Pump.fun will introduce changes to its creator fee program, to encourage traders rather than the constant launches of new meme assets.Pump.fun will introduce changes to its creator fee program, to encourage traders rather than the constant launches of new meme assets.

Co-founder of Pump.fun Alon Cohen announced more changes are coming to creator fees

3 min read

Pump.fun announced a new way of redistributing creator fees. A new version of dynamic fee sharing arrived, announced the platform’s co-founder, Alon Cohen. 

Pump.fun will update the distribution of its creator fees, announced the platform’s co-founder, Alon Cohen. The shift arrives just as Pump.fun recovered some of its activity with new launches and decentralized trading. 

Pump.fun announced creator fees may be shared with up to 10 wallets, to incentivize engaged teams. 

The exact evolution of fees and incentives will become more clear in the future. More changes will be coming soon, to incentivize the creation of quality assets. The project’s founder announced the upcoming changes after months of almost no posting, where token creation and trading in the trenches slowed down. As Cryptopolitan reported earlier, the introduction of creator fees led to significant gains for the first wave of streamers. 

The upgrade arrives as Pump.fun activity is growing again. The platform aims to incentivize trading, which is becoming its main source of fees, rather than constant new token minting, to generate and support more sustainable projects.

Pump.fun to encourage trading

The creator rewards were one of the key incentives to keep up the pace of new token launches. However, Cohen noted the incentive produced the low-risk behavior of token creation, while increasing the risk for traders. 

Creator fees may have skewed the incentive for users to engage in low-risk activity (coin creation) instead of high-risk activity (trading), which is dangerous, because traders are the lifeblood of the platform,stated Cohen in an X post.

He added that the incentives should have better utility for the platform. The creator fees were used to draw in high-profile persons from the crypto space, including the White Whale and others, he added. However, users often end up having to take over coins in order to keep them alive. 

According to Cohen, creator fees are a good idea for project tokens with a commitment to long-term existence. For other types of tokens, creator fees are not a good idea, he said. Pump.fun will focus more on traders for a more user-friendly and fair experience when the changes to creator fees are finally announced. 

Pump.fun community still worried about creator fees

The Pump.fun creator fees were seen as a way to exploit traders. Fees declined once a project achieved a higher valuation, leading some coin creators to abandon their memes and create new ones. 

For now, the Pump.fun mobile app will offer a more fair approach to distributing fees to ten addresses. Following a community takeover, the new coin owners can also stop or redistribute fees in another way. 

After the update, eligible fee recipients will have to claim the reward to receive it. Previously, teams relied on an airdrop and had potential problems with unverified wallets. Additionally, Dynamic Fees may increase the potential earnings of creators. 

Get seen where it counts. Advertise in Cryptopolitan Research and reach crypto’s sharpest investors and builders.

Market Opportunity
pump.fun Logo
pump.fun Price(PUMP)
$0.001973
$0.001973$0.001973
-8.14%
USD
pump.fun (PUMP) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Is Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX) a strong mutual fund pick right now?

Is Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX) a strong mutual fund pick right now?

The post Is Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX) a strong mutual fund pick right now? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. On the lookout for a Sector – Tech fund? Starting with Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX – Free Report) should not be a possibility at this time. PGTAX possesses a Zacks Mutual Fund Rank of 4 (Sell), which is based on various forecasting factors like size, cost, and past performance. Objective We note that PGTAX is a Sector – Tech option, and this area is loaded with many options. Found in a wide number of industries such as semiconductors, software, internet, and networking, tech companies are everywhere. Thus, Sector – Tech mutual funds that invest in technology let investors own a stake in a notoriously volatile sector, but with a much more diversified approach. History of fund/manager Putnam Funds is based in Canton, MA, and is the manager of PGTAX. The Putnam Global Technology A made its debut in January of 2009 and PGTAX has managed to accumulate roughly $650.01 million in assets, as of the most recently available information. The fund is currently managed by Di Yao who has been in charge of the fund since December of 2012. Performance Obviously, what investors are looking for in these funds is strong performance relative to their peers. PGTAX has a 5-year annualized total return of 14.46%, and is in the middle third among its category peers. But if you are looking for a shorter time frame, it is also worth looking at its 3-year annualized total return of 27.02%, which places it in the middle third during this time-frame. It is important to note that the product’s returns may not reflect all its expenses. Any fees not reflected would lower the returns. Total returns do not reflect the fund’s [%] sale charge. If sales charges were included, total returns would have been lower. When looking at a fund’s performance, it…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 04:05
“Vibes Should Match Substance”: Vitalik on Fake Ethereum Connections

“Vibes Should Match Substance”: Vitalik on Fake Ethereum Connections

Vitalik Buterin criticized L2s that use optimistic bridges without adding meaningful technical innovation. Ethereum’s base layer is scaling, reducing the need for
Share
LiveBitcoinNews2026/02/06 11:30
Why Bitcoin Crashed Below $69,000 — Causes & Outlook

Why Bitcoin Crashed Below $69,000 — Causes & Outlook

Cryptsy - Latest Cryptocurrency News and Predictions Cryptsy - Latest Cryptocurrency News and Predictions - Experts in Crypto Casinos Bitcoin crash explained:
Share
Cryptsy2026/02/06 11:20