The post How Does Netflix’s ‘Frankenstein’ Compare To The Original Novel? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Mia Goth in Netflix’s ‘Frankenstein’ Netflix Guillermo Del Toro’s Frankenstein makes major changes to the story of Mary Shelley’s original novel, and some proved controversial. In some ways, Del Toro’s monster is more faithful to the eloquent, philosophically-minded creature of the book—pop culture has long depicted Frankenstein’s monster as a grunting, lumbering oaf. However, the plot of the Netflix film is significantly different to the original story—here’s how Del Toro’s Frankenstein departs from the novel. Differences Between Netflix’s ‘Frankenstein’ And The Novel, Explained In the Netflix film, Victor Frankenstein (Oscar Isaac) is shown to be the genius son of an abusive father (Charles Dance), and is severely traumatized by the death of his mother, who is essentially murdered by his father’s medical neglect. This fateful tragedy motivates Victor to become obsessed with mastering life and death via science, while his father’s influence can be seen in the way he “parents” the monster. This is in stark contrast to Mary Shelley’s novel, which shows that Victor enjoyed an immensely happy childhood with two loving parents. Victor’s mother also dies young, but Victor’s ambition to create unnatural life is motivated by his obsession with alchemy. Once Victor Frankenstein brings his creature to life, he doesn’t abuse it, but he abandons it immediately, simply because it looks and feels wrong. The Monster’s Appearance The iconic image of Frankenstein’s monster that we see in pop culture comes from the 1931 film starring Boris Karloff, whose creature is a dim-witted, square-headed zombie, stitched together from corpse parts. Closeup of Boris Karloff as the monster in a scene from “Frankenstein”. Bettmann Archive Del Toro’s monster (played by Jacob Elordi) is covered with scars and seams, with blueish skin and a neanderthal brow—he eventually grows long, thick hair, giving him a more romantic, haunted vibe than previous… The post How Does Netflix’s ‘Frankenstein’ Compare To The Original Novel? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Mia Goth in Netflix’s ‘Frankenstein’ Netflix Guillermo Del Toro’s Frankenstein makes major changes to the story of Mary Shelley’s original novel, and some proved controversial. In some ways, Del Toro’s monster is more faithful to the eloquent, philosophically-minded creature of the book—pop culture has long depicted Frankenstein’s monster as a grunting, lumbering oaf. However, the plot of the Netflix film is significantly different to the original story—here’s how Del Toro’s Frankenstein departs from the novel. Differences Between Netflix’s ‘Frankenstein’ And The Novel, Explained In the Netflix film, Victor Frankenstein (Oscar Isaac) is shown to be the genius son of an abusive father (Charles Dance), and is severely traumatized by the death of his mother, who is essentially murdered by his father’s medical neglect. This fateful tragedy motivates Victor to become obsessed with mastering life and death via science, while his father’s influence can be seen in the way he “parents” the monster. This is in stark contrast to Mary Shelley’s novel, which shows that Victor enjoyed an immensely happy childhood with two loving parents. Victor’s mother also dies young, but Victor’s ambition to create unnatural life is motivated by his obsession with alchemy. Once Victor Frankenstein brings his creature to life, he doesn’t abuse it, but he abandons it immediately, simply because it looks and feels wrong. The Monster’s Appearance The iconic image of Frankenstein’s monster that we see in pop culture comes from the 1931 film starring Boris Karloff, whose creature is a dim-witted, square-headed zombie, stitched together from corpse parts. Closeup of Boris Karloff as the monster in a scene from “Frankenstein”. Bettmann Archive Del Toro’s monster (played by Jacob Elordi) is covered with scars and seams, with blueish skin and a neanderthal brow—he eventually grows long, thick hair, giving him a more romantic, haunted vibe than previous…

How Does Netflix’s ‘Frankenstein’ Compare To The Original Novel?

2025/11/09 23:18

Mia Goth in Netflix’s ‘Frankenstein’

Netflix

Guillermo Del Toro’s Frankenstein makes major changes to the story of Mary Shelley’s original novel, and some proved controversial.

In some ways, Del Toro’s monster is more faithful to the eloquent, philosophically-minded creature of the book—pop culture has long depicted Frankenstein’s monster as a grunting, lumbering oaf.

However, the plot of the Netflix film is significantly different to the original story—here’s how Del Toro’s Frankenstein departs from the novel.

Differences Between Netflix’s ‘Frankenstein’ And The Novel, Explained

In the Netflix film, Victor Frankenstein (Oscar Isaac) is shown to be the genius son of an abusive father (Charles Dance), and is severely traumatized by the death of his mother, who is essentially murdered by his father’s medical neglect.

This fateful tragedy motivates Victor to become obsessed with mastering life and death via science, while his father’s influence can be seen in the way he “parents” the monster.

This is in stark contrast to Mary Shelley’s novel, which shows that Victor enjoyed an immensely happy childhood with two loving parents. Victor’s mother also dies young, but Victor’s ambition to create unnatural life is motivated by his obsession with alchemy.

Once Victor Frankenstein brings his creature to life, he doesn’t abuse it, but he abandons it immediately, simply because it looks and feels wrong.

The Monster’s Appearance

The iconic image of Frankenstein’s monster that we see in pop culture comes from the 1931 film starring Boris Karloff, whose creature is a dim-witted, square-headed zombie, stitched together from corpse parts.

Closeup of Boris Karloff as the monster in a scene from “Frankenstein”.

Bettmann Archive

Del Toro’s monster (played by Jacob Elordi) is covered with scars and seams, with blueish skin and a neanderthal brow—he eventually grows long, thick hair, giving him a more romantic, haunted vibe than previous depictions.

Jacob Elordi as the monster in Netflix’s ‘Frankenstein’

Netflix

The original novel describes the creature as having stretched yellow skin, bright white teeth, watery eyes and blackened lips. Interestingly, the novel does not state that the monster is stitched together from corpses.

Mary Shelley is surprisingly vague when describing how Frankenstein actually made his monster, leaving much of the process to the imagination.

There are hints that Victor might have used old bones and body parts to build the structure of the body, but it seems as though he is creating much of the flesh himself, using a mysterious alchemical process.

The book sees Victor Frankenstein attempt to create a beautiful person, but when the creature comes to life, it invokes the uncanny valley, rather like an AI-generated image, and Victor abandons his creation.

The Monster’s Personality

While Del Toro is faithful to the intelligence and brooding melancholy of Shelley’s monster, his Netflix adaptation takes great pains to portray the creature as completely innocent, and Victor as the indisputable villain of the story.

Shelley’s novel is far more ambiguous regarding the morality of Victor and his monster—both prove more than capable of violence, cowardice, and selfishness.

However, the Netflix film frames all the death and destruction around the monster as either an accident or Victor’s fault—the monster accidentally slays Victor’s brother, William (Felix Kammerer), and Victor accidentally shoots Elizabeth (Mia Goth), who is in love with the creature.

In the book, the monster murders William (who is only a child) in anger, and frames the family housekeeper, Justine, for the murder—Victor doesn’t speak in her defense, even as she is hanged.

Instead of sharing a simmering, forbidden love affair, the monster brutally slays Elizabeth in revenge after Victor backtracks on his promise to create a monstrous bride.

Del Toro’s film sees the monster and Elizabeth pining for one another (which makes one question the monster’s need for a bride). She dies after Victor mistakenly shoots her, attempting to kill the creature.

The film flattens the complicated dynamic of the novel—two deeply troubled men, creator and monster, are reduced to the role of abusive father and innocent son.

The Ending Of ‘Frankenstein’

The ending of Del Toro’s Frankenstein sees the creator and monster sharing a moment of peace and mutual understanding.

Victor soon dies and the monster does a good deed for humanity before watching the sunrise, savoring being alive.

This is different from the ending of the book, which also sees Victor dying, but the monster bitterly regrets the terrible crimes he has committed and vows to burn himself alive (in the original story, the monster does not have the regeneration powers of the Netflix film).

Guillermo Del Toro’s Frankenstein paints a sympathetic portrait, but it also sanitizes the creature, spelling out to the viewer that Victor is the real monster.

MORE FROM FORBES

ForbesThe Ending Of Guillermo Del Toro’s ‘Frankenstein,’ ExplainedForbesCoca-Cola Sparks Backlash With AI-Generated Christmas Ad, AgainForbes‘It: Welcome To Derry’—Who (Or What) Is Pennywise?ForbesThe Twist Ending Of ‘Weapons,’ Explained

Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/danidiplacido/2025/11/09/how-does-netflixs-frankenstein-compare-to-the-original-novel/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Laver Cup Begins in San Francisco, But Can’t Match Ryder Cup Fever

The Laver Cup Begins in San Francisco, But Can’t Match Ryder Cup Fever

The post The Laver Cup Begins in San Francisco, But Can’t Match Ryder Cup Fever appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA – MARCH 8: Roger Federer stands outside Chase Center as part of the Laver Cup San Francisco Launch for 2025 on March 8, 2024 in San Francisco, California. (Photo by Loren Elliott/Getty Images for Laver Cup) Getty Images for Laver Cup The Laver Cup is back in the United States as its eighth edition takes place at the Chase Centre in San Francisco, starting on Friday. Andre Agassi takes the captaincy reins from John McEnroe for Team World, which features top ten stars Taylor Fritz and Alex de Minaur alongside Brazilian wonderkid Joao Fonseca. Team Europe’s lineup boasts new world No. 1 Carlos Alcaraz and world No. 3 Alexander Zverev, with Casper Ruud and Holger Rune making an impressive front four on the grid. Europe have won the event five times in the seven iterations so far under the watchful eye of Bjorn Borg. The charismatic former French Open champion Yannick Noah skippers the team as Tim Henman comes in as vice-captain. “I’ve talked to many of the players and they say it’s one of the most fun events to play in, a great event,” said Rune ahead of the Open Practice Day. The Laver Cup was the brainchild of Roger Federer and his longtime agent Tony Godsick. The original concept was to bring about the best of the past, present and future of tennis in a weekend event that could match the team and individual dynamic of the Ryder Cup. The singles and fourballs of golf can easily be swapped into tennis terminology as nine singles and three doubles build to a (potentially) thrilling last day of competition with the first to reach 13 points declared the winner. In the Ryder Cup, 14 and a half points are needed to win outright. Laver Cup CEO Steve…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/19 07:41
Edges higher ahead of BoC-Fed policy outcome

Edges higher ahead of BoC-Fed policy outcome

The post Edges higher ahead of BoC-Fed policy outcome appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. USD/CAD gains marginally to near 1.3760 ahead of monetary policy announcements by the Fed and the BoC. Both the Fed and the BoC are expected to lower interest rates. USD/CAD forms a Head and Shoulder chart pattern. The USD/CAD pair ticks up to near 1.3760 during the late European session on Wednesday. The Loonie pair gains marginally ahead of monetary policy outcomes by the Bank of Canada (BoC) and the Federal Reserve (Fed) during New York trading hours. Both the BoC and the Fed are expected to cut interest rates amid mounting labor market conditions in their respective economies. Inflationary pressures in the Canadian economy have cooled down, emerging as another reason behind the BoC’s dovish expectations. However, the Fed is expected to start the monetary-easing campaign despite the United States (US) inflation remaining higher. Investors will closely monitor press conferences from both Fed Chair Jerome Powell and BoC Governor Tiff Macklem to get cues about whether there will be more interest rate cuts in the remainder of the year. According to analysts from Barclays, the Fed’s latest median projections for interest rates are likely to call for three interest rate cuts by 2025. Ahead of the Fed’s monetary policy, the US Dollar Index (DXY), which tracks the Greenback’s value against six major currencies, holds onto Tuesday’s losses near 96.60. USD/CAD forms a Head and Shoulder chart pattern, which indicates a bearish reversal. The neckline of the above-mentioned chart pattern is plotted near 1.3715. The near-term trend of the pair remains bearish as it stays below the 20-day Exponential Moving Average (EMA), which trades around 1.3800. The 14-day Relative Strength Index (RSI) slides to near 40.00. A fresh bearish momentum would emerge if the RSI falls below that level. Going forward, the asset could slide towards the round level of…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:23