Michael Saylor has stepped back into the center of the Bitcoin debate. This time, the topic isn’t price. It’s quantum computing. In a recent post on X, Saylor arguedMichael Saylor has stepped back into the center of the Bitcoin debate. This time, the topic isn’t price. It’s quantum computing. In a recent post on X, Saylor argued

Michael Saylor Backs Bitcoin’s Post-Quantum Upgrade

2025/12/19 02:48

Michael Saylor has stepped back into the center of the Bitcoin debate. This time, the topic isn’t price. It’s quantum computing.

In a recent post on X, Saylor argued that quantum computing will not break Bitcoin. Instead, he says it will force the network to evolve. Stronger cryptography. Clearer rules. A leaner supply.

“The Bitcoin Quantum Leap,” as Saylor framed it, is not a threat scenario. It’s an upgrade cycle. The network adapts. Active coins move. Lost coins stay frozen. Security improves. Supply tightens.

In his view, Bitcoin doesn’t weaken under pressure. It hardens.

That framing has reignited discussions across the Bitcoin community, especially around post-quantum cryptography and what an eventual upgrade could mean for supply, security, and consensus.

Why Quantum Computing Sparks the Debate

Quantum computing has long been cited as a theoretical risk to modern cryptography. Bitcoin is no exception.

At a high level, the concern is simple. If quantum computers become powerful enough, they could potentially break certain cryptographic assumptions used today. That includes older signature schemes tied to early Bitcoin address formats.

Saylor’s argument flips the concern on its head.

Instead of viewing quantum computing as an existential risk, he frames it as a forcing function. A catalyst that pushes Bitcoin toward stronger, future-proof cryptography.

The idea gaining traction in the community is straightforward. Bitcoin introduces post-quantum cryptography through a network upgrade. Active users migrate their funds to new, quantum-resistant addresses. Coins that are lost, abandoned, or tied to early address formats remain unmoved.

Not hacked. Not stolen. Just frozen.

In this model, quantum computing doesn’t destroy Bitcoin’s security model. It accelerates its evolution.

Active Coins Move, Lost Coins Stay Frozen

One of the most discussed implications of Saylor’s view is supply.

According to ongoing community discussions referenced by Saylor, an estimated 20–25% of all Bitcoin is dormant or lost. This includes early P2PK (pay-to-public-key) addresses, forgotten wallets, and coins whose private keys are no longer accessible.

Under a post-quantum upgrade, those coins wouldn’t migrate. They couldn’t.

Active users would move funds to new addresses secured by upgraded cryptography. Dormant coins would remain locked forever.

The result is simple math.

Circulating supply goes down.

Effective scarcity goes up.

Bitcoin already has a fixed supply cap. But this mechanism would reduce the usable supply even further. Not by policy. Not by governance. But by cryptographic reality.

Saylor sees this as a feature, not a flaw.

Security strengthens. Attack surfaces shrink. And Bitcoin becomes scarcer without changing its issuance schedule.

What This Means for Bitcoin’s Security Model

Bitcoin’s design has always prioritized conservative evolution. Changes are slow. Upgrades are debated endlessly. Consensus is hard to reach by design.

That’s why Saylor’s comments sparked such intense discussion.

Supporters argue that post-quantum cryptography fits perfectly into Bitcoin’s long-term security philosophy. Upgrade carefully. Give users time to migrate. Preserve backward compatibility where possible. Freeze what cannot move.

Critics raise valid concerns.

Upgrading cryptography at the consensus level is not trivial. Coordinating migrations across wallets, exchanges, custodians, and users introduces risk. There are also worries about whether such upgrades could unintentionally favor large custodians or increase centralization pressures.

Still, Saylor’s core argument remains focused. Bitcoin doesn’t rush. It responds when necessary. And when it does, the outcome strengthens the network rather than weakens it.

From his perspective, quantum computing doesn’t invalidate Bitcoin’s assumptions. It validates its adaptability.

Bitcoin Scarcity and Market Implications

Bitcoin remains the largest digital asset by market capitalization, consistently ranked first on CoinMarketCap. It is widely recognized as the benchmark asset for the entire crypto market.

Scarcity has always been central to its value proposition.

A post-quantum upgrade that immobilizes 20–25% of supply would not change Bitcoin’s total supply cap. But it would materially affect circulating supply dynamics. Fewer coins available. Less sell-side pressure. Greater long-term scarcity.

That’s why many in the community see Saylor’s thesis as bullish from a structural perspective.

Others remain cautious.

They point out that Bitcoin’s strength comes from stability and predictability. Any consensus upgrade, especially one tied to a hypothetical future threat, must be handled with extreme care.

Both sides agree on one thing. These discussions are no longer theoretical.

Quantum computing is advancing. Cryptography must keep pace. And Bitcoin, by design, will eventually need to respond.

Saylor’s message is clear. When that moment comes, Bitcoin won’t break. It will adapt. And in doing so, it may emerge more secure and more scarce than before.

Disclosure: This is not trading or investment advice. Always do your research before buying any cryptocurrency or investing in any services.

Follow us on Twitter @nulltxnews to stay updated with the latest Crypto, NFT, AI, Cybersecurity, Distributed Computing, and Metaverse news!

Market Opportunity
QUANTUM Logo
QUANTUM Price(QUANTUM)
$0,003279
$0,003279$0,003279
+%0,39
USD
QUANTUM (QUANTUM) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Role of Blockchain in Building Safer Web3 Gaming Ecosystems

The Role of Blockchain in Building Safer Web3 Gaming Ecosystems

The gaming industry is in the midst of a historic shift, driven by the rise of Web3. Unlike traditional games, where developers and publishers control assets and dictate in-game economies, Web3 gaming empowers players with ownership and influence. Built on blockchain technology, these ecosystems are decentralized by design, enabling true digital asset ownership, transparent economies, and a future where players help shape the games they play. However, as Web3 gaming grows, security becomes a focal point. The range of security concerns, from hacking to asset theft to vulnerabilities in smart contracts, is a significant issue that will undermine or erode trust in this ecosystem, limiting or stopping adoption. Blockchain technology could be used to create security processes around secure, transparent, and fair Web3 gaming ecosystems. We will explore how security is increasing within gaming ecosystems, which challenges are being overcome, and what the future of security looks like. Why is Security Important in Web3 Gaming? Web3 gaming differs from traditional gaming in that players engage with both the game and assets with real value attached. Players own in-game assets that exist as tokens or NFTs (Non-Fungible Tokens), and can trade and sell them. These game assets usually represent significant financial value, meaning security failure could represent real monetary loss. In essence, without security, the promises of owning “something” in Web3, decentralized economies within games, and all that comes with the term “fair” gameplay can easily be eroded by fraud, hacking, and exploitation. This is precisely why the uniqueness of blockchain should be emphasized in securing Web3 gaming. How Blockchain Ensures Security in Web3 Gaming?
  1. Immutable Ownership of Assets Blockchain records can be manipulated by anyone. If a player owns a sword, skin, or plot of land as an NFT, it is verifiably in their ownership, and it cannot be altered or deleted by the developer or even hacked. This has created a proven track record of ownership, providing control back to the players, unlike any centralised gaming platform where assets can be revoked.
  2. Decentralized Infrastructure Blockchain networks also have a distributed architecture where game data is stored in a worldwide network of nodes, making them much less susceptible to centralised points of failure and attacks. This decentralised approach makes it exponentially more difficult to hijack systems or even shut off the game’s economy.
  3. Secure Transactions with Cryptography Whether a player buys an NFT or trades their in-game tokens for other items or tokens, the transactions are enforced by cryptographic algorithms, ensuring secure, verifiable, and irreversible transactions and eliminating the risks of double-spending or fraudulent trades.
  4. Smart Contract Automation Smart contracts automate the enforcement of game rules and players’ economic exchanges for the developer, eliminating the need for intermediaries or middlemen, and trust for the developer. For example, if a player completes a quest that promises a reward, the smart contract will execute and distribute what was promised.
  5. Anti-Cheating and Fair Gameplay The naturally transparent nature of blockchain makes it extremely simple for anyone to examine a specific instance of gameplay and verify the economic outcomes from that play. Furthermore, multi-player games that enforce smart contracts on things like loot sharing or win sharing can automate and measure trustlessness and avoid cheating, manipulations, and fraud by developers.
  6. Cross-Platform Security Many Web3 games feature asset interoperability across platforms. This interoperability is made viable by blockchain, which guarantees ownership is maintained whenever assets transition from one game or marketplace to another, thereby offering protection to players who rely on transfers for security against fraud. Key Security Dangers in Web3 Gaming Although blockchain provides sound first principles of security, the Web3 gaming ecosystem is susceptible to threats. Some of the most serious threats include:
Smart Contract Vulnerabilities: Smart contracts that are poorly written or lack auditing will leave openings for exploitation and thereby result in asset loss. Phishing Attacks: Unintentionally exposing or revealing private keys or signing transactions that are not possible to reverse, under the assumption they were genuine transaction requests. Bridge Hacks: Cross-chain bridges, which allow players to move their assets between their respective blockchains, continually face hacks, requiring vigilance from players and developers. Scams and Rug Pulls: Rug pulls occur when a game project raises money and leaves, leaving player assets worthless. Regulatory Ambiguity: Global regulations remain unclear; risks exist for players and developers alike. While blockchain alone won’t resolve every issue, it remediates the responsibility of the first principles, more so when joined by processes such as auditing, education, and the right governance, which can improve their contribution to the security landscapes in game ecosystems. Real Life Examples of Blockchain Security in Web3 Gaming Axie Infinity (Ronin Hack): The Axie Infinity game and several projects suffered one of the biggest hacks thus far on its Ronin bridge; however, it demonstrated the effectiveness of multi-sig security and the effective utilization of decentralization. The industry benefited through learning and reflection, thus, as projects have implemented changes to reduce the risks of future hacks or misappropriation. Immutable X: This Ethereum scaling solution aims to ensure secure NFT transactions for gaming, allowing players to trade an asset without the burden of exorbitant fees and fears of being a victim of fraud. Enjin: Enjin is providing a trusted infrastructure for Web3 games, offering secure NFT creation and transfer while reiterating that ownership and an asset securely belong to the player. These examples indubitably illustrate that despite challenges to overcome, blockchain remains the foundational layer on which to build more secure Web3 gaming environments. Benefits of Blockchain Security for Players and Developers For Players: Confidence in true ownership of assets Transparency in in-game economies Protection against nefarious trades/scams For Developers: More trust between players and the platform Less reliance on centralized infrastructure Ability to attract wealth and players based on provable fairness By incorporating blockchain security within the mechanics of game design, developers can create and enforce resilient ecosystems where players feel reassured in investing time, money, and ownership within virtual worlds. The Future of Secure Web3 Gaming Ecosystems As the wisdom of blockchain technology and industry knowledge improves, the future for secure Web3 gaming looks bright. New growing trends include: Zero-Knowledge Proofs (ZKPs): A new wave of protocols that enable private transactions and secure smart contracts while managing user privacy with an element of transparency. Decentralized Identity Solutions (DID): Helping players control their identities and decrease account theft risks. AI-Enhanced Security: Identifying irregularities in user interactions by sampling pattern anomalies to avert hacks and fraud by time-stamping critical events. Interoperable Security Standards: Allowing secured and seamless asset transfers across blockchains and games. With these innovations, blockchain will not only secure gaming assets but also enhance the overall trust and longevity of Web3 gaming ecosystems. Conclusion Blockchain is more than a buzzword in Web3; it is the only way to host security, fairness, and transparency. With blockchain, players confirm immutable ownership of digital assets, there is a decentralized infrastructure, and finally, it supports smart contracts to automate code that protects players and developers from the challenges of digital economies. The threats, vulnerabilities, and scams that come from smart contracts still persist, but the industry is maturing with better security practices, cross-chain solutions, and increased formal cryptographic tools. In the coming years, blockchain will remain the base to digital economies and drive Web3 gaming environments that allow players to safely own, trade, and enjoy their digital experiences free from fraud and exploitation. While blockchain and gaming alone entertain, we will usher in an era of secure digital worlds where trust complements innovation. The Role of Blockchain in Building Safer Web3 Gaming Ecosystems was originally published in Coinmonks on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story
Share
Medium2025/09/18 14:40
Will XRP Price Increase In September 2025?

Will XRP Price Increase In September 2025?

Ripple XRP is a cryptocurrency that primarily focuses on building a decentralised payments network to facilitate low-cost and cross-border transactions. It’s a native digital currency of the Ripple network, which works as a blockchain called the XRP Ledger (XRPL). It utilised a shared, distributed ledger to track account balances and transactions. What Do XRP Charts Reveal? […]
Share
Tronweekly2025/09/18 00:00
Gold continues to hit new highs. How to invest in gold in the crypto market?

Gold continues to hit new highs. How to invest in gold in the crypto market?

As Bitcoin encounters a "value winter", real-world gold is recasting the iron curtain of value on the blockchain.
Share
PANews2025/04/14 17:12