The post Miami Depends More On Messi Under Mascherano, For Better And Worse appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Inter Miami manager Javier Mascherano, left, talks to Lionel Messi #10 before entering the pitch during the 2025 Concacaf Champions Cup Round of 16 Second Leg match at Cavalier SC on March 13. Getty Images As Inter Miami tries to keep its hopes of repeating as Supporters’ Shield champions alive and then eyes a potential first MLS Cup title in the playoffs that follow, one clear pattern is emerging when comparing the Herons’ current team to that of 2024. Under first-year manager Javier Mascherano, this year’s version is far more reliant on Messi as a scorer. Yes, it would be weird if any team wasn’t at least somewhat reliant on a player whom many consider the greatest to ever play at the game. But the numbers this season compared to last suggest a Herons squad that isn’t nearly as good as turning to Plan B when Plan A of leaning on the eight-time Ballon d’Or winner scores doesn’t work out. Inter Miami’s 2024 record … When Messi scored: 8W-4D-1L When Messi didn’t score: 5W-2D-0L When Messi didn’t play: 9W-2D-3L Inter Miami’s 2025 record so far … When Messi scored: 13W-2D-1L When Messi didn’t score: 1W-4D-3L When Messi didn’t play: 2W-2D-2L Whether on purpose or by accident, it’s an impossible trend to shrug off how different the numbers are. Determining why that disparity has emerged – and even determining whether it’s even a negative – is more complicated. What Exactly Changed? The immediate impulse is to point out what else is different the difference in head coaching. Mascherano is in his first senior head coaching role. Previous gaffer Tata Martino was as experienced as they come. So you might infer that Martino was simply at utilizing his supplementary players and making adjustments when Messi had an off night or was unavailable.… The post Miami Depends More On Messi Under Mascherano, For Better And Worse appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Inter Miami manager Javier Mascherano, left, talks to Lionel Messi #10 before entering the pitch during the 2025 Concacaf Champions Cup Round of 16 Second Leg match at Cavalier SC on March 13. Getty Images As Inter Miami tries to keep its hopes of repeating as Supporters’ Shield champions alive and then eyes a potential first MLS Cup title in the playoffs that follow, one clear pattern is emerging when comparing the Herons’ current team to that of 2024. Under first-year manager Javier Mascherano, this year’s version is far more reliant on Messi as a scorer. Yes, it would be weird if any team wasn’t at least somewhat reliant on a player whom many consider the greatest to ever play at the game. But the numbers this season compared to last suggest a Herons squad that isn’t nearly as good as turning to Plan B when Plan A of leaning on the eight-time Ballon d’Or winner scores doesn’t work out. Inter Miami’s 2024 record … When Messi scored: 8W-4D-1L When Messi didn’t score: 5W-2D-0L When Messi didn’t play: 9W-2D-3L Inter Miami’s 2025 record so far … When Messi scored: 13W-2D-1L When Messi didn’t score: 1W-4D-3L When Messi didn’t play: 2W-2D-2L Whether on purpose or by accident, it’s an impossible trend to shrug off how different the numbers are. Determining why that disparity has emerged – and even determining whether it’s even a negative – is more complicated. What Exactly Changed? The immediate impulse is to point out what else is different the difference in head coaching. Mascherano is in his first senior head coaching role. Previous gaffer Tata Martino was as experienced as they come. So you might infer that Martino was simply at utilizing his supplementary players and making adjustments when Messi had an off night or was unavailable.…

Miami Depends More On Messi Under Mascherano, For Better And Worse

2025/09/30 08:56

Inter Miami manager Javier Mascherano, left, talks to Lionel Messi #10 before entering the pitch during the 2025 Concacaf Champions Cup Round of 16 Second Leg match at Cavalier SC on March 13.

Getty Images

As Inter Miami tries to keep its hopes of repeating as Supporters’ Shield champions alive and then eyes a potential first MLS Cup title in the playoffs that follow, one clear pattern is emerging when comparing the Herons’ current team to that of 2024.

Under first-year manager Javier Mascherano, this year’s version is far more reliant on Messi as a scorer.

Yes, it would be weird if any team wasn’t at least somewhat reliant on a player whom many consider the greatest to ever play at the game.

But the numbers this season compared to last suggest a Herons squad that isn’t nearly as good as turning to Plan B when Plan A of leaning on the eight-time Ballon d’Or winner scores doesn’t work out.


Inter Miami’s 2024 record …

  • When Messi scored: 8W-4D-1L
  • When Messi didn’t score: 5W-2D-0L
  • When Messi didn’t play: 9W-2D-3L

Inter Miami’s 2025 record so far …

  • When Messi scored: 13W-2D-1L
  • When Messi didn’t score: 1W-4D-3L
  • When Messi didn’t play: 2W-2D-2L

Whether on purpose or by accident, it’s an impossible trend to shrug off how different the numbers are.

Determining why that disparity has emerged – and even determining whether it’s even a negative – is more complicated.

What Exactly Changed?

The immediate impulse is to point out what else is different the difference in head coaching.

Mascherano is in his first senior head coaching role. Previous gaffer Tata Martino was as experienced as they come. So you might infer that Martino was simply at utilizing his supplementary players and making adjustments when Messi had an off night or was unavailable. And maybe that’s even true.

But there’s also more subtle factors that are as likely to be influential.

There’s the passage of time and the aging of Miami’s veteran core. While Messi hasn’t showed much sign of precipitous decline after turning 38 – and has also been healthier over the season so far than in 2024 – both Luis Suarez and Sergio Busquets have seemed to slide considerably from their 2024 levels. Busquets has already announced he’s retiring at the season’s end, and the 38-year-old Suarez’s future remains uncertain.

There’s also the turnover of Miami’s supplemental pieces, in general skewing away from those with MLS experience. Kamal Miller, Julian Gressel and Leonardo Campana are among those who were contributors to Miami during the 2024 season who were jettisoned since.

That could also trace back to the theory of the team being shaped more to Messi’s liking, with a plurality of the roster now having South American connections. But it’s also normal for an incoming manager and sporting director to have different ideas about personnel regardless of who the team’s star player is.

Pros And Cons

The drawbacks of having a team more reliant on a single 38-year-old are fairly obvious.

It makes earning consistent results over a long period more challenging, even when Messi is healthy. As prolific as he has been in 2025 – scoring an MLS-leading 24 goals and adding 14 assists in his 24 league appearances, even he can’t be expected to score in every match he plays. If Miami falls short of winning back-to-back Supporters’ Shield titles, that model of more reliance on Messi may be one reason to blame. And if he succumbs to any sort of injury for even a small portion of the playoffs, Miami’s postseason could be in real jeopardy.

But a game model that goes all in on your best player might actually be the better idea if your goal is to get hot at the right time. Knockout play is often more about determining who has the best positive momentum over a short period rather than who sustains excellence the longest.

The MLS Cup Playoff schedule also might bring less injury risk for Messi because the volume of matchesrelatively to time is less demanding. The championship-winning team could play as many as seven games total, but over a far more manageable stretch of roughly 40 days. Realisitically, Messi and Miami could win their first MLS Cup in only five matches between approximately Oct. 25 and the MLS Cup final on Dec. 6.

Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/ianquillen/2025/09/29/miami-depends-more-on-messi-under-mascherano-for-better-and-worse/

Sorumluluk Reddi: Bu sitede yeniden yayınlanan makaleler, halka açık platformlardan alınmıştır ve yalnızca bilgilendirme amaçlıdır. MEXC'nin görüşlerini yansıtmayabilir. Tüm hakları telif sahiplerine aittir. Herhangi bir içeriğin üçüncü taraf haklarını ihlal ettiğini düşünüyorsanız, kaldırılması için lütfen service@support.mexc.com ile iletişime geçin. MEXC, içeriğin doğruluğu, eksiksizliği veya güncelliği konusunda hiçbir garanti vermez ve sağlanan bilgilere dayalı olarak alınan herhangi bir eylemden sorumlu değildir. İçerik, finansal, yasal veya diğer profesyonel tavsiye niteliğinde değildir ve MEXC tarafından bir tavsiye veya onay olarak değerlendirilmemelidir.

Ayrıca Şunları da Beğenebilirsiniz

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Paylaş
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
SOLANA NETWORK Withstands 6 Tbps DDoS Without Downtime

SOLANA NETWORK Withstands 6 Tbps DDoS Without Downtime

The post SOLANA NETWORK Withstands 6 Tbps DDoS Without Downtime appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In a pivotal week for crypto infrastructure, the Solana network
Paylaş
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/16 20:44
Crucial Fed Rate Cut: October Probability Surges to 94%

Crucial Fed Rate Cut: October Probability Surges to 94%

BitcoinWorld Crucial Fed Rate Cut: October Probability Surges to 94% The financial world is buzzing with a significant development: the probability of a Fed rate cut in October has just seen a dramatic increase. This isn’t just a minor shift; it’s a monumental change that could ripple through global markets, including the dynamic cryptocurrency space. For anyone tracking economic indicators and their impact on investments, this update from the U.S. interest rate futures market is absolutely crucial. What Just Happened? Unpacking the FOMC Statement’s Impact Following the latest Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) statement, market sentiment has decisively shifted. Before the announcement, the U.S. interest rate futures market had priced in a 71.6% chance of an October rate cut. However, after the statement, this figure surged to an astounding 94%. This jump indicates that traders and analysts are now overwhelmingly confident that the Federal Reserve will lower interest rates next month. Such a high probability suggests a strong consensus emerging from the Fed’s latest communications and economic outlook. A Fed rate cut typically means cheaper borrowing costs for businesses and consumers, which can stimulate economic activity. But what does this really signify for investors, especially those in the digital asset realm? Why is a Fed Rate Cut So Significant for Markets? When the Federal Reserve adjusts interest rates, it sends powerful signals across the entire financial ecosystem. A rate cut generally implies a more accommodative monetary policy, often enacted to boost economic growth or combat deflationary pressures. Impact on Traditional Markets: Stocks: Lower interest rates can make borrowing cheaper for companies, potentially boosting earnings and making stocks more attractive compared to bonds. Bonds: Existing bonds with higher yields might become more valuable, but new bonds will likely offer lower returns. Dollar Strength: A rate cut can weaken the U.S. dollar, making exports cheaper and potentially benefiting multinational corporations. Potential for Cryptocurrency Markets: The cryptocurrency market, while often seen as uncorrelated, can still react significantly to macro-economic shifts. A Fed rate cut could be interpreted as: Increased Risk Appetite: With traditional investments offering lower returns, investors might seek higher-yielding or more volatile assets like cryptocurrencies. Inflation Hedge Narrative: If rate cuts are perceived as a precursor to inflation, assets like Bitcoin, often dubbed “digital gold,” could gain traction as an inflation hedge. Liquidity Influx: A more accommodative monetary environment generally means more liquidity in the financial system, some of which could flow into digital assets. Looking Ahead: What Could This Mean for Your Portfolio? While the 94% probability for a Fed rate cut in October is compelling, it’s essential to consider the nuances. Market probabilities can shift, and the Fed’s ultimate decision will depend on incoming economic data. Actionable Insights: Stay Informed: Continue to monitor economic reports, inflation data, and future Fed statements. Diversify: A diversified portfolio can help mitigate risks associated with sudden market shifts. Assess Risk Tolerance: Understand how a potential rate cut might affect your specific investments and adjust your strategy accordingly. This increased likelihood of a Fed rate cut presents both opportunities and challenges. It underscores the interconnectedness of traditional finance and the emerging digital asset space. Investors should remain vigilant and prepared for potential volatility. The financial landscape is always evolving, and the significant surge in the probability of an October Fed rate cut is a clear signal of impending change. From stimulating economic growth to potentially fueling interest in digital assets, the implications are vast. Staying informed and strategically positioned will be key as we approach this crucial decision point. The market is now almost certain of a rate cut, and understanding its potential ripple effects is paramount for every investor. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Q1: What is the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC)? A1: The FOMC is the monetary policymaking body of the Federal Reserve System. It sets the federal funds rate, which influences other interest rates and economic conditions. Q2: How does a Fed rate cut impact the U.S. dollar? A2: A rate cut typically makes the U.S. dollar less attractive to foreign investors seeking higher returns, potentially leading to a weakening of the dollar against other currencies. Q3: Why might a Fed rate cut be good for cryptocurrency? A3: Lower interest rates can reduce the appeal of traditional investments, encouraging investors to seek higher returns in alternative assets like cryptocurrencies. It can also be seen as a sign of increased liquidity or potential inflation, benefiting assets like Bitcoin. Q4: Is a 94% probability a guarantee of a rate cut? A4: While a 94% probability is very high, it is not a guarantee. Market probabilities reflect current sentiment and data, but the Federal Reserve’s final decision will depend on all available economic information leading up to their meeting. Q5: What should investors do in response to this news? A5: Investors should stay informed about economic developments, review their portfolio diversification, and assess their risk tolerance. Consider how potential changes in interest rates might affect different asset classes and adjust strategies as needed. Did you find this analysis helpful? Share this article with your network to keep others informed about the potential impact of the upcoming Fed rate cut and its implications for the financial markets! To learn more about the latest crypto market trends, explore our article on key developments shaping Bitcoin price action. This post Crucial Fed Rate Cut: October Probability Surges to 94% first appeared on BitcoinWorld.
Paylaş
Coinstats2025/09/18 02:25