Author: Anita @anitahityou Three years after the West cut off Russia's connection to SWIFT, the Kremlin has not suffered a financial suffocation. On the contrary, a massive "shadow financial machine" is operating within the Federal Palace in Moscow. This machine no longer relies on JPMorgan Chase, nor is it afraid of a dollar freeze order. According to U.S. Treasury documents, blockchain analysis reports, and data from the ICIJ, this machine is roughly composed of three interlocking gears: Garantex (black market hub), Cryptex (hidden backup), and the Exved/A7 system (national-level B2B channel and "on-chain rubles"). Garantex the Phoenix – The Crossroads of Gangsters and Oil Capital Garantex is a name already highlighted in red on the U.S. Treasury Department's sanctions list; in Russia's grey trade and capital flight system, it is an indispensable "clearing house". 1. On the surface, it's an exchange; beneath, two hidden rivers flow. Public information shows that Garantex was established in Moscow in 2019, with its registered office located in the iconic Federal Building. It was co-founded by Stanislav Drugalev, Sergey Mendeleev, and others. In April 2022, it was sanctioned by the US OFAC for its associated transactions with the darknet market Hydra and the ransomware Conti. At least $100 million in transactions were directly identified as related to criminal activities. However, even after the sanctions, it remains "one of the main channels for Russian funds to enter and leave the world." When the ICIJ investigation zoomed in on the shareholding structure, the picture began to distort: A company deeply intertwined with Garantex is called Fintech Corporation—it is both the owner of the Garantex App and the operator of brands such as "Garantex Academy." Russian company registration records show that Fintech holds a 50% stake in a debt collection company called "Academy of Conflicts," while the other half is controlled by Alexander Tsarapkin, a "gang leader" convicted of extortion and previously sentenced to seven years in prison for extortion. Pavel Karavatsky, a key shareholder of Fintech, previously served on the board of directors of Peresvet Bank, which was later taken over by Rosneft (Russia's state-owned oil company); Fintech also initially used contact information and email domains associated with Rosneft's logistics subsidiary. Looking back from this cold, hard chain of company registration documents, we see state-owned oil capital, violent debt collection companies, and sanctioned cryptocurrency exchanges. This does not mean that "Rosneft is manipulating Garantex," but it is enough to show that Garantex's ability to continue handling billions of dollars of stablecoin liquidity despite being attacked from three sides by OFAC, Tether, and the EU is not simply due to "technology and entrepreneurial spirit." It is a central gear embedded in a larger national network of gray capital. Cryptex – Plan B lurking on Garantex's flank When Garantex becomes a case study under the regulatory spotlight, the strategy of "doing only Garantex and nothing else" becomes too dangerous for black and gray market funds. The market will naturally develop backup lines, and Cryptex is a prime example. 1. The "hidden redemption machine" named by OFAC Cryptex is ostensibly a "Russian cryptocurrency exchange platform" that supports instant exchange of fiat currency and virtual assets. However, on September 26, 2024, the U.S. Treasury Department's OFAC added it and its operator, Sergey Sergeevich Ivanov, to its sanctions list, accusing it of providing money laundering and settlement services for "fraud shops, ransomware organizations, darknet markets, and other criminal activities." Chainalysis's on-chain analysis revealed that Cryptex has processed approximately $5.88 billion in cryptocurrency transactions since 2018, a significant portion of which originated from "high-risk and even obviously illegal" source addresses. Another platform associated with Ivanov, PM2BTC, was identified by FinCEN as a "primary money laundering concern," with nearly half of its business related to criminal activities. If Garantex is more of a "ruble-stablecoin clearing pool both inside and outside Russia," then Cryptex/PM2BTC is positioned as a "lighter, more anonymous money laundering gateway." 2. What cannot be killed is not a single platform, but an entire structure. Structurally, Cryptex plays the role of a typical "flank substitute": when Garantex's on-chain addresses are blacklisted in batches, many dark web shops, fraud gangs, and ransomware operators will switch their settlement channels to KYC-free exchangers like Cryptex or PM2BTC; and when Cryptex itself is sanctioned, a new "Cryptex 2.0" will appear under a different name. This is a "decentralized evasion" model: (1) Regulation eliminates the name, but the market grows the model itself. (2) In this network, Garantex is a heavyweight host; (3) Cryptex and PM2BTC are front-end nodes that are specifically responsible for "receiving dirty money, washing it, and then throwing it into Garantex or other channels". Exved, A7A5, and PSB – the prototypes of sovereign-level “shadow banking” If Garantex is the black market and Cryptex is the gray market, then the Exved + A7 / A7A5 + PSB combination is closer to a country's on-chain laboratory project. It's not meant to evade a bill, but to rewrite the concept of "how Russia pays its foreign counterparts." 1. Exved: A USDT B2B channel disguised as a compliance platform In December 2023, a "digital settlement exchange" called Exved was quietly launched in Moscow. The official positioning is very simple: Provide cross-border digital payment services for Russian legal entities (companies). b. Supports external settlement using Tether's USDT. Almost all public reports emphasize three points: Exved is specifically aimed at export and import companies, not retail investors; it provides companies with an interface that may display "US dollars, USDT or non-resident rubles (offshore rubles)" on the front end, while the back end completes the final settlement through offshore accounts and partner institutions; the project is technically supported by the InDeFi Smart Bank team and has been approved by the Central Bank of Russia and the Federal Financial Monitoring Service (Rosfinmonitoring). From a regulatory perspective, Exved is an innovative pilot program with KYC (Know Your Customer) functionality. Structurally, it is more like a "compliance shell + stablecoin channel" built for enterprises after traditional banks were sanctioned and locked down. It doesn't directly issue any new currency; instead, it incorporates the existing USDT under a state-recognized B2B guise. 2. A7 and A7A5: The True Debut of the Ruble-Based "Shadow Stablecoin" If Exved is still at the level of "borrowing USDT for cross-border settlement", then A7 / A7A5 is the next step - putting the ruble itself on the blockchain. Elliptic's "A7 Leak" report breaks down this system very clearly: A7 is a group company that specializes in providing cross-border payment and sanctions circumvention services to Russian companies. 51% of the shares are held by Moldovan oligarch Ilan Shor—who was convicted in the 2014 Moldovan banking scandal and sanctioned by the United States for helping Russia disrupt the Moldovan elections; Another major shareholder is Promsvyazbank (PSB), the Russian state-owned defense bank. A7A5 is a ruble-based stablecoin developed by A7. The issuer is Old Vector LLC, registered in Kyrgyzstan; Each A7A5 coin is said to be backed 1:1 by ruble deposits held in the PSB account; As of mid-2025, there were approximately 41.6 billion A7A5 coins in circulation, with a total transaction value of approximately US$68 billion; Reuters, citing data from Elliptic and TRM Labs, reported that A7A5's cumulative transaction volume has exceeded $40 billion, with daily peak transaction volume exceeding $1 billion, and its market capitalization has surged from $170 million to $521 million in two weeks. More importantly, it is not a substitute for USDT, but rather a "two-tier structure": According to internal chat logs disclosed by Elliptic, A7 employees discussed using at least $1 billion to $2 billion in USDT to create market capitalization for A7A5 on various exchanges—first using USDT to create liquidity, and then exchanging the tokens for A7A5 to make it look "like a deep stablecoin market." In July 2025, the official A7 Telegram channel announced that it would inject $100 million worth of USDT liquidity into the A7A5 DEX to meet market demand for "A7A5 ↔ USDT best price". With this combination of measures, A7A5's role becomes very clear: it is an "on-chain ruble liability" attached to the PSB balance sheet, using USDT as a credit engine to avoid the risk of Tether freezing assets. For Russian companies, this means that even if they are kicked out of SWIFT and their bank accounts struggle to make cross-border payments, they can still: Rubles → Deposit into PSB → A7A5 → Settle payment on-chain → Exchange back to local fiat currency or USDT. From the outside, it is a technological product; from a geopolitical perspective, it is more like a "ruble-based shadow central bank pipeline" built outside the SWIFT system. In Elliptic's "A7 leak" report, one passage stands out: The A7 Group not only helped Russian companies circumvent regulations by purchasing parts and negotiating freight rates, but it was also used to support political projects in Moldova. Leaked documents and on-chain records show that Shor's funds flowed through stablecoins to a network of applications and organizations called "Taito," which was used to pay political activists and cover propaganda costs. In their sanctions, the United States and the European Union explicitly accused Shor of “using funding and disinformation networks to undermine democracy in Moldova,” and A7 and its encrypted channels are considered one of the key infrastructures for this activity. This does not mean we can simply conclude that "PSB + A7A5 = directly issuing USDT to voters in a certain region to buy votes"; the publicly available materials are not sufficient to draw such a detailed line. But what is certain is that the same financial framework is not only helping Russian companies buy goods and circumvent sanctions, but also providing a tool for distributing funds for political influence operations. When sovereign banks (PSBs), shadow payment groups (A7), and on-chain stablecoins (A7A5) are linked together, Money is no longer just an "economic variable," but a cross-border, programmable geopolitical weapon. Below SWIFT lies the US dollar; outside of SWIFT lies the shadow network. If you abstract all of this into a diagram, you will see a structure like this: Garantex: It aggregates Russian retail investors, gray market traders, black money, and some energy-related funds into a "Rube↔ stablecoin" black market clearing pool; Cryptex / PM2BTC and similar no-KYC exchange tools provide a front-end entry point for ransomware, fraudulent shops, and some sanctioned entities to "get on board and launder money." Exved + A7 / A7A5 + PSB: This extends the network from "civilian and black market" to "semi-official B2B payments" and "on-chain ruble sovereign projects"—breaking down what could only be calculated on the central bank's balance sheet into a token that can jump between Tron and Ethereum. In this network, USDT is the blood, PSB's ruble deposits are the skeleton, Garantex/Cryptex are the capillaries, and A7A5 is a newly grown heart valve—its existence is to keep this cycle beating outside of SWIFT. This is not a joke about sanctions, but a stress test of the limits of the global financial order. When a major power expelled from SWIFT begins to skillfully use stablecoins, shadow platforms, and its own "on-chain ruble" to conduct trade and political engineering, the question is no longer: "Can Russia be blocked?", but rather: "Will a financial sewer that can never be cleaned up grow outside of the US dollar and SWIFT?" The machine that's running inside the Moscow Federation Building is just the first section of this sewer system. References <1>https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/jy0713 <2>https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/specially-designated-nationals-list-data-formats <3>https://www.icij.org/investigations/shadow-money/ <4> FinCEN – Advisory FIN-2023-A002 <5>https://tass.ru/ekonomika <6>OFAC Notice – September 26, 2024 <7>US Treasury Press Release – April 5, 2022 <8>Chainalysis Crypto Crime Report 2023 <9>https://cryptonews.com/news/russias-exved-launches-cross-border-payment-service-powered-by-tethers-usdt-stablecoin <10> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Garantex?utm_source=chatgpt.com <11>https://www.chainalysis.com/blog/ofac-sanctions-russian-exchange-cryptex-uaps-fraud-shop-2024/? <12> https://zh.spaziocrypto.com/wen-ding-bi/e-luo-si-wen-ding-bi-a7a5-zai-4-ge-yue-nei-liu-dong-93-yi-mei-yuan/Author: Anita @anitahityou Three years after the West cut off Russia's connection to SWIFT, the Kremlin has not suffered a financial suffocation. On the contrary, a massive "shadow financial machine" is operating within the Federal Palace in Moscow. This machine no longer relies on JPMorgan Chase, nor is it afraid of a dollar freeze order. According to U.S. Treasury documents, blockchain analysis reports, and data from the ICIJ, this machine is roughly composed of three interlocking gears: Garantex (black market hub), Cryptex (hidden backup), and the Exved/A7 system (national-level B2B channel and "on-chain rubles"). Garantex the Phoenix – The Crossroads of Gangsters and Oil Capital Garantex is a name already highlighted in red on the U.S. Treasury Department's sanctions list; in Russia's grey trade and capital flight system, it is an indispensable "clearing house". 1. On the surface, it's an exchange; beneath, two hidden rivers flow. Public information shows that Garantex was established in Moscow in 2019, with its registered office located in the iconic Federal Building. It was co-founded by Stanislav Drugalev, Sergey Mendeleev, and others. In April 2022, it was sanctioned by the US OFAC for its associated transactions with the darknet market Hydra and the ransomware Conti. At least $100 million in transactions were directly identified as related to criminal activities. However, even after the sanctions, it remains "one of the main channels for Russian funds to enter and leave the world." When the ICIJ investigation zoomed in on the shareholding structure, the picture began to distort: A company deeply intertwined with Garantex is called Fintech Corporation—it is both the owner of the Garantex App and the operator of brands such as "Garantex Academy." Russian company registration records show that Fintech holds a 50% stake in a debt collection company called "Academy of Conflicts," while the other half is controlled by Alexander Tsarapkin, a "gang leader" convicted of extortion and previously sentenced to seven years in prison for extortion. Pavel Karavatsky, a key shareholder of Fintech, previously served on the board of directors of Peresvet Bank, which was later taken over by Rosneft (Russia's state-owned oil company); Fintech also initially used contact information and email domains associated with Rosneft's logistics subsidiary. Looking back from this cold, hard chain of company registration documents, we see state-owned oil capital, violent debt collection companies, and sanctioned cryptocurrency exchanges. This does not mean that "Rosneft is manipulating Garantex," but it is enough to show that Garantex's ability to continue handling billions of dollars of stablecoin liquidity despite being attacked from three sides by OFAC, Tether, and the EU is not simply due to "technology and entrepreneurial spirit." It is a central gear embedded in a larger national network of gray capital. Cryptex – Plan B lurking on Garantex's flank When Garantex becomes a case study under the regulatory spotlight, the strategy of "doing only Garantex and nothing else" becomes too dangerous for black and gray market funds. The market will naturally develop backup lines, and Cryptex is a prime example. 1. The "hidden redemption machine" named by OFAC Cryptex is ostensibly a "Russian cryptocurrency exchange platform" that supports instant exchange of fiat currency and virtual assets. However, on September 26, 2024, the U.S. Treasury Department's OFAC added it and its operator, Sergey Sergeevich Ivanov, to its sanctions list, accusing it of providing money laundering and settlement services for "fraud shops, ransomware organizations, darknet markets, and other criminal activities." Chainalysis's on-chain analysis revealed that Cryptex has processed approximately $5.88 billion in cryptocurrency transactions since 2018, a significant portion of which originated from "high-risk and even obviously illegal" source addresses. Another platform associated with Ivanov, PM2BTC, was identified by FinCEN as a "primary money laundering concern," with nearly half of its business related to criminal activities. If Garantex is more of a "ruble-stablecoin clearing pool both inside and outside Russia," then Cryptex/PM2BTC is positioned as a "lighter, more anonymous money laundering gateway." 2. What cannot be killed is not a single platform, but an entire structure. Structurally, Cryptex plays the role of a typical "flank substitute": when Garantex's on-chain addresses are blacklisted in batches, many dark web shops, fraud gangs, and ransomware operators will switch their settlement channels to KYC-free exchangers like Cryptex or PM2BTC; and when Cryptex itself is sanctioned, a new "Cryptex 2.0" will appear under a different name. This is a "decentralized evasion" model: (1) Regulation eliminates the name, but the market grows the model itself. (2) In this network, Garantex is a heavyweight host; (3) Cryptex and PM2BTC are front-end nodes that are specifically responsible for "receiving dirty money, washing it, and then throwing it into Garantex or other channels". Exved, A7A5, and PSB – the prototypes of sovereign-level “shadow banking” If Garantex is the black market and Cryptex is the gray market, then the Exved + A7 / A7A5 + PSB combination is closer to a country's on-chain laboratory project. It's not meant to evade a bill, but to rewrite the concept of "how Russia pays its foreign counterparts." 1. Exved: A USDT B2B channel disguised as a compliance platform In December 2023, a "digital settlement exchange" called Exved was quietly launched in Moscow. The official positioning is very simple: Provide cross-border digital payment services for Russian legal entities (companies). b. Supports external settlement using Tether's USDT. Almost all public reports emphasize three points: Exved is specifically aimed at export and import companies, not retail investors; it provides companies with an interface that may display "US dollars, USDT or non-resident rubles (offshore rubles)" on the front end, while the back end completes the final settlement through offshore accounts and partner institutions; the project is technically supported by the InDeFi Smart Bank team and has been approved by the Central Bank of Russia and the Federal Financial Monitoring Service (Rosfinmonitoring). From a regulatory perspective, Exved is an innovative pilot program with KYC (Know Your Customer) functionality. Structurally, it is more like a "compliance shell + stablecoin channel" built for enterprises after traditional banks were sanctioned and locked down. It doesn't directly issue any new currency; instead, it incorporates the existing USDT under a state-recognized B2B guise. 2. A7 and A7A5: The True Debut of the Ruble-Based "Shadow Stablecoin" If Exved is still at the level of "borrowing USDT for cross-border settlement", then A7 / A7A5 is the next step - putting the ruble itself on the blockchain. Elliptic's "A7 Leak" report breaks down this system very clearly: A7 is a group company that specializes in providing cross-border payment and sanctions circumvention services to Russian companies. 51% of the shares are held by Moldovan oligarch Ilan Shor—who was convicted in the 2014 Moldovan banking scandal and sanctioned by the United States for helping Russia disrupt the Moldovan elections; Another major shareholder is Promsvyazbank (PSB), the Russian state-owned defense bank. A7A5 is a ruble-based stablecoin developed by A7. The issuer is Old Vector LLC, registered in Kyrgyzstan; Each A7A5 coin is said to be backed 1:1 by ruble deposits held in the PSB account; As of mid-2025, there were approximately 41.6 billion A7A5 coins in circulation, with a total transaction value of approximately US$68 billion; Reuters, citing data from Elliptic and TRM Labs, reported that A7A5's cumulative transaction volume has exceeded $40 billion, with daily peak transaction volume exceeding $1 billion, and its market capitalization has surged from $170 million to $521 million in two weeks. More importantly, it is not a substitute for USDT, but rather a "two-tier structure": According to internal chat logs disclosed by Elliptic, A7 employees discussed using at least $1 billion to $2 billion in USDT to create market capitalization for A7A5 on various exchanges—first using USDT to create liquidity, and then exchanging the tokens for A7A5 to make it look "like a deep stablecoin market." In July 2025, the official A7 Telegram channel announced that it would inject $100 million worth of USDT liquidity into the A7A5 DEX to meet market demand for "A7A5 ↔ USDT best price". With this combination of measures, A7A5's role becomes very clear: it is an "on-chain ruble liability" attached to the PSB balance sheet, using USDT as a credit engine to avoid the risk of Tether freezing assets. For Russian companies, this means that even if they are kicked out of SWIFT and their bank accounts struggle to make cross-border payments, they can still: Rubles → Deposit into PSB → A7A5 → Settle payment on-chain → Exchange back to local fiat currency or USDT. From the outside, it is a technological product; from a geopolitical perspective, it is more like a "ruble-based shadow central bank pipeline" built outside the SWIFT system. In Elliptic's "A7 leak" report, one passage stands out: The A7 Group not only helped Russian companies circumvent regulations by purchasing parts and negotiating freight rates, but it was also used to support political projects in Moldova. Leaked documents and on-chain records show that Shor's funds flowed through stablecoins to a network of applications and organizations called "Taito," which was used to pay political activists and cover propaganda costs. In their sanctions, the United States and the European Union explicitly accused Shor of “using funding and disinformation networks to undermine democracy in Moldova,” and A7 and its encrypted channels are considered one of the key infrastructures for this activity. This does not mean we can simply conclude that "PSB + A7A5 = directly issuing USDT to voters in a certain region to buy votes"; the publicly available materials are not sufficient to draw such a detailed line. But what is certain is that the same financial framework is not only helping Russian companies buy goods and circumvent sanctions, but also providing a tool for distributing funds for political influence operations. When sovereign banks (PSBs), shadow payment groups (A7), and on-chain stablecoins (A7A5) are linked together, Money is no longer just an "economic variable," but a cross-border, programmable geopolitical weapon. Below SWIFT lies the US dollar; outside of SWIFT lies the shadow network. If you abstract all of this into a diagram, you will see a structure like this: Garantex: It aggregates Russian retail investors, gray market traders, black money, and some energy-related funds into a "Rube↔ stablecoin" black market clearing pool; Cryptex / PM2BTC and similar no-KYC exchange tools provide a front-end entry point for ransomware, fraudulent shops, and some sanctioned entities to "get on board and launder money." Exved + A7 / A7A5 + PSB: This extends the network from "civilian and black market" to "semi-official B2B payments" and "on-chain ruble sovereign projects"—breaking down what could only be calculated on the central bank's balance sheet into a token that can jump between Tron and Ethereum. In this network, USDT is the blood, PSB's ruble deposits are the skeleton, Garantex/Cryptex are the capillaries, and A7A5 is a newly grown heart valve—its existence is to keep this cycle beating outside of SWIFT. This is not a joke about sanctions, but a stress test of the limits of the global financial order. When a major power expelled from SWIFT begins to skillfully use stablecoins, shadow platforms, and its own "on-chain ruble" to conduct trade and political engineering, the question is no longer: "Can Russia be blocked?", but rather: "Will a financial sewer that can never be cleaned up grow outside of the US dollar and SWIFT?" The machine that's running inside the Moscow Federation Building is just the first section of this sewer system. References <1>https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/jy0713 <2>https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/specially-designated-nationals-list-data-formats <3>https://www.icij.org/investigations/shadow-money/ <4> FinCEN – Advisory FIN-2023-A002 <5>https://tass.ru/ekonomika <6>OFAC Notice – September 26, 2024 <7>US Treasury Press Release – April 5, 2022 <8>Chainalysis Crypto Crime Report 2023 <9>https://cryptonews.com/news/russias-exved-launches-cross-border-payment-service-powered-by-tethers-usdt-stablecoin <10> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Garantex?utm_source=chatgpt.com <11>https://www.chainalysis.com/blog/ofac-sanctions-russian-exchange-cryptex-uaps-fraud-shop-2024/? <12> https://zh.spaziocrypto.com/wen-ding-bi/e-luo-si-wen-ding-bi-a7a5-zai-4-ge-yue-nei-liu-dong-93-yi-mei-yuan/

The World Beyond SWIFT (Part Two): Moscow's Underground Ledger

2025/12/10 08:00

Author: Anita @anitahityou

Three years after the West cut off Russia's connection to SWIFT, the Kremlin has not suffered a financial suffocation. On the contrary, a massive "shadow financial machine" is operating within the Federal Palace in Moscow.

This machine no longer relies on JPMorgan Chase, nor is it afraid of a dollar freeze order. According to U.S. Treasury documents, blockchain analysis reports, and data from the ICIJ, this machine is roughly composed of three interlocking gears:

Garantex (black market hub), Cryptex (hidden backup), and the Exved/A7 system (national-level B2B channel and "on-chain rubles").

Garantex the Phoenix – The Crossroads of Gangsters and Oil Capital

Garantex is a name already highlighted in red on the U.S. Treasury Department's sanctions list; in Russia's grey trade and capital flight system, it is an indispensable "clearing house".

1. On the surface, it's an exchange; beneath, two hidden rivers flow.

Public information shows that Garantex was established in Moscow in 2019, with its registered office located in the iconic Federal Building. It was co-founded by Stanislav Drugalev, Sergey Mendeleev, and others. In April 2022, it was sanctioned by the US OFAC for its associated transactions with the darknet market Hydra and the ransomware Conti. At least $100 million in transactions were directly identified as related to criminal activities. However, even after the sanctions, it remains "one of the main channels for Russian funds to enter and leave the world."

When the ICIJ investigation zoomed in on the shareholding structure, the picture began to distort:

  • A company deeply intertwined with Garantex is called Fintech Corporation—it is both the owner of the Garantex App and the operator of brands such as "Garantex Academy."
  • Russian company registration records show that Fintech holds a 50% stake in a debt collection company called "Academy of Conflicts," while the other half is controlled by Alexander Tsarapkin, a "gang leader" convicted of extortion and previously sentenced to seven years in prison for extortion.
  • Pavel Karavatsky, a key shareholder of Fintech, previously served on the board of directors of Peresvet Bank, which was later taken over by Rosneft (Russia's state-owned oil company); Fintech also initially used contact information and email domains associated with Rosneft's logistics subsidiary.

Looking back from this cold, hard chain of company registration documents, we see state-owned oil capital, violent debt collection companies, and sanctioned cryptocurrency exchanges.

This does not mean that "Rosneft is manipulating Garantex," but it is enough to show that Garantex's ability to continue handling billions of dollars of stablecoin liquidity despite being attacked from three sides by OFAC, Tether, and the EU is not simply due to "technology and entrepreneurial spirit."

It is a central gear embedded in a larger national network of gray capital.

Cryptex – Plan B lurking on Garantex's flank

When Garantex becomes a case study under the regulatory spotlight, the strategy of "doing only Garantex and nothing else" becomes too dangerous for black and gray market funds. The market will naturally develop backup lines, and Cryptex is a prime example.

1. The "hidden redemption machine" named by OFAC

Cryptex is ostensibly a "Russian cryptocurrency exchange platform" that supports instant exchange of fiat currency and virtual assets. However, on September 26, 2024, the U.S. Treasury Department's OFAC added it and its operator, Sergey Sergeevich Ivanov, to its sanctions list, accusing it of providing money laundering and settlement services for "fraud shops, ransomware organizations, darknet markets, and other criminal activities."

Chainalysis's on-chain analysis revealed that Cryptex has processed approximately $5.88 billion in cryptocurrency transactions since 2018, a significant portion of which originated from "high-risk and even obviously illegal" source addresses. Another platform associated with Ivanov, PM2BTC, was identified by FinCEN as a "primary money laundering concern," with nearly half of its business related to criminal activities.

If Garantex is more of a "ruble-stablecoin clearing pool both inside and outside Russia," then Cryptex/PM2BTC is positioned as a "lighter, more anonymous money laundering gateway."

2. What cannot be killed is not a single platform, but an entire structure.

Structurally, Cryptex plays the role of a typical "flank substitute": when Garantex's on-chain addresses are blacklisted in batches, many dark web shops, fraud gangs, and ransomware operators will switch their settlement channels to KYC-free exchangers like Cryptex or PM2BTC; and when Cryptex itself is sanctioned, a new "Cryptex 2.0" will appear under a different name.

This is a "decentralized evasion" model:

(1) Regulation eliminates the name, but the market grows the model itself.

(2) In this network, Garantex is a heavyweight host;

(3) Cryptex and PM2BTC are front-end nodes that are specifically responsible for "receiving dirty money, washing it, and then throwing it into Garantex or other channels".

Exved, A7A5, and PSB – the prototypes of sovereign-level “shadow banking”

If Garantex is the black market and Cryptex is the gray market, then the Exved + A7 / A7A5 + PSB combination is closer to a country's on-chain laboratory project.

It's not meant to evade a bill, but to rewrite the concept of "how Russia pays its foreign counterparts."

1. Exved: A USDT B2B channel disguised as a compliance platform

In December 2023, a "digital settlement exchange" called Exved was quietly launched in Moscow.

The official positioning is very simple:

Provide cross-border digital payment services for Russian legal entities (companies).

b. Supports external settlement using Tether's USDT.

Almost all public reports emphasize three points: Exved is specifically aimed at export and import companies, not retail investors; it provides companies with an interface that may display "US dollars, USDT or non-resident rubles (offshore rubles)" on the front end, while the back end completes the final settlement through offshore accounts and partner institutions; the project is technically supported by the InDeFi Smart Bank team and has been approved by the Central Bank of Russia and the Federal Financial Monitoring Service (Rosfinmonitoring).

From a regulatory perspective, Exved is an innovative pilot program with KYC (Know Your Customer) functionality.

Structurally, it is more like a "compliance shell + stablecoin channel" built for enterprises after traditional banks were sanctioned and locked down.

It doesn't directly issue any new currency; instead, it incorporates the existing USDT under a state-recognized B2B guise.

2. A7 and A7A5: The True Debut of the Ruble-Based "Shadow Stablecoin"

If Exved is still at the level of "borrowing USDT for cross-border settlement", then A7 / A7A5 is the next step - putting the ruble itself on the blockchain.

Elliptic's "A7 Leak" report breaks down this system very clearly:

  • A7 is a group company that specializes in providing cross-border payment and sanctions circumvention services to Russian companies.
  • 51% of the shares are held by Moldovan oligarch Ilan Shor—who was convicted in the 2014 Moldovan banking scandal and sanctioned by the United States for helping Russia disrupt the Moldovan elections;
  • Another major shareholder is Promsvyazbank (PSB), the Russian state-owned defense bank.
  • A7A5 is a ruble-based stablecoin developed by A7.
  • The issuer is Old Vector LLC, registered in Kyrgyzstan;
  • Each A7A5 coin is said to be backed 1:1 by ruble deposits held in the PSB account;
  • As of mid-2025, there were approximately 41.6 billion A7A5 coins in circulation, with a total transaction value of approximately US$68 billion;
  • Reuters, citing data from Elliptic and TRM Labs, reported that A7A5's cumulative transaction volume has exceeded $40 billion, with daily peak transaction volume exceeding $1 billion, and its market capitalization has surged from $170 million to $521 million in two weeks.

More importantly, it is not a substitute for USDT, but rather a "two-tier structure":

  • According to internal chat logs disclosed by Elliptic, A7 employees discussed using at least $1 billion to $2 billion in USDT to create market capitalization for A7A5 on various exchanges—first using USDT to create liquidity, and then exchanging the tokens for A7A5 to make it look "like a deep stablecoin market."
  • In July 2025, the official A7 Telegram channel announced that it would inject $100 million worth of USDT liquidity into the A7A5 DEX to meet market demand for "A7A5 ↔ USDT best price".

With this combination of measures, A7A5's role becomes very clear: it is an "on-chain ruble liability" attached to the PSB balance sheet, using USDT as a credit engine to avoid the risk of Tether freezing assets.

For Russian companies, this means that even if they are kicked out of SWIFT and their bank accounts struggle to make cross-border payments, they can still:

Rubles → Deposit into PSB → A7A5 → Settle payment on-chain → Exchange back to local fiat currency or USDT.

From the outside, it is a technological product; from a geopolitical perspective, it is more like a "ruble-based shadow central bank pipeline" built outside the SWIFT system.

In Elliptic's "A7 leak" report, one passage stands out:

  • The A7 Group not only helped Russian companies circumvent regulations by purchasing parts and negotiating freight rates, but it was also used to support political projects in Moldova.
  • Leaked documents and on-chain records show that Shor's funds flowed through stablecoins to a network of applications and organizations called "Taito," which was used to pay political activists and cover propaganda costs.
  • In their sanctions, the United States and the European Union explicitly accused Shor of “using funding and disinformation networks to undermine democracy in Moldova,” and A7 and its encrypted channels are considered one of the key infrastructures for this activity.

This does not mean we can simply conclude that "PSB + A7A5 = directly issuing USDT to voters in a certain region to buy votes"; the publicly available materials are not sufficient to draw such a detailed line.

But what is certain is that the same financial framework is not only helping Russian companies buy goods and circumvent sanctions, but also providing a tool for distributing funds for political influence operations.

When sovereign banks (PSBs), shadow payment groups (A7), and on-chain stablecoins (A7A5) are linked together,

Money is no longer just an "economic variable," but a cross-border, programmable geopolitical weapon.

Below SWIFT lies the US dollar; outside of SWIFT lies the shadow network.

If you abstract all of this into a diagram, you will see a structure like this:

  • Garantex: It aggregates Russian retail investors, gray market traders, black money, and some energy-related funds into a "Rube↔ stablecoin" black market clearing pool;
  • Cryptex / PM2BTC and similar no-KYC exchange tools provide a front-end entry point for ransomware, fraudulent shops, and some sanctioned entities to "get on board and launder money."
  • Exved + A7 / A7A5 + PSB: This extends the network from "civilian and black market" to "semi-official B2B payments" and "on-chain ruble sovereign projects"—breaking down what could only be calculated on the central bank's balance sheet into a token that can jump between Tron and Ethereum.

In this network, USDT is the blood, PSB's ruble deposits are the skeleton, Garantex/Cryptex are the capillaries, and A7A5 is a newly grown heart valve—its existence is to keep this cycle beating outside of SWIFT.

This is not a joke about sanctions, but a stress test of the limits of the global financial order.

When a major power expelled from SWIFT begins to skillfully use stablecoins, shadow platforms, and its own "on-chain ruble" to conduct trade and political engineering, the question is no longer: "Can Russia be blocked?", but rather: "Will a financial sewer that can never be cleaned up grow outside of the US dollar and SWIFT?"

The machine that's running inside the Moscow Federation Building is just the first section of this sewer system.

References

<1>https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/jy0713

<2>https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/specially-designated-nationals-list-data-formats

<3>https://www.icij.org/investigations/shadow-money/

<4> FinCEN – Advisory FIN-2023-A002

<5>https://tass.ru/ekonomika

<6>OFAC Notice – September 26, 2024

<7>US Treasury Press Release – April 5, 2022

<8>Chainalysis Crypto Crime Report 2023

<9>https://cryptonews.com/news/russias-exved-launches-cross-border-payment-service-powered-by-tethers-usdt-stablecoin

<10> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Garantex?utm_source=chatgpt.com

<11>https://www.chainalysis.com/blog/ofac-sanctions-russian-exchange-cryptex-uaps-fraud-shop-2024/?

<12> https://zh.spaziocrypto.com/wen-ding-bi/e-luo-si-wen-ding-bi-a7a5-zai-4-ge-yue-nei-liu-dong-93-yi-mei-yuan/

Market Opportunity
Particl Logo
Particl Price(PART)
$0,3119
$0,3119$0,3119
+0,03%
USD
Particl (PART) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
The Role of Blockchain in Building Safer Web3 Gaming Ecosystems

The Role of Blockchain in Building Safer Web3 Gaming Ecosystems

The gaming industry is in the midst of a historic shift, driven by the rise of Web3. Unlike traditional games, where developers and publishers control assets and dictate in-game economies, Web3 gaming empowers players with ownership and influence. Built on blockchain technology, these ecosystems are decentralized by design, enabling true digital asset ownership, transparent economies, and a future where players help shape the games they play. However, as Web3 gaming grows, security becomes a focal point. The range of security concerns, from hacking to asset theft to vulnerabilities in smart contracts, is a significant issue that will undermine or erode trust in this ecosystem, limiting or stopping adoption. Blockchain technology could be used to create security processes around secure, transparent, and fair Web3 gaming ecosystems. We will explore how security is increasing within gaming ecosystems, which challenges are being overcome, and what the future of security looks like. Why is Security Important in Web3 Gaming? Web3 gaming differs from traditional gaming in that players engage with both the game and assets with real value attached. Players own in-game assets that exist as tokens or NFTs (Non-Fungible Tokens), and can trade and sell them. These game assets usually represent significant financial value, meaning security failure could represent real monetary loss. In essence, without security, the promises of owning “something” in Web3, decentralized economies within games, and all that comes with the term “fair” gameplay can easily be eroded by fraud, hacking, and exploitation. This is precisely why the uniqueness of blockchain should be emphasized in securing Web3 gaming. How Blockchain Ensures Security in Web3 Gaming?
  1. Immutable Ownership of Assets Blockchain records can be manipulated by anyone. If a player owns a sword, skin, or plot of land as an NFT, it is verifiably in their ownership, and it cannot be altered or deleted by the developer or even hacked. This has created a proven track record of ownership, providing control back to the players, unlike any centralised gaming platform where assets can be revoked.
  2. Decentralized Infrastructure Blockchain networks also have a distributed architecture where game data is stored in a worldwide network of nodes, making them much less susceptible to centralised points of failure and attacks. This decentralised approach makes it exponentially more difficult to hijack systems or even shut off the game’s economy.
  3. Secure Transactions with Cryptography Whether a player buys an NFT or trades their in-game tokens for other items or tokens, the transactions are enforced by cryptographic algorithms, ensuring secure, verifiable, and irreversible transactions and eliminating the risks of double-spending or fraudulent trades.
  4. Smart Contract Automation Smart contracts automate the enforcement of game rules and players’ economic exchanges for the developer, eliminating the need for intermediaries or middlemen, and trust for the developer. For example, if a player completes a quest that promises a reward, the smart contract will execute and distribute what was promised.
  5. Anti-Cheating and Fair Gameplay The naturally transparent nature of blockchain makes it extremely simple for anyone to examine a specific instance of gameplay and verify the economic outcomes from that play. Furthermore, multi-player games that enforce smart contracts on things like loot sharing or win sharing can automate and measure trustlessness and avoid cheating, manipulations, and fraud by developers.
  6. Cross-Platform Security Many Web3 games feature asset interoperability across platforms. This interoperability is made viable by blockchain, which guarantees ownership is maintained whenever assets transition from one game or marketplace to another, thereby offering protection to players who rely on transfers for security against fraud. Key Security Dangers in Web3 Gaming Although blockchain provides sound first principles of security, the Web3 gaming ecosystem is susceptible to threats. Some of the most serious threats include:
Smart Contract Vulnerabilities: Smart contracts that are poorly written or lack auditing will leave openings for exploitation and thereby result in asset loss. Phishing Attacks: Unintentionally exposing or revealing private keys or signing transactions that are not possible to reverse, under the assumption they were genuine transaction requests. Bridge Hacks: Cross-chain bridges, which allow players to move their assets between their respective blockchains, continually face hacks, requiring vigilance from players and developers. Scams and Rug Pulls: Rug pulls occur when a game project raises money and leaves, leaving player assets worthless. Regulatory Ambiguity: Global regulations remain unclear; risks exist for players and developers alike. While blockchain alone won’t resolve every issue, it remediates the responsibility of the first principles, more so when joined by processes such as auditing, education, and the right governance, which can improve their contribution to the security landscapes in game ecosystems. Real Life Examples of Blockchain Security in Web3 Gaming Axie Infinity (Ronin Hack): The Axie Infinity game and several projects suffered one of the biggest hacks thus far on its Ronin bridge; however, it demonstrated the effectiveness of multi-sig security and the effective utilization of decentralization. The industry benefited through learning and reflection, thus, as projects have implemented changes to reduce the risks of future hacks or misappropriation. Immutable X: This Ethereum scaling solution aims to ensure secure NFT transactions for gaming, allowing players to trade an asset without the burden of exorbitant fees and fears of being a victim of fraud. Enjin: Enjin is providing a trusted infrastructure for Web3 games, offering secure NFT creation and transfer while reiterating that ownership and an asset securely belong to the player. These examples indubitably illustrate that despite challenges to overcome, blockchain remains the foundational layer on which to build more secure Web3 gaming environments. Benefits of Blockchain Security for Players and Developers For Players: Confidence in true ownership of assets Transparency in in-game economies Protection against nefarious trades/scams For Developers: More trust between players and the platform Less reliance on centralized infrastructure Ability to attract wealth and players based on provable fairness By incorporating blockchain security within the mechanics of game design, developers can create and enforce resilient ecosystems where players feel reassured in investing time, money, and ownership within virtual worlds. The Future of Secure Web3 Gaming Ecosystems As the wisdom of blockchain technology and industry knowledge improves, the future for secure Web3 gaming looks bright. New growing trends include: Zero-Knowledge Proofs (ZKPs): A new wave of protocols that enable private transactions and secure smart contracts while managing user privacy with an element of transparency. Decentralized Identity Solutions (DID): Helping players control their identities and decrease account theft risks. AI-Enhanced Security: Identifying irregularities in user interactions by sampling pattern anomalies to avert hacks and fraud by time-stamping critical events. Interoperable Security Standards: Allowing secured and seamless asset transfers across blockchains and games. With these innovations, blockchain will not only secure gaming assets but also enhance the overall trust and longevity of Web3 gaming ecosystems. Conclusion Blockchain is more than a buzzword in Web3; it is the only way to host security, fairness, and transparency. With blockchain, players confirm immutable ownership of digital assets, there is a decentralized infrastructure, and finally, it supports smart contracts to automate code that protects players and developers from the challenges of digital economies. The threats, vulnerabilities, and scams that come from smart contracts still persist, but the industry is maturing with better security practices, cross-chain solutions, and increased formal cryptographic tools. In the coming years, blockchain will remain the base to digital economies and drive Web3 gaming environments that allow players to safely own, trade, and enjoy their digital experiences free from fraud and exploitation. While blockchain and gaming alone entertain, we will usher in an era of secure digital worlds where trust complements innovation. The Role of Blockchain in Building Safer Web3 Gaming Ecosystems was originally published in Coinmonks on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story
Share
Medium2025/09/18 14:40
Morning Crypto Report: $3.6 XRP Dream Is Not Dead: Bollinger Bands, ‘New Cardano’ Rockets 40%, Vitalik Buterin Sells Binance Coin and Other Crypto Amid ‘Crypto Winter’

Morning Crypto Report: $3.6 XRP Dream Is Not Dead: Bollinger Bands, ‘New Cardano’ Rockets 40%, Vitalik Buterin Sells Binance Coin and Other Crypto Amid ‘Crypto Winter’

The post Morning Crypto Report: $3.6 XRP Dream Is Not Dead: Bollinger Bands, ‘New Cardano’ Rockets 40%, Vitalik Buterin Sells Binance Coin and Other Crypto Amid
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/21 22:15