The post Zora memecoin scandal erupts after Tyson Fury token disappears! appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key takeaways The sudden launch and disappearance of a Tyson Fury token on Zora exposed crypto’s social layer. As creators link and unlink verified accounts at will, platforms like Zora and Base are left scrambling to manage perception and user safety. When Tyson Fury’s “verified” account suddenly appeared on Zora (an NFT marketplace) with a token attached, Crypto Twitter (CT) rushed in. But just hours later, the account vanished, the tweet was deleted, and holders claimed their money had disappeared. What unfolded was a classic trust trap. The incident laid bare how vulnerable crypto’s social layer still is, where reputation can be weaponized, and hype can override caution. Tyson Fury token fallout CT went into frenzy when a “verified” Tyson Fury account launched a token on Zora, amplified by a tweet from @js_horne. Within hours, both the account and tweet vanished; and so did the token’s trade history from users’ wallets. Confused holders accused Zora of censorship and even assumed their money had disappeared. In reality, the token was only removed from Zora’s frontend, a standard industry move meant to protect users, while trading remained possible via coin-to-coin swaps or Uniswap [UNI]. The real problem wasn’t the protocol, but how it was handled. Source: X Zora’s unclear communication and clunky UX around “moderated” tokens left new users blindsided. For a platform positioning itself as the go-to for creator onboarding, the optics couldn’t have been worse. Sahil and social engineering rug At the center of the Fury token mess was Sahil, a familiar figure in crypto circles with a track record of celebrity coin launches and quick exits. His reputation alone casted doubt on the project, but the real trick was in the social layer. The playbook was simple: create a token and Zora account, link it to a verified or high-follower… The post Zora memecoin scandal erupts after Tyson Fury token disappears! appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key takeaways The sudden launch and disappearance of a Tyson Fury token on Zora exposed crypto’s social layer. As creators link and unlink verified accounts at will, platforms like Zora and Base are left scrambling to manage perception and user safety. When Tyson Fury’s “verified” account suddenly appeared on Zora (an NFT marketplace) with a token attached, Crypto Twitter (CT) rushed in. But just hours later, the account vanished, the tweet was deleted, and holders claimed their money had disappeared. What unfolded was a classic trust trap. The incident laid bare how vulnerable crypto’s social layer still is, where reputation can be weaponized, and hype can override caution. Tyson Fury token fallout CT went into frenzy when a “verified” Tyson Fury account launched a token on Zora, amplified by a tweet from @js_horne. Within hours, both the account and tweet vanished; and so did the token’s trade history from users’ wallets. Confused holders accused Zora of censorship and even assumed their money had disappeared. In reality, the token was only removed from Zora’s frontend, a standard industry move meant to protect users, while trading remained possible via coin-to-coin swaps or Uniswap [UNI]. The real problem wasn’t the protocol, but how it was handled. Source: X Zora’s unclear communication and clunky UX around “moderated” tokens left new users blindsided. For a platform positioning itself as the go-to for creator onboarding, the optics couldn’t have been worse. Sahil and social engineering rug At the center of the Fury token mess was Sahil, a familiar figure in crypto circles with a track record of celebrity coin launches and quick exits. His reputation alone casted doubt on the project, but the real trick was in the social layer. The playbook was simple: create a token and Zora account, link it to a verified or high-follower…

Zora memecoin scandal erupts after Tyson Fury token disappears!

3 min read

Key takeaways

The sudden launch and disappearance of a Tyson Fury token on Zora exposed crypto’s social layer. As creators link and unlink verified accounts at will, platforms like Zora and Base are left scrambling to manage perception and user safety.


When Tyson Fury’s “verified” account suddenly appeared on Zora (an NFT marketplace) with a token attached, Crypto Twitter (CT) rushed in.

But just hours later, the account vanished, the tweet was deleted, and holders claimed their money had disappeared. What unfolded was a classic trust trap.

The incident laid bare how vulnerable crypto’s social layer still is, where reputation can be weaponized, and hype can override caution.

Tyson Fury token fallout

CT went into frenzy when a “verified” Tyson Fury account launched a token on Zora, amplified by a tweet from @js_horne.

Within hours, both the account and tweet vanished; and so did the token’s trade history from users’ wallets. Confused holders accused Zora of censorship and even assumed their money had disappeared.

In reality, the token was only removed from Zora’s frontend, a standard industry move meant to protect users, while trading remained possible via coin-to-coin swaps or Uniswap [UNI].

The real problem wasn’t the protocol, but how it was handled.

Source: X

Zora’s unclear communication and clunky UX around “moderated” tokens left new users blindsided. For a platform positioning itself as the go-to for creator onboarding, the optics couldn’t have been worse.

Sahil and social engineering rug

At the center of the Fury token mess was Sahil, a familiar figure in crypto circles with a track record of celebrity coin launches and quick exits.

His reputation alone casted doubt on the project, but the real trick was in the social layer.

The playbook was simple: create a token and Zora account, link it to a verified or high-follower X (formerly Twitter) profile, post a tweet to lend credibility, and watch users flood in. 

Once the hype peaked, the account was deleted, causing the token to vanish from Zora’s frontend.

Financially, though, the rug pull fell flat. The token only reached a $400,000 market cap and $550,000 in trading volume, not exactly headline-grabbing numbers.

Base, trust and the real weak spot

The drama didn’t stop at Zora.

It spilled over to Base, where Jesse Pollak found himself trapped in a lose-lose scenario.

If he blocked Sahil, Base would look like it was censoring permissionless access. If he allowed it, critics could claim Base was backing a bad actor.

That’s classic social engineering: set up a situation where every choice looks bad, then let perception do the damage.

Pollak said,

But the deeper issue here is about trust.

‘Verified’ social accounts instantly boost the credibility of creator tokens. But when those accounts can be linked and unlinked at will, scammers can easily exploit the system.

Zora says it’s working on fixes, yet without stronger verification and on-chain transparency, these memory-hole rugs will keep happening.

Next: Michael Saylor uses MSTR stock to buy 3K Bitcoin in latest move – Details

Source: https://ambcrypto.com/zora-memecoin-scandal-erupts-after-tyson-fury-token-disappears/

Market Opportunity
Threshold Logo
Threshold Price(T)
$0.006531
$0.006531$0.006531
-6.76%
USD
Threshold (T) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

The post Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. “It’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress,” writes Pipes. Getty Images Washington is addicted to taxing success. Now, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is floating a plan to skim half the patent earnings from inventions developed at universities with federal funding. It’s being sold as a way to shore up programs like Social Security. In reality, it’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress. Yes, taxpayer dollars support early-stage research. But the real payoff comes later—in the jobs created, cures discovered, and industries launched when universities and private industry turn those discoveries into real products. By comparison, the sums at stake in patent licensing are trivial. Universities collectively earn only about $3.6 billion annually in patent income—less than the federal government spends on Social Security in a single day. Even confiscating half would barely register against a $6 trillion federal budget. And yet the damage from such a policy would be anything but trivial. The true return on taxpayer investment isn’t in licensing checks sent to Washington, but in the downstream economic activity that federally supported research unleashes. Thanks to the bipartisan Bayh-Dole Act of 1980, universities and private industry have powerful incentives to translate early-stage discoveries into real-world products. Before Bayh-Dole, the government hoarded patents from federally funded research, and fewer than 5% were ever licensed. Once universities could own and license their own inventions, innovation exploded. The result has been one of the best returns on investment in government history. Since 1996, university research has added nearly $2 trillion to U.S. industrial output, supported 6.5 million jobs, and launched more than 19,000 startups. Those companies pay…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 03:26
XRP Ledger Unlocks Permissioned Domains With 91% Validator Backing

XRP Ledger Unlocks Permissioned Domains With 91% Validator Backing

XRP Ledger activated XLS-80 after 91% validator approval, enabling permissioned domains for credential-gated use on the public XRPL. The XRP Ledger has activated
Share
LiveBitcoinNews2026/02/06 13:00
TrendX Taps Trusta AI to Develop Safer and Smarter Web3 Network

TrendX Taps Trusta AI to Develop Safer and Smarter Web3 Network

The purpose of collaboration is to advance the Web3 landscape by combining the decentralized infrastructure of TrendX with AI-led capabilities of Trusta AI.
Share
Blockchainreporter2025/09/18 01:07