Failed blockchain adoption narratives and weak fee capture have undercut confidence in major crypto projects.Failed blockchain adoption narratives and weak fee capture have undercut confidence in major crypto projects.

Why Bitcoin Is Struggling: 8 Factors Impacting Crypto Markets

3 min read

A prominent crypto analyst has detailed a list of factors driving the current market downturn while also outlining longer-term reasons for optimism.

The analysis, shared by Post Fiat founder Alex Good, also known as ‘goodalexander’ on February 3, 2026, comes as digital asset markets face their most bearish social sentiment in months and Bitcoin trades near nine-month lows.

Dissecting the Current Downturn

The industry observer presented eight bearish factors for the current slump, with the primary reason being the failure of major blockchain integration narratives to generate sustained value.

Examples include Arbitrum’s brief rally on a Robinhood announcement that later resulted in an in-house solution from the broker and Nasdaq’s use of private blockchains for on-chain trading instead of public ones.

The analyst noted that real fee capture for major layer-1 protocols has been low, with Solana’s daily fees falling to around $1 million from peaks above $24 million during the “Trump coin” frenzy.

Other factors include a macroeconomic focus on international equities, gold, and AI, which has drawn attention away from crypto. Good also suggested that the market has acted as a “Trump proxy,” performing well on pro-crypto policy expectations that have not fully materialized.

Furthermore, the expert pointed to structural market pressures, suggesting that if discounts on digital asset trusts (DATs) widen, activist investors could be incentivized to sell the underlying tokens, creating more downward pressure.

Data supports this bearish view. According to market intelligence provider Santiment, “FUD has taken over social media” following Bitcoin’s 16% drop over the past week, with the firm calling it the most negative retail sentiment since November 2025.

Investment flows have also mirrored the gloom, considering data from CoinShares showed a $1.7 billion weekly outflow from digital asset investment products, with Bitcoin alone seeing $1.32 billion exit. Additionally, since hitting highs in October 2025, the sector has lost $73 billion in assets under management.

What Could Still Support Crypto Longer Term

Despite the sell-off, Good said there are still reasons for cautious optimism. He pointed to a more fragmented global order, rising debt, and the risk of wealth taxes as factors that could renew interest in fixed-supply assets.

He also argued that artificial intelligence may lead to higher unemployment rather than job creation, increasing pressure on central banks to ease policy, which has historically benefited scarce assets.

Other analysts have echoed the idea that the cycle is strained rather than broken. On February 2, Global Macro Investor founder Raoul Pal said Bitcoin’s decline reflects a U.S. liquidity drain tied to fiscal mechanics and a government shutdown, not a failed market structure. He argued that easing liquidity later in the year could change conditions, though near-term momentum remains weak.

However, as things stand, traders will need to monitor if Bitcoin can maintain its stability in the mid-$70,000 range. According to market watchers like Daan Crypto Trades, a sustained move back above $80,000 could calm markets, while another break lower would likely test sentiment again.

The post Why Bitcoin Is Struggling: 8 Factors Impacting Crypto Markets appeared first on CryptoPotato.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

FCA komt in 2026 met aangepaste cryptoregels voor Britse markt

FCA komt in 2026 met aangepaste cryptoregels voor Britse markt

De Britse financiële waakhond, de FCA, komt in 2026 met nieuwe regels speciaal voor crypto bedrijven. Wat direct opvalt: de toezichthouder laat enkele klassieke financiële verplichtingen los om beter aan te sluiten op de snelle en grillige wereld van digitale activa. Tegelijkertijd wordt er extra nadruk gelegd op digitale beveiliging,... Het bericht FCA komt in 2026 met aangepaste cryptoregels voor Britse markt verscheen het eerst op Blockchain Stories.
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 00:33
Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

The post Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. “It’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress,” writes Pipes. Getty Images Washington is addicted to taxing success. Now, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is floating a plan to skim half the patent earnings from inventions developed at universities with federal funding. It’s being sold as a way to shore up programs like Social Security. In reality, it’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress. Yes, taxpayer dollars support early-stage research. But the real payoff comes later—in the jobs created, cures discovered, and industries launched when universities and private industry turn those discoveries into real products. By comparison, the sums at stake in patent licensing are trivial. Universities collectively earn only about $3.6 billion annually in patent income—less than the federal government spends on Social Security in a single day. Even confiscating half would barely register against a $6 trillion federal budget. And yet the damage from such a policy would be anything but trivial. The true return on taxpayer investment isn’t in licensing checks sent to Washington, but in the downstream economic activity that federally supported research unleashes. Thanks to the bipartisan Bayh-Dole Act of 1980, universities and private industry have powerful incentives to translate early-stage discoveries into real-world products. Before Bayh-Dole, the government hoarded patents from federally funded research, and fewer than 5% were ever licensed. Once universities could own and license their own inventions, innovation exploded. The result has been one of the best returns on investment in government history. Since 1996, university research has added nearly $2 trillion to U.S. industrial output, supported 6.5 million jobs, and launched more than 19,000 startups. Those companies pay…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 03:26
Trump foe devises plan to starve him of what he 'craves' most

Trump foe devises plan to starve him of what he 'craves' most

A longtime adversary of President Donald Trump has a plan for a key group to take away what Trump craves the most — attention. EX-CNN journalist Jim Acosta, who
Share
Rawstory2026/02/04 01:19