Decentralized Finance (DeFi) is transforming financial intermediation by replacing banks with smart contracts. Platforms like MakerDAO issue DAI, a stablecoin pegged to the US dollar, through overcollateralized crypto loans, governed by MKR token holders. This ecosystem enables lending, savings, and passive income without intermediaries, but also raises challenges for regulation, taxation, and financial stability. MakerDAO’s mechanisms—collateralized debt positions, governance votes, auctions, and external actors like oracles and keepers—keep the system running. Together with platforms like Uniswap, DeFi illustrates both the promise of financial innovation and the complexity of decentralized governance.Decentralized Finance (DeFi) is transforming financial intermediation by replacing banks with smart contracts. Platforms like MakerDAO issue DAI, a stablecoin pegged to the US dollar, through overcollateralized crypto loans, governed by MKR token holders. This ecosystem enables lending, savings, and passive income without intermediaries, but also raises challenges for regulation, taxation, and financial stability. MakerDAO’s mechanisms—collateralized debt positions, governance votes, auctions, and external actors like oracles and keepers—keep the system running. Together with platforms like Uniswap, DeFi illustrates both the promise of financial innovation and the complexity of decentralized governance.

What Is DeFi? Inside MakerDAO, DAI, and the Future of Finance

10 min read

Abstract and 1. Introduction

  1. Bitcoin and the Blockchain

    2.1 The Origins

    2.2 Bitcoin in a nutshell

    2.3 Basic Concepts

  2. Crypto Exchanges

  3. Source of Value of crypto assets and Bootstrapping

  4. Initial Coin Offerings

  5. Airdrops

  6. Ethereum

    7.1 Proof-of-Stake based consensus in Ethereum

    7.2 Smart Contracts

    7.3 Tokens

    7.4 Non-Fungible Tokens

  7. Decentralized Finance and 8.1 MakerDAO

    8.2 Uniswap

    8.3 Taxable events in DeFi ecosystem

    8.4 Maximal Extractable Value (MEV) on Ethereum

  8. Decentralized Autonomous Organizations - DAOs

    9.1 Legal Entity Status of DAOs

    9.2 Taxation issues of DAOs

  9. International Cooperation and Exchange of Information

    10.1 FATF Standards on VAs and VASPs

    10.2 Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework

    10.3 Need for Global Public Digital Infrastructure

    10.4 The Challenge of Anonymity Enhancing Crypto Assets

  10. Conclusion and References

8. Decentralized Finance

The financial system performs a critical job of financial intermediation and enables the flow of capital from lenders to borrowers. Similarly, in the domain of crypto assets using platforms like centralized crypto exchanges or decentralized platforms using smart contracts, such financial intermediation is possible. The smart contract ecosystem enables the automation of deposit, disbursal, lending and repayment of funds. This has created an entire ecosystem of financial services which operate on the blockchain, called DeFi or Decentralized Finance. DeFi enables enormous opportunities of financial innovation using crypto assets and smart contracts. At the same time, it also poses new challenges to tax administrations and law enforcement agencies as lack of KYC norms and regulatory oversight can enable tax evasion and money laundering. The wide variety of applications and products offered by DeFi warrant a separate paper to describe the mechanics as well as the taxation aspects of this ecosystem, which are not very clear and well understood today. However, this paper discusses two prominent DeFi platforms MakerDAO and UniSwap which account for a significant portion of assets locked up in DeFi applications.

8.1 MakerDAO

MakerDAO is one of the most popular DeFi projects. It is a Decentralized Autonomous Organization that issues and manages two ERC-20 tokens. The first token is known as DAI, which is a cryptocollateralized so called stablecoin soft pegged to the US Dollar, the second token is Maker (MKR) which is used as a governance token of the Maker protocol as well as a utility token for auctioning DAI for MKR and vice versa. In unforeseen situations it can also be used as a resource for recapitalization and repayment of Maker protocol debt. The MakerDAO is essentially a system of smart contracts running on the Ethereum Blockchain that manage the supply of DAI and MKR. A system of incentives and other mechanisms enable creation and destruction of DAI as well as its backing with appropriate collateral to maintain its soft peg to the US Dollar using smart contracts. Unlike the so called centralized stablecoins, the collateralization and assets in the MakerDAO ecosystem are publicly available and do not require any proof of reserve or audit. A detailed overview of the MakerDAO is available in the whitepaper[115].

\ The MakerDAO can be considered a digital vault system which gives a DAI denominated loan to users which lock-up their Ether or other authorized crypto assets into a smart contract, which is called a Collateralized Debt Position (CDP). This is the mechanism that generates DAI as shown in Fig. 40. The DAI loan accrues interest denominated in DAI which is called the ‘stability fees’ in the Maker protocol. When the DAI loan is returned along with the stability fee by the borrower, the retuned DAI is burnt, the stability fees go to the surplus smart contract account and the collateralized assets are released (Fig. 41).

\ Fig. 41 Repayment of DAI loan

\ This system is analogous to a mortgage in the traditional financial system. One of the key differences is that the collateralized crypto assets like ETH and Basic Attention Token (BAT) are much more volatile than the assets mortgaged in traditional finance. Thus, MakerDAO users need to overcollateralize the DAI loans by at least 150% for ETH which can be higher (>175%) for some other crypto assets like BAT. This facilitates the stability of the protocol as well as the peg of DAI to the USD, as even if the value of CDP reduces, the Maker protocol would still be able to discharge the liability of issued DAI. If the CDP value falls below the threshold, the protocol enables three scenarios:

\ i) The borrower deposits more collateral to the CDP.

\ ii) The borrower repays some of the DAI debt.

\ iii) The protocol opens the CDP for auction by keepers which liquidate the CDP.

\ The MKR token is the governance token of the Maker protocol which enables the holders to vote on proposals as well as initiate proposals for changes in the protocol. The parameters like stability fee, the crypto assets to be taken as collateral, as well as their collateralization ratios are decided through voting, with each MKR token holder entitled to one vote. If due to an extreme event the protocol accrues a debt, the governance mechanism decides through voting to issue new MKR tokens for recapitalization. This is very similar to a situation in traditional finance where new equity is issued to infuse capital in a sick enterprise.

\ It is also noteworthy that apart from the Maker protocol DAI and MKR can also be bought and sold on various crypto exchanges. In order to incentivise people to hold DAI rather than selling it and to stabilize its value in the open market, the Maker protocol also enables the DAI borrowers to deposit the borrowed DAI into smart contracts that yield returns at the rate of the DAI savings rate. The DAI savings rate is also determined by the governance ecosystem of MakerDAO. Just like in ordinary finance where the lending rate is higher than the savings rate, the stability fee is always higher than the DAI savings rate. Besides this, the borrowers of DAI can use it to earn passive income on other DeFi applications or create further leveraged positions. The DAI stability fee, savings rate and the collateralization ratio are like instruments in the armour of a central bank which can affect the demand and supply of DAI resulting in movement of price of DAI in the desired direction as compared to the US Dollar.

\ Various external actors also play an important role in the Maker protocol operations. They play a critical role in maintaining the peg against the US Dollar. The main external actors in the Maker protocol are:

\ i) Keepers: They are independent actors which take advantage of arbitrage opportunities which help DAI to move towards the target price of 1 USD. They participate in Surplus Auctions, Debt Auctions, and Collateral Auctions which help to maintain sufficient reserves against the issued DAI in the protocol. Keepers are usually bots operated by natural or legal persons.

\ ii) Oracles: As the blockchains cannot access any off-chain information like asset prices of assets locked in CDPs or the price of DAI, oracles deliver price information about the assets locked in CDPs in order to enable the protocol to know when to trigger a liquidation.

\ iii) Emergency Oracles: They are the oracles selected by Maker governance as last line of defence against Maker governance or oracles. They are authorized by Maker governance to freeze oracles and trigger an emergency shutdown in an unforeseen situation.

\ iv) DAO Teams: These are individuals and service providers who are authorized by Maker governance to provide services to MakerDAO.

\ Keepers play an important role in maintaining the peg of DAI to the US Dollar as they participate in various auctions like the Surplus Auctions, Debt Auctions, and Collateral Auctions. The various auctions in the MakerDAO ecosystem and their role in the protocol is as follows:

\ i) Surplus Auctions: The DAI loans with accrued stability fee denominated in DAI is repaid back to the CDP smart contract. Once the DAI principal along with the stability fee is repaid, the collateralized assets are released. The excess DAI obtained from the stability fee goes to a smart contract which accumulates it to a level determined by the Maker governance, after which an auction for the surplus DAI to be converted to MKR can be triggered by a keeper and the MKR tokens obtained consequent to the auction are burnt.

\ ii) Debt Auctions: It is possible in certain cases that in situations where the value of the collateralized asset collapses rapidly, the liquidations might not be able to repay the entire collateralized assets and the protocol may incur debt. When this debt crosses a certain threshold determined by the Maker governance, an auction can be triggered by a keeper to recapitalize the protocol by auctioning off MKR for a fixed number of DAI.

\ iii) Collateral Auctions: These auctions are triggered to recover debt in liquidated vaults. When the collateral position in a CDP vault drops below the specified liquidation ratio the vault becomes available for liquidation. The keeper bots liquidate the vaults by sending transactions which trigger an auction of the assets locked in the vault. It is important to note that as the liquidation transactions can only originate from an externally owned account on Ethereum, the Maker protocol cannot automatically trigger the collateral auctions and relies on keepers for the same. The amount of DAI recovered by the auction is used to repay the debt and the remaining collateral is returned to the user after deduction of a penalty fee. The keeper gets a fee for the transaction as an incentive to keep a watch on vaults that can be liquidated.

\ The MakerDAO users and owners of MKR and DAI do not undergo any KYC procedure to determine their tax residency or for identification of the beneficial ownership of the assets, this gives rise to a complex scenario where a number of individuals or entities come together to transact on a decentralized lending platform which also issues a so-called stable coin and maintains its peg to the US Dollar. The individuals or entities also participate in the governance of the Maker Decentralized Autonomous Organization and take decisions which have financial implications for the protocol and the holders of MKR token themselves.

\ The tax implications of transactions in such ecosystems can be very complex and due to unforeseen and trans-national nature of such organizations there is virtually no guidance available for taxation of the truly Decentralized Autonomous Organizations which do not have a well-defined legal identity. Although, the individual transactions are still governed by the tax guidelines and laws of the respective jurisdictions of the members and users of the Decentralized Autonomous Organization’s platforms/protocols. The taxation of such Decentralized Autonomous Organizations is discussed in the subsequent sections.

\

:::info Author:

(1) Arindam Misra.

:::


:::info This paper is available on arxiv under CC BY 4.0 DEED license.

:::

  1. https://makerdao.com/en/whitepaper/

\

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

The post Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. “It’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress,” writes Pipes. Getty Images Washington is addicted to taxing success. Now, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is floating a plan to skim half the patent earnings from inventions developed at universities with federal funding. It’s being sold as a way to shore up programs like Social Security. In reality, it’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress. Yes, taxpayer dollars support early-stage research. But the real payoff comes later—in the jobs created, cures discovered, and industries launched when universities and private industry turn those discoveries into real products. By comparison, the sums at stake in patent licensing are trivial. Universities collectively earn only about $3.6 billion annually in patent income—less than the federal government spends on Social Security in a single day. Even confiscating half would barely register against a $6 trillion federal budget. And yet the damage from such a policy would be anything but trivial. The true return on taxpayer investment isn’t in licensing checks sent to Washington, but in the downstream economic activity that federally supported research unleashes. Thanks to the bipartisan Bayh-Dole Act of 1980, universities and private industry have powerful incentives to translate early-stage discoveries into real-world products. Before Bayh-Dole, the government hoarded patents from federally funded research, and fewer than 5% were ever licensed. Once universities could own and license their own inventions, innovation exploded. The result has been one of the best returns on investment in government history. Since 1996, university research has added nearly $2 trillion to U.S. industrial output, supported 6.5 million jobs, and launched more than 19,000 startups. Those companies pay…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 03:26
VectorUSA Achieves Fortinet’s Engage Preferred Services Partner Designation

VectorUSA Achieves Fortinet’s Engage Preferred Services Partner Designation

TORRANCE, Calif., Feb. 3, 2026 /PRNewswire/ — VectorUSA, a trusted technology solutions provider, specializes in delivering integrated IT, security, and infrastructure
Share
AI Journal2026/02/05 00:02
Top Solana Treasury Firm Forward Industries Unveils $4 Billion Capital Raise To Buy More SOL ⋆ ZyCrypto

Top Solana Treasury Firm Forward Industries Unveils $4 Billion Capital Raise To Buy More SOL ⋆ ZyCrypto

The post Top Solana Treasury Firm Forward Industries Unveils $4 Billion Capital Raise To Buy More SOL ⋆ ZyCrypto appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Advertisement &nbsp &nbsp Forward Industries, the largest publicly traded Solana treasury company, has filed a $4 billion at-the-market (ATM) equity offering program with the U.S. SEC  to raise more capital for additional SOL accumulation. Forward Strategies Doubles Down On Solana Strategy In a Wednesday press release, Forward Industries revealed that the 4 billion ATM equity offering program will allow the company to issue and sell common stock via Cantor Fitzgerald under a sales agreement dated Sept. 16, 2025. Forward said proceeds will go toward “general corporate purposes,” including the pursuit of its Solana balance sheet and purchases of income-generating assets. The sales of the shares are covered by an automatic shelf registration statement filed with the US Securities and Exchange Commission that is already effective – meaning the shares will be tradable once they’re sold. An automatic shelf registration allows certain publicly listed companies to raise capital with flexibility swiftly.  Kyle Samani, Forward’s chairman, astutely described the ATM offering as “a flexible and efficient mechanism” to raise and deploy capital for the company’s Solana strategy and bolster its balance sheet.  Advertisement &nbsp Though the maximum amount is listed as $4 billion, the firm indicated that sales may or may not occur depending on existing market conditions. “The ATM Program enhances our ability to continue scaling that position, strengthen our balance sheet, and pursue growth initiatives in alignment with our long-term vision,” Samani said. Forward Industries kicked off its Solana treasury strategy on Sept. 8. The Wednesday S-3 form follows Forward’s $1.65 billion private investment in public equity that closed last week, led by crypto heavyweights like Galaxy Digital, Jump Crypto, and Multicoin Capital. The company started deploying that capital this week, announcing it snatched up 6.8 million SOL for approximately $1.58 billion at an average price of $232…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 03:42