Now, institutional Bitcoin holdings have quietly entered a new phase, shifting gears from mere exposure to yield — Bitcoin-native yield.Now, institutional Bitcoin holdings have quietly entered a new phase, shifting gears from mere exposure to yield — Bitcoin-native yield.

From exposure to yield: Idle institutional capital activates Bitcoin-native DeFi | Opinion

6 min read

Disclosure: The views and opinions expressed here belong solely to the author and do not represent the views and opinions of crypto.news’ editorial.

A new Bitwise report recently revealed that, as of Q3 2025, 172 public companies now hold over one million Bitcoin (BTC) worth $117 billion. That’s up 39% in company count (48 new) and 21% in holdings from the previous quarter. Bitcoin has not only lived up to the “digital gold” title it has long held, but firmly established itself as a pillar of institutions’ financial strategies in Q3 2025 despite its sharp price fluctuations.

Summary
  • Bitcoin’s institutional era has begun. Once a speculative asset, Bitcoin is now evolving into a yield-bearing instrument as institutions seek productive, compliant ways to deploy idle BTC capital.
  • DeFi meets TradFi. Institutional Bitcoin integration requires permissioned, compliant infrastructure — custodial integration, in-kind BTC yield, and privacy-preserving auditability — not retail-style DeFi.
  • The next phase is Bitcoin-native finance. With regulatory clarity and maturing infrastructure, 2025 marks the convergence of Bitcoin, DeFi, and institutional adoption into a unified on-chain financial system.

In less than two years after spot Bitcoin ETFs were approved in the United States, Bitcoin has transitioned from a gamble to a hedge, lauded for its scarcity, sovereignty, and resilience after years of outright institutional criticism and skepticism. Now, institutional Bitcoin holdings have quietly entered a new phase, shifting gears from mere exposure to yield — Bitcoin-native yield.

The great convergence

The first chapter of DeFi was more of a cypherpunk revolution. It began on Ethereum (ETH) as a wild and unregulated experiment that thrived on speculation, permissionless access, and pseudonymous wallets. Bitcoin wasn’t part of the early DeFi revolution. It was supposed to be a new monetary system built on code and resistant to centralized control.

As they evolved over the years, Bitcoin and DeFi have increasingly converged. Bitcoin is now a yield-bearing asset prized by corporate treasuries, institutions, and nation-states. DeFi, meanwhile, has made a global, permissionless financial infrastructure without centralized gatekeepers a reality. 

Institutions stare at the idle capital

Despite its limited smart contract capabilities, Bitcoin is the most secure, trustworthy, and robust financial system there is. To the average pension fund, any cryptocurrency that’s not Bitcoin is just a speculative play at best. It’s Bitcoin, not the “not Bitcoin” chains, that will power the next phase of the DeFi revolution.

Institutions hold not just ETFs, but actual Bitcoin on their balance sheets, signaling they are not merely interested in exposure but the benefits of on-chain infrastructure. Today, custodians manage over $200 billion worth of Bitcoin for their institutional clients. Unfortunately, it’s been mostly sitting idle.

Unlocking the full potential of institutional Bitcoin is what would truly move the needle for DeFi, especially considering the total value locked in DeFi is relatively small at approximately $156 billion.

Not the retail way

Retail adoption will continue to grow, but right now, the growth is focused on corporations because that is the next uncharted territory. There’s a growing institutional demand to turn Bitcoin into a productive, yield-bearing asset. Their capital is inert, not through lack of will but because the existing DeFi stack is incompatible with their operational realities. In traditional banking, people are used to earning yield on savings and being able to get credit. Those basic primitives are just not there yet for institutional Bitcoin.

Corporate treasuries and custodians are not going to leverage public DeFi for their idle BTC. They can’t. The public, open DeFi has worked well for retail users. But the institutional financial needs are different, specifically regarding compliance and privacy regulations. 

In retail, people typically use a self-custody wallet that connects to dApps via a web browser. In contrast, all institutional digital assets, especially Bitcoin, are held by custodians who have to adhere to strict compliance protocols.

A permissioned place in the permissionless ecosystem

Bitcoin will always be permissionless. But now that the ecosystem has matured to some extent and institutions have become active participants, some of the financial applications built on top of Bitcoin may be permissioned to cater to their specific needs. As we move towards Bitcoin-native financial markets, some aspects of the BitcoinFi economy must adapt to meet the requirements of regulated entities like corporations and institutions.  

Their primary requirements are:

  • Custodial integration: Institutions hold crypto via custodians that offer additional security features like recovery and multisig management. They won’t use DeFi applications that require them to exit the custodian and move assets to a regular wallet. 
  • Bitcoin-native, in-kind yield: The stakes are high for institutions, and they can’t take on the unnecessary risks that come with bridging BTC to another chain or earning yield in secondary, speculative tokens. They prefer in-kind yield. That’s Bitcoin.
  • Permissioned DeFi: Institutions need privacy-preserving auditability that verifies compliance without exposing strategies. Shielded contracts on a permissioned network ensure that level of privacy while still being fully auditable. Embedding KYC/AML workflows at the protocol level facilitates access to superior financial products for the custodians that they don’t currently have access to, including borrow, lend, trading, and yield. 

The institutional integration should not be seen as a betrayal of DeFi’s cypherpunk origins. In fact, it’s their validation because the institutional-focused features are being built on the very foundations laid by DeFi. They reflect the industry’s maturation and the next phase of adoption. The total value locked in the Bitcoin DeFi has skyrocketed from $705 million in September 2024 to $8.49 billion at the end of September 2025.

Closing thoughts

DeFi demonstrated what was possible with on-chain finance, and now it has evolved from a retail-first experiment into a robust financial system attracting the Smart Money. 

Combining compliance with on-chain innovation in a permissioned environment would truly open the institutional floodgates to not just yield products but the broader Bitcoin-powered financial system. 

2025 is the year regulatory clarity, Bitcoin-native DeFi infrastructure, and institutional frameworks have finally aligned to drive the next phase of adoption.

Marvin Bertin

Marvin Bertin is the co-founder and CEO of Maestro, the first enterprise-grade infrastructure provider tailor-made for BitcoinFi. He previously worked at the biotech company Freenome as an AI engineer, building AI models for early cancer detection. Marvin Bertin holds a Bachelor of Engineering degree in Mechanical Engineering from McGill University.  

Market Opportunity
DeFi Logo
DeFi Price(DEFI)
$0.000309
$0.000309$0.000309
-5.21%
USD
DeFi (DEFI) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

XRP Ledger Unlocks Permissioned Domains With 91% Validator Backing

XRP Ledger Unlocks Permissioned Domains With 91% Validator Backing

XRP Ledger activated XLS-80 after 91% validator approval, enabling permissioned domains for credential-gated use on the public XRPL. The XRP Ledger has activated
Share
LiveBitcoinNews2026/02/06 13:00
Music body ICMP laments “wilful” theft of artists’ work

Music body ICMP laments “wilful” theft of artists’ work

The post Music body ICMP laments “wilful” theft of artists’ work appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. A major music industry group, ICMP, has lamented the use of artists’ work by AI companies, calling them guilty of “wilful” copyright infringement, as the battle between the tech firms and the arts industry continues. The Brussels-based group known as the International Confederation of Music Publishers (ICMP) comprises major record labels and other music industry professionals. Their voice adds to many others within the arts industry that have expressed displeasure at AI firms for using their creative work to train their systems without permission. ICMP accuses AI firms of deliberate copyright infringement ICMP director general John Phelan told AFP that big tech firms and AI-specific companies were involved in what he termed “the largest copyright infringement exercise that has been seen.” He cited the likes of OpenAI, Suno, Udio, and Mistral as some of the culprits. The ICMP carried out an investigation for nearly two years to ascertain how generative AI firms were using material by creatives to enrich themselves. The Brussels-based group is one of a number of industry bodies that span across news media and publishing to target the fast-growing AI sector over its use of content without paying any royalties. Suno and Udio, who are AI music generators, can produce tracks with voices, melodies, and musical styles that echo those of the original artists such as the Beatles, Depeche Mode, Mariah Carey, and the Beach boys. “What is legal or illegal is how the technologies are used. That means the corporate decisions made by the chief executives of companies matter immensely and should comply with the law,” Phelan told AFP. “What we see is they are engaged in wilful, commercial-scale copyright infringement.” Phelan. In June last year, a US trade group, the Recording Industry Association of America, filed a lawsuit against Suno and Udio. However, an exception…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 04:41
XRPL Adds Institutional Lending and Privacy Tools in Ripple’s 2026 Roadmap

XRPL Adds Institutional Lending and Privacy Tools in Ripple’s 2026 Roadmap

Ripple shared a new Institutional DeFi roadmap showing how the XRP Ledger is being shaped for everyday use by banks, asset managers, and regulated financial firms
Share
Tronweekly2026/02/06 13:00