New offering enables CISOs, security teams, and MSSPs to deploy AI for threat analysis, incident response, and compliance—without exposing sensitive data to publicNew offering enables CISOs, security teams, and MSSPs to deploy AI for threat analysis, incident response, and compliance—without exposing sensitive data to public

LLM.co Launches Private LLM Infrastructure Purpose-Built for Cybersecurity Teams

2026/01/29 12:02
4 min read

New offering enables CISOs, security teams, and MSSPs to deploy AI for threat analysis, incident response, and compliance—without exposing sensitive data to public models

LLM.co, a provider of private large language model (LLM) infrastructure for regulated and data-sensitive industries, today announced the launch of its private LLM solutions designed specifically for cybersecurity teams. The new offering allows organizations to apply AI across security operations while keeping sensitive data fully contained within their own environment.

As cybersecurity teams increasingly experiment with AI to improve detection, response, and operational efficiency, many face a fundamental barrier: public AI models are incompatible with security, compliance, and data-governance requirements. Logs, alerts, incident data, and investigative materials cannot be safely shared with third-party AI platforms without introducing unacceptable risk.

LLM.co’s private LLM infrastructure addresses this challenge by enabling fully isolated AI deployments—on-premises, in private cloud environments, or in hybrid configurations—without data ever leaving the organization’s control.

“Security teams want the productivity gains AI offers, but they cannot compromise on data protection,” said Samuel Edwards, Chief Marketing Officer at LLM.co. “Private LLMs eliminate that tradeoff. This is about giving cybersecurity teams modern AI capabilities without creating new attack surfaces or compliance liabilities.”

Built for High-Risk Cybersecurity Workflows

LLM.co’s private LLMs are designed to support real-world security operations, including:

  • Threat analysis and alert triage across SIEM, SOAR, and EDR systems
  • Incident response support, including playbooks and root-cause analysis
  • Security documentation, reporting, and executive summaries
  • Policy analysis, compliance mapping, and audit preparation
  • Vulnerability and exposure assessment
  • Internal security knowledge bases trained on proprietary data

Unlike public AI tools, LLM.co’s models are not trained on customer data, do not log prompts externally, and operate entirely within controlled environments.

“From a revenue and go-to-market perspective, we’re seeing strong demand from organizations that already understand the risks of public AI,” said Timothy Carter, Chief Revenue Officer at LLM.co. “CISOs aren’t asking whether AI will be used in security—they’re asking how to deploy it safely. Private LLMs are quickly becoming the default answer.”

Designed for Enterprise Control and Compliance

LLM.co’s cybersecurity-focused LLM deployments support strict governance requirements, including internal security policies and industry compliance frameworks such as SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, CJIS, and other regulatory standards. Organizations retain full control over data access, retention, model behavior, and user permissions.

“Sales conversations in cybersecurity are fundamentally about trust and control,” said Eric Lamanna, Vice President of Sales at LLM.co. “Private LLMs allow security leaders to move forward with AI initiatives without pushing risk uphill to legal, compliance, or the board. That alignment is critical for adoption.”

Serving Enterprises, MSSPs, and Regulated Industries

The private LLM offering is designed for:

  • Enterprise security teams
  • Managed Security Service Providers (MSSPs) and MDR firms
  • Financial services, healthcare, government, and critical infrastructure organizations
  • Any organization with strict data-handling and confidentiality requirements

LLM.co integrates with existing security stacks and workflows, allowing teams to deploy AI without disrupting established controls or processes.

A Broader Shift Toward Private, Domain-Specific AI

The launch reflects a broader industry shift away from general-purpose public AI toward private, domain-specific LLMs tailored to high-risk use cases. As AI adoption accelerates, organizations are increasingly prioritizing architectures that balance capability with control.

“Cybersecurity is one of the clearest examples of where private AI is not optional—it’s essential,” Edwards added. “This launch formalizes what many security leaders already know: if AI touches sensitive security data, it must be private by design.”

About LLM.co

Created by DEV.co, LLM.co provides private, secure large language model infrastructure for organizations operating in regulated and data-sensitive environments. The company specializes in deploying AI systems that prioritize compliance, control, and enterprise-grade security—enabling teams to benefit from AI without exposing proprietary or sensitive information.

Contact Info:
Name: Samuel Edwards
Email: Send Email
Organization: Digital.Marketing
Website: https://digital.marketing

Release ID: 89182243

If you detect any issues, problems, or errors in this press release content, kindly contact error@releasecontact.com to notify us (it is important to note that this email is the authorized channel for such matters, sending multiple emails to multiple addresses does not necessarily help expedite your request). We will respond and rectify the situation in the next 8 hours.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Tags:

You May Also Like

HitPaw API is Integrated by Comfy for Professional Image and Video Enhancement to Global Creators

HitPaw API is Integrated by Comfy for Professional Image and Video Enhancement to Global Creators

SAN FRANCISCO, Feb. 7, 2026 /PRNewswire/ — HitPaw, a leader in AI-powered visual enhancement solutions, announced Comfy, a global content creation platform, is
Share
AI Journal2026/02/08 09:15
Journalist gives brutal review of Melania movie: 'Not a single person in the theater'

Journalist gives brutal review of Melania movie: 'Not a single person in the theater'

A Journalist gave a brutal review of the new Melania documentary, which has been criticized by those who say it won't make back the huge fees spent to make it,
Share
Rawstory2026/02/08 09:08
Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Prominent analyst Cheeky Crypto (203,000 followers on YouTube) set out to verify a fast-spreading claim that XRP’s circulating supply could “vanish overnight,” and his conclusion is more nuanced than the headline suggests: nothing in the ledger disappears, but the amount of XRP that is truly liquid could be far smaller than most dashboards imply—small enough, in his view, to set the stage for an abrupt liquidity squeeze if demand spikes. XRP Supply Shock? The video opens with the host acknowledging his own skepticism—“I woke up to a rumor that XRP supply could vanish overnight. Sounds crazy, right?”—before committing to test the thesis rather than dismiss it. He frames the exercise as an attempt to reconcile a long-standing critique (“XRP’s supply is too large for high prices”) with a rival view taking hold among prominent community voices: that much of the supply counted as “circulating” is effectively unavailable to trade. His first step is a straightforward data check. Pulling public figures, he finds CoinMarketCap showing roughly 59.6 billion XRP as circulating, while XRPScan reports about 64.7 billion. The divergence prompts what becomes the video’s key methodological point: different sources count “circulating” differently. Related Reading: Analyst Sounds Major XRP Warning: Last Chance To Get In As Accumulation Balloons As he explains it, the higher on-ledger number likely includes balances that aggregators exclude or treat as restricted, most notably Ripple’s programmatic escrow. He highlights that Ripple still “holds a chunk of XRP in escrow, about 35.3 billion XRP locked up across multiple wallets, with a nominal schedule of up to 1 billion released per month and unused portions commonly re-escrowed. Those coins exist and are accounted for on-ledger, but “they aren’t actually sitting on exchanges” and are not immediately available to buyers. In his words, “for all intents and purposes, that escrow stash is effectively off of the market.” From there, the analysis moves from headline “circulating supply” to the subtler concept of effective float. Beyond escrow, he argues that large strategic holders—banks, fintechs, or other whales—may sit on material balances without supplying order books. When you strip out escrow and these non-selling stashes, he says, “the effective circulating supply… is actually way smaller than the 59 or even 64 billion figure.” He cites community estimates in the “20 or 30 billion” range for what might be truly liquid at any given moment, while emphasizing that nobody has a precise number. That effective-float framing underpins the crux of his thesis: a potential supply shock if demand accelerates faster than fresh sell-side supply appears. “Price is a dance between supply and demand,” he says; if institutional or sovereign-scale users suddenly need XRP and “the market finds that there isn’t enough XRP readily available,” order books could thin out and prices could “shoot on up, sometimes violently.” His phrase “circulating supply could collapse overnight” is presented not as a claim that tokens are destroyed or removed from the ledger, but as a market-structure scenario in which available inventory to sell dries up quickly because holders won’t part with it. How Could The XRP Supply Shock Happen? On the demand side, he anchors the hypothetical to tokenization. He points to the “very early stages of something huge in finance”—on-chain tokenization of debt, stablecoins, CBDCs and even gold—and argues the XRP Ledger aims to be “the settlement layer” for those assets.He references Ripple CTO David Schwartz’s earlier comments about an XRPL pivot toward tokenized assets and notes that an institutional research shop (Bitwise) has framed XRP as a way to play the tokenization theme. In his construction, if “trillions of dollars in value” begin settling across XRPL rails, working inventories of XRP for bridging, liquidity and settlement could rise sharply, tightening effective float. Related Reading: XRP Bearish Signal: Whales Offload $486 Million In Asset To illustrate, he offers two analogies. First, the “concert tickets” model: you think there are 100,000 tickets (100B supply), but 50,000 are held by the promoter (escrow) and 30,000 by corporate buyers (whales), leaving only 20,000 for the public; if a million people want in, prices explode. Second, a comparison to Bitcoin’s halving: while XRP has no programmatic halving, he proposes that a sudden adoption wave could function like a de facto halving of available supply—“XRP’s version of a halving could actually be the adoption event.” He also updates the narrative context that long dogged XRP. Once derided for “too much supply,” he argues the script has “totally flipped.” He cites the current cycle’s optics—“XRP is sitting above $3 with a market cap north of around $180 billion”—as evidence that raw supply counts did not cap price as tightly as critics claimed, and as a backdrop for why a scarcity narrative is gaining traction. Still, he declines to publish targets or timelines, repeatedly stressing uncertainty and risk. “I’m not a financial adviser… cryptocurrencies are highly volatile,” he reminds viewers, adding that tokenization could take off “on some other platform,” unfold more slowly than enthusiasts expect, or fail to get to “sudden shock” scale. The verdict he offers is deliberately bound. The theory that “XRP supply could vanish overnight” is imprecise on its face; the ledger will not erase coins. But after examining dashboard methodologies, escrow mechanics and the behavior of large holders, he concludes that the effective float could be meaningfully smaller than headline supply figures, and that a fast-developing tokenization use case could, under the right conditions, stress that float. “Overnight is a dramatic way to put it,” he concedes. “The change could actually be very sudden when it comes.” At press time, XRP traded at $3.0198. Featured image created with DALL.E, chart from TradingView.com
Share
NewsBTC2025/09/18 11:00