The post Ripple Urges SEC for Clear, Rights-Based Crypto Rules appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Ripple Urges SEC to Move Beyond “Decentralization” in CryptoThe post Ripple Urges SEC for Clear, Rights-Based Crypto Rules appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Ripple Urges SEC to Move Beyond “Decentralization” in Crypto

Ripple Urges SEC for Clear, Rights-Based Crypto Rules

Ripple Urges SEC to Move Beyond “Decentralization” in Crypto Regulation

On January 9, 2026, Ripple submitted a formal letter to the SEC Crypto Task Force advocating for a fundamental shift in how digital assets are regulated. 

Well, the company is pushing regulators to move beyond the increasingly criticized “decentralization” test and instead focus on enforceable rights and obligations to determine whether a crypto asset should fall under securities law.

Ripple argues that “decentralization” is an inherently subjective and fluid concept, influenced by factors such as code contributions, node distribution, economic incentives, and governance participation. Because decentralization exists on a continuum rather than as a binary state, relying on it as a legal metric creates uncertainty, legal risk, and inconsistent outcomes. 

According to Ripple, this approach can lead to both “false negatives,” where assets that should be regulated avoid oversight by appearing diffuse, and “false positives,” where market-proven assets remain trapped in securities regulations due to ongoing participation by developers or holders.

Why does this matter? Well, Ripple’s letter urges regulators to separate the security offering from the asset itself. Once the original contractual obligations end, secondary market trades should no longer be treated as securities. 

Ripple acknowledges that privity, the legal link between issuer and initial investor, matters only in primary sales, not in mature markets. This approach mirrors SEC Chair Mark Atkins’ view that obligations tied to an offering naturally expire over time.

Therefore, Ripple’s submission urges clear, practical crypto regulations, championing a rights-based framework that separates assets from their original offerings. 

By pushing for legal certainty, Ripple is shaping a path for responsible innovation and broader institutional adoption, guiding the SEC toward rules that reflect the realities of digital assets in 2026 and beyond.

Conclusion

Ripple is calling for a shift from subjective decentralization tests to a clear, rights-based regulatory framework, setting a precedent for the entire crypto industry. 

By emphasizing enforceable obligations, privity, and the natural expiration of contractual promises, Ripple advocates for rules that deliver certainty, protect investors, and let digital assets thrive without regulatory overreach. 

Notably, Ripple’s approach provides a practical blueprint for distinguishing between assets and offerings, paving the way for a transparent, efficient, and innovation-friendly market.

Source: https://coinpaper.com/13716/ripple-to-sec-decentralization-is-too-vague-give-crypto-clear-rights-based-rules

Market Opportunity
Everclear Logo
Everclear Price(CLEAR)
$0.00302
$0.00302$0.00302
+1.68%
USD
Everclear (CLEAR) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

What is the best way for a teenager to start investing?

What is the best way for a teenager to start investing?

This article helps parents and teenagers understand how to start investing as a teenager, with clear explanations of legal account options, basic tax issues, sensible
Share
Coinstats2026/01/31 05:14
United Kingdom CFTC GBP NC Net Positions climbed from previous £-22K to £-16.2K

United Kingdom CFTC GBP NC Net Positions climbed from previous £-22K to £-16.2K

The post United Kingdom CFTC GBP NC Net Positions climbed from previous £-22K to £-16.2K appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Information on these pages contains
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/31 05:36
ABC Also Pulled Jimmy Kimmel’s Predecessor After Controversial Comments

ABC Also Pulled Jimmy Kimmel’s Predecessor After Controversial Comments

The post ABC Also Pulled Jimmy Kimmel’s Predecessor After Controversial Comments appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Jimmy Kimmel (Photo by Media Access Awards Presented By Easterseals/Getty Images for Easterseals) Getty Images for Easterseals The shock decision by ABC to pull Jimmy Kimmel Live! “indefinitely” after the late-night host’s remarks about the killing of Charlie Kirk has created a rare moment in modern TV media: A major show abruptly taken off the air, with its network forced into crisis-management mode. Rare, that is, but not unprecedented. What might go unnoticed by many people reacting to the news about Kimmel and his potential cancellation is that this is not the first time ABC has made such a move. In fact, a version of the same thing happened to Kimmel’s predecessor program — Bill Maher’s Politically Incorrect, which once had Kimmel’s slot and which ABC cancelled in the wake of a firestorm around comments Maher made in the immediate aftermath of the September 11 terrorist attacks. (Notice, by the way, that I said cancelled “in the wake of” and not “because of.” More on that in a moment.) Here’s what happened: Less than a week after 9/11, Maher and a panel were talking about then-President George W. Bush’s use of the word “cowards” to describe the hijackers. “We have been the cowards,” Maher interjected, referencing the practice of “lobbing cruise missiles from 2,000 miles away. That’s cowardly.” But Maher then went even farther over the line: Actually staying in an airplane as it hits a building? “Not cowardly.” You can read more about the ensuing uproar in this ABC news story from 2001, which includes a statement that Maher issued through his publicist: “In no way was I intending to say, nor have I ever thought, that the men and women who defend our nation in uniform are anything but courageous and valiant, and I offer my apologies to…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 11:02