PANews reported on November 6th that UBS analysis indicates that if the US Supreme Court rules Trump's tariff policies illegal, it is expected to force the US government to refund approximately $140 billion in tariffs to importers, equivalent to 7.9% of the estimated federal budget deficit for fiscal year 2025. If the US government loses the case, the massive tax refund will immediately trigger a fiscal shock and may lead to a structurally low-tariff trade environment. If trading partners do not retaliate, this environment will ultimately benefit the US economy and stock market. UBS estimates that the government is likely to use legal tools such as Sections 201 and 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 to rebuild tariff barriers, but this process will take several quarters and reduce trade policy flexibility. While the refunds will bring unexpected profits to importing companies, the impact on the overall market may be limited because tariff costs have not significantly lowered S&P 500 earnings expectations. UBS believes that the ruling may ultimately reduce the overall effective tariff rate, increase household purchasing power, alleviate inflationary pressures, and provide the Federal Reserve with more room for interest rate cuts. This will generally be welcomed by stock market investors, provided that trading partners avoid escalating retaliatory measures.PANews reported on November 6th that UBS analysis indicates that if the US Supreme Court rules Trump's tariff policies illegal, it is expected to force the US government to refund approximately $140 billion in tariffs to importers, equivalent to 7.9% of the estimated federal budget deficit for fiscal year 2025. If the US government loses the case, the massive tax refund will immediately trigger a fiscal shock and may lead to a structurally low-tariff trade environment. If trading partners do not retaliate, this environment will ultimately benefit the US economy and stock market. UBS estimates that the government is likely to use legal tools such as Sections 201 and 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 to rebuild tariff barriers, but this process will take several quarters and reduce trade policy flexibility. While the refunds will bring unexpected profits to importing companies, the impact on the overall market may be limited because tariff costs have not significantly lowered S&P 500 earnings expectations. UBS believes that the ruling may ultimately reduce the overall effective tariff rate, increase household purchasing power, alleviate inflationary pressures, and provide the Federal Reserve with more room for interest rate cuts. This will generally be welcomed by stock market investors, provided that trading partners avoid escalating retaliatory measures.

UBS: If Trump's tariffs are overturned, the Fed may have an opportunity to cut interest rates amid fiscal pressure on the US.

2025/11/06 16:26

PANews reported on November 6th that UBS analysis indicates that if the US Supreme Court rules Trump's tariff policies illegal, it is expected to force the US government to refund approximately $140 billion in tariffs to importers, equivalent to 7.9% of the estimated federal budget deficit for fiscal year 2025. If the US government loses the case, the massive tax refund will immediately trigger a fiscal shock and may lead to a structurally low-tariff trade environment. If trading partners do not retaliate, this environment will ultimately benefit the US economy and stock market. UBS estimates that the government is likely to use legal tools such as Sections 201 and 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 to rebuild tariff barriers, but this process will take several quarters and reduce trade policy flexibility. While the refunds will bring unexpected profits to importing companies, the impact on the overall market may be limited because tariff costs have not significantly lowered S&P 500 earnings expectations. UBS believes that the ruling may ultimately reduce the overall effective tariff rate, increase household purchasing power, alleviate inflationary pressures, and provide the Federal Reserve with more room for interest rate cuts. This will generally be welcomed by stock market investors, provided that trading partners avoid escalating retaliatory measures.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

The post Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. “It’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress,” writes Pipes. Getty Images Washington is addicted to taxing success. Now, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is floating a plan to skim half the patent earnings from inventions developed at universities with federal funding. It’s being sold as a way to shore up programs like Social Security. In reality, it’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress. Yes, taxpayer dollars support early-stage research. But the real payoff comes later—in the jobs created, cures discovered, and industries launched when universities and private industry turn those discoveries into real products. By comparison, the sums at stake in patent licensing are trivial. Universities collectively earn only about $3.6 billion annually in patent income—less than the federal government spends on Social Security in a single day. Even confiscating half would barely register against a $6 trillion federal budget. And yet the damage from such a policy would be anything but trivial. The true return on taxpayer investment isn’t in licensing checks sent to Washington, but in the downstream economic activity that federally supported research unleashes. Thanks to the bipartisan Bayh-Dole Act of 1980, universities and private industry have powerful incentives to translate early-stage discoveries into real-world products. Before Bayh-Dole, the government hoarded patents from federally funded research, and fewer than 5% were ever licensed. Once universities could own and license their own inventions, innovation exploded. The result has been one of the best returns on investment in government history. Since 1996, university research has added nearly $2 trillion to U.S. industrial output, supported 6.5 million jobs, and launched more than 19,000 startups. Those companies pay…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 03:26