Sillytuna, one of Ethereum’s earliest NFT whales, has reported a $24 million crypto theft that allegedly combined an on‑chain address‑poisoning scam with offlineSillytuna, one of Ethereum’s earliest NFT whales, has reported a $24 million crypto theft that allegedly combined an on‑chain address‑poisoning scam with offline

OG Trader Sillytuna Says $24M Crypto Theft Came With Violent Threats

2026/03/06 12:00
3 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

Sillytuna, one of Ethereum’s earliest NFT whales, has reported a $24 million crypto theft that allegedly combined an on‑chain address‑poisoning scam with offline violence and threats.

The Crime’s Details

In a post on the social network X on March 4, the trader known as Sillytuna reported that he had been the victim of a $24 million-dollar crypto theft in AUSD/aEThUSDC from his wallet.

Mr. Silly claims the authorities have been involved, not just because the immense amount of money that was subtracted, but also because the crime wasn’t just online, describing it as a violent robbery that left him physically unharmed but deeply shaken. shaken.

Following the incident, Mr. Silly stated he is quitting the crypto space and expressed gratitude for still having his “limbs”.

In a different post on March 5, Mr. Silly offered a generous bounty for anyone who can recover some of the funds, even if they were involved in the original crime.

The Architecture Behind a Crypto Theft

The most plausible scenario for cases like this one is a hybrid operation where online reconnaissance and social engineering set the stage long before any overt threat appears. Criminals can quietly map a target’s on‑chain footprint, social media presence and real‑world routines, then use low‑friction tricks like address poisoning to ensure that when a big move eventually happens, single copy‑paste mistake routes funds into their infrastructure.

Once a victim realizes something is wrong, the operation can escalate to doxxing, extortion and even in‑person intimidation or kidnapping threats.

A Chain Of Major Crypto Thefts

The crime against Sillytuna is another example of recent catastrophic losses tied to violent situations in the crypto world. In December 2025, a single trader lost almost $50 million in USDT after copying a poisoned address from their own transaction history, then publicly offered a seven‑figure “peaceful resolution” bounty if the attacker returned most of the funds. Scam‑tracking firms also point to at least two more victims who lost roughly $62 million in just two months to similar address‑poisoning mistakes, while physical “wrench attacks” and kidnappings targeting crypto holders have surged worldwide.

This sort of hacking attacks tend to be a multi‑layer campaign rather than a single hack. They are designed to exploit every weak point between a person’s wallet’s interface and their real‑world vulnerability.

This situation leaves the crypto community sitting on the uncomfortable truth that you do not have to be “reckless” or technically incompetent to end up in a position like this. If even the greatest of them all can be felled by coordinated efforts, no one is safe.

Cover image from ChatGPT, ETHUSD chart from Tradingview

Market Opportunity
OG Logo
OG Price(OG)
$2.776
$2.776$2.776
-0.78%
USD
OG (OG) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Original Penguin Sues Pudgy Penguins Over Trademark Dispute

Original Penguin Sues Pudgy Penguins Over Trademark Dispute

TLDR Original Penguin sues Pudgy Penguins for alleged trademark misuse. PEI targets crypto brand over penguin-themed apparel and headwear. Lawsuit demands stop
Share
Coincentral2026/03/06 21:09
Exclusive interview with Smokey The Bera, co-founder of Berachain: How the innovative PoL public chain solves the liquidity problem and may be launched in a few months

Exclusive interview with Smokey The Bera, co-founder of Berachain: How the innovative PoL public chain solves the liquidity problem and may be launched in a few months

Recently, PANews interviewed Smokey The Bera, co-founder of Berachain, to unravel the background of the establishment of this anonymous project, Berachain's PoL mechanism, the latest developments, and answered widely concerned topics such as airdrop expectations and new opportunities in the DeFi field.
Share
PANews2024/07/03 13:00
American Manufacturing Has A Private Equity Problem

American Manufacturing Has A Private Equity Problem

The post American Manufacturing Has A Private Equity Problem appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Private equity would seem to be a natural fit for SME manufacturers’ increasing needs for growth and buyout capital. But there’s a problem. getty Baby Boom owners of small- and medium-sized enterprise manufacturing companies, which comprise about 98% of American industry, are reaching retirement age in droves, with Generation X not far behind. Those without relatives or partners to take over the businesses need to find buyers so they can exit. Private equity investors would seem to be the natural answer. Unfortunately, there exists a critical distrust of PE among industrial owners. Matt Guse is president of MRS Machining in Augusta, Wisconsin, a family-owned machine shop established by his dad in 1986. Author of the new book MRS Machining: A Manufacturing Story, Guse published an article on LinkedIn last week giving one reason for that great level of distrust among owners looking to sell. There’s a gap right now in manufacturing that mostly gets swept under the rug—a real disconnect between buyers and sellers that goes way deeper than price. Almost every week, I hear from private equity firms or buyers circling manufacturing businesses, coming in with their own playbooks. But let’s be honest: most buyers still approach business owners like they’re handing them a favor, tossing out the same tired 2x–4x multiples, assuming owners are desperate to cash out. That attitude misses the point entirely. Manufacturing business owners aren’t just selling off machines and real estate. They’re putting decades of hard work, community, and identity on the line. These are their legacies, not just another transaction to check off a spreadsheet. Treating these deals as cold, purely financial moves ignores everything that actually makes these businesses valuable in the first place. There’s a much deeper level of distrust that dates back about as long as MRS Machining has been…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 05:05