The post ADA Weekly Analysis Jan 31 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. ADA closed the week with a drop of over 10%, approaching the critical support zone withinThe post ADA Weekly Analysis Jan 31 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. ADA closed the week with a drop of over 10%, approaching the critical support zone within

ADA Weekly Analysis Jan 31

ADA closed the week with a drop of over 10%, approaching the critical support zone within the main downtrend, giving signals of potential base formation with oversold momentum indicators; however, BTC’s bearish supertrend pressure continues to create high correlated risk on altcoins.

Weekly Market Summary for ADA

This week, ADA exhibited a sharp decline from the $0.32 resistance to the $0.27 level, incurring a -%10.26 loss in weekly change. While the price stabilizes around $0.29, the volume profile shows medium-level activity at $874.62M. The market is positioned in a phase dominated by the main downtrend; RSI at 28.41 is in the oversold region, while MACD confirms bearish momentum with a negative histogram. Despite no recovery above EMA20 ($0.36), 12 critical levels were identified across multiple timeframes: 1 support/3 resistances on daily, 1 support/2 resistances on 3-day, and 2 supports/5 resistances confluence on weekly. No significant news flow in the macro context, but BTC’s downtrend around $78K dominates ADA’s movements. This position signals a phase of patience and disciplined waiting for position traders – click for details on ADA Spot Analysis.

Trend Structure and Market Phases

Long-Term Trend Analysis

In the long-term view, ADA remains faithful to its downtrend structure since the 2025 peaks (%50+ decline); the weekly chart shows lower highs and lower lows, ensuring trend integrity. The main trend filter gives a bearish signal, while moving averages like EMA20 ($0.36) and EMA50 ($0.42) form resistance above. The market structure indicates the continuation of the distribution phase in the big picture – institutional positioning and lack of altcoin rotation support this trend. However, RSI dropping to 28 may signal temporary exhaustion in the long-term downtrend; trend integrity depends on holding the $0.2685 main support.

Accumulation/Distribution Analysis

Weekly candle formations and volume profile exhibit distribution characteristics in the $0.27-$0.32 range: high-volume decline candles confirm seller pressure, while low-volume tests in recent days may give potential accumulation signals. In the volume profile, the $0.2934 level plays the role of distribution peak as a high-volume node. Market phase analysis, according to Wyckoff methodology, is in the final stage of the ‘distribution schema’; however, oversold conditions increase the risk of ‘spring’ (misleading breakdown). Transition to accumulation phase is possible with volume-backed hold at $0.2685 support and BTC stabilization – in this scenario, the $0.4310 upside target activates. Conversely, if volume-less distribution continues, downside risk extends to $0.1528.

Multi-Timeframe Confluence

Daily Chart View

On the daily timeframe, ADA tests and rejects the $0.2934 resistance, staying within the bearish channel; there is 1 support ($0.2685) and 3 resistances ($0.3170, $0.2934, $0.37) confluence. RSI at 28 is starting to form divergence, MACD histogram is narrowing – this indicates short-term recovery potential but no trend break. Remaining below EMA20 keeps the daily structure bearish; the critical $0.27 range clashes with $0.2685 as confluence support.

Weekly Chart View

The weekly chart shows high resistance density with 2 supports ($0.2685, $0.23 range) and 5 resistances ($0.3170, $0.37, $0.42, $0.5313, $0.60). Downtrend intact; weekly candles complete a negative engulfing pattern. Additional confluence on 3-day ($0.3170 resistance) aligns with weekly bearish supertrend – this multi-TF confluence emphasizes that $0.2685 will be the determining inflection point. Weekly closes are critical for long-term traders; check out ADA Futures Analysis here.

Critical Decision Points

Main support: $0.2685 (72/100 score, multi-TF confluence). Secondary supports: $0.27, $0.23. Critical resistances: $0.3170 (66/100), $0.2934 (61/100), $0.5313 (66/100). The inflection point that will determine market direction is $0.2685 – if held, accumulation phase begins; if broken, distribution accelerates and $0.1528 downside target comes into view. For upside breakout, weekly close above $0.3170 is required; otherwise, short-term bearish bias prevails.

Weekly Strategy Recommendation

In Case of Rise

With volume-backed hold at $0.2685 support and RSI divergence confirmation, long positions can be positioned towards the $0.3170 target; first target $0.37 (EMA20), then $0.4310 extension (30 score). Stop below $0.2685 to provide 1:3+ risk/reward; BTC stabilization above $80K is a confluence condition. Scale-in approach recommended for position traders, get confirmation from the ADA and other analyses page.

In Case of Decline

$0.2685 breakdown (red candle close) activates short opportunity; targets $0.23, ultimate $0.1528 (22 score). Stop above $0.3170; correlation momentum increases if BTC drops below $75K. Risk management: Position size should not exceed %2, protect with trailing stop.

Bitcoin Correlation

ADA shows high correlation with BTC (%0.85+); BTC’s -%6.78 drop from $78K directly pressured ADA. BTC main supports $75,720 / $74,513 / $64,655 are critical – ADA short bias strengthens with BTC breakdowns below $75K. Resistances BTC $80,357 / $83K; as long as BTC supertrend remains bearish, altcoin rotation stays limited, accelerating ADA’s $0.2685 test. BTC dominance increase triggers ADA distribution – ADA longs are risky without BTC stabilization.

Conclusion: Key Points for Next Week

Next week’s focus: $0.2685 hold vs breakdown, BTC $75K test, and RSI divergence development. While market structure preserves the downtrend, oversold conditions carry significant reversal potential; weekly closes will determine direction. Position traders should remain in disciplined waiting, monitor macro BTC context – strategic R/R-focused entries are priority.

This analysis uses Chief Analyst Devrim Cacal’s market views and methodology.

Market Analyst: Sarah Chen

Technical analysis and risk management specialist

This analysis is not investment advice. Do your own research.

Source: https://en.coinotag.com/analysis/ada-weekly-analysis-january-31-2026-market-structure-and-strategic-situation

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

HitPaw API is Integrated by Comfy for Professional Image and Video Enhancement to Global Creators

HitPaw API is Integrated by Comfy for Professional Image and Video Enhancement to Global Creators

SAN FRANCISCO, Feb. 7, 2026 /PRNewswire/ — HitPaw, a leader in AI-powered visual enhancement solutions, announced Comfy, a global content creation platform, is
Share
AI Journal2026/02/08 09:15
Journalist gives brutal review of Melania movie: 'Not a single person in the theater'

Journalist gives brutal review of Melania movie: 'Not a single person in the theater'

A Journalist gave a brutal review of the new Melania documentary, which has been criticized by those who say it won't make back the huge fees spent to make it,
Share
Rawstory2026/02/08 09:08
Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Prominent analyst Cheeky Crypto (203,000 followers on YouTube) set out to verify a fast-spreading claim that XRP’s circulating supply could “vanish overnight,” and his conclusion is more nuanced than the headline suggests: nothing in the ledger disappears, but the amount of XRP that is truly liquid could be far smaller than most dashboards imply—small enough, in his view, to set the stage for an abrupt liquidity squeeze if demand spikes. XRP Supply Shock? The video opens with the host acknowledging his own skepticism—“I woke up to a rumor that XRP supply could vanish overnight. Sounds crazy, right?”—before committing to test the thesis rather than dismiss it. He frames the exercise as an attempt to reconcile a long-standing critique (“XRP’s supply is too large for high prices”) with a rival view taking hold among prominent community voices: that much of the supply counted as “circulating” is effectively unavailable to trade. His first step is a straightforward data check. Pulling public figures, he finds CoinMarketCap showing roughly 59.6 billion XRP as circulating, while XRPScan reports about 64.7 billion. The divergence prompts what becomes the video’s key methodological point: different sources count “circulating” differently. Related Reading: Analyst Sounds Major XRP Warning: Last Chance To Get In As Accumulation Balloons As he explains it, the higher on-ledger number likely includes balances that aggregators exclude or treat as restricted, most notably Ripple’s programmatic escrow. He highlights that Ripple still “holds a chunk of XRP in escrow, about 35.3 billion XRP locked up across multiple wallets, with a nominal schedule of up to 1 billion released per month and unused portions commonly re-escrowed. Those coins exist and are accounted for on-ledger, but “they aren’t actually sitting on exchanges” and are not immediately available to buyers. In his words, “for all intents and purposes, that escrow stash is effectively off of the market.” From there, the analysis moves from headline “circulating supply” to the subtler concept of effective float. Beyond escrow, he argues that large strategic holders—banks, fintechs, or other whales—may sit on material balances without supplying order books. When you strip out escrow and these non-selling stashes, he says, “the effective circulating supply… is actually way smaller than the 59 or even 64 billion figure.” He cites community estimates in the “20 or 30 billion” range for what might be truly liquid at any given moment, while emphasizing that nobody has a precise number. That effective-float framing underpins the crux of his thesis: a potential supply shock if demand accelerates faster than fresh sell-side supply appears. “Price is a dance between supply and demand,” he says; if institutional or sovereign-scale users suddenly need XRP and “the market finds that there isn’t enough XRP readily available,” order books could thin out and prices could “shoot on up, sometimes violently.” His phrase “circulating supply could collapse overnight” is presented not as a claim that tokens are destroyed or removed from the ledger, but as a market-structure scenario in which available inventory to sell dries up quickly because holders won’t part with it. How Could The XRP Supply Shock Happen? On the demand side, he anchors the hypothetical to tokenization. He points to the “very early stages of something huge in finance”—on-chain tokenization of debt, stablecoins, CBDCs and even gold—and argues the XRP Ledger aims to be “the settlement layer” for those assets.He references Ripple CTO David Schwartz’s earlier comments about an XRPL pivot toward tokenized assets and notes that an institutional research shop (Bitwise) has framed XRP as a way to play the tokenization theme. In his construction, if “trillions of dollars in value” begin settling across XRPL rails, working inventories of XRP for bridging, liquidity and settlement could rise sharply, tightening effective float. Related Reading: XRP Bearish Signal: Whales Offload $486 Million In Asset To illustrate, he offers two analogies. First, the “concert tickets” model: you think there are 100,000 tickets (100B supply), but 50,000 are held by the promoter (escrow) and 30,000 by corporate buyers (whales), leaving only 20,000 for the public; if a million people want in, prices explode. Second, a comparison to Bitcoin’s halving: while XRP has no programmatic halving, he proposes that a sudden adoption wave could function like a de facto halving of available supply—“XRP’s version of a halving could actually be the adoption event.” He also updates the narrative context that long dogged XRP. Once derided for “too much supply,” he argues the script has “totally flipped.” He cites the current cycle’s optics—“XRP is sitting above $3 with a market cap north of around $180 billion”—as evidence that raw supply counts did not cap price as tightly as critics claimed, and as a backdrop for why a scarcity narrative is gaining traction. Still, he declines to publish targets or timelines, repeatedly stressing uncertainty and risk. “I’m not a financial adviser… cryptocurrencies are highly volatile,” he reminds viewers, adding that tokenization could take off “on some other platform,” unfold more slowly than enthusiasts expect, or fail to get to “sudden shock” scale. The verdict he offers is deliberately bound. The theory that “XRP supply could vanish overnight” is imprecise on its face; the ledger will not erase coins. But after examining dashboard methodologies, escrow mechanics and the behavior of large holders, he concludes that the effective float could be meaningfully smaller than headline supply figures, and that a fast-developing tokenization use case could, under the right conditions, stress that float. “Overnight is a dramatic way to put it,” he concedes. “The change could actually be very sudden when it comes.” At press time, XRP traded at $3.0198. Featured image created with DALL.E, chart from TradingView.com
Share
NewsBTC2025/09/18 11:00