The post SEC proposes final judgments sanctioning former FTX and Alameda executives appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The U.S. Securities and Exchange CommissionThe post SEC proposes final judgments sanctioning former FTX and Alameda executives appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

SEC proposes final judgments sanctioning former FTX and Alameda executives

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has proposed final consent judgments against Caroline Ellison, the former CEO of Alameda Research; Gary Wang, the former CTO of FTX; and Nishad Singh, the former co-lead engineer of FTX. The three executives were involved in the 2022 collapse of FTX Trading Ltd. and its affiliation with the Alameda Research hedge fund.

The proposed judgments were tabled by the SEC in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York on December 19, 2025. The SEC alleged that from May 2019 to November 2022, FTX and its founder, Samuel Bankman-Fried, raised over $1.8 billion from investors by representing the exchange as a secure crypto asset trading platform with advanced automated risk mitigation techniques to secure customer funds. 

SEC argues that Alameda received preferential treatment from FTX

According to the filing tabled by the SEC with the Court for the Southern District of New York, FTX assured investors that Alameda, owned by Bankman-Fried and Wang, was an ordinary customer with no preferential treatment. SEC complaints revealed that Alameda was actually exempted from risk controls and received a virtually unlimited line of credit financed by FTX customer funds. 

The SEC argued that funds allocated to Alameda were used for Alameda’s trading activities, venture investments, and loans to Bankman-Fried and other executives, including Wang and Singh. The Commission further alleged that Wand and Singh were responsible for developing the software code used to divert customer funds to Alameda, with Ellison utilizing the funds for trading activities. 

Based on the SEC’s argument, the three executives were indeed aware of Bankman-Fried’s actions, allegedly directing additional hundreds of millions in customer funds to Alameda. The three executives, including Ellison, Wang, and Singh, consented to permanent injunctions against violating antifraud provisions of Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and Rule 10b-5. 

Without denying the Commission’s allegations, the three executives agreed to five-year conduct-based injunctions. Additionally, Ellison consented to a 10-year ban from serving as an officer or director of public companies, while Wang and Singh each agreed to an eight-year ban. Previously, the three officers faced criminal charges and pleaded guilty to various counts, including fraud and conspiracy to commit fraud. 

The three executives cooperated with the court against Bankman-Fried’s prosecution, which resulted in a 25-year prison sentence for Bankman-Fried on seven criminal counts. Ellison, who was the key witness in the Bankman-Fried case, received a two-year prison sentence, with the option for early release. Wang and Singh, on the other hand, received sentences for time served only. 

According to a recent Cryptopolitan report, Caroline Ellison, who was considered Sam Bankman-Fried’s girlfriend, has been transferred from federal prison after serving approximately 11 months of her two-year sentence. Ellison was moved on October 16 from Danbury Federal Correctional Institute to a community confinement program. 

As of now, the proposed judgments, led by attorneys from the Enforcement Division of the Cyber and Emerging Technologies unit, conclude the agency’s civil proceedings against individuals connected to the FTX collapse scandal. 

In another related report delivered by Cryptopolitan, a class action lawsuit has also been filed against Silvergate Bank in California, inviting investors connected to FTX or Alameda Research accounts. The lawsuit invites investors who deposited fiat into an FTX or Alameda account between 2019 and 2022 to submit claims for a $10 million settlement filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California.

Based on the filing, investors have until January 30, 2026, to submit their claims as part of the settlement seeking to resolve the matter on whether Silvergate Bank, Silvergate Capital Corporation, and Alan J. Lane aided and abetted FTX’s fraudulent actions. 

Get up to $30,050 in trading rewards when you join Bybit today

Source: https://www.cryptopolitan.com/sec-vs-former-ftx-and-alameda-executives/

Market Opportunity
Union Logo
Union Price(U)
$0.003128
$0.003128$0.003128
-1.44%
USD
Union (U) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Trump’s Crypto Gains Risk Backlash Post-Presidency, Ethereum Veteran Advises Urgency

Trump’s Crypto Gains Risk Backlash Post-Presidency, Ethereum Veteran Advises Urgency

The post Trump’s Crypto Gains Risk Backlash Post-Presidency, Ethereum Veteran Advises Urgency appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. President Trump’s administration
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/21 01:29
China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

The post China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise China’s internet regulator has ordered the country’s biggest technology firms, including Alibaba and ByteDance, to stop purchasing Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D GPUs. According to the Financial Times, the move shuts down the last major channel for mass supplies of American chips to the Chinese market. Why Beijing Halted Nvidia Purchases Chinese companies had planned to buy tens of thousands of RTX Pro 6000D accelerators and had already begun testing them in servers. But regulators intervened, halting the purchases and signaling stricter controls than earlier measures placed on Nvidia’s H20 chip. Image: Nvidia An audit compared Huawei and Cambricon processors, along with chips developed by Alibaba and Baidu, against Nvidia’s export-approved products. Regulators concluded that Chinese chips had reached performance levels comparable to the restricted U.S. models. This assessment pushed authorities to advise firms to rely more heavily on domestic processors, further tightening Nvidia’s already limited position in China. China’s Drive Toward Tech Independence The decision highlights Beijing’s focus on import substitution — developing self-sufficient chip production to reduce reliance on U.S. supplies. “The signal is now clear: all attention is focused on building a domestic ecosystem,” said a representative of a leading Chinese tech company. Nvidia had unveiled the RTX Pro 6000D in July 2025 during CEO Jensen Huang’s visit to Beijing, in an attempt to keep a foothold in China after Washington restricted exports of its most advanced chips. But momentum is shifting. Industry sources told the Financial Times that Chinese manufacturers plan to triple AI chip production next year to meet growing demand. They believe “domestic supply will now be sufficient without Nvidia.” What It Means for the Future With Huawei, Cambricon, Alibaba, and Baidu stepping up, China is positioning itself for long-term technological independence. Nvidia, meanwhile, faces…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:37
Academic Publishing and Fairness: A Game-Theoretic Model of Peer-Review Bias

Academic Publishing and Fairness: A Game-Theoretic Model of Peer-Review Bias

Exploring how biases in the peer-review system impact researchers' choices, showing how principles of fairness relate to the production of scientific knowledge based on topic importance and hardness.
Share
Hackernoon2025/09/17 23:15