The post Inside the fallout from PeckShield’s Synnax Labs audit appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. PeckShield Inc. has been accused by stablecoin yield layer Synnax Labs of refunding and removing an audit after the crypto security firm allegedly overlooked the same bug that caused the $1.7 million hack of DeFi lending protocol Abracadabra. Synnax Labs, which is a fork of Abracadabra, first asked for a refund after discovering several vulnerabilities that weren’t spotted by PeckShield in its audit. According to Synnax Labs, the audit “lacked sufficient depth.” The company also claimed that, “After refunding, PeckShield removed the audit report and related correspondence — an unprofessional move that undermines transparency.” The firm disclosed the refund after PHD student and blockchain specialist, Weilin Li, questioned Synnax Labs’ activity in relation to the Abracadabra hack on October 4.  Li claims that Synnax Labs was the only fork of Abracadabra’s Magic Internet Money (MIM) with total value locked (TVL) that was vulnerable to the attack.  Regarding yesterday’s Abracadabra (@MIM_Spell) hack event. Below are some fun facts I observed: *Disclaimer: I have no opinion or comment on this event. I am just listing some facts. (1) The only fork with TVL and was vulnerable to this attack vector (afaik), @synnax_labs,… pic.twitter.com/6L60tGDN3v — Weilin (William) Li (@hklst4r) October 5, 2025 Read more: No crying in the casino: XPL bug hits Aster, Hypervault rug pull suspected They note how Synnax Labs patched this vulnerability four days before the exploit, how PeckShield deleted the audit, which didn’t include this vulnerability, before asking the question, “What happened?” Li added, “I have no opinion or comment on this event. I am just listing some facts.”  Indeed, Synnax Labs claims that the contracts were paused and patched “proactively” four days before Abracadabra’s exploit, before elaborating on what happened with the audit.  Abracadabra has lost over $21 million in major DeFi hacks Abracadabra reportedly suffered the hack… The post Inside the fallout from PeckShield’s Synnax Labs audit appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. PeckShield Inc. has been accused by stablecoin yield layer Synnax Labs of refunding and removing an audit after the crypto security firm allegedly overlooked the same bug that caused the $1.7 million hack of DeFi lending protocol Abracadabra. Synnax Labs, which is a fork of Abracadabra, first asked for a refund after discovering several vulnerabilities that weren’t spotted by PeckShield in its audit. According to Synnax Labs, the audit “lacked sufficient depth.” The company also claimed that, “After refunding, PeckShield removed the audit report and related correspondence — an unprofessional move that undermines transparency.” The firm disclosed the refund after PHD student and blockchain specialist, Weilin Li, questioned Synnax Labs’ activity in relation to the Abracadabra hack on October 4.  Li claims that Synnax Labs was the only fork of Abracadabra’s Magic Internet Money (MIM) with total value locked (TVL) that was vulnerable to the attack.  Regarding yesterday’s Abracadabra (@MIM_Spell) hack event. Below are some fun facts I observed: *Disclaimer: I have no opinion or comment on this event. I am just listing some facts. (1) The only fork with TVL and was vulnerable to this attack vector (afaik), @synnax_labs,… pic.twitter.com/6L60tGDN3v — Weilin (William) Li (@hklst4r) October 5, 2025 Read more: No crying in the casino: XPL bug hits Aster, Hypervault rug pull suspected They note how Synnax Labs patched this vulnerability four days before the exploit, how PeckShield deleted the audit, which didn’t include this vulnerability, before asking the question, “What happened?” Li added, “I have no opinion or comment on this event. I am just listing some facts.”  Indeed, Synnax Labs claims that the contracts were paused and patched “proactively” four days before Abracadabra’s exploit, before elaborating on what happened with the audit.  Abracadabra has lost over $21 million in major DeFi hacks Abracadabra reportedly suffered the hack…

Inside the fallout from PeckShield’s Synnax Labs audit

PeckShield Inc. has been accused by stablecoin yield layer Synnax Labs of refunding and removing an audit after the crypto security firm allegedly overlooked the same bug that caused the $1.7 million hack of DeFi lending protocol Abracadabra.

Synnax Labs, which is a fork of Abracadabra, first asked for a refund after discovering several vulnerabilities that weren’t spotted by PeckShield in its audit. According to Synnax Labs, the audit “lacked sufficient depth.”

The company also claimed that, “After refunding, PeckShield removed the audit report and related correspondence — an unprofessional move that undermines transparency.”

The firm disclosed the refund after PHD student and blockchain specialist, Weilin Li, questioned Synnax Labs’ activity in relation to the Abracadabra hack on October 4. 

Li claims that Synnax Labs was the only fork of Abracadabra’s Magic Internet Money (MIM) with total value locked (TVL) that was vulnerable to the attack. 

Read more: No crying in the casino: XPL bug hits Aster, Hypervault rug pull suspected

They note how Synnax Labs patched this vulnerability four days before the exploit, how PeckShield deleted the audit, which didn’t include this vulnerability, before asking the question, “What happened?”

Li added, “I have no opinion or comment on this event. I am just listing some facts.” 

Indeed, Synnax Labs claims that the contracts were paused and patched “proactively” four days before Abracadabra’s exploit, before elaborating on what happened with the audit. 

Abracadabra has lost over $21 million in major DeFi hacks

Abracadabra reportedly suffered the hack after a flaw in the protocol’s cook function was exploited to manipulate its solvency checks.

The funds were subsequently sent to Tornado Cash before Abracadabra bought back MIM and fully recovered. PeckShield didn’t flag the Abracadabra exploit on its alert account.

Abracadabra has suffered three major DeFi exploits since 2024, losing over $21 million.

In January 2024, it lost $6.5 million after a hacker appeared to have exploited a rounding error in its CauldronV4 smart contract code.

Then, over a year later, it was hacked for $13 million worth of ether after following an exploit with the contract’s collateral accounting mechanism.

Protos has reached out to Synnax Labs and PeckShield Inc. for comment and will update this piece should we hear back. 

Got a tip? Send us an email securely via Protos Leaks. For more informed news, follow us on X, Bluesky, and Google News, or subscribe to our YouTube channel.

Source: https://protos.com/inside-the-fallout-from-peckshields-synnax-labs-audit/

Market Opportunity
WorldAssets Logo
WorldAssets Price(INC)
$0.7094
$0.7094$0.7094
-2.83%
USD
WorldAssets (INC) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Jump’s Firedancer Team Proposes Removing Solana Block Limit After Alpenglow Upgrade

Jump’s Firedancer Team Proposes Removing Solana Block Limit After Alpenglow Upgrade

PANews reported on September 29th that according to The Block, Jump Crypto's Firedancer team is building a high-performance client for Solana. Their SIMD-0370 proposal proposes removing the current fixed limit of 60 million CUs per block (a previous proposal had raised this limit to 100 million) after Solana's major Alpenglow upgrade, scheduled for testing later this year. Without a fixed limit, block size would adjust based on the transaction volume accommodated by high-performance validators, while weaker validators would automatically abstain from voting on oversized blocks by skipping the voting mechanism. The proposal argues that removing the limit would encourage well-funded block producers to upgrade their hardware and add more transactions to increase revenue, incentivizing others to follow suit, creating a "flywheel effect" and increasing the average capacity of validator clients. Roger Wattenhofer, head of research at Anza and a driving force behind Solana's Alpenglow upgrade, supports removing the limit but also expresses concerns about potential centralization and network stability risks. He stated that these issues are solvable and that he has been a staunch supporter of removing the limit.
Share
PANews2025/09/29 07:16
Sushi Solana integration expands multichain DeFi reach

Sushi Solana integration expands multichain DeFi reach

The post Sushi Solana integration expands multichain DeFi reach appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In a move that underscores growing DeFi competition, Sushi
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/10 05:22
Sushi Solana integration signals strategic DeFi expansion on a fast-growing blockchain

Sushi Solana integration signals strategic DeFi expansion on a fast-growing blockchain

In a move that underscores growing DeFi competition, Sushi Solana integration is set to widen access to high-speed trading for millions of crypto users. Sushi deploys
Share
The Cryptonomist2026/02/10 04:54