platform werkt met cross-chain proofs en een high performance VM, waardoor een grote swap niet meer afhankelijk is van een chain. Een grote Bitcoin swap haalt bijvoorbeeld tegelijk liquiditeit uit Ethereum en Solana. Hierdoor wordt de diepte van de markt veel groter en verdwijnt het slippage probleem dat whales al jaren dwarszit. Bovendien worden transacties atomisch uitgevoerd. Dat betekent: of volledig succes, of volledige refund, nooit halverwege kapitaal kwijt zijn. Voor whales is dat essentieel: geen vastgelopen swaps, geen gedeeltelijke fills en geen tussenstops waar geld blijft hangen. Waarom projecten gericht op utility aantrekkelijker zijn dan meme coins Whales jagen niet op 10x hype tokens met nauwelijks liquiditeit. Zodra grote bedragen instromen, verdwijnt de exit liquiditeit en lopen risico’s extreem op. Daarom verschuiven grote investeerders steeds vaker naar infrastructuurprojecten, platforms die echte transacties verwerken, niet alleen speculatieve hype. LiquidChain valt precies in die categorie. Elke swap, elke uitleenactie, elke liquiditeitsbeweging binnen dit multi-chain netwerk wordt betaald in $LIQUID. De token heeft dus functionele vraag, geen theoretische utility. De presale, die al $43K aantrok met miljoenen tokens in staking, laat zien dat vroeg kapitaal deze visie deelt. Grote holders kiezen liever voor projecten die bear markets overleven, waar netwerkactiviteit waarde creëert, en waar de token gebruik afdwingt in plaats van alleen hype. Cross-chain liquiditeit als oplossing voor miljoenenverliezen door slippage Whales die $500K of $1M per trade verplaatsen, botsen constant tegen hetzelfde plafond. Er is te weinig liquiditeit op een chain, te hoge slippage en te veel marktimpact. LiquidChain bundelt pools van Bitcoin, Ethereum en Solana in een grote liquidity engine. Daardoor voelt een $1 miljoen trade aan alsof het verdeeld is over drie blockchains tegelijk, worden prijzen stabieler bij large caps, en ontstaat institutionele kwaliteit uitvoering zonder gecentraliseerd risico. Met Solana-achtige snelheid voert de VM trades uit, terwijl Bitcoin proofs en Ethereum state data de veiligheid en finaliteit garanderen. Dat maakt LiquidChain aantrekkelijk voor grote arbitrages, market makers en high volume traders. Waarom whales instappen vóór de listing Whales willen niet pas instappen wanneer LiquidChain op grote CEX’en verschijnt. Tegen die tijd is de prijs al door prijsontdekking gegaan en is accumuleren veel duurder. De presale van $LIQUID biedt een drieledig voordeel. Als eerste een token dat goedkoop genoeg is ($0,01225) om enorme posities op te bouwen, en staking dat direct actief is waardoor kapitaal niet stilstaat tijdens de ontwikkelfase. Ook is er ruimte voor dominantie, want met een totale voorraad van 11,8 miljard tokens kunnen vroege whales een strategisch percentage van het netwerk vastleggen. Met gecentraliseerde exchange listings in Q3 2026 ontstaat bovendien institutionele liquiditeit. Whales positioneren zich nu, niet wanneer de rest van de markt het project ontdekt. Hoe grote investeerders hun $LIQUID posities kunnen opbouwen De deelname aan de presale van LiquidChain gaat via gangbare wallets zoals MetaMask en Best Wallet. Wie groot inkoopt, moet soms transacties opdelen vanwege limieten, de interface ondersteunt dat. De meeste whales kiezen direct voor Buy & Stake zodat de hoge APY meteen begint te tellen. Grote posities kunnen hierdoor snel aangroeien, zelfs voor de mainnet lancering. Voor alternatieve financiering kunnen ook kaartbetalingen worden gebruikt. Zodra het mainnet live gaat, komt de volledige cross-chain functionaliteit beschikbaar. Dan verandert LiquidChain van een presale project in een operationele brug tussen de drie grootste blockchains. De bottom line: LiquidChain richt zich op een probleem dat al jaren bestaat Ethereum whales willen Bitcoin zekerheid en Solana snelheid, zonder hun ETH te verkopen. Tot nu toe bestonden daar geen veilige, efficiënte of volledig trustless oplossingen voor. LiquidChain biedt precies dat: een laag waar alle grote chains samenkomen en kapitaal eindelijk mobiel wordt. Voor grote spelers is dat geen hype narratief, maar een structureel marktprobleem dat eindelijk wordt opgelost. Presale: https://liquidchain.com/Social: https://x.com/getliquidchain i Kennisgeving: Dit artikel bevat inzichten van onafhankelijke auteurs en valt buiten de redactionele verantwoordelijkheid van BitcoinMagazine.nl. De informatie is bedoeld ter educatie en reflectie. Dit is geen financieel advies. Doe zelf onderzoek voordat je financiële beslissingen neemt. Crypto is zeer volatiel er zitten kansen en risicos aan deze investering. Je kunt je inleg verliezen. Het bericht Waarom Ethereum whales massaal naar de LiquidChain presale kijken is geschreven door Redactie en verscheen als eerst op Bitcoinmagazine.nl.

Author: Coinstats

2025/11/23

Best Crypto To Buy Now: Remittix Surges Ahead of Cardano, XRP, and Solana Into #1 Spot

Best Crypto To Buy Now: Remittix Surges Ahead of Cardano, XRP, and Solana Into #1 Spot

Remittix surges ahead as Cardano, XRP and Solana struggle, with rising demand driven by real world payments, top audits and strong presale momentum.

Author: Blockchainreporter

2025/11/22

Aptos (APT) Struggles at $2.30 but $4.25 Recovery Target Remains Possible

Aptos (APT) Struggles at $2.30 but $4.25 Recovery Target Remains Possible

Aptos (APT) is sitting around $2.30 after losing the $3.50 support and slipping beneath the long-term channel. That break shifted the whole structure bearish, and with $3.50 as resistance, the market is certainly not ready to turn around. The long wick also reveals heavy liquidations, but unless market action starts to turn around, APT remains […]

Author: Tronweekly

2025/11/22

The CoinGape Crypto Impact Awards 2025

The CoinGape Crypto Impact Awards 2025

The post The CoinGape Crypto Impact Awards 2025 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The crypto market may be navigating one of its most volatile phases – charts are red, billions have been liquidated, and sentiment is shaken. Yet, even in the harshest market cycles, one thing remains constant: the builders never stop building. Across the industry, founders, engineers, researchers, exchanges, analysts, and project teams continue to show up every single day. They’re squashing protocol bugs at 2 a.m., upgrading infrastructure that supports billions in on-chain value, and pushing forward despite the cycles. To honor this relentless commitment, CoinGape proudly announces the CoinGape Crypto Impact Awards 2025. This is an initiative dedicated to recognizing the brightest minds and most influential contributors across the global Web3 ecosystem. Categories The awards encompass every major sector shaping the future of digital assets. From Innovators & Builders to Exchanges, Mining, Wallets, Best Projects, Stablecoins, AI, and DePIN, each category is crafted to highlight excellence, resilience, and innovation. Whether it’s groundbreaking Web3 startups, the most trusted CEX platforms, DePIN networks redefining connectivity, or RWA pioneers bridging traditional finance with blockchain – the awards reflect the full spectrum of crypto’s evolution. Evaluation System To ensure credibility and fairness, we have kept a dual evaluation system – jury + community voting with 50:50 ratio. The jury – soon to be revealed – consists of respected ecosystem leaders, researchers, founders, analysts, security specialists, and industry veterans who bring deep sector expertise and objective evaluation. Their involvement is set to ensure that nominations are judged not only on popularity or visibility but on real impact, technical contribution, innovation quality, transparency, and long-term value. It will help in ensuring that the final recognition truly reflects both industry merit and community voice. At CoinGape, we’ve always believed the backbone of this industry isn’t just price action – it’s the people who build through it. We…

Author: BitcoinEthereumNews

2025/11/22

Avoid These Domains! Aerodrome Finance Warns Users After Front-End Breach

Avoid These Domains! Aerodrome Finance Warns Users After Front-End Breach

The post Avoid These Domains! Aerodrome Finance Warns Users After Front-End Breach  appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News Aerodrome Finance, a leading decentralised exchange on the Base blockchain, recently warned about a possible breach involving its frontend and is currently investigating the situation. The team has urged users to avoid accessing the platform through any domain until they fully assess the situation.  Centralized Domains Hit, Decentralized Mirrors Stay Safe The Aerodrome team confirmed …

Author: CoinPedia

2025/11/22

Ethereum at a Crossroads: The Approaching Quantum Threat and the Double Squeeze from Wall Street Capital

Ethereum at a Crossroads: The Approaching Quantum Threat and the Double Squeeze from Wall Street Capital

Author: JAE, PANews With the frequent approvals and widespread adoption of spot ETFs, Ethereum seems to have completed its magnificent transformation from a "geek experiment" to a "global asset." However, under the spotlight of the crypto market, this largest smart contract platform in the industry is now standing at a historical crossroads. Beneath the prosperity, undercurrents are surging. Recently, Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin warned at the Devconnect conference that Ethereum is currently facing three major risks: the threat of quantum computing, increased control by Wall Street, and governance fairness. These three pressures will test Ethereum's long-term sustainability and resilience as a trusted and neutral infrastructure. With the threat of quantum technology looming large, quantum-resistant upgrades have been incorporated into the roadmap. Beyond the blockchain trilemma, another, more fundamental risk is looming: cryptographic security. The most destructive risk facing Ethereum comes from the disruption of modern cryptography by quantum computing. This technological threat is sudden and non-linear; once a critical point is crossed, all defenses will crumble instantly. Ethereum, and most other blockchain networks, rely on the Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm (ECDSA) for account security. This algorithm depends on the computational difficulty of solving the Elliptic Curve Discrete Logarithm Problem (ECDLP) to achieve security. In the classic model, deriving the private key from the public key requires exponential time, which is considered computationally infeasible. However, this assumption is becoming increasingly precarious in the face of the rapid development of quantum computing. Peter Shor's algorithm, developed in 1994, poses a fatal threat to ECDLP-based cryptographic systems. Leveraging the properties of quantum superposition and quantum entanglement, Shor's algorithm reduces the computational complexity of ECDLP from exponential to polynomial time under traditional models. This is considered "efficient" or "processable" computation time because the time increase is relatively controllable as the input size grows. Compared to exponential time, polynomial-time algorithms can handle much larger-scale problems in practice. This means that if a fault-tolerant quantum computer (FTQC) with sufficient computing power were to emerge, it would be able to efficiently deduce a user's private key from an exposed public key (which is typically exposed on-chain when a user initiates a transaction), thereby forging digital signatures and enabling unauthorized control and theft of user funds. This risk represents a fundamental disruption to ownership of crypto assets and forces the Ethereum ecosystem to complete a massive cryptographic migration before quantum advantage arrives. Vitalik Buterin warned on Devconnect that quantum computers may be able to break elliptic curve cryptography by 2028, and the community should prepare in advance. Industry predictions for Quantum Advantage Day are accelerating. According to Metaculus, the emergence of a quantum computer capable of RSA factorization has been moved forward from 2052 to 2034. IBM plans to deliver its first FTQC in 2029. In response to the quantum threat, Ethereum has included PQC (post-quantum cryptography) as one of the key objectives of the Splurge phase in its long-term roadmap. Ethereum's preventative strategy is proactive and flexible. Ethereum will use L2 as a test sandbox. Quantum-resistant cryptographic algorithms will first be tested on L2 to assess their performance and security, while avoiding disruption or risk to L1. This tiered upgrade strategy will allow the network to cautiously mitigate evolving technological threats. Regarding candidate algorithms, Ethereum is also exploring various PQC schemes, mainly including: Lattice-based cryptography: This type of algorithm is considered to have strong mathematical resistance to quantum attacks. Hash-based cryptography, such as SPHINCS and its component HORST, can construct a scalable and quantum-safe signature system using a Merkle tree structure. This invocation of L2 solutions provides Ethereum with a flexibility advantage. Compared to rigid protocols like Bitcoin, whose design philosophy emphasizes immutability, Ethereum's structured design allows for faster iteration and deployment of the PQC algorithm, and in the future, it can seamlessly integrate PQC into the user experience layer through mechanisms such as account abstraction. We should emphasize strengthening community cohesion and correcting technological deviations to prevent the risks of community fragmentation and centralization. Ethereum's second potential threat stems from changes in market structure: the large-scale intervention of Wall Street institutional capital is reshaping Ethereum's economic and governance structure, which may erode Ethereum's decentralized spirit, thereby triggering the dual risks of community division and infrastructure centralization. Institutional investors are showing growing interest in Ethereum, locking up significant amounts of ETH in structured financial products. Latest data from SER shows that institutions (including spot ETFs and DAT treasuries) hold a total of 12.58 million ETH, representing 10.4% of the total supply. This large-scale capital accumulation is bringing about two structural changes: Contraction in effective circulating supply: Glassnode research reveals that ETH's share on centralized exchanges (CEXs) has plummeted from approximately 29% to around 11%. As institutions move ETH from high-liquidity venues like CEXs to low-liquidity structures such as ETFs or DATs, the market's effective circulating supply will continue to contract. Shifting asset characterization: This type of change will also solidify ETH's position as productive collateral and a long-term savings asset. VanEck's CEO even called ETH a "Wall Street token," which reflects institutional interest in the financialization of ETH. In the Proof-of-Stake (PoS) consensus mechanism, ETH holdings are directly linked to staking rights and governance rights. Although ETH held through ETFs does not directly participate in on-chain staking, the large-scale economic concentration will endow major stakeholders with significant potential governance influence. This economic concentration may gradually translate into governance control over the protocol's decision-making process. Ethereum's core competitiveness stems from its vibrant open-source community and idealistic developer group. However, the will of institutional capital often runs counter to the cypherpunk spirit. The first risk of institutional capital involvement is the potential for community fragmentation. When governance power is concentrated in the hands of a few institutional stakeholders, the fairness and neutrality of the governance process face challenges. When Wall Street giants become major holders, the power in community governance will subtly shift towards the interests of capital. Even if Ethereum maintains its decentralization on the surface, actual power will be concentrated in the hands of a "small circle" composed of institutions such as BlackRock, Fidelity, and Bitmine. The development of the Ethereum ecosystem will no longer rely on pure technological advantages, but rather on its proximity to capital, which will lead to a decoupling of economic value from community spirit. Ethereum will also shift from idealism to capitalism, thereby undermining the decentralized development foundation of the protocol. Furthermore, institutions tend to prioritize compliance, stability, and auditability, while developers often seek privacy, innovation, and censorship resistance. If governance is excessively concentrated in the hands of institutions with substantial capital, even without overt corruption, community decisions may inadvertently favor maximizing stakeholder commercial value rather than upholding the protocol's inherent fairness and decentralized principles. This could alienate a large number of developers, leading to talent drain and undermining Ethereum's trustworthiness and neutrality as a world computer. Another far-reaching risk is that the pursuit of returns and operational efficiency by institutional capital may subtly alter Ethereum's technology roadmap, transforming decentralization at the consensus mechanism level into centralization at the physical level. First, in order to meet the extreme demands of institutions for transaction processing speed and compliance, the underlying technology is very likely to be tilted towards high-performance nodes, which will significantly raise the threshold for ordinary users to run nodes. Secondly, existing research indicates that despite Ethereum's large validator cluster, its validator community exhibits significant geographical centralization, primarily concentrated in regions with the lowest network latency, particularly North America (the US East Coast) and Europe. North America is, in most cases, the network's "focal point," providing a geographical advantage for validators there. This trend is expected to intensify further if staking ETFs issued by BlackRock, Fidelity, and other issuers are approved. Since lower latency (i.e., faster block reception and proposal) directly translates into higher staking rewards and MEV (Maximum Extractable Value) capture efficiency, institutional validators will also accelerate their influx into these "lowest latency" regions. This profit-driven behavior pattern may solidify and exacerbate the current trend of geographical centralization. In reality, this physical centralization also introduces single-point risks. Institutional ETH holdings are often staked through custodians, leading to a large concentration of validator nodes in data centers governed by US law. This not only creates geographical centralization but also exposes the Ethereum network to regulatory scrutiny (such as OFAC compliance requirements). Once the base layer loses its censorship resistance, Ethereum will degenerate into merely a "financial database" running on distributed servers. Therefore, the coupling of economic motives and geography is transforming decentralization at the protocol consensus mechanism level into physical centralization, which violates the fundamental security goals of blockchain. To prevent institutional capital from indirectly dominating governance, Ethereum can drive improvements at multiple levels. In terms of community cohesion, Ethereum can grant developers greater governance weight to balance the capital advantage of institutional giants. Community funding support will be an important supplement; the Ethereum Foundation should significantly expand the Grant program and collaborate with platforms like Gitcoin to subsidize open-source contributions, preventing talent from leaving due to capital bias. Regarding technical roadmap correction, Ethereum should promote a solution that emphasizes both technology and incentives. Ethereum can encourage institutions to adopt a combination of multi-signature + DVT (Distributed Validator Technology) or restaking through incentive measures. This would allow institutions to distribute their staked ETH across more independent nodes, balancing custody and compliance needs while improving decentralization. To address the issue of geographical concentration, Ethereum should introduce latency balancing algorithms at the protocol layer and launch a node distribution subsidy program, focusing on reducing the proportion of North American validators to a reasonable range. Simultaneously, hardware barriers need to be lowered, along with client-side optimizations, to make the cost for independent validators to run full nodes affordable. Looking at the history of Ethereum's evolution, it is essentially a history of racing against potential crises. Faced with the relentless advances of quantum computing and the enticing allure of Wall Street capital, Ethereum can actually build new competitive advantages through quantum-resistant upgrades, balancing community governance, and combining hardware and software solutions. This battle between technology and human nature will determine whether Ethereum ultimately becomes a backend for Wall Street's fintech or a public infrastructure for digital civilization.

Author: PANews

2025/11/22

Recommended by active authors

BitcoinEthereumNews
BitcoinEthereumNews
1321Articles
PANews
PANews
502Articles
Coinstats
Coinstats
220Articles
Coindesk
Coindesk
218Articles

Related Tags

#Oracle#Brifge#Yield-Farming#Basis-Trading#Prediction-Market#Launchpad#Liquid-Staking#Lending#DePIN

Latest Articles

Why Some Traders Say Bitcoin’s 21 Million Cap Is Being Diluted Off-Chain

Why Some Traders Say Bitcoin’s 21 Million Cap Is Being Diluted Off-Chain

2026/02/08 01:37
Stellar (XLM) Eyes $0.57 Recovery as Rails Launches Institutional-Grade Vaults

Stellar (XLM) Eyes $0.57 Recovery as Rails Launches Institutional-Grade Vaults

2026/02/08 01:30
Trend Research Concludes Major ETH Liquidation

Trend Research Concludes Major ETH Liquidation

2026/02/08 00:58
Students stage walkout after professor and former US ambassador named in Epstein files

Students stage walkout after professor and former US ambassador named in Epstein files

2026/02/08 00:55
Trump isn't the real threat — the 'MAGA apparatus' is: analysis

Trump isn't the real threat — the 'MAGA apparatus' is: analysis

2026/02/08 00:52