More than 200 influencers were exposed early Monday after crypto detective ZachXBT posted a leaked price sheet on X showing usernames, wallet addresses, and promo rates of crypto shillers who were contacted to promote an unnamed project. The document, which Zach attached in three screenshots, included every detail from post pricing to tiers to on-chain […]More than 200 influencers were exposed early Monday after crypto detective ZachXBT posted a leaked price sheet on X showing usernames, wallet addresses, and promo rates of crypto shillers who were contacted to promote an unnamed project. The document, which Zach attached in three screenshots, included every detail from post pricing to tiers to on-chain […]

Crypto leak exposes 200+ influencers charging up to $60k for undisclosed shill posts

2025/09/01 22:50
4 min read

More than 200 influencers were exposed early Monday after crypto detective ZachXBT posted a leaked price sheet on X showing usernames, wallet addresses, and promo rates of crypto shillers who were contacted to promote an unnamed project.

The document, which Zach attached in three screenshots, included every detail from post pricing to tiers to on-chain wallet addresses. He claimed over 160 of them accepted payment.

“From 160+ accounts who accepted the deal, I only saw <5 accounts actually disclose the promotional posts as an advertisement,” Zach wrote.

Top-tier accounts charge tens of thousands with no disclosure

Each row in the document listed a crypto personality’s X handle, how much they charge per post, and where they want the funds sent. Every account had a tier rank.

Some were charging up to $60,000 for one post. Others were offering bulk tweet packages for $1,500. Many of them had public wallet addresses attached, making the transactions traceable.

The file covered everything from Tier 1 influencers like Atity, Eddy, and Sibeleth, all the way down to Tier 3 names charging less than two grand.

Atity was the most expensive account in the leak, asking $60,000 for one single promotion. His Solana wallet was listed as 2camhmXwvDnfDCnoSDuvjEdgWcR6kUNz6JiaNXqoWmxf. Eddy, labeled as Tier 1, charged $12,000 for six tweets, or $2,000 each.

MediaGiratfes asked for $10,000 for two posts, which worked out to $5,000 for one. Sibeleth, another Tier 1 name, went for $40,000 per post with a wallet under AGXRFS15Mu8dimT9EovjfDQR7pnGr2SyttszgPjK37c1. None of their profiles marked those paid posts as ads.

Apemps listed $8,500 for two video tweets. TedPillows went for $9,000 across four posts, breaking down to $2,260 each. Regrets10x had a similar rate; $8,000 for four tweets. DaokwonDo offered three posts for $6,500, or $2,166 for one.

HerroCrypto, Fuelkek, Mooondat, JeremyYBTC, 0xSweep, SolidTradesz, ShmooNFT, and WisdomMatic all clustered around $5,000 per post. Fuelkek left the one-post price as “ask,” but the bulk rate was two tweets for five grand.

Lynkox charged $4,200 for four tweets, while Arcane_Crypto priced two tweets plus an extra at $5,000. The one-post rate there landed at $2,600. Some addresses were reused across accounts. The one tied to Regrets10x also appeared beside Lynkox.

Tier 2 and 3 names stack up with low prices and no labels

The Tier 2 crowd filled most of the doc. Otrew took $4,750 for two videos. Bon_G and NotEezzy sat at $4,500 and $4,000 per post. OfficialSkyweel asked $4,000 for two tweets, tagged with a third-party $22,000 package deal.

Darkytk, Brommmyy, and Farmercist_eth all accepted $4,000 for two posts, breaking down to $2,000 each. RealPabloHeman was listed at $3,600 for three tweets or $4,200 for one. CryptoTony had a $3,500 package, marked “PACKAGE APPROVED.”

Vee, CryptoSalina, K3llyDeFi priced posts between $3,500–$3,600. The common wallet formats (e.g., A5s3jAQ9P7nX1zEBVTXWzCNS6c4vBG9cwUciwJZbLJB) showed they weren’t hiding where the payments went.

MomoWeb3, Cz7dt, DylanLeclair_, and NekoZilla were listed between $3,000–$3,400. All included tweet counts. Me3Mix3 took $2,800 for one post. Others like BlockFinanc3, Web3Mood, and Dexs_Maid asked between $2,500–$2,700. Wallets were consistent and clear. Most posts were two-tweet bundles.

The lower range showed Baza_NFT charging $2,000 for one video, with wallet ExLthb5n7zp4MBL2nM3ZbspMsQ9P6z5cF3uFcXJykF. CryptoDegin, CryptoBonding, Badmnsoon, and Neptune0x took $2,000 for two posts.

Some noted specific one-post prices—like 1,500 or 1,000—but left others blank. HotPepperAlpha, GoldenCrypto__, and BitInsiderETH had straight $2,000 rates with no breakdown.

Tier 3 accounts were the cheapest. CryptoCradle, Web3Daily, and CryptoCoachETH charged $1,800. Their wallets were attached to every deal. DefiPulseX, CryptoLush_, CryptoETAs, and Captalist00x are also priced at $1,800, with a separate $750-per-post tag. That pattern repeated across several names.

Alpha_Bizness dropped to $1,600. CoinJakeETH, DegenInvesting, NFTjamz, and GhostInsiders all settled at $1,500 for two tweets. GhostInsiders ended the sheet. Wallet: 62uRU8bCdDGRSJSmnNHLRWCVGr9X5D2gyc57nd5r6Z. No ad disclosure noted.

KEY Difference Wire helps crypto brands break through and dominate headlines fast

Market Opportunity
Moonveil Logo
Moonveil Price(MORE)
$0.0006299
$0.0006299$0.0006299
-4.27%
USD
Moonveil (MORE) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Dramatic Spot Crypto ETF Outflows Rock US Market

Dramatic Spot Crypto ETF Outflows Rock US Market

BitcoinWorld Dramatic Spot Crypto ETF Outflows Rock US Market The cryptocurrency market is always buzzing with activity, and recent developments surrounding US spot Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs have certainly grabbed attention. After a brief period of inflows, these prominent investment vehicles experienced a significant reversal, recording notable Spot Crypto ETF Outflows on September 22. This shift has sparked discussions among investors and analysts alike, prompting a closer look at what drove these movements and their potential implications for the broader digital asset landscape. What Triggered These Dramatic Spot Crypto ETF Outflows? On September 22, both US spot Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs collectively observed net outflows, effectively ending a two-day streak of positive inflows. This sudden reversal indicates a potential shift in investor sentiment or market dynamics. Understanding the specifics of these Spot Crypto ETF Outflows is crucial for anyone tracking the pulse of the crypto market. Data from Trader T revealed that spot Bitcoin ETFs alone registered total net outflows amounting to $363.17 million. This substantial figure highlights a notable selling pressure across several key funds. Fidelity’s FBTC led the pack with $276.68 million in outflows. Ark Invest’s ARKB followed, seeing $52.30 million depart. Grayscale’s GBTC, a long-standing player, recorded $24.65 million in outflows. VanEck’s HODL also contributed with $9.54 million. Interestingly, BlackRock’s IBIT and several other funds reported zero flows on this particular day, indicating a concentrated selling activity in specific products rather than a market-wide exodus. How Did Ethereum ETFs Respond to the Spot Crypto ETF Outflows? The trend of net outflows wasn’t limited to Bitcoin. Spot Ethereum ETFs also faced considerable pressure, collectively experiencing $76.06 million in net outflows during the same period. This indicates a broader market sentiment affecting both major cryptocurrencies. Fidelity’s FETH accounted for $33.12 million of the outflows. Bitwise’s ETHW saw $22.30 million withdrawn. BlackRock’s ETHA registered $15.19 million in outflows. Grayscale’s Mini ETH contributed $5.45 million to the total. These figures underscore that while Bitcoin ETFs saw larger absolute outflows, Ethereum ETFs also experienced a significant cooling of investor interest. Such synchronized movements often suggest overarching market factors rather than isolated fund-specific issues. What Are the Broader Implications of These Spot Crypto ETF Outflows? The reversal from inflows to substantial Spot Crypto ETF Outflows could signal a few things. It might reflect profit-taking by investors after recent market rallies, or it could indicate a cautious stance due to macroeconomic uncertainties. Moreover, such movements can influence market sentiment, potentially leading to increased volatility in the short term. For investors, monitoring these ETF flows provides valuable insights into institutional and retail sentiment. Significant outflows can sometimes precede price corrections, offering an opportunity for strategic re-evaluation. Conversely, sustained inflows often suggest growing confidence in digital assets. It is important to remember that ETF flows are just one metric among many. A holistic view, considering on-chain data, macroeconomic indicators, and regulatory news, is essential for making informed decisions in the dynamic crypto space. These Spot Crypto ETF Outflows serve as a reminder of the market’s inherent volatility and the need for continuous vigilance. In summary, the recent dramatic Spot Crypto ETF Outflows from US Bitcoin and Ethereum funds mark a notable shift in the investment landscape. While a two-day inflow streak was broken, these movements are a natural part of a maturing market. They highlight the ebb and flow of investor confidence and the dynamic nature of digital asset investments. As the market continues to evolve, keeping a close eye on these ETF trends will remain crucial for understanding broader sentiment and potential future directions. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Q1: What does “net outflows” mean for crypto ETFs? A1: Net outflows occur when investors redeem more shares from an ETF than they purchase, indicating more money is leaving the fund than entering it. Q2: Which US spot Bitcoin ETFs saw the largest outflows? A2: Fidelity’s FBTC led with $276.68 million in outflows, followed by Ark Invest’s ARKB and Grayscale’s GBTC, contributing significantly to the overall Spot Crypto ETF Outflows. Q3: Were Ethereum ETFs also affected by outflows? A3: Yes, US spot Ethereum ETFs experienced $76.06 million in net outflows, with Fidelity’s FETH and Bitwise’s ETHW being major contributors. Q4: What do these Spot Crypto ETF Outflows suggest about market sentiment? A4: They can suggest a shift towards profit-taking, increased caution due to macroeconomic factors, or a temporary cooling of investor interest in digital assets. Did you find this analysis of Spot Crypto ETF Outflows insightful? Share this article with your network on social media to help others understand the latest trends in the crypto ETF market and contribute to informed discussions! To learn more about the latest crypto market trends, explore our article on key developments shaping Bitcoin and Ethereum institutional adoption. This post Dramatic Spot Crypto ETF Outflows Rock US Market first appeared on BitcoinWorld.
Share
Coinstats2025/09/23 10:55
Remittix Success Leads To Rewarding Presale Investors With 300% Bonus – Here’s How To Get Involved

Remittix Success Leads To Rewarding Presale Investors With 300% Bonus – Here’s How To Get Involved

Besides its enormous presale success, Remittix is also extending a 300% bonus to early purchasers. This temporary bonus can be […] The post Remittix Success Leads
Share
Coindoo2026/02/07 16:39
Korean Crypto Exchange Bithumb Accidentally Gives Away Millions in Bitcoin During Promotion

Korean Crypto Exchange Bithumb Accidentally Gives Away Millions in Bitcoin During Promotion

TLDR Bithumb accidentally sent excess Bitcoin to customers during a promotional “Random Box” event in South Korea Some users reportedly received 2,000 BTC ($139
Share
Coincentral2026/02/07 16:39