The post Stablecoins face new rules as Russia advances payments bill appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Russia stablecoin bill: Ministry of Finance plan, whatThe post Stablecoins face new rules as Russia advances payments bill appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Russia stablecoin bill: Ministry of Finance plan, what

Stablecoins face new rules as Russia advances payments bill

For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

Russia stablecoin bill: Ministry of Finance plan, what’s allowed vs banned

Russia is preparing a legislative framework for a domestic stablecoin, with officials describing its potential as significant, as reported by DL News. The Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation is central to the effort, with the bill positioned as a way to structure tokenized payments within a regulated perimeter.

The government is weighing the legalization of stablecoin payments while keeping cryptocurrency payments banned for the same purpose, according to CryptoNews.net. In practical terms, this draws a line between regulated, asset-referenced tokens and unregulated crypto for settlements, aiming to preserve monetary control and compliance.

Why a ruble-backed stablecoin matters for cross-border payments

A ruble-backed stablecoin could provide a standardized, programmable unit for corporate settlements, potentially reducing reconciliation frictions and improving payment finality in cross-border trade. It may also support fintech integrations that rely on transparent reserves and predictable on-chain settlement.

Proponents in Moscow frame the instrument as part of a broader payments overhaul targeting transfers, trade invoices, and settlement rails. Federation Council member Artem Sheikin called ruble-denominated stablecoins “a key element of the new financial infrastructure,” citing potential in cross-border transfers and corporate settlements.

BingX: a trusted exchange delivering real advantages for traders at every level.

For companies, near-term implications would concentrate on clarity around settlement workflows, onboarding standards, and documentation, including KYC/AML controls. Accounting treatment, audit trails, and treasury policies would require updates once the bill defines reserve, redemption, and reporting rules.

For monetary authorities, the immediate workload would include supervision of issuance, reserve quality, and redemption mechanics. Interoperability with existing payment systems and alignment with Russia’s broader digital currency strategy would be necessary to contain operational and liquidity risks.

Risks and oversight: IMF and Bank of Russia views

The proposed framework sits at the intersection of monetary policy, payments efficiency, and financial stability. International and domestic authorities have flagged distinct but overlapping risk channels that any law would need to address.

Currency substitution, capital flows, and systemic risk flagged by IMF

The International Monetary Fund warns that stablecoins can accelerate currency substitution, weakening monetary transmission in economies where users pivot to alternative units of account. It also highlights volatility in capital flows if redemptions spike during stress. The fund notes systemic risk from large, concentrated reserve portfolios that could transmit shocks if liquidated rapidly.

Retail limits and complementarity with the digital ruble

central bank officials have emphasized that any ruble-referenced token must be designed so it does not undermine the digital ruble, as reported by Criptolog. Initial access could be narrow and staged to limit household exposure while infrastructure and oversight mature.

“Retail use may be restricted to a very, very limited class of investors,” said Vladimir Chistyukhin, Deputy Governor, bank of Russia. In policy terms, a stablecoin would likely complement the CBDC for specific use cases, while the CBDC anchors legal tender and public money functions.

FAQ about Russia stablecoin bill

How would a ruble-backed stablecoin be designed and issued in Russia (state, banks, or private issuers)?

The bill’s final model is not specified in available reporting. Options could include state-led issuance, licensed banks, or private issuers under central oversight, pending detailed regulation.

Can a Russian stablecoin realistically support cross-border payments for companies under sanctions, and through what channels?

It could improve permitted trade settlement via compliant partners and clearer on-chain rails. Effectiveness would depend on counterparties, de-risking practices, and regulatory agreements across jurisdictions.

Source: https://coincu.com/news/stablecoins-face-new-rules-as-russia-advances-payments-bill/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

SoFi taps BitGo to support distribution of its SoFiUSD stablecoin

SoFi taps BitGo to support distribution of its SoFiUSD stablecoin

The post SoFi taps BitGo to support distribution of its SoFiUSD stablecoin appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. SoFi Technologies has selected BitGo Bank & Trust
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/03/06 01:50
The reality of today

The reality of today

It may take a long time to process and to reach the point of awakening. Then we discover what is important in life — the value of creating, giving, and contributing
Share
Bworldonline2026/03/06 00:02
Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Prominent analyst Cheeky Crypto (203,000 followers on YouTube) set out to verify a fast-spreading claim that XRP’s circulating supply could “vanish overnight,” and his conclusion is more nuanced than the headline suggests: nothing in the ledger disappears, but the amount of XRP that is truly liquid could be far smaller than most dashboards imply—small enough, in his view, to set the stage for an abrupt liquidity squeeze if demand spikes. XRP Supply Shock? The video opens with the host acknowledging his own skepticism—“I woke up to a rumor that XRP supply could vanish overnight. Sounds crazy, right?”—before committing to test the thesis rather than dismiss it. He frames the exercise as an attempt to reconcile a long-standing critique (“XRP’s supply is too large for high prices”) with a rival view taking hold among prominent community voices: that much of the supply counted as “circulating” is effectively unavailable to trade. His first step is a straightforward data check. Pulling public figures, he finds CoinMarketCap showing roughly 59.6 billion XRP as circulating, while XRPScan reports about 64.7 billion. The divergence prompts what becomes the video’s key methodological point: different sources count “circulating” differently. Related Reading: Analyst Sounds Major XRP Warning: Last Chance To Get In As Accumulation Balloons As he explains it, the higher on-ledger number likely includes balances that aggregators exclude or treat as restricted, most notably Ripple’s programmatic escrow. He highlights that Ripple still “holds a chunk of XRP in escrow, about 35.3 billion XRP locked up across multiple wallets, with a nominal schedule of up to 1 billion released per month and unused portions commonly re-escrowed. Those coins exist and are accounted for on-ledger, but “they aren’t actually sitting on exchanges” and are not immediately available to buyers. In his words, “for all intents and purposes, that escrow stash is effectively off of the market.” From there, the analysis moves from headline “circulating supply” to the subtler concept of effective float. Beyond escrow, he argues that large strategic holders—banks, fintechs, or other whales—may sit on material balances without supplying order books. When you strip out escrow and these non-selling stashes, he says, “the effective circulating supply… is actually way smaller than the 59 or even 64 billion figure.” He cites community estimates in the “20 or 30 billion” range for what might be truly liquid at any given moment, while emphasizing that nobody has a precise number. That effective-float framing underpins the crux of his thesis: a potential supply shock if demand accelerates faster than fresh sell-side supply appears. “Price is a dance between supply and demand,” he says; if institutional or sovereign-scale users suddenly need XRP and “the market finds that there isn’t enough XRP readily available,” order books could thin out and prices could “shoot on up, sometimes violently.” His phrase “circulating supply could collapse overnight” is presented not as a claim that tokens are destroyed or removed from the ledger, but as a market-structure scenario in which available inventory to sell dries up quickly because holders won’t part with it. How Could The XRP Supply Shock Happen? On the demand side, he anchors the hypothetical to tokenization. He points to the “very early stages of something huge in finance”—on-chain tokenization of debt, stablecoins, CBDCs and even gold—and argues the XRP Ledger aims to be “the settlement layer” for those assets.He references Ripple CTO David Schwartz’s earlier comments about an XRPL pivot toward tokenized assets and notes that an institutional research shop (Bitwise) has framed XRP as a way to play the tokenization theme. In his construction, if “trillions of dollars in value” begin settling across XRPL rails, working inventories of XRP for bridging, liquidity and settlement could rise sharply, tightening effective float. Related Reading: XRP Bearish Signal: Whales Offload $486 Million In Asset To illustrate, he offers two analogies. First, the “concert tickets” model: you think there are 100,000 tickets (100B supply), but 50,000 are held by the promoter (escrow) and 30,000 by corporate buyers (whales), leaving only 20,000 for the public; if a million people want in, prices explode. Second, a comparison to Bitcoin’s halving: while XRP has no programmatic halving, he proposes that a sudden adoption wave could function like a de facto halving of available supply—“XRP’s version of a halving could actually be the adoption event.” He also updates the narrative context that long dogged XRP. Once derided for “too much supply,” he argues the script has “totally flipped.” He cites the current cycle’s optics—“XRP is sitting above $3 with a market cap north of around $180 billion”—as evidence that raw supply counts did not cap price as tightly as critics claimed, and as a backdrop for why a scarcity narrative is gaining traction. Still, he declines to publish targets or timelines, repeatedly stressing uncertainty and risk. “I’m not a financial adviser… cryptocurrencies are highly volatile,” he reminds viewers, adding that tokenization could take off “on some other platform,” unfold more slowly than enthusiasts expect, or fail to get to “sudden shock” scale. The verdict he offers is deliberately bound. The theory that “XRP supply could vanish overnight” is imprecise on its face; the ledger will not erase coins. But after examining dashboard methodologies, escrow mechanics and the behavior of large holders, he concludes that the effective float could be meaningfully smaller than headline supply figures, and that a fast-developing tokenization use case could, under the right conditions, stress that float. “Overnight is a dramatic way to put it,” he concedes. “The change could actually be very sudden when it comes.” At press time, XRP traded at $3.0198. Featured image created with DALL.E, chart from TradingView.com
Share
NewsBTC2025/09/18 11:00