The post Polkadot community votes on pUSD stablecoin proposal appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Polkadot has opened voting on DOT-backed pUSD amid strong support and sharp criticism. The previous failed aUSD stablecoin project raises doubts over governance and technical trust. Polkadot founder Gavin Wood is pushing the stablecoin strategy to steady validator rewards. The Polkadot community is weighing one of its most consequential proposals to date, a plan to launch a native stablecoin backed entirely by DOT tokens. Known as pUSD, the project is being debated through an on-chain referendum that has quickly attracted strong interest, passionate support, and sharp criticism in equal measure. Polkadot’s push for a native stablecoin The proposal was introduced by Bryan Chen, co-founder and chief technology officer of Acala, through RFC-155. The proposal aims to deploy a DOT-backed stablecoin on Polkadot’s Asset Hub, utilising the Honzon protocol. For reference, Honzon previously powered Acala’s failed aUSD stablecoin, a connection that has fueled both technical optimism and community mistrust. Chen has argued that Polkadot must have a native, decentralised stablecoin to reduce reliance on USDT and USDC, which dominate the ecosystem with a combined market share of more than $74 million. Without such a move, Chen warned, the network risks losing liquidity and strategic advantages to competing chains that already feature their own native stablecoins. At the time of writing, more than 74.6% of votes are cast in favour of the measure, though it has not yet reached the 79.7% approval threshold required for passage. Over $5.6 million worth of DOT, amounting to more than 1.4 million tokens, has already been committed to the vote. The vote remains open for another three weeks, ensuring that the outcome is far from certain. Acala’s memories and community doubts While the case for a DOT-backed stablecoin is clear to many, memories of Acala’s collapse in 2022 still hang over the debate. Acala’s aUSD project… The post Polkadot community votes on pUSD stablecoin proposal appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Polkadot has opened voting on DOT-backed pUSD amid strong support and sharp criticism. The previous failed aUSD stablecoin project raises doubts over governance and technical trust. Polkadot founder Gavin Wood is pushing the stablecoin strategy to steady validator rewards. The Polkadot community is weighing one of its most consequential proposals to date, a plan to launch a native stablecoin backed entirely by DOT tokens. Known as pUSD, the project is being debated through an on-chain referendum that has quickly attracted strong interest, passionate support, and sharp criticism in equal measure. Polkadot’s push for a native stablecoin The proposal was introduced by Bryan Chen, co-founder and chief technology officer of Acala, through RFC-155. The proposal aims to deploy a DOT-backed stablecoin on Polkadot’s Asset Hub, utilising the Honzon protocol. For reference, Honzon previously powered Acala’s failed aUSD stablecoin, a connection that has fueled both technical optimism and community mistrust. Chen has argued that Polkadot must have a native, decentralised stablecoin to reduce reliance on USDT and USDC, which dominate the ecosystem with a combined market share of more than $74 million. Without such a move, Chen warned, the network risks losing liquidity and strategic advantages to competing chains that already feature their own native stablecoins. At the time of writing, more than 74.6% of votes are cast in favour of the measure, though it has not yet reached the 79.7% approval threshold required for passage. Over $5.6 million worth of DOT, amounting to more than 1.4 million tokens, has already been committed to the vote. The vote remains open for another three weeks, ensuring that the outcome is far from certain. Acala’s memories and community doubts While the case for a DOT-backed stablecoin is clear to many, memories of Acala’s collapse in 2022 still hang over the debate. Acala’s aUSD project…

Polkadot community votes on pUSD stablecoin proposal

2025/09/30 04:30
  • Polkadot has opened voting on DOT-backed pUSD amid strong support and sharp criticism.
  • The previous failed aUSD stablecoin project raises doubts over governance and technical trust.
  • Polkadot founder Gavin Wood is pushing the stablecoin strategy to steady validator rewards.

The Polkadot community is weighing one of its most consequential proposals to date, a plan to launch a native stablecoin backed entirely by DOT tokens.

Known as pUSD, the project is being debated through an on-chain referendum that has quickly attracted strong interest, passionate support, and sharp criticism in equal measure.

Polkadot’s push for a native stablecoin

The proposal was introduced by Bryan Chen, co-founder and chief technology officer of Acala, through RFC-155.

The proposal aims to deploy a DOT-backed stablecoin on Polkadot’s Asset Hub, utilising the Honzon protocol.

For reference, Honzon previously powered Acala’s failed aUSD stablecoin, a connection that has fueled both technical optimism and community mistrust.

Chen has argued that Polkadot must have a native, decentralised stablecoin to reduce reliance on USDT and USDC, which dominate the ecosystem with a combined market share of more than $74 million.

Without such a move, Chen warned, the network risks losing liquidity and strategic advantages to competing chains that already feature their own native stablecoins.

At the time of writing, more than 74.6% of votes are cast in favour of the measure, though it has not yet reached the 79.7% approval threshold required for passage.

Over $5.6 million worth of DOT, amounting to more than 1.4 million tokens, has already been committed to the vote.

The vote remains open for another three weeks, ensuring that the outcome is far from certain.

Acala’s memories and community doubts

While the case for a DOT-backed stablecoin is clear to many, memories of Acala’s collapse in 2022 still hang over the debate.

Acala’s aUSD project was crippled after an exploit, leading to a loss of trust and financial damage that rippled across the ecosystem.

Critics argue that no one involved with Acala should be tasked with launching another stablecoin, no matter the technical merits of the underlying protocol.

Some of the network’s most vocal participants have voted against the measure, pointing to the risk of repeating past mistakes.

The group known as TheGlobedotters stated that Acala should never again be entrusted with a strategic project of this scale, while others stressed the need for strict oversight from Polkadot’s Technical Fellowship before any stablecoin could be deployed.

The White Rabbit, another community member, opposed the proposal but suggested they could support it under conditions that explicitly exclude Acala from development and guarantee robust governance safeguards.

Gavin Wood outlines the broader vision for Polkadot

Polkadot founder Gavin Wood has added weight to the conversation by articulating a wider strategy for stablecoins within the ecosystem.

Earlier this month, Wood argued that Polkadot must pursue multiple approaches, including fully collateralised native stablecoins and what he termed “stable-ish” assets designed to reduce, but not eliminate, DOT’s volatility.

Wood also highlighted validator incentives as a key consideration. He has floated the idea of paying validators directly in a DOT-backed stablecoin such as pUSD, instead of volatile DOT rewards.

This shift, Wood argued, would stabilise validator income, attract institutional participants, and strengthen the network’s long-term security model.

Under the design, DOT would be used as collateral, and PUSD would be minted against it with liquidation mechanisms ensuring the peg remains intact.

Supporters say this could solve a long-standing problem of validator earnings fluctuating sharply as DOT’s price swings.

Source: https://coinjournal.net/news/polkadot-community-votes-on-pusd-stablecoin-proposal/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Critical Victory: US Senate Passes Temporary Budget Bill Ending Government Shutdown Crisis

Critical Victory: US Senate Passes Temporary Budget Bill Ending Government Shutdown Crisis

BitcoinWorld Critical Victory: US Senate Passes Temporary Budget Bill Ending Government Shutdown Crisis In a crucial political breakthrough, the US Senate has approved a temporary budget bill that resolves the looming government shutdown crisis. This decisive action brings relief to millions of Americans and federal workers who faced uncertainty about government operations and services. What Does the Temporary Budget Bill Accomplish? The newly passed temporary budget bill provides essential government funding through January, ensuring continuous operation of federal agencies and services. This stopgap measure passed with a solid 60-40 vote margin, demonstrating bipartisan support for keeping the government functioning. Following the bill’s approval, President Donald Trump expressed optimism about the shutdown ending soon. The temporary budget bill represents a practical solution that allows more time for comprehensive budget negotiations while preventing immediate disruption to government services. Why Was This Temporary Budget Bill Necessary? Government shutdowns create widespread consequences that affect: Federal employee pay and benefits Essential public services National park operations Economic stability and market confidence The temporary budget bill serves as a bridge solution, providing lawmakers additional time to reach consensus on longer-term funding arrangements. This approach prevents the damaging effects of a full government shutdown while maintaining critical operations. How Does the Political Process Unfold From Here? With the temporary budget bill now passed, attention shifts to the House of Representatives and presidential approval. The legislative process requires both chambers to agree on identical versions before the bill reaches the President’s desk for signature. This temporary budget bill success follows reports of senators reaching partial agreements earlier in the week. The 60-40 vote margin indicates significant cross-party cooperation, suggesting growing consensus around the urgency of avoiding a government shutdown. What Are the Immediate Impacts of This Decision? The passage of this temporary budget bill brings several immediate benefits: Federal workers can continue their duties without interruption Government services remain accessible to citizens Economic uncertainty decreases International confidence in US stability strengthens Moreover, the temporary budget bill creates a stable environment for businesses and individuals who rely on consistent government operations. This stability is crucial for maintaining economic momentum and public confidence. Looking Ahead: What Comes After This Temporary Budget Bill? While this temporary budget bill resolves the immediate crisis, it sets the stage for more comprehensive budget negotiations in the coming months. Lawmakers now have until January to develop a longer-term funding solution that addresses broader fiscal priorities. The successful passage of this temporary budget bill demonstrates that bipartisan cooperation remains possible in challenging political environments. It serves as a model for future negotiations and highlights the importance of pragmatic solutions over ideological standoffs. Frequently Asked Questions What is a temporary budget bill? A temporary budget bill, often called a continuing resolution, provides short-term funding to keep government operations running when full-year budgets aren’t approved by the deadline. How long does this temporary budget bill last? This specific temporary budget bill funds the government through January, giving lawmakers several months to negotiate a more comprehensive budget agreement. What happens if a temporary budget bill isn’t passed? Without a temporary budget bill or full budget approval, the government would partially shut down, furloughing non-essential workers and suspending many services. Can the temporary budget bill be extended? Yes, temporary budget bills can be extended if lawmakers need additional time to reach agreement on longer-term funding solutions. What services continue during temporary budget periods? Essential services like national security, air traffic control, and law enforcement continue, while non-essential services may operate with reduced staffing. How does this affect federal employees? Federal employees continue working and receiving pay during temporary budget bill periods, avoiding the uncertainty of potential furloughs. Found this analysis helpful? Share this article with others who need to understand how the temporary budget bill affects our government and economy. Your shares help spread accurate information about important political developments. To learn more about how government decisions impact financial markets, explore our article on key developments shaping economic policy and market reactions. This post Critical Victory: US Senate Passes Temporary Budget Bill Ending Government Shutdown Crisis first appeared on BitcoinWorld.
Share
Coinstats2025/11/10 12:10