Solana confirmed on X that its network has been under a sustained Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attack for over a week, with traffic peaking near 6 terabitsSolana confirmed on X that its network has been under a sustained Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attack for over a week, with traffic peaking near 6 terabits

Solana Absorbs One of the Largest DDoS Attacks Ever Recorded

2025/12/18 02:53

Solana confirmed on X that its network has been under a sustained Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attack for over a week, with traffic peaking near 6 terabits per second.

By scale, Solana says the incident ranks as the fourth-largest attack ever recorded across any distributed system.

That number alone is extreme. But the more important detail sits beneath it.

Despite the pressure, Solana’s network performance did not degrade. On-chain activity remained stable. Confirmations stayed under one second. Slot latency showed no abnormal behavior. From the outside, users wouldn’t have known anything unusual was happening.

Solana emphasized that this outcome is not accidental. One of the network’s core design goals is to continue operating normally under adversarial conditions, including large-scale network attacks. Over the past week, that principle moved from theory to practice.

While attacks of this magnitude often expose structural weaknesses, Solana continued processing transactions as usual. No emergency measures. No visible slowdown. No congestion-driven fee spikes.

The network just kept running.

What a 6 Tbps DDoS Attack Really Means

Six terabits per second is hard to visualize. It represents an enormous volume of data, comparable to millions of high-definition video streams hitting a single destination at the same time. Except here, the traffic wasn’t legitimate. It was deliberately malicious.

To understand why this matters, it helps to separate a DoS attack from a DDoS attack.

A Denial of Service attack usually comes from a single source. One device floods a target with traffic until it can’t respond. These attacks are disruptive, but relatively easy to stop. Block the IP address. The attack ends.

A DDoS attack works differently.

Instead of one device, attackers deploy thousands or millions of compromised machines, known collectively as a botnet. These machines can be everyday devices: computers, routers, cameras, and other internet-connected hardware infected with malware. Once controlled remotely, they act in unison.

Each device sends traffic simultaneously.

That “distributed” nature makes DDoS attacks far harder to mitigate. You’re no longer blocking one source. You’re facing traffic from across the internet, arriving all at once.

In blockchain systems, DDoS attacks often appear as transaction spam. Attackers attempt to overwhelm the network by submitting massive volumes of transactions or requests, hoping to slow block production, increase latency, or raise fees.

That’s exactly why Solana’s response is notable. The attack hit hard. And the network absorbed it.

How Solana Continued Operating Without Disruption

According to Solana, internal network data showed no measurable impact throughout the attack window. Confirmations stayed fast. Slot times remained stable. Validators stayed in sync.

This outcome reflects how the network is built.

Solana’s architecture emphasizes high throughput, parallel execution, and rapid message propagation between validators. Rather than forcing transactions through a narrow execution bottleneck, the network spreads workload across available resources.

During a DDoS event, that design matters.

Where some networks experience backlogs, rising fees, or validator delays under heavy spam, Solana showed none of those symptoms. The attack did not trigger congestion. Gas fees did not spike. Users did not experience delays.

From the perspective of applications running on Solana, DeFi protocols, NFT platforms, payments, and consumer apps, operations continued as normal.

That’s the key point. Resilience isn’t just about surviving an attack. It’s about doing so without degrading the user experience.

A Clear Contrast as Sui Faces Disruptions

The timing of this incident adds important context. During the same period, the Sui network was also targeted by a DDoS attack. The outcome there was very different.

Sui experienced delays in block production and periods of degraded network performance. Normal operations were impacted. The attack produced visible effects.

This contrast highlights a reality across blockchain infrastructure. Not all networks respond the same way under stress. DDoS resilience isn’t theoretical. It’s operational.

When a network slows under attack, applications suffer. Users feel it. Builders take note.

Solana’s experience shows the opposite scenario. Even under sustained pressure at historic scale, the network continued functioning as designed. That difference matters as blockchains move closer to real-world financial and consumer use cases.

Attacks aren’t rare. They’re expected. Networks that plan for them gain credibility.

What This Means for Solana and Its Ecosystem

Solana’s native asset, SOL, underpins transaction fees, staking, and validator incentives across the network. It plays a central role in securing the chain and enabling on-chain activity across DeFi, NFTs, payments, and consumer applications.

This event strengthens a narrative that has been building around Solana: performance under real conditions matters more than benchmarks.

It’s easy to claim speed in ideal scenarios. It’s harder to maintain stability when faced with sustained hostile traffic measured in terabits per second. Over the past week, Solana demonstrated that its design choices translate into real resilience.

That matters for developers deciding where to deploy applications. It matters for users who expect networks to remain available. And it matters as blockchains increasingly resemble critical infrastructure rather than experimental technology.

Solana’s message throughout the incident remained consistent and calm. The attack happened. It was massive. And it did not succeed.

In an environment where reliability is becoming a differentiator, that outcome speaks for itself.

Disclosure: This is not trading or investment advice. Always do your research before buying any cryptocurrency or investing in any services.

Follow us on Twitter @nulltxnews to stay updated with the latest Crypto, NFT, AI, Cybersecurity, Distributed Computing, and Metaverse news!

Piyasa Fırsatı
Everscale Logosu
Everscale Fiyatı(EVER)
$0,00836
$0,00836$0,00836
-%2,56
USD
Everscale (EVER) Canlı Fiyat Grafiği
Sorumluluk Reddi: Bu sitede yeniden yayınlanan makaleler, halka açık platformlardan alınmıştır ve yalnızca bilgilendirme amaçlıdır. MEXC'nin görüşlerini yansıtmayabilir. Tüm hakları telif sahiplerine aittir. Herhangi bir içeriğin üçüncü taraf haklarını ihlal ettiğini düşünüyorsanız, kaldırılması için lütfen service@support.mexc.com ile iletişime geçin. MEXC, içeriğin doğruluğu, eksiksizliği veya güncelliği konusunda hiçbir garanti vermez ve sağlanan bilgilere dayalı olarak alınan herhangi bir eylemden sorumlu değildir. İçerik, finansal, yasal veya diğer profesyonel tavsiye niteliğinde değildir ve MEXC tarafından bir tavsiye veya onay olarak değerlendirilmemelidir.

Ayrıca Şunları da Beğenebilirsiniz

What Could Help Pi Coin Rebound?

What Could Help Pi Coin Rebound?

The post What Could Help Pi Coin Rebound? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Pi Coin has extended its decline for a third straight week, falling sharply from
Paylaş
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/19 21:09
Foreigner’s Lou Gramm Revisits The Band’s Classic ‘4’ Album, Now Reissued

Foreigner’s Lou Gramm Revisits The Band’s Classic ‘4’ Album, Now Reissued

The post Foreigner’s Lou Gramm Revisits The Band’s Classic ‘4’ Album, Now Reissued appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. American-based rock band Foreigner performs onstage at the Rosemont Horizon, Rosemont, Illinois, November 8, 1981. Pictured are, from left, Mick Jones, on guitar, and vocalist Lou Gramm. (Photo by Paul Natkin/Getty Images) Getty Images Singer Lou Gramm has a vivid memory of recording the ballad “Waiting for a Girl Like You” at New York City’s Electric Lady Studio for his band Foreigner more than 40 years ago. Gramm was adding his vocals for the track in the control room on the other side of the glass when he noticed a beautiful woman walking through the door. “She sits on the sofa in front of the board,” he says. “She looked at me while I was singing. And every now and then, she had a little smile on her face. I’m not sure what that was, but it was driving me crazy. “And at the end of the song, when I’m singing the ad-libs and stuff like that, she gets up,” he continues. “She gives me a little smile and walks out of the room. And when the song ended, I would look up every now and then to see where Mick [Jones] and Mutt [Lange] were, and they were pushing buttons and turning knobs. They were not aware that she was even in the room. So when the song ended, I said, ‘Guys, who was that woman who walked in? She was beautiful.’ And they looked at each other, and they went, ‘What are you talking about? We didn’t see anything.’ But you know what? I think they put her up to it. Doesn’t that sound more like them?” “Waiting for a Girl Like You” became a massive hit in 1981 for Foreigner off their album 4, which peaked at number one on the Billboard chart for 10 weeks and…
Paylaş
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:26
Why BitDelta’s Winter WonderTrade Stands Out

Why BitDelta’s Winter WonderTrade Stands Out

The post Why BitDelta’s Winter WonderTrade Stands Out appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Crypto Projects As the crypto market widens in scope and participation
Paylaş
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/19 21:26