Key Takeaways: 77 entities have expressed interest in a Hong Kong stablecoin licence, spanning banking, tech, and Web3 sectors. HKMA has started screening applicants, but will issue only a limited number of licences in the initial stage. Final approvals will depend on whether the applications meet strict compliance requirements. The Hong Kong Monetary Authority has received 77 expressions of interest for stablecoin licenses and is now conducting meetings with applicants, according to a report published by HK01 on September 1. A spokesperson for the HKMA said the interested parties span multiple sectors, including banks, technology firms, asset managers, e-commerce platforms, payment companies, and Web3 startups. Meetings have already been arranged to assess each party’s intention and readiness. Monetary Authority Received 77 Stablecoin Expressions of Interest The HKMA stated that it would not publish the list of entities that submitted expressions of interest or applications. Communications with these firms are part of the preliminary licensing process and do not indicate regulatory approval or endorsement. “Whether a licence is ultimately granted will depend on whether the application meets the licensing requirements,” the spokesperson said. Earlier, the authority made clear that only a limited number of licenses would be issued during the initial phase. The HKMA said the current meetings are meant to help applicants evaluate the necessity and maturity of their issuance plans before deciding to move forward with a formal submission. The spokesperson added that the outcome of the discussions would help both the regulator and the market participants understand the depth and readiness of Hong Kong’s stablecoin ecosystem. The HKMA also reiterated its warning to the public regarding unlicensed stablecoins, advising consumers to remain cautious about promotional materials that do not come from licensed entities. Hong Kong to Set Regulatory Reference Point The stablecoin licensing regime came into effect on August 1. It is one of the city’s core regulatory tools as it continues to develop its virtual asset framework under the Financial Services and the Treasury Bureau’s broader digital finance agenda. Formal licence applications are expected to follow in the coming months, though the final number of approved entities remains unclear. The limited availability of licences may lead firms to reassess their strategies. Some could postpone applications, partner with existing licensees, or pursue alternative structures to meet compliance thresholds without applying directly. Hong Kong’s initial screening process will likely set a reference point for other regulatory jurisdictions. Early decisions around transparency, scope, and eligibility may shape how regional markets approach stablecoin oversight going forward. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) What risks is the HKMA trying to mitigate with limited early licenses? Concentrating approvals allows the regulator to monitor systemic risk, assess operational practices, and avoid large-scale fallout from early-stage failures. Are there consequences for entities that promote stablecoins without a license? While enforcement mechanisms haven’t been detailed, public warnings suggest the HKMA may escalate scrutiny or coordinate with other regulatory bodies. Will license holders be allowed to offer retail services immediately? Not necessarily. Retail offerings may require separate approvals or phased rollout conditions depending on the applicant’s risk profile and business model. Key Takeaways: 77 entities have expressed interest in a Hong Kong stablecoin licence, spanning banking, tech, and Web3 sectors. HKMA has started screening applicants, but will issue only a limited number of licences in the initial stage. Final approvals will depend on whether the applications meet strict compliance requirements. The Hong Kong Monetary Authority has received 77 expressions of interest for stablecoin licenses and is now conducting meetings with applicants, according to a report published by HK01 on September 1. A spokesperson for the HKMA said the interested parties span multiple sectors, including banks, technology firms, asset managers, e-commerce platforms, payment companies, and Web3 startups. Meetings have already been arranged to assess each party’s intention and readiness. Monetary Authority Received 77 Stablecoin Expressions of Interest The HKMA stated that it would not publish the list of entities that submitted expressions of interest or applications. Communications with these firms are part of the preliminary licensing process and do not indicate regulatory approval or endorsement. “Whether a licence is ultimately granted will depend on whether the application meets the licensing requirements,” the spokesperson said. Earlier, the authority made clear that only a limited number of licenses would be issued during the initial phase. The HKMA said the current meetings are meant to help applicants evaluate the necessity and maturity of their issuance plans before deciding to move forward with a formal submission. The spokesperson added that the outcome of the discussions would help both the regulator and the market participants understand the depth and readiness of Hong Kong’s stablecoin ecosystem. The HKMA also reiterated its warning to the public regarding unlicensed stablecoins, advising consumers to remain cautious about promotional materials that do not come from licensed entities. Hong Kong to Set Regulatory Reference Point The stablecoin licensing regime came into effect on August 1. It is one of the city’s core regulatory tools as it continues to develop its virtual asset framework under the Financial Services and the Treasury Bureau’s broader digital finance agenda. Formal licence applications are expected to follow in the coming months, though the final number of approved entities remains unclear. The limited availability of licences may lead firms to reassess their strategies. Some could postpone applications, partner with existing licensees, or pursue alternative structures to meet compliance thresholds without applying directly. Hong Kong’s initial screening process will likely set a reference point for other regulatory jurisdictions. Early decisions around transparency, scope, and eligibility may shape how regional markets approach stablecoin oversight going forward. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) What risks is the HKMA trying to mitigate with limited early licenses? Concentrating approvals allows the regulator to monitor systemic risk, assess operational practices, and avoid large-scale fallout from early-stage failures. Are there consequences for entities that promote stablecoins without a license? While enforcement mechanisms haven’t been detailed, public warnings suggest the HKMA may escalate scrutiny or coordinate with other regulatory bodies. Will license holders be allowed to offer retail services immediately? Not necessarily. Retail offerings may require separate approvals or phased rollout conditions depending on the applicant’s risk profile and business model.

HKMA’s Stablecoin Regime Attracts 77 Inquiries – Limited Early Licenses Raise Stakes

2025/09/02 02:18
3 min read

Key Takeaways:

  • 77 entities have expressed interest in a Hong Kong stablecoin licence, spanning banking, tech, and Web3 sectors.
  • HKMA has started screening applicants, but will issue only a limited number of licences in the initial stage.
  • Final approvals will depend on whether the applications meet strict compliance requirements.

The Hong Kong Monetary Authority has received 77 expressions of interest for stablecoin licenses and is now conducting meetings with applicants, according to a report published by HK01 on September 1.

A spokesperson for the HKMA said the interested parties span multiple sectors, including banks, technology firms, asset managers, e-commerce platforms, payment companies, and Web3 startups. Meetings have already been arranged to assess each party’s intention and readiness.

Monetary Authority Received 77 Stablecoin Expressions of Interest

The HKMA stated that it would not publish the list of entities that submitted expressions of interest or applications. Communications with these firms are part of the preliminary licensing process and do not indicate regulatory approval or endorsement.

“Whether a licence is ultimately granted will depend on whether the application meets the licensing requirements,” the spokesperson said.

Earlier, the authority made clear that only a limited number of licenses would be issued during the initial phase. The HKMA said the current meetings are meant to help applicants evaluate the necessity and maturity of their issuance plans before deciding to move forward with a formal submission.

The spokesperson added that the outcome of the discussions would help both the regulator and the market participants understand the depth and readiness of Hong Kong’s stablecoin ecosystem.

The HKMA also reiterated its warning to the public regarding unlicensed stablecoins, advising consumers to remain cautious about promotional materials that do not come from licensed entities.

Hong Kong to Set Regulatory Reference Point

The stablecoin licensing regime came into effect on August 1. It is one of the city’s core regulatory tools as it continues to develop its virtual asset framework under the Financial Services and the Treasury Bureau’s broader digital finance agenda.

Formal licence applications are expected to follow in the coming months, though the final number of approved entities remains unclear.

The limited availability of licences may lead firms to reassess their strategies. Some could postpone applications, partner with existing licensees, or pursue alternative structures to meet compliance thresholds without applying directly.

Hong Kong’s initial screening process will likely set a reference point for other regulatory jurisdictions. Early decisions around transparency, scope, and eligibility may shape how regional markets approach stablecoin oversight going forward.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

What risks is the HKMA trying to mitigate with limited early licenses?

Concentrating approvals allows the regulator to monitor systemic risk, assess operational practices, and avoid large-scale fallout from early-stage failures.

Are there consequences for entities that promote stablecoins without a license?

While enforcement mechanisms haven’t been detailed, public warnings suggest the HKMA may escalate scrutiny or coordinate with other regulatory bodies.

Will license holders be allowed to offer retail services immediately?

Not necessarily. Retail offerings may require separate approvals or phased rollout conditions depending on the applicant’s risk profile and business model.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Trump’s 'desperate' push to rename landmarks for himself is a 'growing problem': analysis

Trump’s 'desperate' push to rename landmarks for himself is a 'growing problem': analysis

President Donald Trump's fixation on adding his name to major landmarks is presenting numerous problems both for himself and his party.That's according to a Friday
Share
Alternet2026/02/07 05:30
Can XRP Repeat Its 300% Surge and Reach $5? Analysts Weigh In

Can XRP Repeat Its 300% Surge and Reach $5? Analysts Weigh In

The post Can XRP Repeat Its 300% Surge and Reach $5? Analysts Weigh In appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. One of the most notable outcomes of the bull run has been the 300% price increase of XRP this year. Investors are wondering if XRP may reach $5 in 2025, given the pace driven by ecosystem improvements, institutional interest, and legal clarity. Numerous analysts hold this view, pointing to significant demand stimulants such as the impending approval of the XRP ETF and the introduction of XRP options on CME. Beyond conjecture, the fundamentals of XRPL are more solid than ever. In just a few months, the network’s TVL increased from $20 million to over $100 million, and cross-chain DeFi applications are becoming more accessible because to EVM compatibility. XRPL is changing into a center for liquidity and intelligent financial solutions as a result of this innovation surge. As the native DEX that XRPL has long required, DeXRP is becoming more and more popular. DeXRP is getting ready to launch as the focal point of XRPL’s new DeFi economy, having already generated over $6.6 million in presale and attracted over 9,500 investors. What is DeXRP?  As the first decentralized exchange (DEX) based on XRPL, DeXRP is taking center stage as XRP continues to solidify its place in the global market. Massive expectation has been generated by the combination of DeXRP’s ambition for an advanced trading platform and XRPL’s established infrastructure, which is renowned for its quick transactions, cheap fees, and institutional-ready capabilities. In contrast to a lot of speculative presales, DeXRP’s development shows both institutional interest and community-driven momentum. Its early achievement of the $6.4 million milestone demonstrates how rapidly investors are realizing its potential. DeXRP Presale Success More than 9,300 distinct wallets have already joined the DeXRP presale, indicating a high level of interest from around the world. A crucial aspect is highlighted by the volume and variety of participation:…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/19 20:01
Crypto Investor Loses $6.28M to Sophisticated Phishing Permit Scam

Crypto Investor Loses $6.28M to Sophisticated Phishing Permit Scam

A cryptocurrency investor recently lost $6.28 million to a sophisticated phishing scam that exploited malicious signature approvals. The incident serves as a significant reminder of the increasing prevalence of “permit phishing” schemes, which pose a serious threat to users in the DeFi ecosystem. Attacker Steals $6.28 Million   The attack began when the victim received a targeted phishing message that appeared to be a legitimate update from a decentralized finance (DeFi) platform. Tempted by offers of better returns, the investor connected their wallet to a fake website. There, they signed an EIP-2612, which includes a feature that allows token approvals without gas fees. However, it can also unintentionally give scammers unlimited spending access to a smart contract.  The theft occurred shortly after the approvals were granted. The scammer quickly executed a contract that drained 3,200 stETH and a matching amount of aEthWBTC from the victim’s wallet. The loot, which was traced to a mixer address, revealed a calculated plan to conceal the trail.  The entire theft took less than 12 minutes, using automated scripts for speed. Scam Sniffer noted that the victim’s portfolio, which was worth over $10 million before the attack, lost half its value immediately. The rapid process allowed no time for intervention, as blockchain transactions cannot be reversed once completed. On-chain analysis indicated that the assets were unlikely to be recovered, as they were likely laundered through exchanges. Not New   Following the exploit, some users on X have expressed shock, wondering how the victim unwittingly signed malicious token approvals. However, this subtle trap has long troubled the crypto space. For instance, earlier this month, a user of Venus Protocol lost $13.5 million. The victim fell prey to a phishing scam by approving a transaction from a malicious Core Pool Comptroller contract, which granted the attacker access to their funds. Once permission was given, the hacker quickly drained stablecoins and wrapped tokens from the trader’s wallet.  Surprisingly, though, a few hours after the incident, the Venus team tracked the stolen funds by force-liquidating the hackers’ trade positions. The team fully recovered the stolen funds afterwards, leaving the thief with nothing. The post Crypto Investor Loses $6.28M to Sophisticated Phishing Permit Scam appeared first on Cointab.
Share
Coinstats2025/09/19 01:35