The post Crypto News: SEC Moves to Finalize Penalties Against Former FTX Executives appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. US regulators advance final judgments againstThe post Crypto News: SEC Moves to Finalize Penalties Against Former FTX Executives appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. US regulators advance final judgments against

Crypto News: SEC Moves to Finalize Penalties Against Former FTX Executives

US regulators advance final judgments against former FTX executives, outlining injunctions, bans, and fraud findings tied to customer fund misuse.

The US Securities and Exchange Commission moved closer to closing its FTX enforcement actions. Therefore, proposed consent judgments against senior executives involved in the collapse of the exchange. Consequently, the filings reinforce the themes of accountability following the 2022 failure. Moreover, the cases highlight persistent barriers to leadership positions within public companies.

SEC Details Final Judgments Against FTX Insiders

According to the SEC, filings were submitted in New York federal court. The defendants are Caroline Ellison, Gary Wang and Nishad Singh. In the past Ellison headed Alameda Research and Wang was FTX chief technology officer. Singh served as a co-lead engineer during the growth of the platform.

With court approval, the three accepted permanent antifraud injunctions. Additionally, each agreed on five-year conduct-based restrictions. However, penalties differ depending on a role. Ellison accepted a ten-year ban from an officer and director position. Meanwhile, Wang and Singh agreed to eight-year bans.

Related Reading: Crypto News: FTX’s Caroline Ellison Released After 11 Months Behind Bars

Moreover, the SEC alleged gross misusage of customer funds. Regulators said Alameda received special privileges that were unseen by investors. Specifically, risk controls were turned off for Alameda’s accounts. Consequently, customer assets were supposedly used to fund trading, investments and executive loans.

Furthermore, complaints said FTX had collected more than 1.8 billion dollars from investors. These efforts were conducted from May 2019 to November 2022. Investors were told assets were still sheltered by the automated safeguards. In reality, according to the representations made by the regulators, this proved to be materially false.

Non-Monetary Settlements Mark Closing Phase of Case

Importantly there are no further monetary penalties to the settlements. Instead, they focus on limits of behavior and future compliance. The SEC said there was no disgorgement or civil fines involved here. However, the approval of the court regarding finalization is required.

Additionally, the actions are followed by co-operation in associated criminal proceedings. Each of the executives had earlier entered guilty pleas. Those admissions covered the multibillion-dollar fraud in how FTX collapsed. Therefore, the civil outcomes are in line with wider accountability efforts.

Finally, the case highlights the ongoing scrutiny of crypto markets. Regulators continue emphasizing on governance controls and transparency. As enforcement moves forward, firms reconsider compliance frameworks. Consequently, the FTX resolutions may have an impact on future industry resolutions.

According to filings, the SEC brought initial complaints in late 2022. Actions against Ellison and Wang came in December. Singh had been charged in February 2023. Collectively, the timeline itself is indicative of sustained regulatory focus following the collapse.

Moreover, the agency said software changes allowed for the diversion of funds. Wang and Singh purportedly wrote code which allowed for transfers. Ellison allegedly used diverted assets for trading. Therefore, the SEC explained customer protections as illusory.

Meanwhile, the Southern District of New York remains at the center of crypto enforcement. Courts there preside over a number of high profile cases. Consequently, outcomes set the expectations of executives across the country. Observers expect tighter oversight following repeated market failures.

Ultimately, the consent judgments mark an end stage for this chapter. Yet, regulatory pressure is ongoing in exchanges and funds. There is a growing demand among investors for safeguards and transparency. As memory of the collapse lingers, compliance failures have long-term ramifications for leadership credibility and trust in the markets.

Source: https://www.livebitcoinnews.com/sec-moves-to-finalize-penalties-against-former-ftx-executives/

Market Opportunity
Talus Logo
Talus Price(US)
$0.01161
$0.01161$0.01161
+1.04%
USD
Talus (US) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Trump’s Crypto Gains Risk Backlash Post-Presidency, Ethereum Veteran Advises Urgency

Trump’s Crypto Gains Risk Backlash Post-Presidency, Ethereum Veteran Advises Urgency

The post Trump’s Crypto Gains Risk Backlash Post-Presidency, Ethereum Veteran Advises Urgency appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. President Trump’s administration
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/21 01:29
China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

The post China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise China’s internet regulator has ordered the country’s biggest technology firms, including Alibaba and ByteDance, to stop purchasing Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D GPUs. According to the Financial Times, the move shuts down the last major channel for mass supplies of American chips to the Chinese market. Why Beijing Halted Nvidia Purchases Chinese companies had planned to buy tens of thousands of RTX Pro 6000D accelerators and had already begun testing them in servers. But regulators intervened, halting the purchases and signaling stricter controls than earlier measures placed on Nvidia’s H20 chip. Image: Nvidia An audit compared Huawei and Cambricon processors, along with chips developed by Alibaba and Baidu, against Nvidia’s export-approved products. Regulators concluded that Chinese chips had reached performance levels comparable to the restricted U.S. models. This assessment pushed authorities to advise firms to rely more heavily on domestic processors, further tightening Nvidia’s already limited position in China. China’s Drive Toward Tech Independence The decision highlights Beijing’s focus on import substitution — developing self-sufficient chip production to reduce reliance on U.S. supplies. “The signal is now clear: all attention is focused on building a domestic ecosystem,” said a representative of a leading Chinese tech company. Nvidia had unveiled the RTX Pro 6000D in July 2025 during CEO Jensen Huang’s visit to Beijing, in an attempt to keep a foothold in China after Washington restricted exports of its most advanced chips. But momentum is shifting. Industry sources told the Financial Times that Chinese manufacturers plan to triple AI chip production next year to meet growing demand. They believe “domestic supply will now be sufficient without Nvidia.” What It Means for the Future With Huawei, Cambricon, Alibaba, and Baidu stepping up, China is positioning itself for long-term technological independence. Nvidia, meanwhile, faces…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:37
Academic Publishing and Fairness: A Game-Theoretic Model of Peer-Review Bias

Academic Publishing and Fairness: A Game-Theoretic Model of Peer-Review Bias

Exploring how biases in the peer-review system impact researchers' choices, showing how principles of fairness relate to the production of scientific knowledge based on topic importance and hardness.
Share
Hackernoon2025/09/17 23:15