In the crypto space, saturated with scams, empty partnerships, and decaying incentives, the only growth engine that still works is trust.In the crypto space, saturated with scams, empty partnerships, and decaying incentives, the only growth engine that still works is trust.

The death of crypto marketing: Why founders became the product interface | Opinion

5 min read

Disclosure: The views and opinions expressed here belong solely to the author and do not represent the views and opinions of crypto.news’ editorial.

For most of crypto’s short history, growth followed a simple formula: reward behavior, and it will repeat. Liquidity mining, referral loops, token launches, airdrops. If adoption slowed, teams increased the incentives. When that stopped working, they layered on marketing campaigns, splashy announcements, and logo-filled partnership decks. That era is over.

Summary
  • Crypto growth stalled because trust collapsed: incentives, airdrops, and marketing no longer convert in a market saturated with scams, fake metrics, and empty signals.
  • Founder credibility has become the growth engine: consistent, public explanation builds compounding trust, defines the narrative, and creates adoption that campaigns can’t buy.
  • Founders are now infrastructure: belief, coherence, and conviction are the real distribution layer — and when trust is scarce, credibility becomes the product.

Crypto didn’t stall because people forgot how to market. It stalled because the industry had exhausted trust. In a market where scams surface daily, rug pulls are routine, and metrics can be manufactured, buyers stopped believing what they were being shown. The result is uncomfortable but obvious: attention no longer converts.

The marginal return on spend is collapsing because none of these mechanisms answer the real question buyers are asking anymore: who can I trust? When trust disappears, growth doesn’t follow money. It follows credibility.

This is why a new system has quietly replaced traditional crypto marketing: founder-credibility driven growth. In this model, the primary driver of adoption is not rewards, spend, or partnerships. It is the founder’s ability to consistently earn trust by explaining, teaching, and embodying the product in public.

But this isn’t just personal branding. It’s something more structural.

Markets no longer discover products through landing pages. They discover them through people who show up repeatedly with the same worldview, the same logic, and the same intellectual posture. Buyers don’t want dashboards. They want explanations they can repeat internally. They want mental models they can borrow when convincing teams that don’t live on crypto Twitter.

This is also why campaigns and fake logo partnerships are dead. They once worked because the market was naïve, but all they signal today is performance rather than any substance. A press release filled with logos doesn’t signal legitimacy anymore — it signals theatre. In a trust-depleted market, anything that feels manufactured is discounted instantly.

Founder-credibility-driven growth model

Founder-credibility-driven growth flips the old model on its head. I’ve watched this pattern repeat across dozens of teams. Products with strong technology but weak founder presence struggled to move beyond early adopters, even with serious budgets. Meanwhile, other products — sometimes technically simpler — pulled in disproportionate inbound interest because the founder kept explaining the same problem in the same way until the market finally understood it.

The difference? Coherence.

A campaign can generate awareness. It cannot generate conviction. Founder-credibility-driven growth works because it performs three functions that incentives never could.

  • First, it compounds. Campaigns are episodic. They flare up and vanish. Founder narratives accumulate. Every explanation builds context for the next. Over time, the market doesn’t just recognize the product — it understands it.
  • Second, founder-driven growth creates defensibility. Institutions don’t adopt things they can’t explain. Founders who teach the market how to think about a problem don’t just promote products — they define the language people use to justify decisions internally.
  • Third, this type of growth creates trust asymmetry. In a market saturated with noise, the person who keeps showing up with clarity becomes the reference point everyone else measures against.

This shift is uncomfortable because it changes who owns growth. Go-to-market is no longer something you can fully outsource. You can pay for campaigns. You cannot pay for belief.

Vision, philosophy, and conviction are non-transferable. The market doesn’t want a spokesperson. It wants the person who made the trade-offs. You can hire someone to write your announcements. You cannot hire someone to embody your worldview.

That is why founders have quietly become infrastructure. They are no longer just builders. They are the distribution layer through which markets learn how to adopt increasingly complex financial systems.

Crypto marketing isn’t dying because teams stopped trying. It’s dying because the interface changed. And in a space saturated with scams, empty partnerships, and decaying incentives, the only growth engine that still works is authentic, founder-credibility-driven trust.

When trust becomes scarce, credibility becomes the product.

Dean Khan Dhillon

Dean Khan Dhillon is the Head of Growth at RWA.xyz, a data analytics platform focused on tokenised assets. He specializes in RWA adoption, crypto market structure, and GTM for crypto infrastructure. Previously, Dean was CEO of fortyIQ, a crypto GTM and thought leadership firm, which he scaled to $2M ARR in under a year, and worked with over 25+ leading blockchain protocols such as Babylon, Initia, and Syndicate.

Market Opportunity
Intuition Logo
Intuition Price(TRUST)
$0.06878
$0.06878$0.06878
-6.87%
USD
Intuition (TRUST) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Is Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX) a strong mutual fund pick right now?

Is Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX) a strong mutual fund pick right now?

The post Is Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX) a strong mutual fund pick right now? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. On the lookout for a Sector – Tech fund? Starting with Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX – Free Report) should not be a possibility at this time. PGTAX possesses a Zacks Mutual Fund Rank of 4 (Sell), which is based on various forecasting factors like size, cost, and past performance. Objective We note that PGTAX is a Sector – Tech option, and this area is loaded with many options. Found in a wide number of industries such as semiconductors, software, internet, and networking, tech companies are everywhere. Thus, Sector – Tech mutual funds that invest in technology let investors own a stake in a notoriously volatile sector, but with a much more diversified approach. History of fund/manager Putnam Funds is based in Canton, MA, and is the manager of PGTAX. The Putnam Global Technology A made its debut in January of 2009 and PGTAX has managed to accumulate roughly $650.01 million in assets, as of the most recently available information. The fund is currently managed by Di Yao who has been in charge of the fund since December of 2012. Performance Obviously, what investors are looking for in these funds is strong performance relative to their peers. PGTAX has a 5-year annualized total return of 14.46%, and is in the middle third among its category peers. But if you are looking for a shorter time frame, it is also worth looking at its 3-year annualized total return of 27.02%, which places it in the middle third during this time-frame. It is important to note that the product’s returns may not reflect all its expenses. Any fees not reflected would lower the returns. Total returns do not reflect the fund’s [%] sale charge. If sales charges were included, total returns would have been lower. When looking at a fund’s performance, it…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 04:05
“Vibes Should Match Substance”: Vitalik on Fake Ethereum Connections

“Vibes Should Match Substance”: Vitalik on Fake Ethereum Connections

Vitalik Buterin criticized L2s that use optimistic bridges without adding meaningful technical innovation. Ethereum’s base layer is scaling, reducing the need for
Share
LiveBitcoinNews2026/02/06 11:30
Why Bitcoin Crashed Below $69,000 — Causes & Outlook

Why Bitcoin Crashed Below $69,000 — Causes & Outlook

Cryptsy - Latest Cryptocurrency News and Predictions Cryptsy - Latest Cryptocurrency News and Predictions - Experts in Crypto Casinos Bitcoin crash explained:
Share
Cryptsy2026/02/06 11:20