TLDR Bitcoin briefly fell to $74,000 before bouncing back above $76,000 in a sharp V-shaped recovery driven by thin market liquidity Over $510 million in leveragedTLDR Bitcoin briefly fell to $74,000 before bouncing back above $76,000 in a sharp V-shaped recovery driven by thin market liquidity Over $510 million in leveraged

Why is Crypto Crashing? Here’s What Happened

4 min read

TLDR

  • Bitcoin briefly fell to $74,000 before bouncing back above $76,000 in a sharp V-shaped recovery driven by thin market liquidity
  • Over $510 million in leveraged positions were liquidated in 12 hours, with long positions accounting for $391.6 million of the losses
  • Major altcoins including Ether, BNB, XRP and Solana declined between 4% and 8% as risk appetite weakened across crypto markets
  • Weekend trading conditions thinned order books further with institutional desks inactive, making price swings more extreme
  • The total crypto market cap dropped $121 billion to $2.51 trillion, holding just above the critical $2.50 trillion support level

Bitcoin fell below $75,000 over the weekend before recovering above $76,000 in volatile trading conditions. The sharp price swing highlighted how reduced market liquidity is making both selloffs and recoveries more extreme.

Bitcoin (BTC) PriceBitcoin (BTC) Price

The cryptocurrency briefly tested $74,000 support before rebounding. This V-shaped price movement came from thin order books where smaller trades can move prices more dramatically than usual.

Markets saw forced selling pressure over a 12-hour period. Liquidations totaled $510 million in leveraged positions across crypto exchanges.

Long positions made up the majority of losses at $391.6 million. Short positions accounted for $118.6 million in liquidations.

Source: Coinglass

The imbalance in liquidations shows traders were positioned for price increases. When Bitcoin dropped, these bullish bets were automatically closed, adding to downward pressure.

Ether led declines among major cryptocurrencies with an 8% drop in 24 hours. BNB, XRP and Solana all fell between 4% and 6%.

Lido’s staked ether followed Ethereum’s decline. Dogecoin and TRON posted smaller losses as risk appetite declined across large-cap tokens.

Thin Market Conditions Amplify Price Moves

The shallow market depth allowed relatively small selling waves to break support levels. The same thin liquidity helped dip buyers push prices back up quickly.

Weekend trading added another factor to Bitcoin’s volatility. Traditional markets were closed and large institutional trading desks remained mostly inactive.

Order books typically thin during weekend periods. This reduction means less capital is needed to move prices through key technical levels.

Under these conditions, Bitcoin behaves more like a leveraged derivative. Funding imbalances and clustered stop orders can dictate price direction for extended periods.

China released manufacturing data that showed mixed results. A private survey indicated slight expansion while the official gauge slipped into contraction.

Beijing’s managed yuan policy limits direct capital flow impacts on Bitcoin. The factory data offers background context but doesn’t act as a direct price catalyst.

Without currency volatility or new stimulus measures, Chinese economic data functions as a stabilizer. It doesn’t provide the momentum needed to drive crypto markets higher.

Market Cap Holds Above Key Support

The total crypto market capitalization fell by $121 billion. The market cap now stands near $2.51 trillion, just above the $2.50 trillion support zone.

Source: CoinGecko

Holding this level suggests selling pressure may be easing. A breakdown below $2.50 trillion would likely push markets toward $2.39 trillion support.

Late January saw extreme volatility with nearly $300 billion erased from markets. That movement reflected broader risk aversion across global assets.

Bitcoin’s rebound above the mid-$70,000 range suggests the selloff was primarily a leverage reset. It does not appear to be a fundamental repricing of the asset.

The US Treasury sanctioned two UK-registered crypto exchanges, Zedcex and Zedxion. The platforms processed nearly $1 billion in transactions linked to Iran’s IRGC.

This marks the first time entire digital asset platforms faced blacklisting under Iran-related sanctions. The Treasury cited extensive USDT use on Tron network and ties to sanctioned individuals.

A UAE-backed entity agreed to acquire a 49% stake in Trump-linked World Liberty Financial for $500 million. The deal occurred just days before Trump’s inauguration in January.

The post Why is Crypto Crashing? Here’s What Happened appeared first on CoinCentral.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Role of Blockchain in Building Safer Web3 Gaming Ecosystems

The Role of Blockchain in Building Safer Web3 Gaming Ecosystems

The gaming industry is in the midst of a historic shift, driven by the rise of Web3. Unlike traditional games, where developers and publishers control assets and dictate in-game economies, Web3 gaming empowers players with ownership and influence. Built on blockchain technology, these ecosystems are decentralized by design, enabling true digital asset ownership, transparent economies, and a future where players help shape the games they play. However, as Web3 gaming grows, security becomes a focal point. The range of security concerns, from hacking to asset theft to vulnerabilities in smart contracts, is a significant issue that will undermine or erode trust in this ecosystem, limiting or stopping adoption. Blockchain technology could be used to create security processes around secure, transparent, and fair Web3 gaming ecosystems. We will explore how security is increasing within gaming ecosystems, which challenges are being overcome, and what the future of security looks like. Why is Security Important in Web3 Gaming? Web3 gaming differs from traditional gaming in that players engage with both the game and assets with real value attached. Players own in-game assets that exist as tokens or NFTs (Non-Fungible Tokens), and can trade and sell them. These game assets usually represent significant financial value, meaning security failure could represent real monetary loss. In essence, without security, the promises of owning “something” in Web3, decentralized economies within games, and all that comes with the term “fair” gameplay can easily be eroded by fraud, hacking, and exploitation. This is precisely why the uniqueness of blockchain should be emphasized in securing Web3 gaming. How Blockchain Ensures Security in Web3 Gaming?
  1. Immutable Ownership of Assets Blockchain records can be manipulated by anyone. If a player owns a sword, skin, or plot of land as an NFT, it is verifiably in their ownership, and it cannot be altered or deleted by the developer or even hacked. This has created a proven track record of ownership, providing control back to the players, unlike any centralised gaming platform where assets can be revoked.
  2. Decentralized Infrastructure Blockchain networks also have a distributed architecture where game data is stored in a worldwide network of nodes, making them much less susceptible to centralised points of failure and attacks. This decentralised approach makes it exponentially more difficult to hijack systems or even shut off the game’s economy.
  3. Secure Transactions with Cryptography Whether a player buys an NFT or trades their in-game tokens for other items or tokens, the transactions are enforced by cryptographic algorithms, ensuring secure, verifiable, and irreversible transactions and eliminating the risks of double-spending or fraudulent trades.
  4. Smart Contract Automation Smart contracts automate the enforcement of game rules and players’ economic exchanges for the developer, eliminating the need for intermediaries or middlemen, and trust for the developer. For example, if a player completes a quest that promises a reward, the smart contract will execute and distribute what was promised.
  5. Anti-Cheating and Fair Gameplay The naturally transparent nature of blockchain makes it extremely simple for anyone to examine a specific instance of gameplay and verify the economic outcomes from that play. Furthermore, multi-player games that enforce smart contracts on things like loot sharing or win sharing can automate and measure trustlessness and avoid cheating, manipulations, and fraud by developers.
  6. Cross-Platform Security Many Web3 games feature asset interoperability across platforms. This interoperability is made viable by blockchain, which guarantees ownership is maintained whenever assets transition from one game or marketplace to another, thereby offering protection to players who rely on transfers for security against fraud. Key Security Dangers in Web3 Gaming Although blockchain provides sound first principles of security, the Web3 gaming ecosystem is susceptible to threats. Some of the most serious threats include:
Smart Contract Vulnerabilities: Smart contracts that are poorly written or lack auditing will leave openings for exploitation and thereby result in asset loss. Phishing Attacks: Unintentionally exposing or revealing private keys or signing transactions that are not possible to reverse, under the assumption they were genuine transaction requests. Bridge Hacks: Cross-chain bridges, which allow players to move their assets between their respective blockchains, continually face hacks, requiring vigilance from players and developers. Scams and Rug Pulls: Rug pulls occur when a game project raises money and leaves, leaving player assets worthless. Regulatory Ambiguity: Global regulations remain unclear; risks exist for players and developers alike. While blockchain alone won’t resolve every issue, it remediates the responsibility of the first principles, more so when joined by processes such as auditing, education, and the right governance, which can improve their contribution to the security landscapes in game ecosystems. Real Life Examples of Blockchain Security in Web3 Gaming Axie Infinity (Ronin Hack): The Axie Infinity game and several projects suffered one of the biggest hacks thus far on its Ronin bridge; however, it demonstrated the effectiveness of multi-sig security and the effective utilization of decentralization. The industry benefited through learning and reflection, thus, as projects have implemented changes to reduce the risks of future hacks or misappropriation. Immutable X: This Ethereum scaling solution aims to ensure secure NFT transactions for gaming, allowing players to trade an asset without the burden of exorbitant fees and fears of being a victim of fraud. Enjin: Enjin is providing a trusted infrastructure for Web3 games, offering secure NFT creation and transfer while reiterating that ownership and an asset securely belong to the player. These examples indubitably illustrate that despite challenges to overcome, blockchain remains the foundational layer on which to build more secure Web3 gaming environments. Benefits of Blockchain Security for Players and Developers For Players: Confidence in true ownership of assets Transparency in in-game economies Protection against nefarious trades/scams For Developers: More trust between players and the platform Less reliance on centralized infrastructure Ability to attract wealth and players based on provable fairness By incorporating blockchain security within the mechanics of game design, developers can create and enforce resilient ecosystems where players feel reassured in investing time, money, and ownership within virtual worlds. The Future of Secure Web3 Gaming Ecosystems As the wisdom of blockchain technology and industry knowledge improves, the future for secure Web3 gaming looks bright. New growing trends include: Zero-Knowledge Proofs (ZKPs): A new wave of protocols that enable private transactions and secure smart contracts while managing user privacy with an element of transparency. Decentralized Identity Solutions (DID): Helping players control their identities and decrease account theft risks. AI-Enhanced Security: Identifying irregularities in user interactions by sampling pattern anomalies to avert hacks and fraud by time-stamping critical events. Interoperable Security Standards: Allowing secured and seamless asset transfers across blockchains and games. With these innovations, blockchain will not only secure gaming assets but also enhance the overall trust and longevity of Web3 gaming ecosystems. Conclusion Blockchain is more than a buzzword in Web3; it is the only way to host security, fairness, and transparency. With blockchain, players confirm immutable ownership of digital assets, there is a decentralized infrastructure, and finally, it supports smart contracts to automate code that protects players and developers from the challenges of digital economies. The threats, vulnerabilities, and scams that come from smart contracts still persist, but the industry is maturing with better security practices, cross-chain solutions, and increased formal cryptographic tools. In the coming years, blockchain will remain the base to digital economies and drive Web3 gaming environments that allow players to safely own, trade, and enjoy their digital experiences free from fraud and exploitation. While blockchain and gaming alone entertain, we will usher in an era of secure digital worlds where trust complements innovation. The Role of Blockchain in Building Safer Web3 Gaming Ecosystems was originally published in Coinmonks on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story
Share
Medium2025/09/18 14:40
Vitalik Buterin Challenges Ethereum’s Layer 2 Paradigm

Vitalik Buterin Challenges Ethereum’s Layer 2 Paradigm

Vitalik Buterin challenges the role of layer 2 solutions in Ethereum's ecosystem. Layer 2's slow progress and Ethereum’s L1 scaling impact future strategies.
Share
Coinstats2026/02/04 04:08
USAA Names Dan Griffiths Chief Information Officer to Drive Secure, Simplified Digital Member Experiences

USAA Names Dan Griffiths Chief Information Officer to Drive Secure, Simplified Digital Member Experiences

SAN ANTONIO–(BUSINESS WIRE)–USAA today announced the appointment of Dan Griffiths as Chief Information Officer, effective February 5, 2026. A proven financial‑services
Share
AI Journal2026/02/04 04:15