MetaMask has launched a new premium safeguard called shield, designed to protect users from transaction-related losses while adding fast-response support. MetaMask introduces premium loss protection for on-chain activity MetaMask has rolled out Transaction Shield, a premium opt-in security upgrade that bundles transaction loss protection with 24/7 wallet priority support for its users. The product, announced […]MetaMask has launched a new premium safeguard called shield, designed to protect users from transaction-related losses while adding fast-response support. MetaMask introduces premium loss protection for on-chain activity MetaMask has rolled out Transaction Shield, a premium opt-in security upgrade that bundles transaction loss protection with 24/7 wallet priority support for its users. The product, announced […]

MetaMask unveils new shield security upgrade with transaction loss protection

metamask shield

MetaMask has launched a new premium safeguard called shield, designed to protect users from transaction-related losses while adding fast-response support.

MetaMask introduces premium loss protection for on-chain activity

MetaMask has rolled out Transaction Shield, a premium opt-in security upgrade that bundles transaction loss protection with 24/7 wallet priority support for its users. The product, announced on Dec. 2, 2025, aims to reduce the financial impact of risky interactions across decentralized applications and smart contracts.

The new subscription service extends MetaMask’s security stack by offering coverage for losses up to $10,000 per month on transactions the platform classifies as safe. However, only actions that pass MetaMask’s automated contract checks and transaction simulations qualify for reimbursement if something goes wrong.

Moreover, the company positions Transaction Shield as an added layer on top of its existing threat detection tools, instead of a replacement. That said, users still need to monitor approvals, contract interactions, and spending limits whenever they connect their wallet to on-chain services.

Pricing, free trial, and subscription details

The Transaction Shield MetaMask subscription service is priced at $9.99 per month or $99 annually, maintaining clear monthly coverage limits tied to approved transactions. Subscribers receive a 14-day free trial, and annual plans include a $20 discount compared with paying month to month.

Currently, coverage is available only through the MetaMask Extension in desktop browsers. However, the team plans to extend the feature to the mobile wallet at a later stage, bringing the same transaction loss protection and support package to smartphone users.

Supported networks and transaction types

Transaction Shield applies to approved transactions on a wide range of supported blockchain networks. Covered chains include Ethereum, Linea, Arbitrum, Avalanche, Optimism, Base, Polygon, BSC, and Sei, giving users protection across major EVM-compatible ecosystems.

Moreover, the feature supports common DeFi and NFT interactions. Eligible actions include DeFi swaps, lending and borrowing activity, NFT mints, and NFT sales on trusted marketplaces, as well as verified airdrop claims. This structure is intended to offer defi swaps protection and coverage for typical retail user behavior without overextending the risk pool.

The company stresses that only transactions flagged as safe by MetaMask’s automated systems fall within the protection scope. That said, users still need to review prompts and risk warnings before signing any transaction, as unsafe or manually overridden actions may not qualify.

Exclusions, claims process, and payout structure

Despite its broad reach, Transaction Shield comes with clear exclusions. The service does not cover compromised wallets, broader market losses, or protocol-level exploits, even when they affect assets held in a MetaMask wallet. These carve-outs are meant to prevent the coverage from functioning as open-ended insurance against market volatility or systemic failures.

However, when a covered loss occurs within the approved parameters, subscribers can file a claim within 21 days of the incident. Most reimbursements are processed within 15 business days, according to MetaMask, and are paid out in mUSD at the current market rate at the time of settlement.

Moreover, the policy framework emphasizes documentation and accurate reporting. Users must submit transaction details and on-chain evidence to support their claims, allowing the review team to verify whether the interaction fit into the eligible categories and monthly coverage limits defined by the service.

Shield impact on wallet security and user expectations

The introduction of Metamask shield also signals a broader shift toward monetized security layers in consumer crypto wallets. While self-custody remains central to MetaMask’s model, the company is now offering a paid pathway to mitigate some of the risks associated with complex contract interactions and fast-moving markets.

However, MetaMask continues to warn that no protection product can fully eliminate the dangers of phishing, malicious contracts, or extreme volatility. Users still bear ultimate responsibility for private key management and transaction review, even when using premium tools marketed as transaction loss protection within the wallet stack.

In summary, Transaction Shield adds structured coverage, priority assistance, and clearer expectations around on-chain risk for paying customers, without changing the underlying non-custodial nature of the wallet.

Market Opportunity
OPT Logo
OPT Price(OPT)
$0.002191
$0.002191$0.002191
-0.45%
USD
OPT (OPT) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Is Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX) a strong mutual fund pick right now?

Is Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX) a strong mutual fund pick right now?

The post Is Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX) a strong mutual fund pick right now? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. On the lookout for a Sector – Tech fund? Starting with Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX – Free Report) should not be a possibility at this time. PGTAX possesses a Zacks Mutual Fund Rank of 4 (Sell), which is based on various forecasting factors like size, cost, and past performance. Objective We note that PGTAX is a Sector – Tech option, and this area is loaded with many options. Found in a wide number of industries such as semiconductors, software, internet, and networking, tech companies are everywhere. Thus, Sector – Tech mutual funds that invest in technology let investors own a stake in a notoriously volatile sector, but with a much more diversified approach. History of fund/manager Putnam Funds is based in Canton, MA, and is the manager of PGTAX. The Putnam Global Technology A made its debut in January of 2009 and PGTAX has managed to accumulate roughly $650.01 million in assets, as of the most recently available information. The fund is currently managed by Di Yao who has been in charge of the fund since December of 2012. Performance Obviously, what investors are looking for in these funds is strong performance relative to their peers. PGTAX has a 5-year annualized total return of 14.46%, and is in the middle third among its category peers. But if you are looking for a shorter time frame, it is also worth looking at its 3-year annualized total return of 27.02%, which places it in the middle third during this time-frame. It is important to note that the product’s returns may not reflect all its expenses. Any fees not reflected would lower the returns. Total returns do not reflect the fund’s [%] sale charge. If sales charges were included, total returns would have been lower. When looking at a fund’s performance, it…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 04:05
SEC Approves Grayscale’s Digital Large Cap Fund for Trading

SEC Approves Grayscale’s Digital Large Cap Fund for Trading

SEC greenlights GDLC, the first U.S.-listed multi-asset crypto ETF, offering exposure to BTC, ETH, XRP, SOL and ADA.
Share
CryptoPotato2025/09/18 17:55
‘Scam’ claims spread after Trump’s Super Bowl crypto donation pitch

‘Scam’ claims spread after Trump’s Super Bowl crypto donation pitch

AI concerns and lack of disclosure sparked controversy, raising questions about legality, ethics, and campaign transparency rules.
Share
Coinstats2026/02/09 20:15