The post XLM Technical Analysis Feb 1 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. XLM’s 24-hour volume is hovering at the 158.71 million dollar level; despite the downtrendThe post XLM Technical Analysis Feb 1 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. XLM’s 24-hour volume is hovering at the 158.71 million dollar level; despite the downtrend

XLM Technical Analysis Feb 1

4 min read

XLM’s 24-hour volume is hovering at the 158.71 million dollar level; despite the downtrend, volume remaining below average signals weak seller participation. This situation highlights the accumulation potential during the price’s bottom search and distances market sentiment from indecisive selling pressure.

Volume Profile and Market Participation

XLM’s current volume profile stands out with a trading volume of 158.71 million dollars over the last 24 hours. This level is significantly below the 7-day average volume (approximately 220 million dollars), indicating low market participation. In volume profile analysis, the Value Area High (VAH) level is concentrated around 0.21, while the Point of Control (POC) is fixed near 0.19. Even as the price pulls back to 0.18 in the downtrend, volume nodes thin out at lower levels; this reflects selective selling rather than a broad-based selling wave.

In terms of market participation, volume in down moves (price -3.92%) stays below 30%, which is insufficient for healthy bearish momentum. Conversely, volume spikes are observed in minor upticks (e.g., around the 0.1787 support). This pattern indicates dominance of retail-focused selling, with institutional players not yet fully engaged. RSI at 29.12 level gives an oversold signal, and the lack of volume confirmation offers hope for a trend reversal. Overall, the volume profile emphasizes low participation, showing that price alone can be misleading – the real story is in the volume.

Accumulation or Distribution?

Accumulation Signals

Accumulation signals are clear: While price is suppressed below EMA20 (0.21), volume in down candles stays 40% below average. This ‘low-volume decline’ is a classic accumulation pattern; it indicates that strong hands (institutional) are cost averaging. In MTF volume levels (1D/3D/1W), there are 8 strong levels, 4 of which are support (S) focused: 0.1655 (74/100 score) and 0.1787 (62/100). In recent weeks, after price tested and was rejected at 0.22 resistance, volume dry-up was observed – a typical Wyckoff accumulation phase.

Additionally, volume delta shows positive divergence: Selling volume is decreasing while buying volume is stabilizing. Combined with RSI oversold, an accumulation zone may form around 0.1655. Target bullish 0.2423 (30 score), accessible with volume increase.

Distribution Risks

Distribution risk is low but present: If volume does not confirm an upside breakout (0.1852R, 72/100), there’s fakeout risk. In the last 3 days, volume decline divergence in minor rallies may imply hidden distribution. For bearish target 0.1186 (22 score), a volume spike is required; current low volume does not support this. Supertrend bearish and MACD negative histogram provide additional warnings for distribution – but no volume confirmation.

Price-Volume Confluence

Despite price being in a downtrend (-3.92%), volume confirmation is weak: Volume on down days < average, interpreted as ‘unhealthy downside’. For a healthy decline, up volume > down volume is needed; here it’s the opposite. As price tests 0.1787 support, volume increase (+15% spike) confirms buyer defense. Divergence is obvious: Price makes new lows while volume contracts – classic bullish divergence.

Price below EMAs looks bearish, but lacking volume confirmation. This suggests the trend is exhausting and a volume explosion can be expected for reversal. Key levels: If support 0.1655 holds with volume, confluence turns positive.

Big Player Activity

Big player (institutional/whale) activities are concentrated in upper tails of the volume profile – high rejection volumes around 0.22R. In the last 1W timeframe, 3 resistance levels (1W breakdown) imply institutional selling pressure, but 1D shows increasing support volumes. No climax volume; low volume down suggests whales are stalking buying opportunities.

Delta analysis: Cumulative volume delta shows tendency to turn from negative to positive. This pattern indicates smart money is accumulating positions – patterns are aligned, though not definitive. Watch: Wallet trackers for sudden volume spikes.

Bitcoin Correlation

BTC at 78,367$ with -6.16% decline in downtrend; Supertrend bearish and rising dominance caution for altcoins. XLM correlates with BTC at 0.85 – if BTC supports (77,897$, 75,720$) fail, XLM is forced to 0.1655. If BTC resistances (80,285$) break, XLM relief rally to 0.1852R. With high BTC dominance, alt volume stays low; BTC stabilization triggers XLM accumulation. Key: BTC break below 77k bearish for XLM, above bullish signal.

Volume-Based Outlook

Volume-based outlook is cautiously bullish: Low-volume decline signals accumulation, awaiting high-volume upside confirmation. Short-term: 0.1655S test, bounce with volume increase. Long-term: Breakout above volume average targets 0.2423. Risk: BTC dump with volume climax down. Overall: Volume does not confirm price – bottom near, accumulation phase likely.

Educational note: Volume beats price alone; divergences give early signals. Spot: XLM Spot Analysis, Futures: XLM Futures Analysis.

This analysis uses the market views and methodology of Chief Analyst Devrim Cacal.

Crypto Research Analyst: Michael Roberts

Blockchain technology and DeFi focused

This analysis is not investment advice. Do your own research.

Source: https://en.coinotag.com/analysis/xlm-technical-analysis-february-1-2026-volume-and-accumulation

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Role of Blockchain in Building Safer Web3 Gaming Ecosystems

The Role of Blockchain in Building Safer Web3 Gaming Ecosystems

The gaming industry is in the midst of a historic shift, driven by the rise of Web3. Unlike traditional games, where developers and publishers control assets and dictate in-game economies, Web3 gaming empowers players with ownership and influence. Built on blockchain technology, these ecosystems are decentralized by design, enabling true digital asset ownership, transparent economies, and a future where players help shape the games they play. However, as Web3 gaming grows, security becomes a focal point. The range of security concerns, from hacking to asset theft to vulnerabilities in smart contracts, is a significant issue that will undermine or erode trust in this ecosystem, limiting or stopping adoption. Blockchain technology could be used to create security processes around secure, transparent, and fair Web3 gaming ecosystems. We will explore how security is increasing within gaming ecosystems, which challenges are being overcome, and what the future of security looks like. Why is Security Important in Web3 Gaming? Web3 gaming differs from traditional gaming in that players engage with both the game and assets with real value attached. Players own in-game assets that exist as tokens or NFTs (Non-Fungible Tokens), and can trade and sell them. These game assets usually represent significant financial value, meaning security failure could represent real monetary loss. In essence, without security, the promises of owning “something” in Web3, decentralized economies within games, and all that comes with the term “fair” gameplay can easily be eroded by fraud, hacking, and exploitation. This is precisely why the uniqueness of blockchain should be emphasized in securing Web3 gaming. How Blockchain Ensures Security in Web3 Gaming?
  1. Immutable Ownership of Assets Blockchain records can be manipulated by anyone. If a player owns a sword, skin, or plot of land as an NFT, it is verifiably in their ownership, and it cannot be altered or deleted by the developer or even hacked. This has created a proven track record of ownership, providing control back to the players, unlike any centralised gaming platform where assets can be revoked.
  2. Decentralized Infrastructure Blockchain networks also have a distributed architecture where game data is stored in a worldwide network of nodes, making them much less susceptible to centralised points of failure and attacks. This decentralised approach makes it exponentially more difficult to hijack systems or even shut off the game’s economy.
  3. Secure Transactions with Cryptography Whether a player buys an NFT or trades their in-game tokens for other items or tokens, the transactions are enforced by cryptographic algorithms, ensuring secure, verifiable, and irreversible transactions and eliminating the risks of double-spending or fraudulent trades.
  4. Smart Contract Automation Smart contracts automate the enforcement of game rules and players’ economic exchanges for the developer, eliminating the need for intermediaries or middlemen, and trust for the developer. For example, if a player completes a quest that promises a reward, the smart contract will execute and distribute what was promised.
  5. Anti-Cheating and Fair Gameplay The naturally transparent nature of blockchain makes it extremely simple for anyone to examine a specific instance of gameplay and verify the economic outcomes from that play. Furthermore, multi-player games that enforce smart contracts on things like loot sharing or win sharing can automate and measure trustlessness and avoid cheating, manipulations, and fraud by developers.
  6. Cross-Platform Security Many Web3 games feature asset interoperability across platforms. This interoperability is made viable by blockchain, which guarantees ownership is maintained whenever assets transition from one game or marketplace to another, thereby offering protection to players who rely on transfers for security against fraud. Key Security Dangers in Web3 Gaming Although blockchain provides sound first principles of security, the Web3 gaming ecosystem is susceptible to threats. Some of the most serious threats include:
Smart Contract Vulnerabilities: Smart contracts that are poorly written or lack auditing will leave openings for exploitation and thereby result in asset loss. Phishing Attacks: Unintentionally exposing or revealing private keys or signing transactions that are not possible to reverse, under the assumption they were genuine transaction requests. Bridge Hacks: Cross-chain bridges, which allow players to move their assets between their respective blockchains, continually face hacks, requiring vigilance from players and developers. Scams and Rug Pulls: Rug pulls occur when a game project raises money and leaves, leaving player assets worthless. Regulatory Ambiguity: Global regulations remain unclear; risks exist for players and developers alike. While blockchain alone won’t resolve every issue, it remediates the responsibility of the first principles, more so when joined by processes such as auditing, education, and the right governance, which can improve their contribution to the security landscapes in game ecosystems. Real Life Examples of Blockchain Security in Web3 Gaming Axie Infinity (Ronin Hack): The Axie Infinity game and several projects suffered one of the biggest hacks thus far on its Ronin bridge; however, it demonstrated the effectiveness of multi-sig security and the effective utilization of decentralization. The industry benefited through learning and reflection, thus, as projects have implemented changes to reduce the risks of future hacks or misappropriation. Immutable X: This Ethereum scaling solution aims to ensure secure NFT transactions for gaming, allowing players to trade an asset without the burden of exorbitant fees and fears of being a victim of fraud. Enjin: Enjin is providing a trusted infrastructure for Web3 games, offering secure NFT creation and transfer while reiterating that ownership and an asset securely belong to the player. These examples indubitably illustrate that despite challenges to overcome, blockchain remains the foundational layer on which to build more secure Web3 gaming environments. Benefits of Blockchain Security for Players and Developers For Players: Confidence in true ownership of assets Transparency in in-game economies Protection against nefarious trades/scams For Developers: More trust between players and the platform Less reliance on centralized infrastructure Ability to attract wealth and players based on provable fairness By incorporating blockchain security within the mechanics of game design, developers can create and enforce resilient ecosystems where players feel reassured in investing time, money, and ownership within virtual worlds. The Future of Secure Web3 Gaming Ecosystems As the wisdom of blockchain technology and industry knowledge improves, the future for secure Web3 gaming looks bright. New growing trends include: Zero-Knowledge Proofs (ZKPs): A new wave of protocols that enable private transactions and secure smart contracts while managing user privacy with an element of transparency. Decentralized Identity Solutions (DID): Helping players control their identities and decrease account theft risks. AI-Enhanced Security: Identifying irregularities in user interactions by sampling pattern anomalies to avert hacks and fraud by time-stamping critical events. Interoperable Security Standards: Allowing secured and seamless asset transfers across blockchains and games. With these innovations, blockchain will not only secure gaming assets but also enhance the overall trust and longevity of Web3 gaming ecosystems. Conclusion Blockchain is more than a buzzword in Web3; it is the only way to host security, fairness, and transparency. With blockchain, players confirm immutable ownership of digital assets, there is a decentralized infrastructure, and finally, it supports smart contracts to automate code that protects players and developers from the challenges of digital economies. The threats, vulnerabilities, and scams that come from smart contracts still persist, but the industry is maturing with better security practices, cross-chain solutions, and increased formal cryptographic tools. In the coming years, blockchain will remain the base to digital economies and drive Web3 gaming environments that allow players to safely own, trade, and enjoy their digital experiences free from fraud and exploitation. While blockchain and gaming alone entertain, we will usher in an era of secure digital worlds where trust complements innovation. The Role of Blockchain in Building Safer Web3 Gaming Ecosystems was originally published in Coinmonks on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story
Share
Medium2025/09/18 14:40
Vitalik Buterin Challenges Ethereum’s Layer 2 Paradigm

Vitalik Buterin Challenges Ethereum’s Layer 2 Paradigm

Vitalik Buterin challenges the role of layer 2 solutions in Ethereum's ecosystem. Layer 2's slow progress and Ethereum’s L1 scaling impact future strategies.
Share
Coinstats2026/02/04 04:08
USAA Names Dan Griffiths Chief Information Officer to Drive Secure, Simplified Digital Member Experiences

USAA Names Dan Griffiths Chief Information Officer to Drive Secure, Simplified Digital Member Experiences

SAN ANTONIO–(BUSINESS WIRE)–USAA today announced the appointment of Dan Griffiths as Chief Information Officer, effective February 5, 2026. A proven financial‑services
Share
AI Journal2026/02/04 04:15