US spot crypto ETFs have attracted more than $70 billion in net inflows since January 2024, making traditional financial investment vehicles the primary entry pointUS spot crypto ETFs have attracted more than $70 billion in net inflows since January 2024, making traditional financial investment vehicles the primary entry point

Crypto index ETFs will dominate 2026 because the SEC is about to break the single-asset model

US spot crypto ETFs have attracted more than $70 billion in net inflows since January 2024, making traditional financial investment vehicles the primary entry point for new money into the emerging industry.

That surge, driven by products linked to Bitcoin, Ethereum, and more recently Solana and XRP, has validated the industry’s view that many investors will buy crypto only through regulated structures they already use for stocks and bonds.

Notably, Schwab Asset Management recently found that 45% of ETF investors plan to purchase crypto ETFs, a figure that now ties with interest in bond ETFs.

Schwabs ETF SurveySchwabs ETF Survey (Source: Eric Balchunas)

However, with the SEC expected to clear more than 100 additional crypto ETFs next year, wealth managers face a new problem. Due to this wave of products, their decision will move from a simple “own Bitcoin or not” question to picking which of dozens of single-asset products might lead the next cycle.

In a recent interview, Bitwise Chief Investment Officer Matt Hougan pointed out this difficulty, while noting that many traditional investors have no strong view on decentralization or on “Ethereum versus Solana” and instead want broad market exposure.

However, that has become harder to achieve as the lineup shifts from a few flagship Bitcoin ETFs to a crowded shelf of narrowly focused products that demand a level of due diligence many advisory platforms are not built to handle.

The crypto index solution

Market observers believe that this growing complexity of single-asset choices will push investors toward crypto index ETPs, which package baskets of tokens into a single listed security.

Notably, the category gained structural footing in September when Grayscale launched the Grayscale CoinDesk Crypto 5 ETF, described as the first multi-asset crypto fund in the United States.

Since then, issuers have rolled out Bitwise’s BITW, 21Shares’ FTSE Crypto 10 Index ETF (TTOP) and its ex-Bitcoin version (TXBC), along with competing products from Hashdex and Franklin Templeton.

Roxanna Islam, head of sector and industry research at VettaFi, said the evolution resembles the way equity investors often move from individual stocks to broad index funds as an asset class matures.

Islam added that the new funds reflect a growing preference among advisors for simple portfolio building blocks.

Nate Geraci, President of Nova Dius Wealth, agreed, noting he is “highly bullish” on demand for these baskets as they offer a one-click solution for allocators looking to bypass the noise of individual token selection.

The mechanics

Most multi-asset crypto index products end up owning a very similar mix of coins.

Their rulebooks typically start with free-float market capitalization and basic liquidity filters, which naturally push most of the weight into Bitcoin and ETH, leaving only small allocations for everything else.

Grayscale’s Digital Large Cap Fund (GDLC) is a case in point. According to its data, the fund holds roughly three-quarters of its portfolio in Bitcoin and about 15% in Ethereum, with the remainder split into single-digit stakes: around 5% in XRP, just under 3% in Solana, and a little more than half a percent in Cardano.

Meanwhile, a holdings comparison compiled by Bloomberg illustrates how systematic the funds' holdings can be.

Looking across six of the main crypto baskets, including products from Grayscale, Bitwise, and Hashdex, Solana and Cardano appear in every lineup.

Crypto Index ETF Asset WeightingsCrypto Index ETF Asset Weightings (Source: Bloomberg)

Cardano's presence across all the funds is surprising, given that it lacks a dedicated US spot ETF and lags higher-profile rivals such as Solana and Ethereum in both performance and mindshare.

So, its presence across these funds can be linked to its market value and trading depth. According to CryptoSlate's data, Cardano is the 10th-largest crypto asset by market capitalization, with a market cap of over $13 billion.

This qualifies the token for a small but steady share of passive flows even as market attention moves elsewhere.

The challenges

The simplicity of a single-ticker crypto index fund often comes at a price for investors.

For context, many of the products charge fees north of 0.5% a year, compared with roughly 0.25% on spot Bitcoin ETFs and single-digit basis points on broad equity trackers.

That spread is effectively the cost of outsourcing rebalancing, and in digital-asset markets, rebalancing is rarely frictionless.

This is because liquidity drops quickly once a portfolio moves beyond the top three or four tokens, and index providers publish both their methodologies and review calendars.

As a result, professional traders can see when funds will be forced to buy or sell. When those flows are predictable, these traders can position against them, leaving index vehicles to buy into strength and sell into weakness to stay in line with their benchmarks.

Moreover, the basket construction creates a risk profile that does not align with what many advisors expect from equity indices.

Usually, investors tend to assume that a diversified sleeve is safer than a concentrated position. Yet historical data often show that Bitcoin exhibits lower volatility than smart-contract platforms such as Ethereum and Solana.

Bitcoin Ethereum SolanaBitcoin vs. Ethereum Solana Price Performance YTD and Volatility (Source: Cryptorank)

So, because most large-cap crypto indices are market-cap weighted, Bitcoin still accounts for most of the exposure. As a result, smaller allocations to Ethereum, Solana, and other tokens add a higher beta rather than a defensive offset.

In rising markets, that mix can help a basket outperform a Bitcoin-only holding. However, during market downturns, it can cause the index product to fall faster than the asset underlying it.

What should we expect in 2026?

Despite the current preference for single-asset “winners,” the 2026 pipeline shows issuers are betting that behavior will change.

Bloomberg Intelligence ETF analyst James Seyffart expects crypto index ETPs to be a primary category for asset gathering next year.

Considering this, if US crypto ETF flows in 2026 match this year’s pace, which has already seen more than $47 billion in net inflows according to CoinShares, the CryptoSlate model estimates that a bundling shift from single-stock picking to diversified beta could direct between 2% and 10% of that total into index products.

On that baseline, the implied range for crypto index ETF inflows looks like this:

ScenarioShare of 2026 US crypto ETF flows going to crypto index ETFsImplied inflows to index ETFs (on $47B total)
Low2%$0.94 billion
Base5%$2.35 billion
High10%$4.70 billion

Islam believes this shift will happen out of necessity. She said:

In that scenario, the winners of 2026 are unlikely to be the funds with the flashiest short-term returns, but the ones that secure slots in major advisory firms’ model portfolios, where allocations become embedded and flows systematic.

The post Crypto index ETFs will dominate 2026 because the SEC is about to break the single-asset model appeared first on CryptoSlate.

Market Opportunity
Index Cooperative Logo
Index Cooperative Price(INDEX)
$0.4928
$0.4928$0.4928
-2.12%
USD
Index Cooperative (INDEX) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Whales keep selling XRP despite ETF success — Data signals deeper weakness

Whales keep selling XRP despite ETF success — Data signals deeper weakness

The post Whales keep selling XRP despite ETF success — Data signals deeper weakness appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. XRP ETFs have crossed $1 billion in assets
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/20 02:55
Foreigner’s Lou Gramm Revisits The Band’s Classic ‘4’ Album, Now Reissued

Foreigner’s Lou Gramm Revisits The Band’s Classic ‘4’ Album, Now Reissued

The post Foreigner’s Lou Gramm Revisits The Band’s Classic ‘4’ Album, Now Reissued appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. American-based rock band Foreigner performs onstage at the Rosemont Horizon, Rosemont, Illinois, November 8, 1981. Pictured are, from left, Mick Jones, on guitar, and vocalist Lou Gramm. (Photo by Paul Natkin/Getty Images) Getty Images Singer Lou Gramm has a vivid memory of recording the ballad “Waiting for a Girl Like You” at New York City’s Electric Lady Studio for his band Foreigner more than 40 years ago. Gramm was adding his vocals for the track in the control room on the other side of the glass when he noticed a beautiful woman walking through the door. “She sits on the sofa in front of the board,” he says. “She looked at me while I was singing. And every now and then, she had a little smile on her face. I’m not sure what that was, but it was driving me crazy. “And at the end of the song, when I’m singing the ad-libs and stuff like that, she gets up,” he continues. “She gives me a little smile and walks out of the room. And when the song ended, I would look up every now and then to see where Mick [Jones] and Mutt [Lange] were, and they were pushing buttons and turning knobs. They were not aware that she was even in the room. So when the song ended, I said, ‘Guys, who was that woman who walked in? She was beautiful.’ And they looked at each other, and they went, ‘What are you talking about? We didn’t see anything.’ But you know what? I think they put her up to it. Doesn’t that sound more like them?” “Waiting for a Girl Like You” became a massive hit in 1981 for Foreigner off their album 4, which peaked at number one on the Billboard chart for 10 weeks and…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:26
New York Regulators Push Banks to Adopt Blockchain Analytics

New York Regulators Push Banks to Adopt Blockchain Analytics

New York’s top financial regulator urged banks to adopt blockchain analytics, signaling tighter oversight of crypto-linked risks. The move reflects regulators’ concern that traditional institutions face rising exposure to digital assets. While crypto-native firms already rely on monitoring tools, the Department of Financial Services now expects banks to use them to detect illicit activity. NYDFS Outlines Compliance Expectations The notice, issued on Wednesday by Superintendent Adrienne Harris, applies to all state-chartered banks and foreign branches. In its industry letter, the New York State Department of Financial Services (NYDFS) emphasized that blockchain analytics should be integrated into compliance programs according to each bank’s size, operations, and risk appetite. The regulator cautioned that crypto markets evolve quickly, requiring institutions to update frameworks regularly. “Emerging technologies introduce evolving threats that require enhanced monitoring tools,” the notice stated. It stressed the need for banks to prevent money laundering, sanctions violations, and other illicit finance linked to virtual currency transactions. To that end, the Department listed specific areas where blockchain analytics can be applied: Screening customer wallets with crypto exposure to assess risks. Verifying the origin of funds from virtual asset service providers (VASPs). Monitoring the ecosystem holistically to detect money laundering or sanctions exposure. Identifying and assessing counterparties, such as third-party VASPs. Evaluating expected versus actual transaction activity, including dollar thresholds. Weighing risks tied to new digital asset products before rollout. These examples highlight how institutions can tailor monitoring tools to strengthen their risk management frameworks. The guidance expands on NYDFS’s Virtual Currency-Related Activities (VCRA) framework, which has governed crypto oversight in the state since 2022. Regulators Signal Broader Impact Market observers say the notice is less about new rules and more about clarifying expectations. By formalizing the role of blockchain analytics in traditional finance, New York is reinforcing the idea that banks cannot treat crypto exposure as a niche concern. Analysts also believe the approach could ripple beyond New York. Federal agencies and regulators in other states may view the guidance as a blueprint for aligning banking oversight with the realities of digital asset adoption. For institutions, failure to adopt blockchain intelligence tools may invite regulatory scrutiny and undermine their ability to safeguard customer trust. With crypto now firmly embedded in global finance, New York’s stance suggests that blockchain analytics are no longer optional for banks — they are essential to protecting the financial system’s integrity.
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 08:49