Creating a payments system involves more than just the tech side of the job. It’s trust. People are handing over their money and their information and their trust that it’s going to just work. Get it right and payments are seamless. Get it wrong and even small glitches can destroy user trust.
And as Bill Gates once pointed out, ‘Trust takes years to build, seconds to break, and forever to repair.’ This premise has always been at the nucleus of payment systems. Efficiency will keep customers smiling, but security will keep the business thriving. It’s actually finding a good middle ground.
A payment system that is efficient and secure is not an accident. Nor is it built by chance. There is thoughtful planning occurring at every level.
Source
Compliance and Risk Screening as a Foundation
Before you need to worry about speed, checkout layout, or conversion-related matters, you need to lay the foundation of payment systems on compliance. And sanctions screening is an important part of this foundation.
Sp, what is sanctions screening and how can it work to your benefit? Sanctions screening refers to the verification of customers, transactions, and business partners using sanctions lists issued by governments and international organizations. Sanctions lists are used to prevent financial assistance being provided to individuals, organizations, and states which engage in activities such as terrorism financing and organized crime.
But the reality is, this job has become much more complex in the past few years. There are currently over 57,000 active sanctions records in more than 300 international programs by the target date of 2025. For payment teams, it’s a never-ending struggle to process massive international data without impacting legitimate users.
Where subpar tools will cause headaches for users and drive up latency as the fraud team has to review transactions for confirmation, the largest pain point for operationalizing the tool will be handling the false positives, rather than the true negatives.
Platforms such as SEON assist companies in addressing such complexity by integrating sanction screening with fraud prevention and risk analysis. Rather than making compliance a distinct and manual process, present-day technology integrates compliance into payment transactions. This enables faster decision-making, reduced unjustified blocking, and more effective safeguarding against genuine threats.
When implemented correctly, sanctions screening can be integrated to enable security and efficiency, instead of hindering them.
Designing for Speed Without Cutting Corners
Fast transactions mean that the payment solution has been properly developed. Users anticipate payment completion in seconds, not minutes. If it takes too long, it makes them question things, especially when the funds are already out of account.
First, there’s the aspect of efficiency that can be achieved through architecture. Transaction systems can and should ensure that the work takes place asynchronously. This allows non critical checks to happen in parallel rather than sequentially. Certain processes that were to happen during the authorization stage can wait until then to execute.
Another major element here is smart routing. It is understood that all transactions are not created equal when it comes to risks. A customer who comes back to the site on a trusted device and with a known payment method should not experience the same degree of friction as someone who is a new customer making, say, a large money transfer across the world. Risk-based routing ensures additional checks only happen when necessary.
Topics that matter a great deal include caching, redundancy, and failover solutions. And it is not just about creating a payment system that is fast when everything is working properly, but it has to be resilient when things are not going so well either.
Balancing User Experience With Security Controls
One of the biggest errors that businesses make is to assume that greater security equals greater hassle. The truth is that intelligent security reduces friction.
For instance, fingerprinting behaviors on the internet can check for risks in the background without needing to bother the user. The behaviors are responsible for deciding if the transactions are shady or not based on the patterns.
Effective communication is also important. When a transaction is late or disputed, users should be told why. Ambiguous error messages make users skeptical, while clear explanations make them feel that the system is working for them.
Security features should be supportive, rather than punishment-oriented. The aim should be to shield good users and prevent the bad guys, not to criminalize everyone.
Source
Choosing the Right Payment Methods
Your payment options impact how efficient and secure your configuration is. Each payment option has a risk vibe, a speed of settling, and what users are expecting.
- Card payments are fast and familiar, but there is a risk of charge-backs.
- E-wallets reduce payment frictions and many include some sort of payment authentication, but they are highly vulnerable to account takeovers.
- Bank transfers may be slower, but they are generally more definite when completed.
A good payment system takes all of these differences into account and adjusts the controls accordingly. Rather than using the same risk model for all payment types, intelligent payment systems react to the way payments are made and the level of protection afforded to them.
It will increase efficiency by giving consumers a variety of methods to choose from, thus reducing the occurrences of failed transactions and abandoning the checkout process.
Building Scalable Fraud Detection
Because the volume of transactions increases, manual verification is no longer possible on a scalable basis. Scaling up relies upon automation, and this is only possible with good data.
The kind of fraud that actually gets detected is done by weaving together lots of different signals:
- Transaction history
- Device information
- The behavior of people
- Their location
- And compliance testing
The power is in the intersection of the signals, not the individual signal.
Machine learning algorithms are able to detect new fraud trends compared to static rules. However, human intervention is important. There needs to be transparency between machine learning systems and teams to explain why certain decisions are made.
Another advantage of scalable systems is that the systems allow for continuous tuning. Changes keep happening in the business environment, and as a result, the fraud risk will keep changing. An optimal payment system should be adaptable to accommodate changes involving thresholds, rules, and workflow.
Data Protection and Privacy by Design
During the XIX century in England, hotels used to employ detectives that had not only to prevent something going amiss, but also to keep the privacy of hotels’ guests. The same situation could be applied here, in the modern age of technology. Security isn’t only about preventing fraud. It’s also about protecting sensitive data.
This is because payment systems should be developed with privacy by design. The approach entails storing less information, encrypting sensitive information, and keeping personally identifiable information apart from the transaction information.
In this area, tokenization is a powerful option. This is because, through the use of tokens to replace sensitive information, the effects of breaches can be contained while the functionality is maintained.
It’s easier to remain in line with regulations around data protection when privacy is incorporated and not applied retroactively as a fix-it.
Monitoring, Auditing, and Continuous Improvement
No payment method is ever complete. This is due to changing threats, rules, and uses.
This involves monitoring everything at all times to make sure that problems are identified as they arise. There are real-time dashboards and logs that enable teams to act immediately before problems escalate into major incidents.
Auditing the system regularly is equally important. Analyzing transactions, security measures, and compliance procedures can highlight where there are loopholes or inefficiencies. These are then taken into account for improvement in the system.
The greatest payment teams recognize that security and speed are an ongoing process, as opposed to projects with start and end points.
Planning for Global Growth and Regulatory Change
Payment systems rarely remain regional or local. As the business expands their boundaries to other regions, they learn new regulations, new currencies, and new customer expectations. An efficient system is designed with this knowledge in mind.
Stacking for global growth means dealing with numerous currencies, local payment methods, and region-specific rules without having to rebuild the platform. Also, it means adapting to an ever-changing environment when it comes to sanctions, data privacy, and payment schemes. Any system with hard-coded rules will soon be obsolete.
We need a flexible architecture that allows for adaptive risk controls, as well as up-to-date compliance solutions to always remain one step ahead of the ever-changing landscape, all the while providing fast, efficient, and secure cross-border payments.
Source
Built on Thoughtful Design
The key to a sound payment system is good design, not Band-Aid solutions. This compliance nonsense like screening for sanctions helps mitigate large risks if done well. Clever implementation and well-considered risk management decisions support fast payments while keeping them secure. Sound data management considers users even after a payment has been completed.
When all of these bits come together, payments fade into the background, which is precisely what payments should do. User trust builds, control is maintained, and business can thrive.
