Mockery Is Chelsea And Liam Rosenior’s Biggest Enemy

There is a long tradition of Premier League stars being loose with their words when speaking to journalists from their home countries.

International duty was typically a time when, left unsupervised by the club’s public relations team, a player would drop some accidental bombshell that would cause a stir.

In the case of Enzo Fernandez, his rather scathing assessment of Chelsea’s current situation came in his native tongue but on home soil, in the aftermath of the club’s 8-2 aggregate defeat to Paris Saint-Germain in the Champions League.

Speaking to former Argentinian player, Juan Pablo Sorin, Fernandez was asked about the midseason departure of manager Enzo Maresca and the verdict was damming.

“I don’t understand it [what happened],” he said. “Sometimes as a player, there’s things we don’t understand and the way they try to manage things. I don’t have an answer for you because I don’t know.

“Obviously, it was a departure that hurt a lot because we had a lot of identity, he gave us order. But it’s the way that football is, sometimes it’s good, sometimes it’s bad.

“But we always had a clear identity when it came to training, playing and obviously his departure hurt us especially in the middle of the season – it cuts everything short.”

It wasn’t just the “hurt” the Argentinian clearly felt about the departure of the previous manager; the inference was clear: something had been lost under his replacement, Liam Rosenior.

A well-regarded coach, Rosenior arrived at Stamford Bridge with the challenge of having been cast as a ‘yes man’ for the ownership, someone who’d cause fewer problems than his predecessor, Enzo Maresca.

That was a tricky scenario to begin with, but things got worse when videos of Rosenior making cringey descriptions of his role as a manager started circulating on social media.

In an earnest voice, the Chelsea boss claims that breaking the word manage in two offered an insight into the role “man age”, he says, eyes gleaming, “you’re ageing men.”

The quite frankly ridiculous statement has been roundly mocked, and even his former teammates have weighed in on criticisms of the man.

Speaking on the Off The Ball podcast, Kevin Kilbane, who played with Rosenior at Hull City, claimed the armchair philosopher he now saw in a Chelsea tracksuit was a far cry from the man he’d known.

“You see the way he is now, to me, he’s unrecognisable to the player and the person I knew,” he said.

“It’s like he’s swallowed a psychologist’s manual or a sporting mentor’s memoir. Everything he says to me is waffle, drivel, nothing.

“It’s like he tries to write as many quotes down as possible and tries to get them into a pre-match talk or post-match whenever addressing the media.”

The criticism is harsh, especially as Rosenior is trying to establish himself as the coach of an elite side.

But at the same time, it’s hard to see how the quotes and over-intellectualisation in interviews help him.

The press can be a useful tool for the manager of a top club, but it takes nous and experience to harness the power.

Act recklessly, and your interactions become counterproductive.

If Rosenior were delivering results, this criticism would fade into the background. However, Chelsea’s form has remained inconsistent at best and does not reflect the squad’s talent.

Despite the criticism, the former Hull City coach still has some influential supporters.

Chelsea legend Jimmy Floyd Hasselbank described him as good enough for the job, although he acknowledged that it has not necessarily been demonstrated on the field.

“He knows his football, but it’s a result-based game,” he said, “did the club think that Maresca was going to go when he did? I don’t think they did.

Were they ready for that? I don’t think so.

“They’ve given, very bravely, somebody like Liam the job. When you do that very bravely, you need to give him all the chances to succeed.

“You really need to give him all the chances to succeed and give him all the time. If things are going a little bad, or he has a bad spell, you need to give him time because everybody is going to get that.

“You need to take as much pressure away from him. I don’t know if that is possible, but internally, you need to really make him feel and know that he’s the man, and he’s going to go nowhere,” he added.

He was also defended by Chelsea fullback Malo Gusto, although tellingly, the player also acknowledged the flak being hurled at the coach.

“I think he [Rosenior] is a top coach, I saw that a lot of people criticised him,” said Gusto.

“[I’m] not really [understanding why he is being criticised so much], I have worked with him a lot since he joined Chelsea.

“I think he is a top person first of all, a top manager as well and as you say, he is young.

“He is a lot of things for the future, but if he is the Chelsea manager, it is because he has the talent for this.

“As I said before, for us as a team, we have to believe in him, believe in the way we play, to stick to our plan and see how it goes.”

Mockery remains one of the toughest criticisms to escape; even successful runs sometimes cannot prevent it from resurfacing.

If Rosenior cannot turn things around, his tenure may be defined by public mockery rather than his footballing results, illustrating how persistent ridicule has become the principal hurdle to his success at Chelsea.

For Rosenior, the challenge now is clear: he must translate potential into results or risk mockery overshadowing his promise.