Coinbase is facing a shareholder lawsuit after a Delaware judge allowed claims against several of its executives for insider trading to move forward, despite anCoinbase is facing a shareholder lawsuit after a Delaware judge allowed claims against several of its executives for insider trading to move forward, despite an

Coinbase Insider Trading Lawsuit Advances as Delaware Judge Denies Dismissal

2026/01/31 19:52
3 min read

Coinbase is facing a shareholder lawsuit after a Delaware judge allowed claims against several of its executives for insider trading to move forward, despite an investigation clearing the directors of any wrongdoing.

The case, which was filed in 2023, alleges that the executives at the exchange, including CEO Brian Armstrong and board member Marc Andreessen, used inside information to avoid losing over $1 billion by selling their shares around the direct listing in 2021. The executives allegedly sold more than $2.9 billion worth of shares, with Armstrong alone selling $291.8 million.

image.pngSource: assets.bwbx.io

Delaware Chancery Court Judge Kathaleen St. J. McCormick on January. 27, 2026, rejected a motion to dismiss the case after an investigation by a special litigation committee formed by Coinbase.

While admitting that the investigation by the committee supports the defense by the directors of the exchange, she said that doubts over the independence of one of its members justify proceeding with the case.

The lawsuit centers on Coinbase’s decision to go public with a direct listing rather than a traditional IPO. Unlike an IPO, the direct listing allowed existing shareholders to sell their shares immediately without issuing additional shares that could result in ownership dilution.

Coinbase Executives Face Share Lawsuit

Andreessen, a board member at Coinbase since 2020, is accused of selling shares worth $118.7 million through his venture capital firm, Andreessen Horowitz. The directors are accused of selling shares as they knew Coinbase was overvalued and would suffer losses.

image.pngSource: Lawsuit

Coinbase and the executives have denied these allegations, stating that they have no evidence of them acting on any confidential information. In an interview with Bloomberg Law, a Coinbase spokesperson stated, “Coinbase is disappointed by the court’s decision, but we will continue to defend against these meritless claims.”

The lawsuit has been on hold for a year while a 10-month review by the special litigation committee took place. The committee discovered that the sale of shares was minimal and was used to create liquidity for the direct listing. They also discovered that the exchange shares mirrored Bitcoin and did not use any inside information.

Nevertheless, the shareholder had questioned the committee’s independence due to prior business relationships between committee member Gokul Rajaram and the firm of Andreessen. Judge McCormick concurred that there were valid questions, but there were no bad-faith findings.

Also Read | Stellar (XLM) Stabilizes After Demand Zone Bounce and Eyes Rally Toward $0.36

Coinbase Faces Insider Trading Concerns

New concerns regarding insider trading on the exchange have been raised. Some crypto researchers believe that there are possibilities that a number of individuals could have made profits due to their prior information regarding the token listing on the exchange.

Coinbase will be making changes to its token listing process in the coming months to help prevent leaks and ensure fairer access to market information.

Also Read | Cryptocurrency Markets See Volatility One Year After Trump’s Inauguration

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Tags:

You May Also Like

Is Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX) a strong mutual fund pick right now?

Is Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX) a strong mutual fund pick right now?

The post Is Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX) a strong mutual fund pick right now? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. On the lookout for a Sector – Tech fund? Starting with Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX – Free Report) should not be a possibility at this time. PGTAX possesses a Zacks Mutual Fund Rank of 4 (Sell), which is based on various forecasting factors like size, cost, and past performance. Objective We note that PGTAX is a Sector – Tech option, and this area is loaded with many options. Found in a wide number of industries such as semiconductors, software, internet, and networking, tech companies are everywhere. Thus, Sector – Tech mutual funds that invest in technology let investors own a stake in a notoriously volatile sector, but with a much more diversified approach. History of fund/manager Putnam Funds is based in Canton, MA, and is the manager of PGTAX. The Putnam Global Technology A made its debut in January of 2009 and PGTAX has managed to accumulate roughly $650.01 million in assets, as of the most recently available information. The fund is currently managed by Di Yao who has been in charge of the fund since December of 2012. Performance Obviously, what investors are looking for in these funds is strong performance relative to their peers. PGTAX has a 5-year annualized total return of 14.46%, and is in the middle third among its category peers. But if you are looking for a shorter time frame, it is also worth looking at its 3-year annualized total return of 27.02%, which places it in the middle third during this time-frame. It is important to note that the product’s returns may not reflect all its expenses. Any fees not reflected would lower the returns. Total returns do not reflect the fund’s [%] sale charge. If sales charges were included, total returns would have been lower. When looking at a fund’s performance, it…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 04:05
US-wed Irishman with no criminal record detained for months in 'traumatizing' conditions

US-wed Irishman with no criminal record detained for months in 'traumatizing' conditions

An Irish immigrant has been stuck in an ICE camp for months despite having a valid permit and no criminal record, per an interview he gave to The Irish Times, likening
Share
Alternet2026/02/10 03:14
U.S. government isn’t poised to sweep in with bitcoin buys, despite Jim Cramer rumor

U.S. government isn’t poised to sweep in with bitcoin buys, despite Jim Cramer rumor

The post U.S. government isn’t poised to sweep in with bitcoin buys, despite Jim Cramer rumor appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. President Donald Trump’s U.S.
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/10 03:42