The post The Dangerous Contradiction Within Higher Federal Deposit Insurance appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. WASHINGTON, DC – AUGUST 18: The entrance to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) is seen on August 18, 2024, in Washington, DC. (Photo by J. David Ake/Getty Images) Getty Images More federal deposit insurance will weaken banks, depositors at banks, and the U.S. economy more broadly. Say what’s true repeatedly. To see the obvious contradiction in legislation meant to increase deposit insurance from $250,000 per account to $10 million per, simply look a little bit deeper into the details. The insurance is for non-interest-bearing accounts. Bank accounts that don’t pay interest speak loudly to the desires of the owners of those accounts. These are generally checking accounts. Owners of checking accounts want little to no risk. Call non-interest-bearing accounts what they are: money storage for everyday spending needs, debit cards, or just paying bills. By extension, banks logically take the desires of non-interest-bearing account holders very seriously. The money isn’t to be put at major or even minor long or short-term risk precisely because it’s expected to be easily accessible in penalty-free fashion as a consequence of no interest being paid on the funds. It speaks to the near total mismatch of proposed federal legislation meant to increase federal deposit insurance. The legislation implies that money placed in a checking account for everyday transactions is money that banks are routinely putting at risk. No, not at all. Which once again explains the lack of interest paid. Please think about this with substantially expanded FDIC insurance top of mind. Suddenly funds stored at banks for daily use, and that aren’t being put at risk for precisely that reason, would be federally insured as though they were. There are costs associated with such insurance. And as has been reported already, banks would be saddled with those costs through the payment of… The post The Dangerous Contradiction Within Higher Federal Deposit Insurance appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. WASHINGTON, DC – AUGUST 18: The entrance to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) is seen on August 18, 2024, in Washington, DC. (Photo by J. David Ake/Getty Images) Getty Images More federal deposit insurance will weaken banks, depositors at banks, and the U.S. economy more broadly. Say what’s true repeatedly. To see the obvious contradiction in legislation meant to increase deposit insurance from $250,000 per account to $10 million per, simply look a little bit deeper into the details. The insurance is for non-interest-bearing accounts. Bank accounts that don’t pay interest speak loudly to the desires of the owners of those accounts. These are generally checking accounts. Owners of checking accounts want little to no risk. Call non-interest-bearing accounts what they are: money storage for everyday spending needs, debit cards, or just paying bills. By extension, banks logically take the desires of non-interest-bearing account holders very seriously. The money isn’t to be put at major or even minor long or short-term risk precisely because it’s expected to be easily accessible in penalty-free fashion as a consequence of no interest being paid on the funds. It speaks to the near total mismatch of proposed federal legislation meant to increase federal deposit insurance. The legislation implies that money placed in a checking account for everyday transactions is money that banks are routinely putting at risk. No, not at all. Which once again explains the lack of interest paid. Please think about this with substantially expanded FDIC insurance top of mind. Suddenly funds stored at banks for daily use, and that aren’t being put at risk for precisely that reason, would be federally insured as though they were. There are costs associated with such insurance. And as has been reported already, banks would be saddled with those costs through the payment of…

The Dangerous Contradiction Within Higher Federal Deposit Insurance

WASHINGTON, DC – AUGUST 18: The entrance to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) is seen on August 18, 2024, in Washington, DC. (Photo by J. David Ake/Getty Images)

Getty Images

More federal deposit insurance will weaken banks, depositors at banks, and the U.S. economy more broadly. Say what’s true repeatedly.

To see the obvious contradiction in legislation meant to increase deposit insurance from $250,000 per account to $10 million per, simply look a little bit deeper into the details. The insurance is for non-interest-bearing accounts.

Bank accounts that don’t pay interest speak loudly to the desires of the owners of those accounts. These are generally checking accounts. Owners of checking accounts want little to no risk. Call non-interest-bearing accounts what they are: money storage for everyday spending needs, debit cards, or just paying bills.

By extension, banks logically take the desires of non-interest-bearing account holders very seriously. The money isn’t to be put at major or even minor long or short-term risk precisely because it’s expected to be easily accessible in penalty-free fashion as a consequence of no interest being paid on the funds.

It speaks to the near total mismatch of proposed federal legislation meant to increase federal deposit insurance. The legislation implies that money placed in a checking account for everyday transactions is money that banks are routinely putting at risk. No, not at all. Which once again explains the lack of interest paid. Please think about this with substantially expanded FDIC insurance top of mind.

Suddenly funds stored at banks for daily use, and that aren’t being put at risk for precisely that reason, would be federally insured as though they were. There are costs associated with such insurance. And as has been reported already, banks would be saddled with those costs through the payment of billions more into the FDIC’s insurance fund.

It means banks will suffer twice: first through higher insurance costs, and second through a reduction in profitable lending. From this, readers can hopefully deduce that a needless cost imposed on banks would be paid for via reduced economic activity thanks to lending shrunken by federally mandated increases in insurance costs.

Returning to bank depositors, to presume that they won’t pay for increased deposit insurance is truly naïve. That’s because increased FDIC insurance on non-interest-bearing accounts will logically raise the costs for banks to host those accounts in the first place. Translated, fees associated with non-interest-bearing accounts will almost certainly increase to reflect the cost of insurance for accounts that, by virtue of them not paying interest, don’t require much insurance to begin with. The average household checking balance is $5,300.

Which brings us back to the legislation itself. To say it’s a solution in search of a problem insults understatement. Only it’s much worse. Since increased deposit insurance will raise costs for banks and bank customers alike, it will bring harm to both while sapping economic vitality by reducing the availability of money for an economy reliant on it.

Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/johntamny/2025/12/02/the-dangerous-contradiction-within-higher-federal-deposit-insurance/

Market Opportunity
Dogechain Logo
Dogechain Price(DC)
$0.000004633
$0.000004633$0.000004633
-1.10%
USD
Dogechain (DC) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Young Republicans were more proud to be American under Obama than under Trump: data analyst

Young Republicans were more proud to be American under Obama than under Trump: data analyst

CNN data analyst Harry Enten sorts through revealing polls and surveys of American attitudes, looking for shifts, and his latest finding is an indictment of President
Share
Alternet2026/02/10 22:18
Vitalik Buterin Outlines Ethereum’s AI Framework, Pushes Back Against Solana’s Acceleration Thesis

Vitalik Buterin Outlines Ethereum’s AI Framework, Pushes Back Against Solana’s Acceleration Thesis

Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin has reacted to Solana’s artificial general intelligence acceleration initiative. He did this through the establishment of his
Share
Thenewscrypto2026/02/10 18:40
XRP News Today: XRP Tundra Unveils Two-Token Strategy with 25x Return Potential

XRP News Today: XRP Tundra Unveils Two-Token Strategy with 25x Return Potential

The post XRP News Today: XRP Tundra Unveils Two-Token Strategy with 25x Return Potential appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. XRP remains one of the most closely watched assets in the market, both for its role in cross-border settlement and for its potential within the broader digital asset ecosystem. Yet for long-term holders, one gap has persisted: XRP has never had a native staking system. That limitation has left investors with limited options beyond price appreciation, even as competitors like Ethereum and Solana built extensive staking networks. XRP Tundra’s presale is making news for directly addressing that issue. The project has introduced a two-token strategy designed to provide yield opportunities for XRP holders while embedding exponential upside into presale economics. Analysts covering XRP updates have flagged the model as one of the more innovative token launches of 2025, particularly as it blends utility with transparent launch pricing. A Dual-Token Presale With Defined Launch Values At the center of XRP Tundra’s design is a dual-token model. TUNDRA-S, issued on Solana, functions as the utility and yield-generating token. TUNDRA-X, minted on the XRP Ledger, serves as the governance and reserve layer. Every presale purchase of TUNDRA-S automatically delivers free TUNDRA-X, tying investors into both blockchains in a single allocation. In the current Phase 3, TUNDRA-S is priced at $0.041 with a 17% token bonus included. Free TUNDRA-X is valued for reference at $0.0205. Launch values are already fixed at $2.50 for TUNDRA-S and $1.25 for TUNDRA-X, embedding a built-in 25x return potential for presale participants. For investors who have waited years for XRP-related innovation, this clarity has stood out. Staking Introduces Yield for XRP Holders The presale is not only about token distribution. XRP Tundra introduces staking through Cryo Vaults, where XRP can be locked for periods of 7 to 90 days. Rewards increase with longer commitments, while Frost Keys — NFT multipliers — allow participants to enhance yields or shorten lockups.…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/26 05:31