The post INJ Support and Resistance Analysis: Critical Levels January 19, 2026 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. INJ price at $4.68 level, primary support positionedThe post INJ Support and Resistance Analysis: Critical Levels January 19, 2026 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. INJ price at $4.68 level, primary support positioned

INJ Support and Resistance Analysis: Critical Levels January 19, 2026

INJ price at $4.68 level, primary support positioned just above $4.6753. Daily downtrend continues as the critical buyer zone is being tested.

Current Price Position and Critical Levels

INJ is trading at $4.68 as of January 19, 2026, down 9.43% in the last 24 hours, moving in the $4.44-$5.27 range. The overall trend is confirmed as downtrend; price remains below EMA20 ($5.11) and RSI at 41.56 signals neutral-bearish territory. Supertrend indicator gives bearish signal pointing to $5.81 resistance. Multi-timeframe (MTF) analysis detects a total of 11 strong levels across 1D/3D/1W timeframes: 2 supports/2 resistances on 1D, 1S/1R on 3D, 2S/3R confluence on 1W. Price has been rejected from short-term supply zones and is now approaching the primary demand zone. This position implies potential base formation or invalidation test for deeper downside. Volume at $65.21M is moderate; increasing volume on declines shows seller dominance.

Support Levels: Buyer Pools

Primary Support

$4.6753 (Strength Score: 83/100) – This level stands out as INJ’s most critical buyer zone. Why? Perfect confluence on 1D and 3D timeframes: formed as the order block (OB) of the last downward wave on 1D, strong wick rejection occurred here in October 2025 with volume spike as buyers stepped in. On 3D chart, it aligns with Fibonacci 0.618 retracement and has been tested and held 3 times historically (historical test count: 3/3 success). Volume profile shows high volume node (HVN) concentrated here, meaning institutions may have accumulated long positions in this area. MTF confluence score is high; it also overlaps with minor support on 1W. As price approaches here (currently just above at $4.68), there’s stop hunt risk for liquidity sweep, but if it holds, bounce probability is 70%+ (based on historical data). Invalidation: Break below $4.60 opens the next OB.

Secondary Support and Stop Levels

$4.1600 (Strength Score: 67/100) – Secondary support, a deeper demand pool. Lower band of main supply/demand zone on 1W timeframe; confluence with breaker block from November 2025 rally. Strong bounces occurred here twice (volume-backed reversal candles), with RSI divergence potential (near oversold). Aligns with EMA50 ($4.25) on 1D, adding extra confluence. Monitor below $4.10 as stop level; it targets equal lows liquidity and triggers bearish continuation. This level becomes the first target on primary support breakdown (path to $1.7050 downside). If volume decreases, big players (smart money) may enter here.

Resistance Levels: Seller Pools

Near-Term Resistances

$4.9128 (Strength Score: 71/100) – Near-term first seller zone, upper band of last 24h range and EMA20 ($5.11) approach. Fresh order block on 1D (last drop OB), sellers entered aggressive shorts here; wick rejections frequent (2 tests in last 3 days, 100% rejection). Low volume node (LVN) on volume profile but trapped longs’ stops above, ideal for liquidity grab. First obstacle on Supertrend path to $5.81. Clean breakout + retest required for break; otherwise high fakeout risk.

Main Resistance and Targets

$5.1750 (Strength Score: 61/100) – Main resistance, supply zone with 3D and 1W confluence. Mitigation block from December 2025 high on 1W; overlaps with Fib 0.5 extension. Historically 4 tests/4 rejections, seller divergence on volume (low buyer volume). Path to upper target $7.1250 passes through here but Supertrend $5.81 must break for 1:2.5 R/R. Invalidation above $5.30; collects equal highs liquidity and accelerates upside momentum. MTF shows 3R concentration here, big players may await short squeeze.

Liquidity Map and Big Players

INJ liquidity map is filled with short stop liquidity above $4.91 and long stops below $4.60. Big players (CEXs/institutions) appear to have accumulated longs in $4.6753 demand zone while opening shorts in $5.1750 supply. Imbalances (fair value gaps) on 1W between $4.90-$5.10, price may be pulled there. Order flow analysis: Liquidity sweep from $5.27 dump on last drop, now buy imbalance forming at $4.44 low. Smart money seeks higher lows in downtrend as buyers; raid to $4.16 possible on breakdown. Volume delta negative but divergence signal present, $4.6753 hold critical for reversal.

Bitcoin Correlation

INJ has 0.85 correlation with BTC; BTC in uptrend at $92,976 but Supertrend bearish and dominance rise pressuring alts. If BTC key supports $92,356 / $90,950 / $89,311 hold, INJ can bounce from $4.6753 (historical 75% positive correlation). If BTC fails $94,151 resistance, INJ rejection at $4.91 strengthens and $4.16 downside triggers. BTC below $89k cascade risk opens $1.70 target for INJ. Watch: If BTC dominance >55%, alts stay weak. Details in INJ Spot Analysis and INJ Futures Analysis.

Trading Plan and Level-Based Strategy

Level-based outlook: Hold above $4.6753 > $4.91 breakout targets $5.1750 / $7.1250 (R/R 1:3). Break below $4.6753 < $4.16 test, $1.7050 downside (R/R 1:2). Long: $4.68 dip, stop $4.60, target $4.91. Short: $4.91 rejection, stop $5.10, target $4.67. Wait for multi-timeframe confluence; volume spike + candle close required. This outlook is price action based (not advice). Risk management: 1-2% position size, use trailing stop.

This analysis uses Chief Analyst Devrim Cacal’s market views and methodology.

Senior Technical Analyst: James Mitchell

6 years of crypto market analysis

This analysis is not investment advice. Do your own research.

Source: https://en.coinotag.com/analysis/inj-support-and-resistance-analysis-critical-levels-january-19-2026

Piyasa Fırsatı
4 Logosu
4 Fiyatı(4)
$0.0212
$0.0212$0.0212
-3.85%
USD
4 (4) Canlı Fiyat Grafiği
Sorumluluk Reddi: Bu sitede yeniden yayınlanan makaleler, halka açık platformlardan alınmıştır ve yalnızca bilgilendirme amaçlıdır. MEXC'nin görüşlerini yansıtmayabilir. Tüm hakları telif sahiplerine aittir. Herhangi bir içeriğin üçüncü taraf haklarını ihlal ettiğini düşünüyorsanız, kaldırılması için lütfen service@support.mexc.com ile iletişime geçin. MEXC, içeriğin doğruluğu, eksiksizliği veya güncelliği konusunda hiçbir garanti vermez ve sağlanan bilgilere dayalı olarak alınan herhangi bir eylemden sorumlu değildir. İçerik, finansal, yasal veya diğer profesyonel tavsiye niteliğinde değildir ve MEXC tarafından bir tavsiye veya onay olarak değerlendirilmemelidir.

Ayrıca Şunları da Beğenebilirsiniz

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Paylaş
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Will XRP Price Increase In September 2025?

Will XRP Price Increase In September 2025?

Ripple XRP is a cryptocurrency that primarily focuses on building a decentralised payments network to facilitate low-cost and cross-border transactions. It’s a native digital currency of the Ripple network, which works as a blockchain called the XRP Ledger (XRPL). It utilised a shared, distributed ledger to track account balances and transactions. What Do XRP Charts Reveal? […]
Paylaş
Tronweekly2025/09/18 00:00
China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

The post China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise China’s internet regulator has ordered the country’s biggest technology firms, including Alibaba and ByteDance, to stop purchasing Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D GPUs. According to the Financial Times, the move shuts down the last major channel for mass supplies of American chips to the Chinese market. Why Beijing Halted Nvidia Purchases Chinese companies had planned to buy tens of thousands of RTX Pro 6000D accelerators and had already begun testing them in servers. But regulators intervened, halting the purchases and signaling stricter controls than earlier measures placed on Nvidia’s H20 chip. Image: Nvidia An audit compared Huawei and Cambricon processors, along with chips developed by Alibaba and Baidu, against Nvidia’s export-approved products. Regulators concluded that Chinese chips had reached performance levels comparable to the restricted U.S. models. This assessment pushed authorities to advise firms to rely more heavily on domestic processors, further tightening Nvidia’s already limited position in China. China’s Drive Toward Tech Independence The decision highlights Beijing’s focus on import substitution — developing self-sufficient chip production to reduce reliance on U.S. supplies. “The signal is now clear: all attention is focused on building a domestic ecosystem,” said a representative of a leading Chinese tech company. Nvidia had unveiled the RTX Pro 6000D in July 2025 during CEO Jensen Huang’s visit to Beijing, in an attempt to keep a foothold in China after Washington restricted exports of its most advanced chips. But momentum is shifting. Industry sources told the Financial Times that Chinese manufacturers plan to triple AI chip production next year to meet growing demand. They believe “domestic supply will now be sufficient without Nvidia.” What It Means for the Future With Huawei, Cambricon, Alibaba, and Baidu stepping up, China is positioning itself for long-term technological independence. Nvidia, meanwhile, faces…
Paylaş
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:37