Coinbase’s Paul Grewal Criticizes NYT Over Crypto Narrative
- Paul Grewal challenges New York Times report, claims misleading crypto enforcement narrative.
- Grewal highlights lack of favoritism evidence in NYT story.
- SEC attributes enforcement changes to policy, not political bias.
Coinbase’s Chief Legal Officer Paul Grewal criticized a New York Times article about SEC crypto favoring Trump allies, highlighting misrepresentations without supporting evidence, sparking debate over alleged political bias.
The dispute highlights tensions in crypto regulation and the SEC’s shifting policies, impacting market dynamics and investor perceptions amid high-profile memecoin activities linked to the Trump family.
Coinbase’s Chief Legal Officer, Paul Grewal, criticized a New York Times article dated December 14, 2025, alleging SEC favoritism towards Trump allies.
The event reflects ongoing tensions around regulatory practices, highlighting differing views on the SEC’s policy adjustments.
Grewal Denies Evidence of SEC Favoritism in Crypto Cases
Paul Grewal publicly rejected the NYT report’s framing of SEC bias, noting the article found no evidence of pressure from the White House. SEC Commissioners Peirce and Uyeda, known dissenters, now drive policy shifts post-Gary Gensler.
The report suggests SEC softened crypto cases favoring Trump associates; however, MoonPay’s executive excitement over $TRUMP memecoin gains adds another layer to this regulatory controversy.
Crypto Community Reacts to NYT’s SEC Allegations
The NYT story has stirred debate within the crypto community and prompted rebuttals from stakeholders stressing there’s no evidence of White House influence.
Grewal’s and Thorn’s responses highlight skepticism around the article’s conclusions. The SEC’s stance focuses on legal—not political—considerations driving case dismissals.
Experts Weigh In on Perceived Regulatory Disparities
The alleged SEC bias against Trump allies evokes past concerns over regulatory disparity in crypto markets, reminiscent of perceived favoritism controversies.
Experts suggest the dismissal of cases aligns with broader regulatory trends prioritizing lawful frameworks, opposing claims of strategic favoritism towards Trump associates.
| Disclaimer: The information on this website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial or investment advice. Cryptocurrency markets are volatile, and investing involves risk. Always do your own research and consult a financial advisor. |
Ayrıca Şunları da Beğenebilirsiniz
China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise
The aftermath of the energy war: As Microsoft, BlackRock monopolize infrastructure, Eden Miner becomes retail’s last backdoor to the “hashrate yield network”
