Product feasibility is the gold standard for measuring the potential of crypto AI projects, but true decentralization is its holy grail. A few days ago, the Talus research report released by Messari, a top cypto research institution, prompted me to think more deeply. In the crypto AI sector, projects with core products already implemented are not rare; projects like Fetch and Olas are highly mature. However, the vast majority of them adopt a hybrid model of "off-chain computation + on-chain settlement." Because the logic of AI decision-making is not fully on-chain, the entire decision-making process is a "black box," and outsiders cannot verify whether the decision follows the preset logic. This is not true decentralization, nor is it true DeAI. True DeAI: AI on the entire blockchain Talus fills the gap in the DeAI infrastructure sector, transforming AI agents from black-box tools into a fully decentralized, on-chain verifiable, and on-chain-accountable independent economy. Talus's core concept is "full-chain AI," which means that the entire process of an AI agent—from logic and state to decision-making steps—is written into smart contracts and executed directly on the blockchain. Under this architecture, anyone can verify the historical behavior and decision-making path of the AI agent without needing to trust a third party. DeAI's Trilemma Similar to the classic blockchain trilemma, the DeAI field also faces a trilemma: the trade-off between decentralization, performance, and cost. Talus cannot eliminate this trilemma, but it cleverly balances the three based on its Nexus core framework. Decentralization requires all AI agent logic, state, and decisions to be fully on-chain. Pure on-chain execution of computationally intensive tasks can easily cause performance bottlenecks, especially in scenarios with multiple agents running concurrently. Talus is based on Nexus, the first self-developed full-chain AI agent framework. It anchors all the key behaviors of the AI agent (decision logic, workflow status, settlement results) on the chain and ensures that they are verifiable and free of black boxes through smart contract execution and recording on Sui. This is also why Talus chose Sui as its underlying chain: Sui's MoveVM supports parallel transaction processing and allows multiple AI agents to execute concurrently. Talus has found a viable path in the three-fold dilemma of the DeAI field, filling the gap in decentralized AI infrastructure to some extent, but the road to decentralization of AI agents is still long and arduous.Product feasibility is the gold standard for measuring the potential of crypto AI projects, but true decentralization is its holy grail. A few days ago, the Talus research report released by Messari, a top cypto research institution, prompted me to think more deeply. In the crypto AI sector, projects with core products already implemented are not rare; projects like Fetch and Olas are highly mature. However, the vast majority of them adopt a hybrid model of "off-chain computation + on-chain settlement." Because the logic of AI decision-making is not fully on-chain, the entire decision-making process is a "black box," and outsiders cannot verify whether the decision follows the preset logic. This is not true decentralization, nor is it true DeAI. True DeAI: AI on the entire blockchain Talus fills the gap in the DeAI infrastructure sector, transforming AI agents from black-box tools into a fully decentralized, on-chain verifiable, and on-chain-accountable independent economy. Talus's core concept is "full-chain AI," which means that the entire process of an AI agent—from logic and state to decision-making steps—is written into smart contracts and executed directly on the blockchain. Under this architecture, anyone can verify the historical behavior and decision-making path of the AI agent without needing to trust a third party. DeAI's Trilemma Similar to the classic blockchain trilemma, the DeAI field also faces a trilemma: the trade-off between decentralization, performance, and cost. Talus cannot eliminate this trilemma, but it cleverly balances the three based on its Nexus core framework. Decentralization requires all AI agent logic, state, and decisions to be fully on-chain. Pure on-chain execution of computationally intensive tasks can easily cause performance bottlenecks, especially in scenarios with multiple agents running concurrently. Talus is based on Nexus, the first self-developed full-chain AI agent framework. It anchors all the key behaviors of the AI agent (decision logic, workflow status, settlement results) on the chain and ensures that they are verifiable and free of black boxes through smart contract execution and recording on Sui. This is also why Talus chose Sui as its underlying chain: Sui's MoveVM supports parallel transaction processing and allows multiple AI agents to execute concurrently. Talus has found a viable path in the three-fold dilemma of the DeAI field, filling the gap in decentralized AI infrastructure to some extent, but the road to decentralization of AI agents is still long and arduous.

The true holy grail of DeAI: Talus's "full-chain" solution

2025/12/09 08:00

Product feasibility is the gold standard for measuring the potential of crypto AI projects, but true decentralization is its holy grail.

A few days ago, the Talus research report released by Messari, a top cypto research institution, prompted me to think more deeply.

In the crypto AI sector, projects with core products already implemented are not rare; projects like Fetch and Olas are highly mature. However, the vast majority of them adopt a hybrid model of "off-chain computation + on-chain settlement." Because the logic of AI decision-making is not fully on-chain, the entire decision-making process is a "black box," and outsiders cannot verify whether the decision follows the preset logic.

This is not true decentralization, nor is it true DeAI.

True DeAI: AI on the entire blockchain

Talus fills the gap in the DeAI infrastructure sector, transforming AI agents from black-box tools into a fully decentralized, on-chain verifiable, and on-chain-accountable independent economy.

Talus's core concept is "full-chain AI," which means that the entire process of an AI agent—from logic and state to decision-making steps—is written into smart contracts and executed directly on the blockchain. Under this architecture, anyone can verify the historical behavior and decision-making path of the AI agent without needing to trust a third party.

DeAI's Trilemma

Similar to the classic blockchain trilemma, the DeAI field also faces a trilemma: the trade-off between decentralization, performance, and cost. Talus cannot eliminate this trilemma, but it cleverly balances the three based on its Nexus core framework.

Decentralization requires all AI agent logic, state, and decisions to be fully on-chain. Pure on-chain execution of computationally intensive tasks can easily cause performance bottlenecks, especially in scenarios with multiple agents running concurrently.

Talus is based on Nexus, the first self-developed full-chain AI agent framework. It anchors all the key behaviors of the AI agent (decision logic, workflow status, settlement results) on the chain and ensures that they are verifiable and free of black boxes through smart contract execution and recording on Sui.

This is also why Talus chose Sui as its underlying chain: Sui's MoveVM supports parallel transaction processing and allows multiple AI agents to execute concurrently.

Talus has found a viable path in the three-fold dilemma of the DeAI field, filling the gap in decentralized AI infrastructure to some extent, but the road to decentralization of AI agents is still long and arduous.

Market Opportunity
Camelot Token Logo
Camelot Token Price(GRAIL)
$113.09
$113.09$113.09
+0.31%
USD
Camelot Token (GRAIL) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Gold Hits $3,700 as Sprott’s Wong Says Dollar’s Store-of-Value Crown May Slip

Gold Hits $3,700 as Sprott’s Wong Says Dollar’s Store-of-Value Crown May Slip

The post Gold Hits $3,700 as Sprott’s Wong Says Dollar’s Store-of-Value Crown May Slip appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Gold is strutting its way into record territory, smashing through $3,700 an ounce Wednesday morning, as Sprott Asset Management strategist Paul Wong says the yellow metal may finally snatch the dollar’s most coveted role: store of value. Wong Warns: Fiscal Dominance Puts U.S. Dollar on Notice, Gold on Top Gold prices eased slightly to $3,678.9 […] Source: https://news.bitcoin.com/gold-hits-3700-as-sprotts-wong-says-dollars-store-of-value-crown-may-slip/
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:33
Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
Top political stories of 2025: The Villar family’s business and political setbacks

Top political stories of 2025: The Villar family’s business and political setbacks

Rappler's Dwight de Leon recaps the challenges faced in 2025 by one of the Philippines' wealthiest families
Share
Rappler2025/12/25 09:00