The post UK ruling in Getty Images’ AI lawsuit leaves key IP questions unanswered appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The mixed ruling was claimed as a victory by both Stability AI and Getty Images, muddying the legal waters around AI and intellectual property. The United Kingdom’s High Court of Justice issued a mixed ruling on Tuesday in the Getty Images v. Stability AI intellectual property case filed in 2023, which mostly favored Stability AI but left key questions unanswered about AI’s use of copyrighted material. Getty owns a library of copyrighted online stock images — which it licenses to users for a fee — and alleged that Stability’s Stable Diffusion AI model, which is trained using online material, infringed upon its trademark and copyrighted material. Stability’s Stable Diffusion AI model infringed on Getty’s trademark by reproducing its watermark in certain cases. However, the findings were “extremely limited in scope,” Justice Joanna Smith ruled. Read more Source: https://cointelegraph.com/news/uk-ruling-getty-images-ai-lawsuit-ip?utm_source=rss_feed&utm_medium=feed%3F_refresh%3D7xf4f6%26_ts%3D1762438584933&utm_campaign=rss_partner_inboundThe post UK ruling in Getty Images’ AI lawsuit leaves key IP questions unanswered appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The mixed ruling was claimed as a victory by both Stability AI and Getty Images, muddying the legal waters around AI and intellectual property. The United Kingdom’s High Court of Justice issued a mixed ruling on Tuesday in the Getty Images v. Stability AI intellectual property case filed in 2023, which mostly favored Stability AI but left key questions unanswered about AI’s use of copyrighted material. Getty owns a library of copyrighted online stock images — which it licenses to users for a fee — and alleged that Stability’s Stable Diffusion AI model, which is trained using online material, infringed upon its trademark and copyrighted material. Stability’s Stable Diffusion AI model infringed on Getty’s trademark by reproducing its watermark in certain cases. However, the findings were “extremely limited in scope,” Justice Joanna Smith ruled. Read more Source: https://cointelegraph.com/news/uk-ruling-getty-images-ai-lawsuit-ip?utm_source=rss_feed&utm_medium=feed%3F_refresh%3D7xf4f6%26_ts%3D1762438584933&utm_campaign=rss_partner_inbound

UK ruling in Getty Images’ AI lawsuit leaves key IP questions unanswered

2025/11/06 22:18

The mixed ruling was claimed as a victory by both Stability AI and Getty Images, muddying the legal waters around AI and intellectual property.

The United Kingdom’s High Court of Justice issued a mixed ruling on Tuesday in the Getty Images v. Stability AI intellectual property case filed in 2023, which mostly favored Stability AI but left key questions unanswered about AI’s use of copyrighted material.

Getty owns a library of copyrighted online stock images — which it licenses to users for a fee — and alleged that Stability’s Stable Diffusion AI model, which is trained using online material, infringed upon its trademark and copyrighted material.

Stability’s Stable Diffusion AI model infringed on Getty’s trademark by reproducing its watermark in certain cases. However, the findings were “extremely limited in scope,” Justice Joanna Smith ruled.

Read more

Source: https://cointelegraph.com/news/uk-ruling-getty-images-ai-lawsuit-ip?utm_source=rss_feed&utm_medium=feed%3F_refresh%3D7xf4f6%26_ts%3D1762438584933&utm_campaign=rss_partner_inbound

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like