A stake of over 500 million dollars on Solana shines the spotlight on Helius Medical Technologies (Helius).A stake of over 500 million dollars on Solana shines the spotlight on Helius Medical Technologies (Helius).

Helius launches a $500 million treasury on Solana: shares over 200%

solana helius

A stake of over 500 million dollars on Solana shines a spotlight on Helius Medical Technologies (Helius): the plan involves keeping SOL in treasury reserve, with the aim of expanding the portfolio to a potential of approximately 1.25 billion dollars thanks to warrants. The news is also confirmed by the official statement published by the company on September 15, 2025. In this context, the shares fluctuate in pre-market with a rally exceeding 200%, while the SOL token records a 4% drop on a daily basis according to public market data.

According to data collected by market analysts and verified with on‑chain explorers, the pre‑market rally on September 15, 2025, coincided with significant movements between institutional wallets and custody addresses. Industry observers note that the combination of direct holding, staking on Solana, and warrants can increase the liquidity available for the treasury but also introduces elements of leverage and dilution to monitor.

Helius invests in Solana and soars on the Stock Exchange: what happened in brief

On September 15, 2025, Helius Medical Technologies (ticker HSDT) announced the launch of a treasury-focused company on Solana (SOL) through a private financing exceeding 500 million dollars. The investment vehicle, aimed at holding SOL as a reserve asset, plans to increase the overall endowment to approximately 1.25 billion dollars through the issuance of warrants.

The market reacted with a pre-market rally of HSDT shares exceeding 200%, with prices surpassing $24 in the pre-market session on September 15, 2025. That said, in the same time frame, SOL experienced a daily decline of about 4% (market data published on September 15, 2025).

Key Numbers

  • Initial capital raised: over 500 million dollars (private funding announced on September 15, 2025)
  • Potential expansion through warrants: up to approximately 1.25 billion dollars
  • Indicative staking yield: ~7% annually (variable based on network conditions; data updated as of September 16, 2025, source: Staking Rewards)
  • Reference competitor: Forward Industries (FORD), recently highlighted with a declared allocation of approximately 1.65 billion dollars
  • Purchases reported by Forward: approximately 6.8 million SOL for a value of about 1.58 billion dollars.

Who is behind it and how the governance is structured

The round was led by Pantera Capital and Summer Capital. Among the investors are Animoca Brands, FalconX, and HashKey Capital. Joseph Chee from Summer Capital is set to take on the role of executive chairman to lead the digital strategy, alongside Cosmo Jiang and Dan Morehead from Pantera Capital. In this context, the governance includes a structure focused on custody, risk management, and compliance, which are fundamental elements for an operation of this magnitude.

Why a Treasury on Solana: The Operational Strategy

Helius’s plan is structured along three main lines: holding SOL as a reserve, generating income through staking, and targeted investment in DeFi projects and lending operations to increase revenue. The goal is to combine recurring yield and liquidity while maintaining a risk profile consistent with a listed issuer. It should be noted that building solid processes is central to preserving consistency between expected returns and risk control.

Staking SOL: yield and method

Staking on Solana generates rewards that, net of validator fees, generally range between 6% and 8% APY. The estimate of ~7% APY is consistent with recent data, although variable depending on network inflation, participation rate, and fees applied by validators. For further insights, you can consult the Staking Rewards page or explorers like Solana Beach. It is essential to report the reference date for yield calculation (e.g., September 16, 2025) and details regarding the applied fee to ensure consistent comparisons over time.

The Comparison with Forward Industries: Models Compared

Helius is part of the new wave of Digital Asset Treasuries (DAT). While Helius focuses on an emerging model that integrates staking and warrant instruments, Forward adopts a strategy of accumulation and frequent communication with the market. In fact, the two paths reflect different operational priorities while converging on the SOL asset.

These differentiated approaches highlight how the plurality of strategies can not only accelerate the adoption of SOL as a corporate reserve but also raise higher standards in terms of transparency, on-chain audit, and custody quality.

Market Impact: Signals and Readings

The rise of HSDT stock, with an increase of over 200% in the pre-market on September 15, 2025, highlights the positive effect that news about well-integrated digital assets can have on small-cap companies. At the same time, the daily decline of SOL underscores how the crypto market, although deep and liquid, reacts less uniformly to isolated corporate news. That said, the creation of more Digital Asset Treasuries could, in perspective, increase the structural demand for SOL, while also raising the token’s sensitivity to concentrated treasury flows.

Risks, limits, and scenarios

  • Price Volatility: a correction of SOL by even 30% on a quarterly basis could erode the book value of the treasury, surpassing the annual yield obtained from staking.
  • Custody risk: the choice of the custodian, asset segregation, and insurance coverage are crucial to mitigate risks. In this regard, innovative custody services are gaining traction in the European and global market.
  • Operational/DeFi Risk: potential vulnerabilities in smart contracts, exploits, liquidity issues of protocols, and counterparty risks in lending activities represent additional criticalities.
  • Regulatory risk: potential changes in the regulation of accounting treatments, disclosure requirements, and restrictions on crypto investments could impact treasury operations.
  • Concentration: a strong exposure to a single asset like SOL increases the systemic risk in the company’s balance sheet.

Mini‑FAQ

What is the yield of staking SOL?

In recent conditions, the gross yield of SOL staking has settled around ~7% APY (data updated as of September 16, 2025), although this value varies depending on network parameters, validator fees, and other factors. It is important to periodically update the measure indicating the reference date and epoch.

What are warrants and how do they impact the 1.25 billion target?

Warrants are financial instruments that grant the right to purchase shares at a predefined price within a certain expiration date. For Helius, the exercise of the warrants could expand the overall treasury allocation to approximately 1.25 billion dollars, according to the terms communicated in the official statement.

How can a treasury be structured on Solana in a company?

The creation of a treasury on Solana requires the establishment of well-defined policies in terms of governance, asset custody, and risk management, along with procedures for staking, liquidity management, and transparency in reporting. Independent audits and compliance practices help mitigate operational risk. 

What is a Digital Asset Treasury (DAT)?

A Digital Asset Treasury is a structure that manages digital assets, such as SOL, aimed at ensuring both yield—through staking and investments in sectors like DeFi—and liquidity, within the framework of rigorous controls and corporate reporting.

Conclusion

The launch of the Solana treasury by Helius represents a significant step towards the integration of digital assets into corporate balance sheets. If well-structured and governed, these vehicles can offer a combination of staking yield and discipline in treasury management, while highlighting risks related to volatility, custody, and compliance. The comparison with the model adopted by Forward Industries shows that, beyond size, the key factors will be transparency, operational method, and quality of execution.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

FCA komt in 2026 met aangepaste cryptoregels voor Britse markt

FCA komt in 2026 met aangepaste cryptoregels voor Britse markt

De Britse financiële waakhond, de FCA, komt in 2026 met nieuwe regels speciaal voor crypto bedrijven. Wat direct opvalt: de toezichthouder laat enkele klassieke financiële verplichtingen los om beter aan te sluiten op de snelle en grillige wereld van digitale activa. Tegelijkertijd wordt er extra nadruk gelegd op digitale beveiliging,... Het bericht FCA komt in 2026 met aangepaste cryptoregels voor Britse markt verscheen het eerst op Blockchain Stories.
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 00:33
United States Building Permits Change dipped from previous -2.8% to -3.7% in August

United States Building Permits Change dipped from previous -2.8% to -3.7% in August

The post United States Building Permits Change dipped from previous -2.8% to -3.7% in August appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Information on these pages contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Markets and instruments profiled on this page are for informational purposes only and should not in any way come across as a recommendation to buy or sell in these assets. You should do your own thorough research before making any investment decisions. FXStreet does not in any way guarantee that this information is free from mistakes, errors, or material misstatements. It also does not guarantee that this information is of a timely nature. Investing in Open Markets involves a great deal of risk, including the loss of all or a portion of your investment, as well as emotional distress. All risks, losses and costs associated with investing, including total loss of principal, are your responsibility. The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of FXStreet nor its advertisers. The author will not be held responsible for information that is found at the end of links posted on this page. If not otherwise explicitly mentioned in the body of the article, at the time of writing, the author has no position in any stock mentioned in this article and no business relationship with any company mentioned. The author has not received compensation for writing this article, other than from FXStreet. FXStreet and the author do not provide personalized recommendations. The author makes no representations as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of this information. FXStreet and the author will not be liable for any errors, omissions or any losses, injuries or damages arising from this information and its display or use. Errors and omissions excepted. The author and FXStreet are not registered investment advisors and nothing in this article is intended…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:20
Google's AP2 protocol has been released. Does encrypted AI still have a chance?

Google's AP2 protocol has been released. Does encrypted AI still have a chance?

Following the MCP and A2A protocols, the AI Agent market has seen another blockbuster arrival: the Agent Payments Protocol (AP2), developed by Google. This will clearly further enhance AI Agents' autonomous multi-tasking capabilities, but the unfortunate reality is that it has little to do with web3AI. Let's take a closer look: What problem does AP2 solve? Simply put, the MCP protocol is like a universal hook, enabling AI agents to connect to various external tools and data sources; A2A is a team collaboration communication protocol that allows multiple AI agents to cooperate with each other to complete complex tasks; AP2 completes the last piece of the puzzle - payment capability. In other words, MCP opens up connectivity, A2A promotes collaboration efficiency, and AP2 achieves value exchange. The arrival of AP2 truly injects "soul" into the autonomous collaboration and task execution of Multi-Agents. Imagine AI Agents connecting Qunar, Meituan, and Didi to complete the booking of flights, hotels, and car rentals, but then getting stuck at the point of "self-payment." What's the point of all that multitasking? So, remember this: AP2 is an extension of MCP+A2A, solving the last mile problem of AI Agent automated execution. What are the technical highlights of AP2? The core innovation of AP2 is the Mandates mechanism, which is divided into real-time authorization mode and delegated authorization mode. Real-time authorization is easy to understand. The AI Agent finds the product and shows it to you. The operation can only be performed after the user signs. Delegated authorization requires the user to set rules in advance, such as only buying the iPhone 17 when the price drops to 5,000. The AI Agent monitors the trigger conditions and executes automatically. The implementation logic is cryptographically signed using Verifiable Credentials (VCs). Users can set complex commission conditions, including price ranges, time limits, and payment method priorities, forming a tamper-proof digital contract. Once signed, the AI Agent executes according to the conditions, with VCs ensuring auditability and security at every step. Of particular note is the "A2A x402" extension, a technical component developed by Google specifically for crypto payments, developed in collaboration with Coinbase and the Ethereum Foundation. This extension enables AI Agents to seamlessly process stablecoins, ETH, and other blockchain assets, supporting native payment scenarios within the Web3 ecosystem. What kind of imagination space can AP2 bring? After analyzing the technical principles, do you think that's it? Yes, in fact, the AP2 is boring when it is disassembled alone. Its real charm lies in connecting and opening up the "MCP+A2A+AP2" technology stack, completely opening up the complete link of AI Agent's autonomous analysis+execution+payment. From now on, AI Agents can open up many application scenarios. For example, AI Agents for stock investment and financial management can help us monitor the market 24/7 and conduct independent transactions. Enterprise procurement AI Agents can automatically replenish and renew without human intervention. AP2's complementary payment capabilities will further expand the penetration of the Agent-to-Agent economy into more scenarios. Google obviously understands that after the technical framework is established, the ecological implementation must be relied upon, so it has brought in more than 60 partners to develop it, almost covering the entire payment and business ecosystem. Interestingly, it also involves major Crypto players such as Ethereum, Coinbase, MetaMask, and Sui. Combined with the current trend of currency and stock integration, the imagination space has been doubled. Is web3 AI really dead? Not entirely. Google's AP2 looks complete, but it only achieves technical compatibility with Crypto payments. It can only be regarded as an extension of the traditional authorization framework and belongs to the category of automated execution. There is a "paradigm" difference between it and the autonomous asset management pursued by pure Crypto native solutions. The Crypto-native solutions under exploration are taking the "decentralized custody + on-chain verification" route, including AI Agent autonomous asset management, AI Agent autonomous transactions (DeFAI), AI Agent digital identity and on-chain reputation system (ERC-8004...), AI Agent on-chain governance DAO framework, AI Agent NPC and digital avatars, and many other interesting and fun directions. Ultimately, once users get used to AI Agent payments in traditional fields, their acceptance of AI Agents autonomously owning digital assets will also increase. And for those scenarios that AP2 cannot reach, such as anonymous transactions, censorship-resistant payments, and decentralized asset management, there will always be a time for crypto-native solutions to show their strength? The two are more likely to be complementary rather than competitive, but to be honest, the key technological advancements behind AI Agents currently all come from web2AI, and web3AI still needs to keep up the good work!
Share
PANews2025/09/18 07:00