The post OKX And Mantra Clash Over OM Token Price Manipulation Allegations appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. OKX and Mantra clash over OM token manipulation The post OKX And Mantra Clash Over OM Token Price Manipulation Allegations appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. OKX and Mantra clash over OM token manipulation

OKX And Mantra Clash Over OM Token Price Manipulation Allegations

2025/12/15 01:41

OKX and Mantra clash over OM token manipulation claims as token migration and regulatory investigations intensify.

A dispute between cryptocurrency exchange OKX and the Mantra project has escalated following allegations of price manipulation involving the OM token. The conflict centers on claims that coordinated accounts manipulated OM’s value using it as collateral for large USDT loans.

OKX claims to have acted in response to irregular trading behavior, while Mantra’s leadership demands complete transparency regarding token holdings and transaction practices.

Mantra CEO Seeks Token Transparency

Mantra CEO John Patrick Mullin responded to OKX’s allegations with an open letter, published on Twitter, requesting full disclosure from the exchange.

Mullin asked OKX to provide details on how many OM tokens belong to users versus what remains on the company’s balance sheet. He also addressed confusion over the upcoming OM token migration.

According to Mullin, the existing ERC-20 version of OM will be deprecated on January 15, 2026. After that, the token will undergo a protocol-level upgrade and a 1:4 token split.

Mullin clarified that users will not need to take action during this process, aiming to dispel concerns among token holders.

OKX Claims Coordinated Manipulation and Defends Actions

In its response, OKX rejected the claims made in Mullin’s letter and stated that it had acted to protect market integrity.

The exchange accused several accounts of coordinating to use OM as collateral for USDT borrowing, which it says led to artificial inflation of OM’s price. OKX’s internal risk team flagged the behavior and requested that the account holders adjust their positions, but received no cooperation.

Following these developments, OKX intervened by taking control of the involved accounts. The OM token experienced a sharp price drop soon after.

OKX stated that it had liquidated only a limited amount of OM and absorbed related losses using its Security Fund. The exchange also noted that external perpetual trading activity on OKX contributed to the price crash.

Related Reading: OKX Seychelles Settles with U.S. DOJ, Pays $84M Fine

OKX confirmed that it has submitted its findings and documentation to regulatory authorities and law enforcement.

It maintained that it followed all internal protocols and acted responsibly in response to suspicious activity. The exchange also questioned the origin of extensive OM holdings by some entities involved in the situation.

Despite OKX’s stance, Mullin has continued to call for further transparency. He believes the dispute stems from a lack of clarity around the OM token migration process and maintains that the public deserves more insight into OKX’s OM token management.

The matter remains under investigation, with both parties holding their positions amid ongoing legal processes.

Source: https://www.livebitcoinnews.com/okx-and-mantra-clash-over-om-token-price-manipulation-allegations/

Market Opportunity
Clash Logo
Clash Price(CLASH)
$0.021651
$0.021651$0.021651
-2.47%
USD
Clash (CLASH) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
XRP ETF’s bereiken belangrijke mijlpaal: $1 miljard aan netto instroom

XRP ETF’s bereiken belangrijke mijlpaal: $1 miljard aan netto instroom

De markt voor crypto-exchange-traded funds (ETF’s) heeft opnieuw een belangrijke mijlpaal bereikt. XRP ETF’s hebben gezamenlijk meer dan 1 miljard dollar aan netto
Share
Coinstats2025/12/16 21:01
XSGD And XUSD Launch On Solana’s Blazing Network In 2025

XSGD And XUSD Launch On Solana’s Blazing Network In 2025

The post XSGD And XUSD Launch On Solana’s Blazing Network In 2025 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. StraitsX Stablecoins Unleash Power: XSGD And XUSD Launch
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/16 20:59