The post Nevada Court Grants Temporary Restraining Order Against Polymarket appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In brief A Nevada state court has issued a temporaryThe post Nevada Court Grants Temporary Restraining Order Against Polymarket appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In brief A Nevada state court has issued a temporary

Nevada Court Grants Temporary Restraining Order Against Polymarket

In brief

  • A Nevada state court has issued a temporary restraining order blocking Polymarket from offering event contracts.
  • Judge Woodbury ruled the harm from evading Nevada’s “comprehensive regulatory structure” is “immediate, irreparable and not sufficiently remediable by compensatory damages.”
  • The decision adds to mounting regulatory pressure on prediction markets, following enforcement actions in Tennessee and bans in Portugal and Hungary.

A Nevada state court has issued a temporary restraining order blocking Blockratize, the entity behind Polymarket, from offering event-based contracts in the state for two weeks, finding that the platform’s activities likely violate Nevada gaming law and are not shielded by exclusive federal derivatives oversight.

In an order issued Saturday, Judge Jason Woodbury sided with the Nevada Gaming Control Board, ruling that the Commodity Exchange Act “does not vest exclusive jurisdiction over Polymarket’s contracts with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission.” 

The order blocks Polymarket from offering sports and events contracts to Nevada residents ahead of a February 11 hearing on a preliminary injunction.

If upheld, platforms like Polymarket and competitor Kalshi may be forced to obtain state-by-state gambling licenses or abandon sports-related markets entirely, a business segment representing over 80% of some platforms’ trading volumes.

The Nevada Gaming Control Board filed its civil enforcement action seeking “a declaration and injunction to stop Polymarket from offering unlicensed wagering” through its mobile app, which it considers sports wagering activity under state statutes.

“The resulting harm in evasion of Nevada’s ‘comprehensive regulatory structure’ and ‘strict licensing standards’ is immediate, irreparable, and not sufficiently remediable by compensatory damages,” the judge wrote.

The order declared that “an unlicensed participant beyond the Board’s control, such as Polymarket, obstructs the Board’s ability to fulfill its statutory functions,” including preventing wagers from individuals who could influence sporting event outcomes, blocking underage participants, and keeping unsuitable individuals from involvement.

“The balance of hardships and public interest in maintaining meaningful control over Nevada’s gaming industry for the purpose of ensuring its integrity strongly supports issuance of the temporary restraining order,” Judge Woodbury added.

“It appears that Polymarket has already ceased offering event contracts in Nevada,” Daniel Wallach, founder and principal of Wallach Legal LLC, a law firm specializing in sports wagering and gaming law, posted on X.

State-level enforcement may increase “compliance costs and legal uncertainties, potentially deterring investment and slowing the development of new features or products in the prediction market sector,” Even Alex Chandra, a partner at IGNOS Law Alliance, told Decrypt.

Chandra said the government needs to provide “clearer guidelines, potentially standardizing the industry and fostering long-term growth.”

The Nevada action follows similar enforcement moves across multiple jurisdictions. 

Both the Hungarian Supervisory Authority for Regulated Activities and the Portuguese Gaming Regulatory Authority issued bans against Polymarket this month, accusing it of illegal gambling activity. 

Earlier this month, Tennessee’s Sports Wagering Council sent cease-and-desist letters to Polymarket, Kalshi, and Crypto.com, ordering the companies to immediately pull sports-related markets accessible to Tennessee customers and refund pending wagers. 

Rep. Ritchie Torres (D-NY) and 30 House colleagues, including former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), recently introduced the Public Integrity in Financial Prediction Markets Act of 2026.

The bill would stop federal elected officials, political appointees, and employees of Congress and executive agencies from participating in prediction markets when they possess “material non-public information” about a market or the ability to influence its outcome.

Decrypt has reached out to Polyarket for comment.

Daily Debrief Newsletter

Start every day with the top news stories right now, plus original features, a podcast, videos and more.

Source: https://decrypt.co/356597/nevada-court-temporary-restraining-order-polymarket

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Dramatic Spot Crypto ETF Outflows Rock US Market

Dramatic Spot Crypto ETF Outflows Rock US Market

BitcoinWorld Dramatic Spot Crypto ETF Outflows Rock US Market The cryptocurrency market is always buzzing with activity, and recent developments surrounding US spot Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs have certainly grabbed attention. After a brief period of inflows, these prominent investment vehicles experienced a significant reversal, recording notable Spot Crypto ETF Outflows on September 22. This shift has sparked discussions among investors and analysts alike, prompting a closer look at what drove these movements and their potential implications for the broader digital asset landscape. What Triggered These Dramatic Spot Crypto ETF Outflows? On September 22, both US spot Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs collectively observed net outflows, effectively ending a two-day streak of positive inflows. This sudden reversal indicates a potential shift in investor sentiment or market dynamics. Understanding the specifics of these Spot Crypto ETF Outflows is crucial for anyone tracking the pulse of the crypto market. Data from Trader T revealed that spot Bitcoin ETFs alone registered total net outflows amounting to $363.17 million. This substantial figure highlights a notable selling pressure across several key funds. Fidelity’s FBTC led the pack with $276.68 million in outflows. Ark Invest’s ARKB followed, seeing $52.30 million depart. Grayscale’s GBTC, a long-standing player, recorded $24.65 million in outflows. VanEck’s HODL also contributed with $9.54 million. Interestingly, BlackRock’s IBIT and several other funds reported zero flows on this particular day, indicating a concentrated selling activity in specific products rather than a market-wide exodus. How Did Ethereum ETFs Respond to the Spot Crypto ETF Outflows? The trend of net outflows wasn’t limited to Bitcoin. Spot Ethereum ETFs also faced considerable pressure, collectively experiencing $76.06 million in net outflows during the same period. This indicates a broader market sentiment affecting both major cryptocurrencies. Fidelity’s FETH accounted for $33.12 million of the outflows. Bitwise’s ETHW saw $22.30 million withdrawn. BlackRock’s ETHA registered $15.19 million in outflows. Grayscale’s Mini ETH contributed $5.45 million to the total. These figures underscore that while Bitcoin ETFs saw larger absolute outflows, Ethereum ETFs also experienced a significant cooling of investor interest. Such synchronized movements often suggest overarching market factors rather than isolated fund-specific issues. What Are the Broader Implications of These Spot Crypto ETF Outflows? The reversal from inflows to substantial Spot Crypto ETF Outflows could signal a few things. It might reflect profit-taking by investors after recent market rallies, or it could indicate a cautious stance due to macroeconomic uncertainties. Moreover, such movements can influence market sentiment, potentially leading to increased volatility in the short term. For investors, monitoring these ETF flows provides valuable insights into institutional and retail sentiment. Significant outflows can sometimes precede price corrections, offering an opportunity for strategic re-evaluation. Conversely, sustained inflows often suggest growing confidence in digital assets. It is important to remember that ETF flows are just one metric among many. A holistic view, considering on-chain data, macroeconomic indicators, and regulatory news, is essential for making informed decisions in the dynamic crypto space. These Spot Crypto ETF Outflows serve as a reminder of the market’s inherent volatility and the need for continuous vigilance. In summary, the recent dramatic Spot Crypto ETF Outflows from US Bitcoin and Ethereum funds mark a notable shift in the investment landscape. While a two-day inflow streak was broken, these movements are a natural part of a maturing market. They highlight the ebb and flow of investor confidence and the dynamic nature of digital asset investments. As the market continues to evolve, keeping a close eye on these ETF trends will remain crucial for understanding broader sentiment and potential future directions. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Q1: What does “net outflows” mean for crypto ETFs? A1: Net outflows occur when investors redeem more shares from an ETF than they purchase, indicating more money is leaving the fund than entering it. Q2: Which US spot Bitcoin ETFs saw the largest outflows? A2: Fidelity’s FBTC led with $276.68 million in outflows, followed by Ark Invest’s ARKB and Grayscale’s GBTC, contributing significantly to the overall Spot Crypto ETF Outflows. Q3: Were Ethereum ETFs also affected by outflows? A3: Yes, US spot Ethereum ETFs experienced $76.06 million in net outflows, with Fidelity’s FETH and Bitwise’s ETHW being major contributors. Q4: What do these Spot Crypto ETF Outflows suggest about market sentiment? A4: They can suggest a shift towards profit-taking, increased caution due to macroeconomic factors, or a temporary cooling of investor interest in digital assets. Did you find this analysis of Spot Crypto ETF Outflows insightful? Share this article with your network on social media to help others understand the latest trends in the crypto ETF market and contribute to informed discussions! To learn more about the latest crypto market trends, explore our article on key developments shaping Bitcoin and Ethereum institutional adoption. This post Dramatic Spot Crypto ETF Outflows Rock US Market first appeared on BitcoinWorld.
Share
Coinstats2025/09/23 10:55
Remittix Success Leads To Rewarding Presale Investors With 300% Bonus – Here’s How To Get Involved

Remittix Success Leads To Rewarding Presale Investors With 300% Bonus – Here’s How To Get Involved

Besides its enormous presale success, Remittix is also extending a 300% bonus to early purchasers. This temporary bonus can be […] The post Remittix Success Leads
Share
Coindoo2026/02/07 16:39
Korean Crypto Exchange Bithumb Accidentally Gives Away Millions in Bitcoin During Promotion

Korean Crypto Exchange Bithumb Accidentally Gives Away Millions in Bitcoin During Promotion

TLDR Bithumb accidentally sent excess Bitcoin to customers during a promotional “Random Box” event in South Korea Some users reportedly received 2,000 BTC ($139
Share
Coincentral2026/02/07 16:39