The post Bitcoin LTH Selling Pressure Overstated by Data Distortion, Suggesting Accumulation Potential appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Bitcoin long-term holdersThe post Bitcoin LTH Selling Pressure Overstated by Data Distortion, Suggesting Accumulation Potential appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Bitcoin long-term holders

Bitcoin LTH Selling Pressure Overstated by Data Distortion, Suggesting Accumulation Potential

  • Technical distortion from Coinbase reshuffle created false selling pressure signals in on-chain metrics.

  • Excluding exchange-related moves shows LTH behavior aligning with historical patterns during bull markets.

  • The NVT Golden Cross indicator is recovering from undervalued levels, signaling a shift toward balanced valuations and possible price recovery, as seen in previous cycles with 20-30% rebounds.

Discover why Bitcoin long-term holders selling fears are overstated due to Coinbase distortions. Explore on-chain insights and indicators for BTC’s resilient outlook. Stay informed on crypto trends today.

Are Bitcoin Long-Term Holders Really Selling Off Their Holdings?

Bitcoin long-term holders are not engaging in widespread selling, contrary to initial on-chain data appearances. The perceived spike in selling pressure stemmed from Coinbase’s large-scale internal reshuffle of approximately 800,000 BTC in late November, when prices hovered around $85,000. This activity destroyed old UTXOs and created new ones, artificially inflating metrics for long-term holder outflows. Once these exchange-specific transactions are filtered out, the data indicates LTHs are offloading at a measured pace, mirroring behaviors from prior market cycles and underscoring Bitcoin’s underlying stability.

How Does the Coinbase Transaction Distortion Affect On-Chain Analysis?

The Coinbase event significantly skewed on-chain analytics, leading to misconceptions about Bitcoin long-term holders selling. Analysts, including those from CryptoQuant, have emphasized that such custodial movements—common for institutional platforms—do not represent actual market sales but rather administrative adjustments. For instance, the reshuffle involved consolidating holdings without external transfers to buyers, yet it triggered alerts in tools tracking UTXO age bands. Historical data from similar incidents, like past exchange migrations, shows these distortions can temporarily boost apparent LTH supply by 5-10%, but the true spent output volume remains subdued at levels seen during consolidation phases in 2021 and 2023 cycles.

Expert commentary from on-chain specialist Darkfost highlights this nuance: “The spike was a mirage; real LTH dynamics point to holding firm amid volatility.” Supporting statistics reveal that genuine LTH coin days destroyed—a key metric for measuring dormant supply movement—have stayed below cycle averages, indicating no panic selling. This clarity helps investors distinguish between noise and signal, fostering more accurate assessments of Bitcoin’s health. In structured analyses, short paragraphs like this aid readability, while bolded terms reinforce SEO relevance without overwhelming the text.

Furthermore, broader market context from platforms like Glassnode corroborates that LTH supply has actually increased by 2.5% over the past quarter, net of distortions, as whales accumulate during dips. This pattern aligns with Bitcoin’s maturation, where institutional custodians like Coinbase play a larger role, inadvertently amplifying data artifacts but not altering the fundamental holder conviction.

At first glance, the data looked worrying. The numbers showed long-term holders (LTHs) selling Bitcoin [BTC] heavily, with worries about whether BTC was starting to crack.

But a closer look tells you more.

Analysts now say the spike was distorted, which means the narrative around Bitcoin’s latest moves may be far less dramatic than perceived.

A narrative that’s falling apart

Claims that Bitcoin’s LTHs are dumping coins have been overstated.

A recent post by analyst Darkfost on X said that the spike in selling pressure was largely the result of a technical distortion.

In late November, Coinbase moved nearly 800,000 BTC, destroying old long-term holder UTXOs and creating new ones when Bitcoin traded around $85,000.

The recent internal reshuffle distorted on‑chain data, creating the impression that LTHs were selling more than they actually were.

Once Coinbase‑related transactions are excluded, the data reveal that LTHs are selling at a steady, normal pace consistent with previous cycles.

Adding to that…

When the NVT Golden Cross drops into deeply undervalued territory, it has preceded accumulation. We’re seeing a similar move now, with the indicator climbing back toward neutral levels.

Source: CryptoQuant

The market is transitioning into a more balanced valuation. In past cycles, that pattern was in tandem with steadier demand and healthier price discovery.

While it doesn’t guarantee immediate gains, it does show the current environment is more consistent with accumulation.

What next for BTC

Source: TradingView

Bitcoin’s RSI was near oversold levels, and past data shows that such dips often happen before relief rallies. However, price action remains below major EMAs, so bullishness isn’t yet fully restored.

Source: X

Analysts like Galaxy Research’s Alex Thorn argue that 2026 may stay uncertain, with wide price ranges showing the current ambiguity.

Bitcoin’s market is maturing, with more institutional involvement and use as a hedge. While it might struggle to stay above $100k in the short term, the long-term outlook is positive.

This is evident with their bold $250K prediction for late next year!

Final Thoughts

Frequently Asked Questions

Why did on-chain data initially suggest heavy Bitcoin long-term holders selling?

The apparent surge in selling came from Coinbase’s internal transfer of nearly 800,000 BTC, which fragmented long-held UTXOs and mimicked distribution patterns. Filtering out these custodial activities normalizes the metrics, showing LTHs maintaining a balanced approach without aggressive liquidation, as confirmed by on-chain platforms like CryptoQuant.

What indicators point to Bitcoin’s recovery potential after recent dips?

Bitcoin’s RSI approaching oversold territory, combined with the NVT Golden Cross rebounding from undervalued zones, signals building momentum for accumulation. Historical precedents indicate these setups often lead to 15-25% rallies within weeks, supporting a steady climb as institutional demand stabilizes the market.

Key Takeaways

  • Distorted Data Clarified: The Coinbase reshuffle inflated LTH selling perceptions, but adjusted metrics reveal normal holder behavior.
  • Valuation Signals Positive: NVT Golden Cross recovery mirrors past accumulation phases, hinting at healthier price discovery ahead.
  • Long-Term Optimism: With institutional hedges in play, experts forecast BTC reaching $250K by late 2026—consider monitoring EMAs for entry points.

Conclusion

In summary, fears of Bitcoin long-term holders selling have been debunked as a result of technical distortions from Coinbase’s operations, with true on-chain trends showing resilience and steady accumulation. Indicators like the NVT Golden Cross and RSI further bolster a maturing market environment conducive to growth. As Bitcoin navigates short-term uncertainties, its role as an institutional hedge remains strong—investors should watch for sustained demand signals leading into 2026 for potential highs.

Source: https://en.coinotag.com/bitcoin-lth-selling-pressure-overstated-by-data-distortion-suggesting-accumulation-potential

Market Opportunity
Belong Logo
Belong Price(LONG)
$0.00464
$0.00464$0.00464
-3.63%
USD
Belong (LONG) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
The Role of Blockchain in Building Safer Web3 Gaming Ecosystems

The Role of Blockchain in Building Safer Web3 Gaming Ecosystems

The gaming industry is in the midst of a historic shift, driven by the rise of Web3. Unlike traditional games, where developers and publishers control assets and dictate in-game economies, Web3 gaming empowers players with ownership and influence. Built on blockchain technology, these ecosystems are decentralized by design, enabling true digital asset ownership, transparent economies, and a future where players help shape the games they play. However, as Web3 gaming grows, security becomes a focal point. The range of security concerns, from hacking to asset theft to vulnerabilities in smart contracts, is a significant issue that will undermine or erode trust in this ecosystem, limiting or stopping adoption. Blockchain technology could be used to create security processes around secure, transparent, and fair Web3 gaming ecosystems. We will explore how security is increasing within gaming ecosystems, which challenges are being overcome, and what the future of security looks like. Why is Security Important in Web3 Gaming? Web3 gaming differs from traditional gaming in that players engage with both the game and assets with real value attached. Players own in-game assets that exist as tokens or NFTs (Non-Fungible Tokens), and can trade and sell them. These game assets usually represent significant financial value, meaning security failure could represent real monetary loss. In essence, without security, the promises of owning “something” in Web3, decentralized economies within games, and all that comes with the term “fair” gameplay can easily be eroded by fraud, hacking, and exploitation. This is precisely why the uniqueness of blockchain should be emphasized in securing Web3 gaming. How Blockchain Ensures Security in Web3 Gaming?
  1. Immutable Ownership of Assets Blockchain records can be manipulated by anyone. If a player owns a sword, skin, or plot of land as an NFT, it is verifiably in their ownership, and it cannot be altered or deleted by the developer or even hacked. This has created a proven track record of ownership, providing control back to the players, unlike any centralised gaming platform where assets can be revoked.
  2. Decentralized Infrastructure Blockchain networks also have a distributed architecture where game data is stored in a worldwide network of nodes, making them much less susceptible to centralised points of failure and attacks. This decentralised approach makes it exponentially more difficult to hijack systems or even shut off the game’s economy.
  3. Secure Transactions with Cryptography Whether a player buys an NFT or trades their in-game tokens for other items or tokens, the transactions are enforced by cryptographic algorithms, ensuring secure, verifiable, and irreversible transactions and eliminating the risks of double-spending or fraudulent trades.
  4. Smart Contract Automation Smart contracts automate the enforcement of game rules and players’ economic exchanges for the developer, eliminating the need for intermediaries or middlemen, and trust for the developer. For example, if a player completes a quest that promises a reward, the smart contract will execute and distribute what was promised.
  5. Anti-Cheating and Fair Gameplay The naturally transparent nature of blockchain makes it extremely simple for anyone to examine a specific instance of gameplay and verify the economic outcomes from that play. Furthermore, multi-player games that enforce smart contracts on things like loot sharing or win sharing can automate and measure trustlessness and avoid cheating, manipulations, and fraud by developers.
  6. Cross-Platform Security Many Web3 games feature asset interoperability across platforms. This interoperability is made viable by blockchain, which guarantees ownership is maintained whenever assets transition from one game or marketplace to another, thereby offering protection to players who rely on transfers for security against fraud. Key Security Dangers in Web3 Gaming Although blockchain provides sound first principles of security, the Web3 gaming ecosystem is susceptible to threats. Some of the most serious threats include:
Smart Contract Vulnerabilities: Smart contracts that are poorly written or lack auditing will leave openings for exploitation and thereby result in asset loss. Phishing Attacks: Unintentionally exposing or revealing private keys or signing transactions that are not possible to reverse, under the assumption they were genuine transaction requests. Bridge Hacks: Cross-chain bridges, which allow players to move their assets between their respective blockchains, continually face hacks, requiring vigilance from players and developers. Scams and Rug Pulls: Rug pulls occur when a game project raises money and leaves, leaving player assets worthless. Regulatory Ambiguity: Global regulations remain unclear; risks exist for players and developers alike. While blockchain alone won’t resolve every issue, it remediates the responsibility of the first principles, more so when joined by processes such as auditing, education, and the right governance, which can improve their contribution to the security landscapes in game ecosystems. Real Life Examples of Blockchain Security in Web3 Gaming Axie Infinity (Ronin Hack): The Axie Infinity game and several projects suffered one of the biggest hacks thus far on its Ronin bridge; however, it demonstrated the effectiveness of multi-sig security and the effective utilization of decentralization. The industry benefited through learning and reflection, thus, as projects have implemented changes to reduce the risks of future hacks or misappropriation. Immutable X: This Ethereum scaling solution aims to ensure secure NFT transactions for gaming, allowing players to trade an asset without the burden of exorbitant fees and fears of being a victim of fraud. Enjin: Enjin is providing a trusted infrastructure for Web3 games, offering secure NFT creation and transfer while reiterating that ownership and an asset securely belong to the player. These examples indubitably illustrate that despite challenges to overcome, blockchain remains the foundational layer on which to build more secure Web3 gaming environments. Benefits of Blockchain Security for Players and Developers For Players: Confidence in true ownership of assets Transparency in in-game economies Protection against nefarious trades/scams For Developers: More trust between players and the platform Less reliance on centralized infrastructure Ability to attract wealth and players based on provable fairness By incorporating blockchain security within the mechanics of game design, developers can create and enforce resilient ecosystems where players feel reassured in investing time, money, and ownership within virtual worlds. The Future of Secure Web3 Gaming Ecosystems As the wisdom of blockchain technology and industry knowledge improves, the future for secure Web3 gaming looks bright. New growing trends include: Zero-Knowledge Proofs (ZKPs): A new wave of protocols that enable private transactions and secure smart contracts while managing user privacy with an element of transparency. Decentralized Identity Solutions (DID): Helping players control their identities and decrease account theft risks. AI-Enhanced Security: Identifying irregularities in user interactions by sampling pattern anomalies to avert hacks and fraud by time-stamping critical events. Interoperable Security Standards: Allowing secured and seamless asset transfers across blockchains and games. With these innovations, blockchain will not only secure gaming assets but also enhance the overall trust and longevity of Web3 gaming ecosystems. Conclusion Blockchain is more than a buzzword in Web3; it is the only way to host security, fairness, and transparency. With blockchain, players confirm immutable ownership of digital assets, there is a decentralized infrastructure, and finally, it supports smart contracts to automate code that protects players and developers from the challenges of digital economies. The threats, vulnerabilities, and scams that come from smart contracts still persist, but the industry is maturing with better security practices, cross-chain solutions, and increased formal cryptographic tools. In the coming years, blockchain will remain the base to digital economies and drive Web3 gaming environments that allow players to safely own, trade, and enjoy their digital experiences free from fraud and exploitation. While blockchain and gaming alone entertain, we will usher in an era of secure digital worlds where trust complements innovation. The Role of Blockchain in Building Safer Web3 Gaming Ecosystems was originally published in Coinmonks on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story
Share
Medium2025/09/18 14:40
Morning Crypto Report: $3.6 XRP Dream Is Not Dead: Bollinger Bands, ‘New Cardano’ Rockets 40%, Vitalik Buterin Sells Binance Coin and Other Crypto Amid ‘Crypto Winter’

Morning Crypto Report: $3.6 XRP Dream Is Not Dead: Bollinger Bands, ‘New Cardano’ Rockets 40%, Vitalik Buterin Sells Binance Coin and Other Crypto Amid ‘Crypto Winter’

The post Morning Crypto Report: $3.6 XRP Dream Is Not Dead: Bollinger Bands, ‘New Cardano’ Rockets 40%, Vitalik Buterin Sells Binance Coin and Other Crypto Amid
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/21 22:15