The post China’s DeepSeek accused of using banned chips, Nvidia denies it appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. China’s DeepSeek faces accusations of training its AI model with banned Blackwell AI chips, though Nvidia says it has found no such evidence. According to The Information, DeepSeek obtained Nvidia Corp. Blackwell chips through smuggling routes directly from countries that are allowed to purchase the chips. Sources told the Information that computer servers holding the chips were disassembled before entering China. DeepSeek has not responded to requests for comment on the allegations. The company grabbed worldwide attention in January after introducing an AI system that matched the performance of top American technology while costing far less to develop. High-Flyer, a Chinese investment firm, provides financial backing for DeepSeek and had purchased 10,000 Nvidia graphics processing units in 2021, before Washington banned sales of advanced Nvidia chips and similar hardware to China. President Donald Trump gave Nvidia approval earlier this week to send an older chip model, the H200, to China. However, restrictions on the newer Blackwell chips remain active. DeepSeek put out a fresh model in September and said it was partnering with Chinese chip manufacturers on the project. Nvidia disputes smuggling claims On Wednesday, Nvidia challenged the smuggling claims about DeepSeek and its use of Blackwell technology. American officials have blocked Blackwell chip exports to China, viewing them as Nvidia’s most sophisticated products, in an attempt to maintain an edge in artificial intelligence development. The Information reported that DeepSeek acquired chips that entered the country illegally. A Nvidia representative issued a statement saying the company has not discovered any confirmation of hidden data facilities built to mislead Nvidia and its manufacturing partners, then torn down, moved secretly, and reassembled elsewhere. The spokesperson added that while such smuggling appears unlikely, the company investigates every tip it gets. “We haven’t seen any substantiation or received tips of ‘phantom datacenters’ constructed to… The post China’s DeepSeek accused of using banned chips, Nvidia denies it appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. China’s DeepSeek faces accusations of training its AI model with banned Blackwell AI chips, though Nvidia says it has found no such evidence. According to The Information, DeepSeek obtained Nvidia Corp. Blackwell chips through smuggling routes directly from countries that are allowed to purchase the chips. Sources told the Information that computer servers holding the chips were disassembled before entering China. DeepSeek has not responded to requests for comment on the allegations. The company grabbed worldwide attention in January after introducing an AI system that matched the performance of top American technology while costing far less to develop. High-Flyer, a Chinese investment firm, provides financial backing for DeepSeek and had purchased 10,000 Nvidia graphics processing units in 2021, before Washington banned sales of advanced Nvidia chips and similar hardware to China. President Donald Trump gave Nvidia approval earlier this week to send an older chip model, the H200, to China. However, restrictions on the newer Blackwell chips remain active. DeepSeek put out a fresh model in September and said it was partnering with Chinese chip manufacturers on the project. Nvidia disputes smuggling claims On Wednesday, Nvidia challenged the smuggling claims about DeepSeek and its use of Blackwell technology. American officials have blocked Blackwell chip exports to China, viewing them as Nvidia’s most sophisticated products, in an attempt to maintain an edge in artificial intelligence development. The Information reported that DeepSeek acquired chips that entered the country illegally. A Nvidia representative issued a statement saying the company has not discovered any confirmation of hidden data facilities built to mislead Nvidia and its manufacturing partners, then torn down, moved secretly, and reassembled elsewhere. The spokesperson added that while such smuggling appears unlikely, the company investigates every tip it gets. “We haven’t seen any substantiation or received tips of ‘phantom datacenters’ constructed to…

China’s DeepSeek accused of using banned chips, Nvidia denies it

China’s DeepSeek faces accusations of training its AI model with banned Blackwell AI chips, though Nvidia says it has found no such evidence.

According to The Information, DeepSeek obtained Nvidia Corp. Blackwell chips through smuggling routes directly from countries that are allowed to purchase the chips. Sources told the Information that computer servers holding the chips were disassembled before entering China.

DeepSeek has not responded to requests for comment on the allegations.

The company grabbed worldwide attention in January after introducing an AI system that matched the performance of top American technology while costing far less to develop.

High-Flyer, a Chinese investment firm, provides financial backing for DeepSeek and had purchased 10,000 Nvidia graphics processing units in 2021, before Washington banned sales of advanced Nvidia chips and similar hardware to China.

President Donald Trump gave Nvidia approval earlier this week to send an older chip model, the H200, to China. However, restrictions on the newer Blackwell chips remain active.

DeepSeek put out a fresh model in September and said it was partnering with Chinese chip manufacturers on the project.

Nvidia disputes smuggling claims

On Wednesday, Nvidia challenged the smuggling claims about DeepSeek and its use of Blackwell technology.

American officials have blocked Blackwell chip exports to China, viewing them as Nvidia’s most sophisticated products, in an attempt to maintain an edge in artificial intelligence development.

The Information reported that DeepSeek acquired chips that entered the country illegally.

A Nvidia representative issued a statement saying the company has not discovered any confirmation of hidden data facilities built to mislead Nvidia and its manufacturing partners, then torn down, moved secretly, and reassembled elsewhere. The spokesperson added that while such smuggling appears unlikely, the company investigates every tip it gets.

“We haven’t seen any substantiation or received tips of ‘phantom datacenters’ constructed to deceive us and our OEM partners, then deconstructed, smuggled, and reconstructed somewhere else … While such smuggling seems farfetched, we pursue any tip we receive.” – Nvidia Spokesperson.

Nvidia has profited enormously from the AI surge because it makes the graphics processing units essential for training AI systems and handling massive computing tasks.

Because this equipment plays such a vital role in AI advancement, Nvidia’s dealings with China have become a contentious issue among American political leaders.

Trump allows older chip sales to China

Trump announced Monday that Nvidia can deliver H200 chips to cleared buyers in China and other locations, with the United States receiving 25% of revenue from those transactions.

Some Republican lawmakers objected to the announcement.

DeepSeek startled American technology companies in January by launching a reasoning model named R1 that climbed to the top of download charts and industry rankings. Experts estimated that R1 was built for a small fraction of what similar American models cost.

Last August, DeepSeek suggested that China would soon produce its own advanced chips to power AI systems.

Claim your free seat in an exclusive crypto trading community – limited to 1,000 members.

Source: https://www.cryptopolitan.com/china-deepseek-accused-banned-chips/

Market Opportunity
Sleepless AI Logo
Sleepless AI Price(AI)
$0.03821
$0.03821$0.03821
-0.18%
USD
Sleepless AI (AI) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Is Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX) a strong mutual fund pick right now?

Is Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX) a strong mutual fund pick right now?

The post Is Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX) a strong mutual fund pick right now? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. On the lookout for a Sector – Tech fund? Starting with Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX – Free Report) should not be a possibility at this time. PGTAX possesses a Zacks Mutual Fund Rank of 4 (Sell), which is based on various forecasting factors like size, cost, and past performance. Objective We note that PGTAX is a Sector – Tech option, and this area is loaded with many options. Found in a wide number of industries such as semiconductors, software, internet, and networking, tech companies are everywhere. Thus, Sector – Tech mutual funds that invest in technology let investors own a stake in a notoriously volatile sector, but with a much more diversified approach. History of fund/manager Putnam Funds is based in Canton, MA, and is the manager of PGTAX. The Putnam Global Technology A made its debut in January of 2009 and PGTAX has managed to accumulate roughly $650.01 million in assets, as of the most recently available information. The fund is currently managed by Di Yao who has been in charge of the fund since December of 2012. Performance Obviously, what investors are looking for in these funds is strong performance relative to their peers. PGTAX has a 5-year annualized total return of 14.46%, and is in the middle third among its category peers. But if you are looking for a shorter time frame, it is also worth looking at its 3-year annualized total return of 27.02%, which places it in the middle third during this time-frame. It is important to note that the product’s returns may not reflect all its expenses. Any fees not reflected would lower the returns. Total returns do not reflect the fund’s [%] sale charge. If sales charges were included, total returns would have been lower. When looking at a fund’s performance, it…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 04:05
Crypto Casino Luck.io Pays Influencers Up to $500K Monthly – But Why?

Crypto Casino Luck.io Pays Influencers Up to $500K Monthly – But Why?

Crypto casino Luck.io is reportedly paying influencers six figures a month to promote its services, a June 18 X post from popular crypto trader Jordan Fish, aka Cobie, shows. Crypto Influencers Reportedly Earning Six Figures Monthly According to a screenshot of messages between Cobie and an unidentified source embedded in the Wednesday post, the anonymous messenger confirmed that the crypto company pays influencers “around” $500,000 per month to promote the casino. They’re paying extremely well (6 fig per month) pic.twitter.com/AKRVKU9vp4 — Cobie (@cobie) June 18, 2025 However, not everyone was as convinced of the number’s accuracy. “That’s only for Faze Banks probably,” one user replied. “Other influencers are getting $20-40k per month. So, same as other online crypto casinos.” Cobie pushed back on the user’s claims by identifying the messenger as “a crypto person,” going on to state that he knew of “4 other crypto people” earning “above 200k” from Luck.io. Drake’s Massive Stake.com Deal Cobie’s post comes amid growing speculation over celebrity and influencer collaborations with crypto casinos globally. Aubrey Graham, better known as Toronto-based rapper Drake, is reported to make nearly $100 million every year from his partnership with cryptocurrency casino Stake.com. As part of his deal with the Curaçao-based digital casino, the “Nokia” rapper occasionally hosts live-stream gambling sessions for his more than 140 million Instagram followers. Founded by entrepreneurs Ed Craven and Bijan Therani in 2017, the organization allegedly raked in $2.6 billion in 2022. Stake.com has even solidified key partnerships with Alfa Romeo’s F1 team and Liverpool-based Everton Football Club. However, concerns remain over crypto casinos’ legality as a whole , given their massive accessibility and reach online. Earlier this year, Stake was slapped with litigation out of Illinois for supposedly running an illegal online casino stateside while causing “severe harm to vulnerable populations.” “Stake floods social media platforms with slick ads, influencer videos, and flashy visuals, making its games seem safe, fun, and harmless,” the lawsuit claims. “By masking its real-money gambling platform as just another “social casino,” Stake creates exactly the kind of dangerous environment that Illinois gambling laws were designed to stop.”
Share
CryptoNews2025/06/19 04:53
U.S. Banks Near Stablecoin Issuance Under FDIC Genius Act Plan

U.S. Banks Near Stablecoin Issuance Under FDIC Genius Act Plan

The post U.S. Banks Near Stablecoin Issuance Under FDIC Genius Act Plan appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. U.S. banks could soon begin applying to issue payment
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/17 02:55