A viral post claimed Solana lost 84% of its validators, but Anatoly Yakovenko says the real drop is ~20% and tied to a subsidy program ending, not a network collapseA viral post claimed Solana lost 84% of its validators, but Anatoly Yakovenko says the real drop is ~20% and tied to a subsidy program ending, not a network collapse

Solana validator debate flares as founder rebuts 84% node-collapse claim

A viral post claimed Solana lost 84% of its validators, but Anatoly Yakovenko says the real drop is ~20% and tied to a subsidy program ending, not a network collapse.

Summary
  • A social post alleging an 84% plunge in Solana validators sparked fresh centralization fears, comparing SOL to a “centralized database.”​
  • Yakovenko countered that validator participation fell closer to 20% after the Solana Foundation’s Delegation Program wound down.​
  • He stressed the difference between validators and full nodes, claiming roughly 5,000 Solana full nodes versus 8,300 on Ethereum despite ETH’s much larger market cap.

A dispute over Solana’s (SOL) validator count and network decentralization emerged over the weekend after a post claiming an 84% drop in validators circulated widely on social media.

Solana validator debate flares as founder rebuts 84% node-collapse claim - 1

Solana founder Anatoly Yakovenko disputed the claim, stating the actual decline in validator participation was closer to 20% over the past 12 months, according to his public response.

Yakovenko also contested the post’s conflation of validators and full nodes, writing that “Validators are not full nodes.” According to Yakovenko, Solana operates approximately 5,000 full nodes, compared to 8,300 full nodes on the Ethereum blockchain, which has a market capitalization four times larger than Solana’s.

The decline in Solana nodes was attributed to the conclusion of the Solana Foundation Delegation Program (SFDP), a one-year bootstrap initiative that covered voting costs for small validators, according to Yakovenko’s explanation.

Critics continued to question Solana’s decentralization despite the corrections, with comparisons to centralized databases persisting. One social media user claimed operating costs of $20 million per validator prevented broader participation, though this figure could not be independently verified.

Operating a self-hosted, fully validating Solana node requires substantial financial resources, according to industry reports. Hardware costs begin in the hundreds of dollars and can reach thousands, while voting costs can push annual expenses into the tens of thousands of dollars, according to node operators.

Some Solana validators stake millions of dollars worth of tokens and spend hundreds of thousands of dollars on operational costs, according to industry participants. Multiple startups have been developing solutions to enable network verification on consumer-grade hardware and home internet connections, though such products remain in alpha testing phases.

Piyasa Fırsatı
NODE Logosu
NODE Fiyatı(NODE)
$0.01459
$0.01459$0.01459
-1.68%
USD
NODE (NODE) Canlı Fiyat Grafiği
Sorumluluk Reddi: Bu sitede yeniden yayınlanan makaleler, halka açık platformlardan alınmıştır ve yalnızca bilgilendirme amaçlıdır. MEXC'nin görüşlerini yansıtmayabilir. Tüm hakları telif sahiplerine aittir. Herhangi bir içeriğin üçüncü taraf haklarını ihlal ettiğini düşünüyorsanız, kaldırılması için lütfen service@support.mexc.com ile iletişime geçin. MEXC, içeriğin doğruluğu, eksiksizliği veya güncelliği konusunda hiçbir garanti vermez ve sağlanan bilgilere dayalı olarak alınan herhangi bir eylemden sorumlu değildir. İçerik, finansal, yasal veya diğer profesyonel tavsiye niteliğinde değildir ve MEXC tarafından bir tavsiye veya onay olarak değerlendirilmemelidir.

Ayrıca Şunları da Beğenebilirsiniz

Wormhole launches reserve tying protocol revenue to token

Wormhole launches reserve tying protocol revenue to token

The post Wormhole launches reserve tying protocol revenue to token appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Wormhole is changing how its W token works by creating a new reserve designed to hold value for the long term. Announced on Wednesday, the Wormhole Reserve will collect onchain and offchain revenues and other value generated across the protocol and its applications (including Portal) and accumulate them into W, locking the tokens within the reserve. The reserve is part of a broader update called W 2.0. Other changes include a 4% targeted base yield for tokenholders who stake and take part in governance. While staking rewards will vary, Wormhole said active users of ecosystem apps can earn boosted yields through features like Portal Earn. The team stressed that no new tokens are being minted; rewards come from existing supply and protocol revenues, keeping the cap fixed at 10 billion. Wormhole is also overhauling its token release schedule. Instead of releasing large amounts of W at once under the old “cliff” model, the network will shift to steady, bi-weekly unlocks starting October 3, 2025. The aim is to avoid sharp periods of selling pressure and create a more predictable environment for investors. Lockups for some groups, including validators and investors, will extend an additional six months, until October 2028. Core contributor tokens remain under longer contractual time locks. Wormhole launched in 2020 as a cross-chain bridge and now connects more than 40 blockchains. The W token powers governance and staking, with a capped supply of 10 billion. By redirecting fees and revenues into the new reserve, Wormhole is betting that its token can maintain value as demand for moving assets and data between chains grows. This is a developing story. This article was generated with the assistance of AI and reviewed by editor Jeffrey Albus before publication. Get the news in your inbox. Explore Blockworks newsletters: Source: https://blockworks.co/news/wormhole-launches-reserve
Paylaş
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:55
XRPL Validator Reveals Why He Just Vetoed New Amendment

XRPL Validator Reveals Why He Just Vetoed New Amendment

Vet has explained that he has decided to veto the Token Escrow amendment to prevent breaking things
Paylaş
Coinstats2025/09/18 00:28
MakinaFi suffered an attack that resulted in the loss of approximately 1299 ETH, with some funds being preemptively processed by MEV.

MakinaFi suffered an attack that resulted in the loss of approximately 1299 ETH, with some funds being preemptively processed by MEV.

PANews reported on January 20th that, according to PeckShieldAlert, the MakinaFi platform was attacked, with hackers stealing approximately 1,299 ETH, worth about
Paylaş
PANews2026/01/20 12:32