Aperture Finance Hacker Launders $2.4M Through Tornado Cash Following $17M Multi-Protocol Exploit

The DeFi industry experienced a massive security breach after Aperture Finance was attacked for approximately $3.67 million worth of assets. After the attack, the hacker started to obfuscate their stolen assets by using the method called Tornado Cash and thus deposited 1,242.7 Ethereum. These activities were identified by PeckShield’s monitoring services on January 25, 2026, and point to ongoing security issues with DeFi platforms, as well as regulatory challenges facing them as a sector moving forward.

The Anatomy of the Attack

According to security researchers, the protocol that allows for the management of concentrated liquidity positions across various blockchains with Uniswap V3 by Aperture Finance suffered from an arbitrary call vulnerability.

This type of exploit occurs when the smart contract has some functions that are not properly validated so that an attacker can perform an unverified command, thus manipulating the internal logic of the contract.

Aperture Finance’s contracts V3 and V4 were directly attacked by abusing a key function at 0x67b34120(), which took user input and made low-level calls. The pressing concern was that the theft could facilitate the unauthorized acquisition of tokens and unapproved NFTs, as the contract neglected to verify the destination of the data or the nature of the requests being made. The root cause was a lack of validation for incoming input data. This illustrates how a tiny error can cause significant financial loss.

Part of a Coordinated Multi-Protocol Attack

The breach at Aperture Finance was just one incident within a coordinated wave of hacks focusing on SwapNet, which is a decentralized exchange aggregator, resulting in total losses of more than $17 million between all three protocols (Aperture Finance, SwapNet and the two combined). SwapNet ultimately was responsible for more than $13.4 million damage across the Ethereum, Arbitrum, Base, and Binance Smart Chain networks.

The largest single victim from the SwapNet attack suffered a loss of about $13.34 million and the total number of affected users was 20 across four different blockchain networks. Both protocols involved in this incident had similar vulnerabilities, demonstrating a systemic flaw in the way that various DeFi platforms manage user input and validate function calls. These events show that there are common vulnerabilities within decentralized finance (DeFi) security and that these vulnerabilities can be exploited by an attacker across multiple different protocols.

Response and Recovery Efforts by Industry

Following the exploit, Aperture Finance acted quickly to contain the situation by suspending all core front end functions to commence the block of new authorizations. The protocol released emergency warnings that urged users to immediately revoke permissions associated with its Ethereum mainnet contract address, in an effort to avoid further losses as it continues its investigations.

In an official statement Aperture Finance confirmed that all affected web application features had been disabled. The team said that it is working hand-in-hand with top forensic security companies and coordinating with law enforcement agencies to track down the stolen money. Communication channels have also been opened for negotiation of a possible return of assets.

Recovering funds associated with the Tornado Cash attack is extremely difficult because Tornado Cash is a mixer, so it uses zero knowledge proofs to hide transaction trails. According to industry reports, cybercriminals will steal approximately $3.4 worth of cryptocurrency in 2026; almost all these thefts occur because of access control vulnerabilities, pointing out the limitations of using audits alone.

Conclusion

This event shows that Decentralized Finance provides novel and necessary safety measures. Continuous surveillance, staged rollouts, and detailed bug bounty programs must address safety issues to create institutional support for the ecosystem. To protect themselves, users should audit and revoke unneeded token approval. Security researchers and malicious actors continue to compete, making industry-wide collaboration the only option to build long-term infrastructure.