The post ETH Weekly Analysis Jan 31 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. ETH closed the week with a sharp 12.96% drop, entering a critical test phase around theThe post ETH Weekly Analysis Jan 31 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. ETH closed the week with a sharp 12.96% drop, entering a critical test phase around the

ETH Weekly Analysis Jan 31

ETH closed the week with a sharp 12.96% drop, entering a critical test phase around the main support level of $2,250. While the market structure maintains the downward trend, signals of potential base formation are observed alongside oversold RSI signals, but Bitcoin’s dominant bearish outlook makes a cautious approach mandatory for altcoins.

Weekly Market Summary for ETH

This week, ETH experienced a sharp decline from $2,724.66 to $2,250, stabilizing at the $2,370 level. The weekly change of -12.96% reflects strong selling pressure; while trading volume remained at $33.85 billion, the increase in volatility highlights distribution characteristics in the market phase. In the bigger picture, ETH is moving within a long-term downtrend, and under macro uncertainties (Fed policies, lack of regulation news), the $2,250 support test is becoming the key point that will determine the fate of the trend structure. For position traders, holding this level could signal the start of accumulation, while a breakdown could accelerate downward momentum. Check out ETH Spot Analysis for detailed spot data.

Trend Structure and Market Phases

Long-Term Trend Analysis

The long-term trend structure (monthly/quarterly charts) shows a clear downtrend; ETH continues to stay below EMA20 ($2,937.95), maintaining the bearish filter. The MACD histogram is deepening in the negative zone, and while momentum indicators (RSI 25.08) point to oversold territory, the falling channel structure in higher timeframes remains intact. From a market cycle perspective, the distribution phase has dominated since the 2025 highs (50%+ retracement); however, oversold conditions carry early warnings for trend reversal. The trend remains solid, meaning downward pressure will persist until the price holds the $2,250 support.

Accumulation/Distribution Analysis

The weekly volume profile at $33.85B confirms selling volume, with POC (Point of Control) concentrating around $2,250 – this level carries strong potential as an accumulation base. In recent weeks, low-volume spike drops evoke distribution patterns (Wyckoff distribution); moreover, rejection from $2,724 resistance confirms smart money selling. For an accumulation phase, volume increase and higher low formation are required in the $2,250-$2,175 range; in the current structure, distribution characteristics dominate, so confluence should be awaited for long positions.

Multi-Timeframe Confluence

Daily Chart View

On the daily chart, ETH tested and was rejected from $2,478 resistance, approaching $2,250 support (1D: 2S/2R out of 14 strong levels). RSI at 25 shows a divergence signal, with MACD exhibiting correction tendency after a bearish crossover. Short-term trend is down, but confluence is strong at $2,250 (74/100 score): it aligns with Fibonacci 0.618 (61% retracement). ETH Futures Analysis is recommended for futures market.

Weekly Chart View

From a weekly perspective (1W: 3S/2R), the lower band of the falling channel is being tested at $2,250; staying below EMA50 keeps the trend intact. On the 3-day timeframe (2S/3R), resistance cluster concentrates in the $2,639-$2,478 range. Multi-TF confluence is bearish-weighted, but support hold could trigger higher TF reversal – total 14 levels play a critical role for strategic decisions. Check the ETH and other analyses section for all analyses.

Critical Decision Points

Main supports: $2,250.00 (74/100, weekly channel lower band + volume POC), $2,175.28 (71/100, monthly low). Resistances: $2,478.42 (64/100, daily EMA20), $2,639.92 (61/100, weekly swing high). Market structure keeps bullish inflection point active as long as it holds above $2,250; on breakdown, $2,175 is targeted. Upside $2,478 breakout opens $3,000 objective, downside risk extends to $1,000 depth (R/R 1:3+ potential).

Weekly Strategy Recommendation

In Case of Upside

If $2,250 support holds and there’s a weekly close above $2,478, entry for long positions: First target $2,639, extension $3,000 (annual target). Stop-loss below $2,250, manage with trailing. Confluence is high with oversold RSI divergence; scale-in recommended if accumulation phase is confirmed.

In Case of Downside

On $2,250 breakdown (below daily/weekly close), short opportunity: Target $2,175 then $2,000 psychological level. Favorable R/R with MACD negative momentum and BTC correlation; stop above $2,478. For position traders, 5-10% portfolio allocation, expecting distribution continuation.

Bitcoin Correlation

ETH shows high correlation with BTC (0.85+); BTC in downtrend at $77,524 (24h -7.61%), main supports $75,720/$74,493 in test phase. BTC Supertrend bearish signal creates pressure for altcoins – ETH recovery requires BTC to break $80,357 resistance. If BTC slips below $74,493, ETH $2,175 breakdown risk increases; rising dominance delays alt season. BTC movements determine 60% of ETH strategy.

Conclusion: Key Points for Next Week

To watch next week: $2,250 hold vs breakdown, BTC $75k support test, volume increase (accumulation confirmation). RSI divergence and multi-TF confluence could signal reversal; stay cautious, $2,478 above is bullish trigger. Position management is forefront – volatility is high.

This analysis uses the market views and methodology of Chief Analyst Devrim Cacal.

Senior Technical Analyst: James Mitchell

6 years of crypto market analysis

This analysis is not investment advice. Do your own research.

Source: https://en.coinotag.com/analysis/eth-weekly-analysis-evaluation-of-the-weeks-drop-january-31-2026

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

HitPaw API is Integrated by Comfy for Professional Image and Video Enhancement to Global Creators

HitPaw API is Integrated by Comfy for Professional Image and Video Enhancement to Global Creators

SAN FRANCISCO, Feb. 7, 2026 /PRNewswire/ — HitPaw, a leader in AI-powered visual enhancement solutions, announced Comfy, a global content creation platform, is
Share
AI Journal2026/02/08 09:15
Journalist gives brutal review of Melania movie: 'Not a single person in the theater'

Journalist gives brutal review of Melania movie: 'Not a single person in the theater'

A Journalist gave a brutal review of the new Melania documentary, which has been criticized by those who say it won't make back the huge fees spent to make it,
Share
Rawstory2026/02/08 09:08
Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Prominent analyst Cheeky Crypto (203,000 followers on YouTube) set out to verify a fast-spreading claim that XRP’s circulating supply could “vanish overnight,” and his conclusion is more nuanced than the headline suggests: nothing in the ledger disappears, but the amount of XRP that is truly liquid could be far smaller than most dashboards imply—small enough, in his view, to set the stage for an abrupt liquidity squeeze if demand spikes. XRP Supply Shock? The video opens with the host acknowledging his own skepticism—“I woke up to a rumor that XRP supply could vanish overnight. Sounds crazy, right?”—before committing to test the thesis rather than dismiss it. He frames the exercise as an attempt to reconcile a long-standing critique (“XRP’s supply is too large for high prices”) with a rival view taking hold among prominent community voices: that much of the supply counted as “circulating” is effectively unavailable to trade. His first step is a straightforward data check. Pulling public figures, he finds CoinMarketCap showing roughly 59.6 billion XRP as circulating, while XRPScan reports about 64.7 billion. The divergence prompts what becomes the video’s key methodological point: different sources count “circulating” differently. Related Reading: Analyst Sounds Major XRP Warning: Last Chance To Get In As Accumulation Balloons As he explains it, the higher on-ledger number likely includes balances that aggregators exclude or treat as restricted, most notably Ripple’s programmatic escrow. He highlights that Ripple still “holds a chunk of XRP in escrow, about 35.3 billion XRP locked up across multiple wallets, with a nominal schedule of up to 1 billion released per month and unused portions commonly re-escrowed. Those coins exist and are accounted for on-ledger, but “they aren’t actually sitting on exchanges” and are not immediately available to buyers. In his words, “for all intents and purposes, that escrow stash is effectively off of the market.” From there, the analysis moves from headline “circulating supply” to the subtler concept of effective float. Beyond escrow, he argues that large strategic holders—banks, fintechs, or other whales—may sit on material balances without supplying order books. When you strip out escrow and these non-selling stashes, he says, “the effective circulating supply… is actually way smaller than the 59 or even 64 billion figure.” He cites community estimates in the “20 or 30 billion” range for what might be truly liquid at any given moment, while emphasizing that nobody has a precise number. That effective-float framing underpins the crux of his thesis: a potential supply shock if demand accelerates faster than fresh sell-side supply appears. “Price is a dance between supply and demand,” he says; if institutional or sovereign-scale users suddenly need XRP and “the market finds that there isn’t enough XRP readily available,” order books could thin out and prices could “shoot on up, sometimes violently.” His phrase “circulating supply could collapse overnight” is presented not as a claim that tokens are destroyed or removed from the ledger, but as a market-structure scenario in which available inventory to sell dries up quickly because holders won’t part with it. How Could The XRP Supply Shock Happen? On the demand side, he anchors the hypothetical to tokenization. He points to the “very early stages of something huge in finance”—on-chain tokenization of debt, stablecoins, CBDCs and even gold—and argues the XRP Ledger aims to be “the settlement layer” for those assets.He references Ripple CTO David Schwartz’s earlier comments about an XRPL pivot toward tokenized assets and notes that an institutional research shop (Bitwise) has framed XRP as a way to play the tokenization theme. In his construction, if “trillions of dollars in value” begin settling across XRPL rails, working inventories of XRP for bridging, liquidity and settlement could rise sharply, tightening effective float. Related Reading: XRP Bearish Signal: Whales Offload $486 Million In Asset To illustrate, he offers two analogies. First, the “concert tickets” model: you think there are 100,000 tickets (100B supply), but 50,000 are held by the promoter (escrow) and 30,000 by corporate buyers (whales), leaving only 20,000 for the public; if a million people want in, prices explode. Second, a comparison to Bitcoin’s halving: while XRP has no programmatic halving, he proposes that a sudden adoption wave could function like a de facto halving of available supply—“XRP’s version of a halving could actually be the adoption event.” He also updates the narrative context that long dogged XRP. Once derided for “too much supply,” he argues the script has “totally flipped.” He cites the current cycle’s optics—“XRP is sitting above $3 with a market cap north of around $180 billion”—as evidence that raw supply counts did not cap price as tightly as critics claimed, and as a backdrop for why a scarcity narrative is gaining traction. Still, he declines to publish targets or timelines, repeatedly stressing uncertainty and risk. “I’m not a financial adviser… cryptocurrencies are highly volatile,” he reminds viewers, adding that tokenization could take off “on some other platform,” unfold more slowly than enthusiasts expect, or fail to get to “sudden shock” scale. The verdict he offers is deliberately bound. The theory that “XRP supply could vanish overnight” is imprecise on its face; the ledger will not erase coins. But after examining dashboard methodologies, escrow mechanics and the behavior of large holders, he concludes that the effective float could be meaningfully smaller than headline supply figures, and that a fast-developing tokenization use case could, under the right conditions, stress that float. “Overnight is a dramatic way to put it,” he concedes. “The change could actually be very sudden when it comes.” At press time, XRP traded at $3.0198. Featured image created with DALL.E, chart from TradingView.com
Share
NewsBTC2025/09/18 11:00