Ethereum continues to trade inside a deeply compressed downtrend, with repeated rejections from lower-high resistance. While the broader structure remains bearish, signs of sell-side exhaustion and deep liquidity pockets above the price keep the door open for a relief expansion if buyers reclaim key levels. Technical Analysis By Shayan The Daily Chart Ethereum has extended […]Ethereum continues to trade inside a deeply compressed downtrend, with repeated rejections from lower-high resistance. While the broader structure remains bearish, signs of sell-side exhaustion and deep liquidity pockets above the price keep the door open for a relief expansion if buyers reclaim key levels. Technical Analysis By Shayan The Daily Chart Ethereum has extended […]

Ethereum Price Analysis: Bearish Structure Intact Until ETH Reclaims This Key Level

2025/11/17 00:24

Ethereum continues to trade inside a deeply compressed downtrend, with repeated rejections from lower-high resistance. While the broader structure remains bearish, signs of sell-side exhaustion and deep liquidity pockets above the price keep the door open for a relief expansion if buyers reclaim key levels.

Technical Analysis

By Shayan

The Daily Chart

Ethereum has extended its decline within a persistent descending channel, repeatedly failing to break above the 100-day and 200-day moving averages, both of which have now turned into dynamic resistance. The most recent rejection from the $3.8K supply cluster confirms the dominance of sellers in the upper half of the structure.

The asset has now stabilized directly inside the $3K–$3.1K demand block. This region has historically attracted medium-term buyers and is reinforced by a visible positive divergence in the RSI, indicating a slowdown in bearish momentum. However, unless the price reclaims the $3.45K–$3.55K breaker block, the market remains vulnerable to continued pressure toward the deeper $2.6K demand zone.

If a daily close returns above the broken trendline and the 200-day MA, the broader structure could shift, opening the path for a mid-trend recovery toward the $3.8K liquidity band.

The 4-Hour Chart

On the 4H timeframe, ETH continues to move within a sharp falling wedge. Each attempt to break higher has been rejected at the descending trendline and at the aligned $3.55K and $3.8K supply zones. These stacked supply layers have repeatedly capped upside attempts.

The price is now trading close to the wedge’s lower boundary and just above the main liquidity pool spanning the $3K zone. The presence of long downside wicks indicates aggressive buyer absorption, matching the corrective nature of the wedge. If Ethereum manages to reclaim the $3.35K intraday pivot, a short-term shift toward the $3.55K region becomes likely.

Failure at this midpoint would keep the falling-wedge continuation intact and sustain the probability of a retest of $3K or even a brief deviation below it before any meaningful reversal.

Onchain Analysis

By Shayan

The two-week liquidation heatmap highlights a dense concentration of resting long liquidations overhead, especially between $3.6K and $3.9K. This bright cluster is the primary liquidity magnet for any upward expansion. Historically, Ethereum tends to gravitate toward these high-liquidity shelves when the market enters a short-term relief phase.

Below the price, the liquidity is far thinner, meaning any downward continuation is likely to be sharp but short-lived, driven more by stop-runs than sustained selling. The largest imbalance sits at $3.8K–$3.9K, suggesting that if Ethereum manages to reclaim structure at $3.45K, a swift squeeze into that band becomes the most probable scenario.

The post Ethereum Price Analysis: Bearish Structure Intact Until ETH Reclaims This Key Level appeared first on CryptoPotato.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Is Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX) a strong mutual fund pick right now?

Is Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX) a strong mutual fund pick right now?

The post Is Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX) a strong mutual fund pick right now? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. On the lookout for a Sector – Tech fund? Starting with Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX – Free Report) should not be a possibility at this time. PGTAX possesses a Zacks Mutual Fund Rank of 4 (Sell), which is based on various forecasting factors like size, cost, and past performance. Objective We note that PGTAX is a Sector – Tech option, and this area is loaded with many options. Found in a wide number of industries such as semiconductors, software, internet, and networking, tech companies are everywhere. Thus, Sector – Tech mutual funds that invest in technology let investors own a stake in a notoriously volatile sector, but with a much more diversified approach. History of fund/manager Putnam Funds is based in Canton, MA, and is the manager of PGTAX. The Putnam Global Technology A made its debut in January of 2009 and PGTAX has managed to accumulate roughly $650.01 million in assets, as of the most recently available information. The fund is currently managed by Di Yao who has been in charge of the fund since December of 2012. Performance Obviously, what investors are looking for in these funds is strong performance relative to their peers. PGTAX has a 5-year annualized total return of 14.46%, and is in the middle third among its category peers. But if you are looking for a shorter time frame, it is also worth looking at its 3-year annualized total return of 27.02%, which places it in the middle third during this time-frame. It is important to note that the product’s returns may not reflect all its expenses. Any fees not reflected would lower the returns. Total returns do not reflect the fund’s [%] sale charge. If sales charges were included, total returns would have been lower. When looking at a fund’s performance, it…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 04:05